Minimum
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 93 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 31 | 45 | 50 | 66 |
| 1440p QHD | 59 | 82 | 94 | 121 |
| 1080p Full HD | 96 | 122 | 150 | 195 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Minimum with AMD Ryzen 7 9700X + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti delivers a playable experience across most settings in Minimum, a third-person shooter from 2014. The measured data shows that the Low preset provides the highest frame rates at every resolution, while the Ultra preset is the most demanding. For the best balance of visual fidelity and performance, the Medium preset is the recommended starting point, as it offers a substantial frame rate advantage over High while remaining well above playable thresholds at 1080p and 1440p.
Settings Recommendations
Benchmark results indicate that the Medium preset is the optimal choice for this combination. At 1920x1080, the Medium preset delivers 149.6 FPS, which is 27.3 FPS higher than the High preset's 122.3 FPS and 53.5 FPS higher than the Ultra preset's 96.1 FPS. The jump from Low to Medium costs 45.4 FPS at 1080p, but the visual improvement typically justifies this trade-off in a third-person shooter. At 2560x1440, Medium produces 93.6 FPS, which is comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay, while High drops to 81.8 FPS. The Ultra preset at 1440p falls to 59.1 FPS, making it borderline for competitive play.
At 3840x2160, the situation changes dramatically. The Medium preset yields 49.7 FPS, which is below the ideal 60 FPS mark, while High manages 45.3 FPS. The Low preset is the only 4K option that exceeds 60 FPS, achieving 65.8 FPS. The Ultra preset at 4K is nearly unplayable at 30.5 FPS. For users with 4K displays, the Low preset is the only viable choice for consistent frame rates, while Medium or High are acceptable for users prioritizing visual quality over frame rate. The data suggests that Medium at 1440p offers the best overall experience, providing a 93.6 FPS average that balances image quality and responsiveness.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Granite Ridge. It operates on the AMD Socket AM5 platform and features a base clock of 3.80 GHz with a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. The processor's cache configuration includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. This combination of high clock speeds and substantial cache is well-suited for gaming workloads, where single-threaded performance often dictates frame rates.
In synthetic benchmarks, the 9700X demonstrates strong single-threaded capability with a 3dmark single-thread score of 1280, a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4459, and a Geekbench single-core score of 3353. The multi-threaded results are equally impressive, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 31588 and a Passmark multithread score of 37161. The processor's percentile ranking of 89 indicates it outperforms the majority of tested CPUs. The nearest rivals show a tight cluster: the 9700X is 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i5-14500HX, 0.4% behind the Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, 0.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845, and 0.8% behind the Intel Core Ultra 5 225H. This places the 9700X in a competitive position, though the differences are marginal.
In Minimum, the CPU's role appears secondary to the GPU at lower resolutions. At 1080p, the frame rates scale significantly with settings, from 195 FPS on Low to 96.1 FPS on Ultra, suggesting that the CPU can feed the GPU sufficiently at high frame rates. The 9700X's 16 threads and high boost clock provide ample headroom for the game's physics and AI computations, which are typical workloads in third-person shooters. The processor's 65 W TDP and 4 nm process node contribute to efficient operation, though these factors are not directly reflected in the measured FPS data.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is a Pascal architecture GPU built on the 16 nm process node, featuring the GP102 chip. It has 3584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 88 render output units. The memory subsystem consists of 11 GB of GDDR5X on a 352-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 484.4 GB/s. The GPU's base clock is 1481 MHz with a boost clock of 1582 MHz, and the memory operates at 1376 MHz with an effective data rate of 11 Gbps. The GTX 1080 Ti supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.
The GPU's benchmark performance shows a Passmark G3D score of 18600 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 83108. Its percentile ranking of 61 places it below the majority of current GPUs, and the nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 with a 0% delta, the AMD Radeon Pro 560X at -0.1%, the NVIDIA Tesla K40m at -0.6%, and the NVIDIA TITAN Xp at 1.1%. The GTX 1080 Ti's FP32 performance of 11.34 TFLOPS and texture rate of 354.4 GTexel/s are modest by modern standards but remain relevant for older titles like Minimum.
