Minimum
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 75 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 24 | 35 | 39 | 55 |
| 1440p QHD | 52 | 63 | 79 | 101 |
| 1080p Full HD | 77 | 101 | 117 | 155 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Minimum with Intel Core i3-12100F + AMD Radeon RX 6600, In-Depth Analysis
The Intel Core i3-12100F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6600 delivers a playable but resolution-sensitive experience in Minimum, a 2014 third-person shooter. The data shows a clear progression where frame rates are highly dependent on both resolution and quality preset, with the most demanding settings at 4K pushing the combo below fluid thresholds.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data reveals a steep performance curve as resolution climbs. At 1080p, the combo is exceptionally strong: the Low preset delivers 154.6 FPS average, while even the Ultra preset maintains 77.2 FPS. This indicates that at 1080p, the GPU has ample headroom, and the system is likely not bottlenecked by either component in a meaningful way.
Moving to 1440p, the results show a moderate but expected drop. The Low preset falls to 101.2 FPS, which is still excellent for competitive play. High settings at 1440p yield 63.2 FPS, and Ultra drops to 51.9 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p at High settings shows a reduction from 101.2 FPS to 63.2 FPS, a drop of roughly 38%. This is a significant decline, but the absolute numbers remain respectable for a game of this era.
The transition to 4K is where the combo struggles. At 3840x2160, the High preset produces only 35.2 FPS, and Ultra falls to a borderline unplayable 24.3 FPS. Even the Low preset at 4K only reaches 54.7 FPS. The scaling from 1440p High (63.2 FPS) to 4K High (35.2 FPS) represents a 44% reduction. This substantial drop indicates that the AMD Radeon RX 6600, with its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, becomes the primary limiting factor at 4K. The pixel throughput required at this resolution overwhelms the GPU’s 159.4 GPixel/s pixel rate and 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth.
Interestingly, the gap between Low and Ultra settings widens dramatically at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the delta between Low (154.6 FPS) and Ultra (77.2 FPS) is 77.4 FPS. At 4K, that delta shrinks to 30.4 FPS (54.7 vs 24.3). This compression suggests that at 4K, the GPU is saturated regardless of settings, and the visual quality improvements from Low to Ultra cost more performance than the hardware can spare. For players targeting 4K, the data suggests this combo is only viable for Low preset gaming, and even then, the 54.7 FPS result is far from ideal for a smooth experience.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured rows, the sweet spot for this hardware combination is the High preset at 1440p or the Ultra preset at 1080p. At 1080p Ultra, the combo produces 77.2 FPS, which is smooth and visually rich. This setting uses the full capabilities of the Radeon RX 6600 without pushing it into sub-60 FPS territory. The 1080p Medium preset at 116.6 FPS is also excellent for players who prefer higher frame rates over maximum visual fidelity.
For those with 1440p monitors, the High preset at 63.2 FPS is the recommended balance. It stays above the 60 FPS threshold while offering better image quality than Medium (78.6 FPS) or Low (101.2 FPS). The Ultra preset at 1440p drops to 51.9 FPS, which may be acceptable for slower-paced moments but risks noticeable stutter in action sequences.
At 4K, no preset provides an ideal experience. The Low preset at 54.7 FPS is the only option that approaches playability, but it requires sacrificing all visual enhancements. The High preset at 4K (35.2 FPS) and Ultra (24.3 FPS) are best avoided unless the player prioritizes resolution over smoothness. Given the game’s 2014 release date, the visual difference between High and Ultra is likely minimal, making the High preset at 1440p the most efficient choice for this hardware.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i3-12100F is a 4-core, 8-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, with a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. Its benchmark scores indicate strong single-thread performance, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 893 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2224. This is crucial for a third-person shooter, which typically relies heavily on a single primary thread for game logic and physics.
The CPU’s multi-threaded capabilities are also robust for its class. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 11912 and the Passmark multithread score of 14015 show that the i3-12100F can handle background tasks and game engine threads without becoming a bottleneck. The 12 MB of shared L3 cache helps with data locality, which is beneficial for the game’s asset streaming.
