Minimum

Minimum is a third-person shooter released on 2014-06-25. The tested hardware combination is the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 CPU with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile GPU. The data set includes measured average FPS for Low, Medium, High, and Ultra presets at 1920x1080, 2560x1440, and 3840x2160. This combo ranks 2051 out of 3712 tested combinations in Minimum.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS curve drops consistently as resolution increases. The Low preset averages 199 FPS at 1920x1080, 128 FPS at 2560x1440, and 69 FPS at 3840x2160. The Medium preset averages 152 FPS, then 98 FPS, then 53 FPS. High averages 128 FPS, then 82 FPS, then 44 FPS. Ultra averages 97 FPS, then 63 FPS, then 34 FPS. Every settings level follows the same downward pattern across the three resolutions.

The proportional loss becomes more severe at the highest resolution step. Moving from 2560x1440 to 3840x2160 leaves the 3840x2160 result much closer to half of the previous result than the first step does. This pattern repeats for Low, Medium, High, and Ultra, which suggests the render workload at 3840x2160 is stressing the GPU far more than the 1920x1080 and 2560x1440 rows. The CPU sits at the 95th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 75th percentile among all GPUs. That ranking gap aligns with the resolution scaling data: the GPU is the lower-ranked component, and the frame rate loss becomes largest when pixel output increases.

Another notable point is how consistent the settings order is. At each resolution, Low produces the highest average, followed by Medium, then High, then Ultra. There are no crossover results where a lower settings tier falls behind a higher one. That monotonic behavior indicates the game is responding predictably to both resolution and settings load, and the data does not show any CPU-side ceiling that flattens the curve at low settings.

How This Combo Ranks

This combination is ranked 2051 out of 3712 combos in Minimum. That puts it in the lower portion of the tested field, despite the hardware being modern. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 77740, and its nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX at 76513, the AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P at 76492, the Intel Core i9-14900K at 79097, and the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX at 76212. The deltaPct values for those comparisons are 1.6, 1.6, -1.7, and 2.0 respectively.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 29928, with nearest rivals including the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti at 29945, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti at 29783, the AMD Radeon RX 6800 at 30095, and the AMD Radeon RX 6700 at 30433. The deltaPct values are -0.1, 0.5, -0.6, and -1.7. This places the RTX 5070 Mobile in a very tight performance cluster around those cards.

The strong CPU and mid-pack GPU help explain the combo’s rank. A CPU at the 95th percentile is not enough to push the whole combination higher when the GPU is at the 75th percentile and its nearest rivals are separated by small deltaPct margins. In Minimum, the combo’s position at 2051 of 3712 suggests the game’s measured workload is not dominated by the CPU’s advantage.

GPU Role

The RTX 5070 Mobile uses 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, with 384.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. Its base clock is 907 MHz, boost clock is 1425 MHz, and memory clock is 1500 MHz with 24 Gbps effective speed. The GPU has 4608 shading units, 144 TMUs, 48 ROPs, 36 RT cores, and 144 tensor cores. The TDP is 50 W, the slot width is listed as IGP, and there are no power connectors.

Those memory figures are important for interpreting the game rows. The 8 GB frame buffer and 128-bit bus feed a GPU that produces 199 FPS at 1920x1080 Low but only 69 FPS at 3840x2160 Low. The memory bandwidth is fixed at 384.0 GB/s, so the large drop at 3840x2160 is consistent with the GPU being forced to move much more frame data through the same interface.

The GPU’s benchmark data reinforces this. It scores 122238 in Geekbench OpenCL, 116960 in Geekbench Vulkan, and 20355 in Passmark G3D. Its average benchmark score is 29928, and its percentile rank is 75. In DirectX 9, DirectX 11, DirectX 12, and DirectX 10, the scores are 214, 192, 93, and 129 respectively. For a 2014 third-person shooter, the older DirectX result of 214 is present in the data and provides another angle on how this GPU handles legacy rendering paths.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured rows cover every combination of three resolutions and four settings levels. Only the Medium preset includes min and max FPS values; the Low, High, and Ultra rows do not.

| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS | Min FPS | Max FPS |

|---|---|---|---|---|

| 1920x1080 | Low | 199 | — | — |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 152 | 129 | 175 |

| 1920x1080 | High | 128 | — | — |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 97 | — | — |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 128 | — | — |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 98 | 83 | 113 |

| 2560x1440 | High | 82 | — | — |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 63 | — | — |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 69 | — | — |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 53 | 45 | 61 |

| 3840x2160 | High | 44 | — | — |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 34 | — | — |

At 1920x1080, the gap from Low to Ultra is large: Low averages 199 FPS, Medium 152, High 128, and Ultra 97. The Medium row also shows a measured minimum of 129 and maximum of 175, so even the slowest recorded frame in that row equals the High preset’s average. At 2560x1440, Medium averages 98 with a min of 83 and max of 113, while High averages 82. Again, Medium’s minimum sits above High’s average. At 3840x2160, Medium averages 53 with a min of 45 and max of 61, while High averages 44. The same pattern holds.

FAQ

Q: What is the best measured average FPS for this combo in Minimum?

A: The highest measured average is 199 FPS at 1920x1080 with the Low preset. The lowest measured average is 34 FPS at 3840x2160 with the Ultra preset.

Q: How close is the GPU to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 5070 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 29928. It is 0.1 points below the RTX 3070 Ti in deltaPct, 0.5 points above the RTX 2080 Ti, 0.6 points below the RX 6800, and 1.7 points below the RX 6700.

Q: Which component ranks higher in the database?

A: The CPU is at the 95th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU is at the 75th percentile among all GPUs. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 77740, and the GPU’s is 29928.

Q: Are the FPS values measured or estimated?

A: The data set includes `dataIsMeasured: true`, so the FPS rows are measured results rather than estimates.

Q: Do all settings rows include min and max FPS?

A: No. Only Medium rows include min and max values. At 1920x1080 Medium they are 129 and 175, at 2560x1440 Medium they are 83 and 113, and at 3840x2160 Medium they are 45 and 61.

Q: What is the combo’s rank in the game?

A: The combo rank is 2051 out of 3712 tested combos in Minimum.

Settings Recommendations

The Medium preset stands out in the measured data because of its recorded min and max values. At every resolution, Medium has a higher average FPS than High, and Medium’s minimum FPS is higher than High’s average FPS. At 1920x1080, Medium averages 152 and has a min of 129, while High averages 128. At 2560x1440, Medium averages 98 and has a min of 83, while High averages 82. At 3840x2160, Medium averages 53 and has a min of 45, while High averages 44.

For users who want the highest measured average, Low is the fastest settings preset at every resolution: 199 FPS at 1920x1080, 128 FPS at 2560x1440, and 69 FPS at 3840x2160. For users who want a more visually demanding preset while still keeping average FPS above the next preset’s average, Medium is the strongest choice in this data set. Ultra is the slowest settings tier at every resolution, with averages of 97, 63, and 34 FPS. The data does not provide min or max values for Low, High, or Ultra, so Medium is the only settings tier where frame variance is directly observable.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 has 16 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. Its TDP is 55 W, and it uses the Zen 5 architecture on the Strix Halo platform. The process node is 4 nm, and the cache hierarchy is 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3.

The CPU’s synthetic scores are strong. Cinebench R23 multicore is 35314, single-core is 2044, Geekbench multicore is 20992, single-core is 2464, Passmark multithread is 54934, and Passmark single-thread is 4147. The CPU also lists 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth over a quad-channel LPDDR5X memory bus, with ECC support enabled.

Those numbers frame the game results. At 1920x1080 Low, the combo reaches 199 FPS, which suggests the CPU is not preventing high frame rates. At 2560x1440 Low, it still averages 128 FPS, and even at 3840x2160 Low it holds 69 FPS. If the CPU were the main limiter, the resolution steps would be expected to flatten those results more dramatically. The CPU’s 95th percentile standing further supports the idea that the frame rate ceiling in Minimum is driven more by the GPU side of the combo than by the Ryzen AI Max+ 395.