The measured FPS data reveals that the GTX 1080 Ti is the limiting factor in this combination, particularly at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the GPU can maintain high frame rates, with the Low preset reaching 195 FPS and Ultra at 96.1 FPS. However, at 4K, the performance drops sharply, with the Ultra preset managing only 30.5 FPS. This demonstrates that the GPU's 11 GB VRAM and 484.4 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for the game's textures at 1080p and 1440p, but the pixel throughput required at 4K exceeds the card's capabilities. The 16 nm process node and 250 W TDP are historical specifications that contribute to the GPU's thermal and power profile, though the game's performance is primarily dictated by the Pascal architecture's raw compute power.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti ranks 1030 out of 1733 tested combinations in Minimum. This places the combo in the lower third of all tested configurations, reflecting the GPU's age relative to the CPU's modern architecture. The rank is influenced more by the GTX 1080 Ti than the 9700X, as the processor's percentile of 89 is significantly higher than the GPU's percentile of 61.
The discrepancy between CPU and GPU performance creates a bottleneck scenario where the processor is underutilized in many gaming scenarios. The data shows that at 1080p Low, the combo achieves 195 FPS, which is close to the limit of what the CPU can feed, but at 4K Ultra, the frame rate drops to 30.5 FPS, indicating the GPU is the primary constraint. This ranking suggests that users with this combo would benefit from a GPU upgrade to fully leverage the 9700X's capabilities, though the current configuration remains functional for 1080p and 1440p gaming at medium settings.
The combo's rank of 1030 out of 1733 means that approximately 40% of tested combinations perform better, while 60% perform worse. This places the combo in a mid-to-low tier, which is consistent with the GPU's end-of-life production status and the CPU's recent release. The GTX 1080 Ti's successor, the GeForce 20 series, and the 9700X's contemporary GPUs would likely yield higher rankings, but the data indicates that this pairing is still viable for the game's requirements.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data shows a clear pattern of performance degradation as resolution increases. At 1080p, the Ultra preset delivers 96.1 FPS, which drops to 59.1 FPS at 1440p and further to 30.5 FPS at 4K. This represents a 38.5% decrease from 1080p to 1440p and a 68.3% decrease from 1080p to 4K. The Low preset follows a similar trajectory: 195 FPS at 1080p, 121.4 FPS at 1440p, and 65.8 FPS at 4K, reflecting a 37.7% drop from 1080p to 1440p and a 66.3% drop from 1080p to 4K.
This scaling behavior indicates that the GPU is the limiting component at higher resolutions. The 1080p to 1440p transition shows a consistent reduction of roughly 37-39% across all settings, which aligns with the pixel count increase from approximately 2.07 million to 3.69 million pixels. The 1440p to 4K transition is even more pronounced, with a further reduction of approximately 48-49% across settings, corresponding to the jump from 3.69 million to 8.29 million pixels. The CPU's performance remains constant across resolutions, so the frame rate drops are attributable solely to the GPU's rendering workload.
The data suggests that the GTX 1080 Ti's 11 GB VRAM is not the limiting factor, as the game's textures at Medium and High settings at 4K still allow for playable frame rates above 45 FPS. Instead, the GPU's fill rate and shading capacity are the constraints. The 139.2 GPixel/s pixel rate and 11.34 TFLOPS FP32 performance are insufficient for 4K at high settings, but adequate for 1080p and 1440p at medium settings. Users targeting 4K should select the Low preset, while those at 1440p can comfortably use Medium or High, and 1080p users have the flexibility to choose any preset based on their preference for visual quality or frame rate.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 9700X
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 9700X + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti in Minimum
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 65.8 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 49.7 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 45.3 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 30.5 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 121.4 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 93.6 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 81.8 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 59.1 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 195.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 149.6 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 122.3 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 96.1 |
Minimum with Ryzen 7 9700X + Other GPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Minimum with GTX 1080 Ti + Other CPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 9700X + GTX 1080 Ti
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.