In the context of Minimum’s measured FPS, the CPU appears sufficient at 1080p and 1440p, where the GPU is the primary driver of performance. However, at 4K, the CPU’s role diminishes as the GPU becomes saturated. The fact that the FPS drops from 154.6 at 1080p Low to 54.7 at 4K Low—a 65% reduction—suggests that the Radeon RX 6600 is the limiting component at higher resolutions. The i3-12100F’s boost clock of 4.30 GHz ensures it can feed the GPU adequately at lower resolutions, but its 4-core/8-thread configuration may start to show limitations if the game spawns many AI entities or complex physics interactions, though the data does not indicate a CPU bottleneck in this specific title.
How This Combo Ranks
The Intel Core i3-12100F + AMD Radeon RX 6600 combination ranks 1406 out of 1733 tested combos in Minimum. This places it in the lower half of the database, which is surprising given the playable frame rates at 1080p. The rank reflects the overall dataset, which includes higher-end CPUs and GPUs that achieve far superior performance at 4K Ultra settings.
The CPU itself sits in the 72nd percentile among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 13516. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX (avg score 13534, -0.1% delta), the Intel Core i7-1250U (avg score 13462, +0.4% delta), and the Intel Core i7-7700K (avg score 13280, +1.8% delta). This shows that the i3-12100F is competitive with much more expensive parts in synthetic workloads, though its real-world gaming performance is constrained by its core count.
The GPU is in the 69th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 25235. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon 890M (avg score 25246, 0% delta) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (avg score 25120, +0.5% delta). The RX 6600’s position near these parts indicates it is a solid mid-range option, but it lacks the raw power of higher-tier cards that dominate the top of the combo rankings.
The combo’s 1406th rank out of 1733 suggests that while it handles Minimum acceptably at standard resolutions, it is outclassed by many other pairings in the database. Players with this hardware should focus on 1080p or 1440p gaming to get the most out of their investment, as the 4K results drag down the overall ranking.
FAQ
*Q: Can this combo run Minimum at 4K smoothly?*
A: No. The measured data shows the best 4K result is 54.7 FPS on Low settings. High settings drop to 35.2 FPS, and Ultra falls to 24.3 FPS, both below the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay.
Q: What is the best resolution and preset for this hardware?
A: The data indicates that 1080p Ultra at 77.2 FPS or 1440p High at 63.2 FPS are the optimal choices. Both stay above 60 FPS while offering good visual quality.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck in this game?
A: At 4K, the GPU is the clear bottleneck, as evidenced by the large FPS drops across all presets. At 1080p, the GPU still handles the load well, and the CPU’s 4.30 GHz boost clock is sufficient to avoid limiting performance.
Q: How does the i3-12100F compare to its nearest CPU rivals?
A: The i3-12100F has an average benchmark score of 13516, which is within 1.8% of the Intel Core i7-7700K (13280). It is also only 0.1% behind the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX (13534), despite the latter being a much more expensive processor.
Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?
A: At 1080p, Low preset achieves 154.6 FPS, while Ultra achieves 77.2 FPS. This is a difference of 77.4 FPS, indicating that Ultra settings cost roughly half the frame rate of Low.
*Q: Is this combo suitable for competitive play in Minimum?*
A: Yes, at 1080p. The Low preset at 154.6 FPS and Medium at 116.6 FPS provide high refresh rate capabilities that are ideal for competitive third-person shooters. Even the High preset at 101.2 FPS is well above the 60 FPS standard.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i3-12100F
AMD Radeon RX 6600
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i3-12100F + AMD Radeon RX 6600 in Minimum
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 54.7 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 38.7 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 35.2 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 24.3 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 101.2 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 78.6 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 63.2 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 51.9 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 154.6 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 116.6 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 101.2 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 77.2 |
Minimum with ii3-12100F + Other GPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Minimum with RX 6600 + Other CPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii3-12100F + RX 6600
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.