Minimum
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 82 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 29 | 38 | 45 | 59 |
| 1440p QHD | 54 | 71 | 84 | 110 |
| 1080p Full HD | 84 | 110 | 131 | 171 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Minimum with Intel Core i5-10400F + AMD Radeon RX 7600, In-Depth Analysis
Opening Paragraph
The data for Minimum with an Intel Core i5-10400F and AMD Radeon RX 7600 shows a combination that is clearly capable of delivering smooth gameplay, but the balance between CPU and GPU shifts dramatically depending on resolution and settings. At 1080p, the system is heavily GPU-bound, with frame rates scaling impressively as settings are lowered. However, at 4K Ultra, the experience becomes demanding, with average frame rates dipping below the 30 FPS threshold. The measured results indicate that this pairing is best suited for high-refresh-rate 1080p and 1440p gaming, while 4K requires significant compromises in visual fidelity to maintain playability.
Resolution Scaling
The performance drop from 1080p to 4K is the defining characteristic of this hardware pairing in Minimum. At High settings, the average frame rate falls from 110 FPS at 1920x1080 to 71 FPS at 2560x1440, a 35% reduction, and then to 38 FPS at 3840x2160, a 65% reduction from the 1080p baseline. This steep decline is a clear indicator that the AMD Radeon RX 7600 becomes the primary limiting factor as pixel count increases.
This pattern is consistent across all settings presets. At Low settings, the system delivers 171 FPS at 1080p, 110 FPS at 1440p, and 59 FPS at 4K. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a 36% performance drop, while the jump to 4K results in a 65% loss. The GPU's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 128-bit bus, providing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth, are sufficient for 1080p and 1440p but appear to struggle with the bandwidth demands of 4K rendering.
The data suggests that the CPU is not the bottleneck at higher resolutions. The Core i5-10400F, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, maintains consistent performance scaling that aligns with the GPU's workload. At 4K Ultra, the frame rate plummets to 29 FPS, while at 4K Low it recovers to 59 FPS. This wide variance, a 51% swing between the lowest and highest settings at the same resolution, proves that the GPU's rendering load, not CPU processing power, dictates the experience.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 7600 is the workhorse of this configuration, and its specifications directly explain the measured frame rates. The GPU operates with a boost clock of 2655 MHz and a game clock of 2250 MHz, paired with 2048 shading units and 64 ROPs. The 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus delivers 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is the key constraint at 4K resolution.
Benchmark results show the GPU's overall capability with a PassMark G3D score of 16634, placing it in the 57th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM, scores 15199, a 0.2% difference, indicating the RX 7600 is slightly ahead of that competitor. In Minimum, this performance translates to a playable 110 FPS average at 1080p High, but the GPU is clearly taxed at 4K, where it only manages 38 FPS at High settings.
The GPU's memory configuration is a critical factor. At 1080p, the 8 GB frame buffer is ample, allowing the card to stretch to 171 FPS at Low settings. However, at 4K, the higher texture and geometry demands likely push against the memory limit, causing the significant frame rate drops. The measured data supports this: at 4K Medium, the average FPS is 45 with a minimum of 39 FPS, showing that the GPU is working near its capacity. The RX 7600's 21.75 TFLOPS of FP32 compute power is substantial, but it is not enough to overcome the bandwidth limitations at 4K.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i5-10400F provides solid, stable performance that does not bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios. With 6 cores and 12 threads, clocked at a base of 2.90 GHz and boosting to 4.30 GHz, this CPU offers adequate processing power for Minimum. The 12 MB of shared L3 cache and 42.7 GB/s of memory bandwidth are sufficient to feed the GPU at 1080p and 1440p.
CPU benchmark scores reinforce this assessment. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 10283 and single-core score of 1451 show a balanced processor. The PassMark multi-thread score of 12115 places it in the 68th percentile of all CPUs, and its nearest rival, the AMD EPYC 7552, scores 14115, a 0.5% difference. The 3DMark single-thread score of 688 and 2-thread score of 1350 indicate that the CPU can handle the game's single-threaded logic without issue.
The evidence for CPU adequacy is the frame rate scaling at 1080p. When settings drop from Ultra to Low, the average FPS rises from 84 to 171, a 103% increase. This dramatic jump is only possible because the CPU can keep up with the GPU's increased output. If the CPU were the bottleneck, the frame rates would plateau regardless of settings. At 4K, the CPU's role diminishes further, as the GPU becomes the clear limiting factor, with frame rates dropping below the CPU's capability to generate frames.
