Minimum

Minimum

AVERAGE FPS
98
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 98 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 35 46 54 71
1440p QHD 64 85 101 132
1080p Full HD 100 131 156 204

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 71
3840x2160 Medium 54
3840x2160 High 46
3840x2160 Ultra 35
2560x1440 Low 132
2560x1440 Medium 101
2560x1440 High 85
2560x1440 Ultra 64
1920x1080 Low 204
1920x1080 Medium 156
1920x1080 High 131
1920x1080 Ultra 100

Minimum with AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT delivers a thoroughly playable experience in Minimum, but the data reveals a clear performance hierarchy driven almost entirely by resolution and preset. At 1080p, the combination is exceptionally fast, pushing well past high-refresh-rate territory. However, the demanding 4K Ultra preset is the only configuration where the system struggles, dipping below the 40 FPS threshold. The benchmark results indicate a balanced pairing that favors high-refresh 1080p and solid 1440p gaming, with 4K reserved for lower settings.

Resolution Scaling

The most striking trend in the measured data is the dramatic performance drop as resolution scales from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160. At High settings, the average frame rate falls from 131 FPS at 1080p to 85 FPS at 1440p, a reduction of 46 FPS. Moving to 4K High, the average plummets further to 46 FPS, which is a 65% decrease from the 1080p result. This steep curve indicates that the rendering load at higher resolutions is the primary bottleneck, a classic sign that the GPU is being pushed to its limits.

The scaling pattern is consistent across all presets. With Low settings, the frame rate drops from 204 FPS at 1080p to 132 FPS at 1440p and then to 71 FPS at 4K. For Medium, the averages are 156 FPS, 101 FPS, and 54 FPS respectively. Even the Ultra preset, which starts at a respectable 100 FPS at 1080p, falls to 64 FPS at 1440p and a playable-but-demanding 35 FPS at 4K. The relative consistency of these drops—roughly halving the frame rate from 1080p to 4K—confirms that the GPU’s pixel throughput is the limiting factor.

This behavior suggests that the CPU is not the primary constraint at higher resolutions. If the processor were the limiting factor, the frame rates at 1080p and 1440p would be much closer together, as the CPU load would remain similar while the GPU work increased. Instead, the large gaps between resolutions point to the Radeon RX 6700 XT as the component determining performance ceilings. The 1080p results, especially the 204 FPS average on Low, show that the CPU has ample headroom to feed the GPU, but the GPU cannot maintain that pace when pixel count increases.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F provides a robust foundation for this gaming configuration. With 8 cores and 16 threads, it offers substantial parallel processing capability, which is reflected in its strong synthetic scores. The processor achieves a Passmark multithread score of 36470 and a single-thread score of 4691, placing it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. This high single-thread performance is crucial for game logic and frame pacing, ensuring that the CPU does not become a bottleneck in most scenarios.

The data supports this conclusion. At 1080p Low, the system produces 204 FPS, a result that would be unattainable if the CPU were struggling to keep up with the GPU. The processor’s boost clock of 5.50 GHz, paired with a base clock of 3.80 GHz, provides the necessary responsiveness for high-frame-rate gaming. Furthermore, the Ryzen 7 9700F’s nearest rivals—the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX, Intel Core i7-14700KF, AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, and Intel Core i7-14700K—all have average benchmark scores within 0.9% of the 9700F, indicating that its performance level is well-established for demanding tasks.

However, the CPU’s role becomes less prominent at higher resolutions. The benchmark results show that the frame rate drops are more severe when moving from 1440p to 4K than from 1080p to 1440p, which is typical for a GPU-bound scenario. The CPU’s 32 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 memory support provide adequate data throughput for the GPU, but they do not compensate for the GPU’s limitations at 4K. In essence, the Ryzen 7 9700F is a capable partner that never holds the GPU back, but it also cannot boost the GPU’s performance at higher resolutions.

FAQ

*Q: What is the best resolution for this CPU and GPU combo in Minimum?*

A: The data indicates that 1920x1080 is the sweet spot, with all presets averaging above 100 FPS. 2560x1440 is also excellent, with High and Medium presets averaging 85 FPS and 101 FPS respectively, while 4K is only viable with lower settings.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 9700F compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 7 9700F has an average benchmark score of 69996, which is 0.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX, 0.7% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, and 0.9% higher than the Intel Core i7-14700K. It is 0.2% lower than the Intel Core i7-14700KF.

Q: Is the Radeon RX 6700 XT the bottleneck at 4K?

A: Yes. The frame rate drops from 71 FPS at 4K Low to 46 FPS at 4K High, and further to 35 FPS at 4K Ultra. This steep decline with increasing settings, combined with the large gap from 1440p results, shows the GPU is the limiting component at 4K.

Q: Can this system handle high-refresh-rate gaming?

A: At 1080p, yes. The system averages 156 FPS on Medium and 131 FPS on High, which are suitable for 144Hz monitors. At 1440p, it can reach 101 FPS on Medium, which is still smooth, but it cannot consistently hit 144 FPS.

Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 132 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 64 FPS. This represents a 68 FPS difference, indicating that the Ultra preset is significantly more demanding on the GPU.

Q: How does the GPU's benchmark score relate to its in-game performance?

A: The Radeon RX 6700 XT has a Passmark G3D score of 19786, placing it in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile, has a nearly identical average score with a 0% delta, which aligns with the GPU's mid-to-high-end positioning in the measured results.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system demonstrates its peak performance. The Low preset delivers an average of 204 FPS, the highest result in the entire dataset. Moving up the settings ladder, the Medium preset averages 156 FPS with a minimum of 133 FPS and a maximum of 180 FPS. The High preset averages 131 FPS, while the Ultra preset brings the average down to 100 FPS. These figures show that even at the most demanding 1080p preset, the system remains comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold, offering a very smooth experience.

At 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but shows the expected decline. The Low preset averages 132 FPS, which is still excellent for high-refresh monitors. The Medium preset averages 101 FPS, with a minimum of 86 FPS and a maximum of 116 FPS. The High preset averages 85 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 64 FPS. This resolution is clearly the balancing point between visual fidelity and frame rate, as the High preset still provides a solid 85 FPS average.

At 3840x2160, the GPU begins to struggle with the higher workload. The Low preset averages 71 FPS, which is playable but a significant drop from the 1080p result. The Medium preset averages 54 FPS, with a minimum of 46 FPS and a maximum of 62 FPS. The High preset averages 46 FPS, and the Ultra preset falls to 35 FPS. The 4K results are only suitable for slower-paced gameplay or for users who prioritize resolution over frame rate. The data shows a clear pattern: 1080p is for maximum speed, 1440p is for balanced quality, and 4K requires significant compromises.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT is the central component determining the gaming experience in Minimum. Its 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus provides 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is sufficient for the textures and assets at 1080p and 1440p. The GPU’s boost clock of 2581 MHz and game clock of 2424 MHz allow it to maintain high throughput, as evidenced by the 204 FPS average at 1080p Low. With 2560 shading units and 64 ROPs, the card is well-equipped for traditional rasterization tasks.

The benchmark results show that the GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The 4K Ultra preset’s 35 FPS average is a direct consequence of the GPU’s pixel fill rate and shader throughput being overwhelmed. The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 19786 places it in the 72nd percentile, and its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, has a score that is only 0.5% higher. This indicates that the RX 6700 XT is a solid mid-to-high-range performer, but it is not designed for extreme 4K gaming.

The GPU’s FP32 performance of 13.21 TFLOPS and texture rate of 413.0 GTexel/s support its strong 1080p and 1440p results. However, the data suggests that the card’s 192-bit memory interface and 12 GB capacity are better suited for 1440p, where it can maintain high frame rates without hitting memory or bandwidth ceilings. At 4K, the combination of higher memory pressure and increased shader work causes the frame rate to drop significantly, confirming that the RX 6700 XT is best paired with 1080p or 1440p displays for this title.

Settings Recommendations

For the best experience, the measured data points to the 2560x1440 High preset as the optimal balance between visual quality and performance. This configuration averages 85 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS target and provides a smooth, responsive feel. The frame rate is high enough to benefit from adaptive sync technologies, and the visual quality is significantly improved over the Low preset. While the Medium preset at 1440p offers a higher average of 101 FPS, the jump to High is worth the 16 FPS cost for most users seeking a better-looking game.

For users with 1080p displays, the High preset is the clear choice. It averages 131 FPS, offering a fluid experience that takes full advantage of high-refresh-rate monitors. The Ultra preset at 1080p still averages 100 FPS, so it is a viable option for those who want maximum visual fidelity without sacrificing smoothness. The Low preset at 1080p, with its 204 FPS average, is only necessary for competitive play where every millisecond counts.

For 4K displays, the Low preset is the only reasonable option, averaging 71 FPS. The Medium preset at 4K averages 54 FPS, which is borderline for action games, and the High and Ultra presets should be avoided due to their sub-60 FPS averages. The data clearly shows that this system is not intended for 4K gaming. Users should prioritize either 1080p High or 1440p High to get the best combination of performance and visual fidelity from the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and Radeon RX 6700 XT.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 7 9700F

Cores / Threads 8 / 16
Base Clock 3800 MHz
Boost Clock 5500 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket AMD Socket AM5
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

VRAM 12 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2581 MHz MHz
TDP 230 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT in Minimum

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 71.0
3840x2160 Medium 54.0
3840x2160 High 46.0
3840x2160 Ultra 35.0
2560x1440 Low 132.0
2560x1440 Medium 101.0
2560x1440 High 85.0
2560x1440 Ultra 64.0
1920x1080 Low 204.0
1920x1080 Medium 156.0
1920x1080 High 131.0
1920x1080 Ultra 100.0

Minimum with Ryzen 7 9700F + Other GPUs

See how Minimum performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Minimum with RX 6700 XT + Other CPUs

See how Minimum performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 7 9700F + RX 6700 XT

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.