Minimum

The Intel Core i5-12600KF paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti delivers a decisive performance profile in Minimum, a 2014 third-person shooter. This combination ranks at 511th place out of 3712 tested combos, placing it in the top ~14% of all systems evaluated, a strong showing for a game of this era. The benchmark data shows that the GPU is the primary driver of frame rates across all resolutions, while the 10-core, 16-thread CPU provides ample headroom to avoid bottlenecks, even at lower settings where frame rates climb well past 300 FPS.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo’s overall rank of 511 out of 3712 puts it firmly in the upper tier of tested hardware configurations for Minimum. This percentile performance is driven by a balanced pairing; the RTX 4070 Ti’s raw throughput is complemented by the i5-12600KF’s high single-thread and multi-thread capabilities. In the database’s broader CPU benchmarks, the i5-12600KF achieves an average score of 27799, placing it in the 79th percentile against all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i9-10900K (average score 27872, a -0.3% delta) and the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D (average score 27896, a -0.3% delta), showing that this processor trades blows with previous-generation flagship parts.

For the GPU, the RTX 4070 Ti posts an average benchmark score of 44795, landing in the 84th percentile among all GPUs. Its closest competitor in the database is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile (average score 45152, a -0.8% delta), meaning the desktop 4070 Ti is statistically near-identical to that high-end mobile part in synthetic tests. This high GPU percentile is what pushes the combo’s in-game rank up, as Minimum’s frame rates scale heavily with graphics card power. The data indicates that while the CPU is strong, it is not the limiting factor; instead, the combo’s placement is dictated by how well the GPU handles the game’s rendering load at various quality presets.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the undisputed workhorse in this configuration for Minimum. It features 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s. This memory configuration is more than sufficient for a 2014 title, even at 4K resolution, as evidenced by the measured frame rates. The GPU’s clock speeds are a base of 2310 MHz and a boost of 2610 MHz, with memory clocked at 1313 MHz (or 21 Gbps effective), allowing it to sustain high throughput in sustained gaming sessions.

The benchmark results show a clear correlation between GPU load and performance. At 3840x2160, the average frame rate drops from 113 FPS on Low settings to 56 FPS on Ultra, demonstrating that the game is heavily dependent on the graphics card’s shading units (7680), texture mapping units (240), and ROPs (80). The GPU’s 40.09 TFLOPS of FP32 compute power is the key driver here, allowing the card to brute-force the game’s rendering pipeline. Notably, the RTX 4070 Ti’s 60 RT cores and 240 tensor cores are largely irrelevant for Minimum, as the game does not utilize ray tracing or DLSS, but the raw rasterization performance is what secures the high frame rates. The data shows that the GPU’s 285 W TDP is well-utilized, as the card is able to maintain high clocks without throttling, evidenced by the consistent average FPS numbers across multiple settings.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i5-12600KF a bottleneck for the RTX 4070 Ti in this game?

A: Benchmark data suggests no. At 1080p Low, the combo reaches 326 FPS, and the CPU’s single-thread score (e.g., 3302 in Cinebench R23) is high enough to feed the GPU. The CPU ranks in the 79th percentile overall, and its nearest rivals include the Ryzen 7 5800X3D, indicating it is not a limiting factor.

Q: How much faster is this combo compared to the GPU’s nearest rival?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti’s nearest rival, the RTX 5090 Mobile, has an average score of 45152, which is a -0.8% delta from the 4070 Ti’s 44795. This means the desktop card is slightly faster, but the difference is negligible in synthetic tests.

Q: What is the best resolution to play at for a smooth 144Hz experience?

A: At 2560x1440, the High preset delivers 135 FPS, which is close to a 144Hz refresh rate. For a guaranteed lock, the Medium preset at 1440p yields 161 FPS. At 1080p, all settings except Ultra exceed 200 FPS.

Q: Does the game utilize the CPU’s 10 cores and 16 threads effectively?

A: The game’s frame rates are high, but the data does not specify core utilization. However, the CPU’s multi-threaded scores (e.g., 23391 in Cinebench R23) are far above what a 2014 title would require, so it is unlikely to be a constraint.

Q: How does the combo’s rank compare to the CPU’s and GPU’s individual percentiles?

A: The combo ranks 511th out of 3712 (top ~14%), which is higher than the CPU’s 79th percentile but lower than the GPU’s 84th percentile. This suggests the GPU is the dominant factor in determining the in-game rank.