FAQ
*Q: Can this system achieve 60 FPS at 1080p in Minimum?*
A: Yes, comfortably. The measured data shows 84 FPS at Ultra settings, 110 FPS at High, and 131 FPS at Medium. Even at the most demanding preset, it exceeds 60 FPS.
Q: Is 4K gaming viable with this hardware?
A: Only with significant settings reductions. At 4K Low, the system achieves 59 FPS, which is playable. However, at 4K High, it drops to 38 FPS, and at Ultra, it falls to 29 FPS, which is below the standard playability threshold.
Q: How does the RX 7600 compare to its nearest rival in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The RX 7600 scores 16634 in PassMark G3D, which is 0.2% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's score of 15199. This puts it slightly ahead of that competitor.
Q: What is the best resolution for high refresh rate monitors?
A: The data indicates 1080p is optimal. At Low settings, the system achieves 171 FPS, and at High, it reaches 110 FPS. At 1440p, the frame rates are lower, with 110 FPS at Low and 71 FPS at High, making 1440p suitable for 60-75 Hz monitors.
Q: Does the CPU limit performance at any point?
A: The data shows no evidence of CPU bottlenecking. The Core i5-10400F's 3DMark single-thread score of 688 and multi-thread score of 4748 indicate it can keep pace with the GPU. The frame rate scaling from Ultra to Low at 1080p confirms the GPU is the limiting factor.
Q: What is the frame rate variance at Medium settings?
A: At 1080p Medium, the average FPS is 131 with a minimum of 111 and maximum of 150. At 1440p Medium, the average is 84 with a range of 72 to 97. At 4K Medium, the average is 45 with a range of 39 to 52.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured data provides a comprehensive view of performance across all presets and resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system excels: Low settings deliver an average of 171 FPS, Medium averages 131 FPS (min 111, max 150), High averages 110 FPS, and Ultra averages 84 FPS. This resolution is clearly the sweet spot for the RX 7600, with all presets exceeding 60 FPS.
Moving to 2560x1440, performance drops but remains respectable. Low settings average 110 FPS, Medium averages 84 FPS (min 72, max 97), High averages 71 FPS, and Ultra averages 54 FPS. The 1440p results show that the GPU is still capable of delivering smooth gameplay, though Ultra settings begin to strain the system.
At 3840x2160, the limitations are apparent. Low settings average 59 FPS, Medium averages 45 FPS (min 39, max 52), High averages 38 FPS, and Ultra averages 29 FPS. The 4K data reveals a system that is pushed to its limits, with only the Low preset maintaining a playable frame rate. The scaling from 1080p to 4K at High settings, from 110 to 38 FPS, illustrates the GPU's heavy workload at higher resolutions.
Settings Recommendations
For the best experience, the data points to 1080p High as the optimal balance of visual quality and performance. With an average of 110 FPS, users get smooth, responsive gameplay without sacrificing much visual fidelity. For those with high refresh rate monitors, dropping to Medium at 1080p yields 131 FPS, a 19% improvement, while Low settings push to 171 FPS for competitive play.
At 1440p, High settings at 71 FPS are acceptable for most players, but Medium at 84 FPS provides a more comfortable margin above 60 FPS. The data suggests avoiding Ultra at 1440p, as the 54 FPS average may result in noticeable stutters. For 4K, the only viable option is Low settings, which achieves 59 FPS. Medium at 4K, with an average of 45 FPS, is borderline, and both High and Ultra should be avoided due to sub-30 FPS averages.
The measured results indicate that the RX 7600 is best utilized at 1080p, where it can deliver high frame rates with room to spare. The 8 GB of VRAM and 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth are well-suited for this resolution, and the Core i5-10400F provides enough processing power to prevent bottlenecks. For users prioritizing a smooth experience, 1080p Medium or High is the recommended choice.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i5-10400F
AMD Radeon RX 7600
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i5-10400F + AMD Radeon RX 7600 in Minimum
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 59.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 45.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 38.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 29.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 110.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 84.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 71.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 54.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 171.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 131.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 110.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 84.0 |
Minimum with ii5-10400F + Other GPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Minimum with RX 7600 + Other CPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii5-10400F + RX 7600
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.