Fivem

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data for Fivem across three resolutions reveals a clear pattern of GPU-bound scaling. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the Intel Core i5-14400F and AMD Radeon RX 7600 combination delivers 158.4 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440 at the same settings drops this to 103.8 FPS, a reduction of roughly 34% from the 1080p figure. At 3840x2160, the Low preset yields 59.3 FPS, which is about 43% lower than the 1440p result and 63% lower than the 1080p result. This consistent decline as resolution increases indicates that the GPU becomes the primary limiting factor at higher pixel counts.

The scaling behavior shifts when examining higher settings presets. At High settings, the frame rate goes from 101.1 FPS at 1080p to 64.3 FPS at 1440p, then down to 40 FPS at 4K. The percentage drop from 1080p to 1440p is about 36%, while the drop from 1440p to 4K is approximately 38%. This near-linear scaling pattern suggests the RX 7600's rendering pipeline is being saturated progressively as pixel throughput requirements rise. The Ultra preset exhibits the most dramatic scaling: 75.3 FPS at 1080p, 48.9 FPS at 1440p, and 25.9 FPS at 4K. The 4K Ultra result represents only about one-third of the 1080p Ultra performance, showing that the most demanding configuration pushes the GPU well beyond its comfortable operating range.

The data indicates that at 1080p, the CPU still has headroom to feed the GPU in lighter settings, since the jump from Low to Medium only costs about 19% performance (158.4 to 128.5 FPS). However, at 4K, the gap between Low and Medium narrows to about 17% (59.3 to 49.1 FPS), and the gap between Medium and High is about 18% (49.1 to 40 FPS). This compression of performance differences at higher resolutions reinforces that the RX 7600's compute resources are the bottleneck, not the i5-14400F's processing capability.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average frame rate this combination achieves in Fivem?

A: The maximum measured average FPS is 158.4, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings. This is the only configuration in the measured data that exceeds 150 FPS.

Q: How does the i5-14400F compare to its nearest rival in CPU benchmarks?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400F has an average benchmark score of 32508, which places it within 0.2% of the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 (32446) and within 0.2% of the AMD Ryzen 7 250 (32584). It also sits essentially tied with the Intel Core i7-12800H at 32513, showing a delta of 0%.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all tested graphics cards?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600 falls in the 63rd percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 20258. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT, scores 20146, which is 0.6% lower.

Q: Does the RX 7600 outperform or underperform its direct successor in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The data shows the RX 7600's average score of 20258 is slightly higher than the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT's 20146, a difference of 0.6%. However, this is within normal variance and does not indicate a meaningful performance gap.

Q: Which resolution and settings combination yields the most balanced experience?

A: Based on the measured data, 2560x1440 with Medium settings provides 81.6 FPS, which sits comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold while maintaining moderate visual quality. This represents a reasonable middle ground between the 103.8 FPS at Low and the 64.3 FPS at High.

Q: How many total combinations does the combo rank consider?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400F plus AMD Radeon RX 7600 combination ranks 1273 out of 1792 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the lower-middle portion of all tested hardware pairings for this specific game.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7600's specifications directly influence the measured Fivem results. With 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, the card provides 288.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. This bandwidth figure is critical for texture streaming in a multiplayer open-world context like Fivem, where asset loading is continuous. The 2048 shading units and 64 ROPs work in tandem to process the game's draw calls and pixel shading workloads. The GPU's game clock of 2250 MHz and boost clock of 2655 MHz indicate the card can sustain high operating frequencies when thermal and power headroom allow.

The RX 7600's 32 ray accelerators are present on the chip, though Fivem's rendering workload does not heavily emphasize ray-traced effects in the measured presets. The card's pixel rate of 169.9 GPixel/s and texture rate of 339.8 GTexel/s become the practical limits as resolution increases. At 4K Ultra, the combination only manages 25.9 FPS, suggesting that the ROP and texture units are overwhelmed by the pixel fill requirements of the highest preset. The FP32 compute throughput of 21.75 TFLOPS provides the raw shader processing power, but the measured results show that memory bandwidth and fill rate constrain performance more than raw compute at high resolutions.