Q: Is there a measurable difference between High and Ultra settings at 4K?

A: Yes. At 3840x2160, High averages 73 FPS, while Ultra drops to 56 FPS. The gap of 17 FPS indicates that Ultra imposes a significant load on the GPU, making High the more sensible choice for 4K.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data provides a clear hierarchy of settings for this combo. For players targeting a 60 FPS experience at 3840x2160, the High preset is the best choice, averaging 73 FPS. The Ultra preset at 4K is playable at 56 FPS, but it dips below the 60 FPS threshold, making it less desirable for consistent smoothness. The Medium preset at 4K offers a compromise at 87 FPS, with a minimum of 74 FPS, ensuring no stutters.

At 2560x1440, the situation improves dramatically. The High preset hits 135 FPS, which is ideal for 144Hz monitors, while the Medium preset provides 161 FPS for those wanting extra headroom. The Ultra preset at 103 FPS is also viable, but it sacrifices the high refresh rate advantage. For competitive play, the Low preset at 211 FPS is the standout, offering the lowest latency and highest frame pacing.

At 1920x1080, the game becomes exceptionally fluid. The Low preset hits 326 FPS, and even the High preset manages 210 FPS. The Medium preset is the sweet spot for quality and speed, delivering 250 FPS with a minimum of 212 FPS, ensuring no drops below the refresh rate of most high-end monitors. The Ultra preset at 160 FPS is the only setting that dips below the 200 FPS mark, but it still provides a smooth experience. Based on the data, the Medium preset at 1080p or the High preset at 1440p offer the best balance of visual fidelity and performance.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data is comprehensive, covering three resolutions and four settings. At 3840x2160, the frame rates are as follows: Low averages 113 FPS, Medium averages 87 FPS (with a minimum of 74 FPS and maximum of 100 FPS), High averages 73 FPS, and Ultra averages 56 FPS. This shows a steady decline of roughly 20-30% per step up in quality, with the GPU being the sole limiter.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance scales significantly. The Low preset averages 211 FPS, while Medium hits 161 FPS (min 137 FPS, max 185 FPS). High achieves 135 FPS, and Ultra settles at 103 FPS. The delta between Low and Ultra is 108 FPS, demonstrating that the GPU’s headroom at this resolution is substantial. The minimum FPS data for Medium (137 FPS) indicates that even in demanding scenes, the frame rate stays well above 100 FPS.

At 1920x1080, the results are exceptional. Low averages 326 FPS, Medium averages 250 FPS (min 212 FPS, max 287 FPS), High averages 210 FPS, and Ultra averages 160 FPS. The consistency of the Medium preset’s minimum (212 FPS) is notable, as it ensures a flawless experience on any 144Hz or 240Hz display. The data shows that at 1080p, the i5-12600KF’s single-thread performance (e.g., 1016 in 3DMark single-thread) is sufficient to keep the GPU fully fed, as frame rates exceed the CPU’s theoretical limit in many scenarios.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-12600KF plays a supporting but crucial role in this combo’s performance in Minimum. This processor features 10 cores and 16 threads, based on the Alder Lake architecture, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, though the benchmark data does not specify which was used. The CPU’s cache configuration includes 20 MB of shared L3 cache, which aids in keeping frequently accessed data close to the cores.

In terms of synthetic performance, the i5-12600KF achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23391 and a single-core score of 3302. These numbers indicate that the CPU has both high multi-threaded throughput and excellent single-thread responsiveness, which is critical for older games like Minimum that often rely on a few fast cores. The CPU’s 3DMark 16-thread score of 7956 and single-thread score of 1016 further confirm its capability. The data shows that at 1080p, where the CPU load is relatively higher compared to the GPU, the combo still manages 326 FPS on Low settings, proving that the processor is not a bottleneck.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 27799 places it in the 79th percentile, and its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D, has a delta of -0.3%, meaning the i5-12600KF is virtually equivalent to that gaming-focused chip. This parity is reflected in the game’s frame rates, where the CPU’s role is to maintain consistent minimum FPS. For instance, at 1440p Medium, the minimum FPS is 137, which is high enough to prevent any perceptible stutter. The 125 W TDP of the i5-12600KF is modest, but the data does not include power consumption measurements in-game. Overall, the CPU provides a stable foundation, allowing the RTX 4070 Ti to unlock its full potential without interference.