The GPU's 63rd percentile ranking among all GPUs indicates it sits in the mid-range tier of graphics hardware. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT, scores only 0.6% higher on average, meaning the standard RX 7600 is not significantly disadvantaged within its own product family. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile scores 1.3% higher, while the Intel Arc B570 scores 1.5% higher — all of these rivals are within a tight 2% band. This clustering suggests that in Fivem, the RX 7600's performance is representative of its class rather than an outlier.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data provides clear guidance on which settings preset offers the best experience. At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers 158.4 FPS, which is ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors. The Medium preset at 128.5 FPS still provides smooth gameplay while offering improved visual fidelity. High settings at 101.1 FPS remain playable and are the highest preset that maintains triple-digit frame rates. Ultra at 75.3 FPS is the most demanding 1080p option and still clears the 60 FPS threshold, though the performance cost from High to Ultra is substantial at about 26%.

At 2560x1440, the Low preset produces 103.8 FPS, which is smooth but sacrifices visual quality. Medium at 81.6 FPS offers a better balance, providing nearly 82 frames per second with moderate settings. High at 64.3 FPS is the highest preset that maintains a consistent 60+ FPS experience at this resolution. Ultra at 48.9 FPS dips below the 60 FPS mark, making it less desirable for competitive or fast-paced play. For 1440p users, Medium or High settings represent the recommended range.

At 3840x2160, only Low settings achieve a playable frame rate of 59.3 FPS, barely missing the 60 FPS target. Medium at 49.1 FPS and High at 40 FPS are increasingly less viable for smooth gameplay. Ultra at 25.9 FPS is effectively unsuitable for active play. The data indicates that 4K gaming with this combination requires either Low settings or a willingness to accept sub-60 FPS performance. For most users, 1080p with High or Ultra settings, or 1440p with Medium or High, provides the best overall experience based on the measured rows.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i5-14400F and AMD Radeon RX 7600 combination ranks 1273 out of 1792 tested combos in Fivem. This places the pairing in the 71st percentile of all tested combinations, meaning roughly 71% of tested hardware pairings perform better in this specific game. The rank reflects the combination's overall capability across all measured settings and resolutions, not just peak performance.

The CPU component of this combo ranks in the 88th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 32508. This high CPU percentile suggests the processor is not the limiting factor in most scenarios. The GPU, however, ranks in the 63rd percentile among all GPUs, which is notably lower. This discrepancy between CPU and GPU percentiles explains why the overall combo rank is lower than the CPU's individual standing — the RX 7600 holds the combination back relative to what the i5-14400F could support with a more powerful graphics card.

The combo's position at 1273 out of 1792 indicates that while this is not a top-tier setup for Fivem, it is also far from the bottom. The measured FPS data shows the combination can handle 1080p gaming at high frame rates and 1440p at acceptable levels, but struggles at 4K with higher presets. The ranking reflects this mixed capability — strong at lower resolutions, weak at extreme settings. For users prioritizing high-refresh-rate 1080p play, this combo performs reasonably well; for 4K enthusiasts, it falls short of what the rank suggests is achievable with better-matched hardware.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the full range of settings produces the following average frame rates: Low at 158.4 FPS, Medium at 128.5 FPS, High at 101.1 FPS, and Ultra at 75.3 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra is 83.1 FPS, with each progressive setting tier costing approximately 20-25% performance. The transition from High to Ultra is the most expensive single step at about 25% reduction, while the Low to Medium step costs about 19%.

At 2560x1440, the measured results are: Low at 103.8 FPS, Medium at 81.6 FPS, High at 64.3 FPS, and Ultra at 48.9 FPS. The total spread here is 54.9 FPS. The percentage cost of each setting step is more uniform at this resolution: Low to Medium costs about 21%, Medium to High costs about 21%, and High to Ultra costs about 24%. The 1440p results show a consistent degradation pattern as settings increase.

At 3840x2160, the results are: Low at 59.3 FPS, Medium at 49.1 FPS, High at 40 FPS, and Ultra at 25.9 FPS. The total spread is 33.4 FPS. Low to Medium costs about 17%, Medium to High costs about 18%, and High to Ultra costs about 35%. The High to Ultra transition at 4K is notably more expensive than at lower resolutions, indicating that the Ultra preset's additional effects and draw distances disproportionately tax the GPU when pixel count is highest. Across all resolutions, the Low preset consistently provides the highest frame rates, while Ultra consistently provides the lowest, with Medium and High falling predictably between these extremes.