Minimum
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 157 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 57 | 75 | 89 | 116 |
| 1440p QHD | 106 | 139 | 166 | 216 |
| 1080p Full HD | 164 | 215 | 257 | 283 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Minimum with AMD Ryzen 7 3700X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, In-Depth Analysis
# Minimum — AMD Ryzen 7 3700X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
This combo pairs AMD's eight-core Zen 2 desktop processor with NVIDIA's Blackwell-generation flagship-tier GPU, producing a system that ranks in the 85th percentile of all tested combinations for Minimum, a 2014 third-person shooter. The benchmark data reveals a GPU-bound experience at higher resolutions, with the RTX 5070 Ti's 16 GB of GDDR7 memory and 896.0 GB/s bandwidth proving more than adequate for this title's demands, while the Ryzen 7 3700X's 8 cores and 16 threads provide ample headroom at lower resolutions.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data shows a clear and consistent pattern: as resolution increases from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160, frame rates drop substantially across all settings presets. At Medium settings, the system delivers an average of 257 FPS at 1080p, which falls to 166 FPS at 1440p, and further to 89 FPS at 4K — representing a 65% reduction from 1080p to 4K. This scaling behavior strongly indicates that the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions, as the pixel throughput demands increase geometrically.
The Low preset tells a similar story, with average FPS dropping from 283 at 1080p to 216 at 1440p (a 24% decline) and then to 116 at 4K (a 59% decline from 1080p). Interestingly, the 1080p-to-1440p drop is relatively modest for Low settings, suggesting the CPU can still feed the GPU adequately at these lower graphical loads. The High preset shows 215 FPS at 1080p, 139 FPS at 1440p, and 75 FPS at 4K, while Ultra spans from 164 FPS at 1080p down to 57 FPS at 4K.
The most telling observation comes from comparing the resolution scaling between Low and Ultra presets. At 1080p, the gap between Low and Ultra is 119 FPS (283 vs 164), but at 4K this gap narrows to 59 FPS (116 vs 57). This compression of performance differences at higher resolutions is a classic signature of GPU-bound rendering — when the GPU is saturated with pixel work, the additional load from higher settings has relatively less impact on the already-strained rendering pipeline. Conversely, the larger gaps at 1080p suggest that lower settings allow the CPU to push frame rates higher, revealing that the Ryzen 7 3700X is capable of driving very high FPS when the GPU isn't the bottleneck.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 7 3700X brings 8 cores and 16 threads based on the Zen 2 architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 7 nm process. Its base clock of 3.60 GHz and boost clock of 4.40 GHz, combined with 32 MB of L3 cache, position it as a solid mid-range desktop processor. In synthetic benchmarks, it scores 2092 in Cinebench R15 multi-core and 204 in single-core, with a Geekbench multi-core score of 8899 and single-core score of 1593. Its PassMark multithread score of 22458 and single-thread score of 2656 place it in the 84th percentile of all CPUs.
For Minimum, the CPU's role becomes most apparent at 1080p resolution, where frame rates exceed 200 FPS on most settings. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 283 FPS average, which is only 26 FPS higher than the 1080p Medium result of 257 FPS. This relatively small gap between Low and Medium at 1080p, compared to the larger gap at 4K (27 FPS difference between Low and Medium), suggests that the CPU is beginning to limit performance at very high frame rates. The Ryzen 7 3700X's single-thread performance, while respectable with a PassMark single-thread score of 2656, appears to be the constraining factor when the GPU could otherwise deliver even higher frame rates.
The CPU's 65 W TDP and dual-channel DDR4 memory support with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth provide adequate throughput for this game's data streaming needs. The 16 threads allow for efficient handling of background tasks and game engine threads, though Minimum's age (released in 2014) means it likely doesn't fully utilize all available cores. The benchmark data supports this interpretation: at 1440p and 4K, frame rates scale more with resolution than with settings changes, indicating the GPU dominates performance while the CPU has sufficient headroom.
Settings Recommendations
Examining the measured FPS data across all four settings presets and three resolutions reveals distinct trade-offs. At 4K, Medium settings deliver 89 FPS average with a minimum of 76 FPS and maximum of 103 FPS — the only 4K configuration with min/max data available. This makes Medium the clear choice for 4K gaming, as it maintains playable frame rates while offering better visual quality than Low (116 FPS) and significantly better performance than High (75 FPS) or Ultra (57 FPS).
At 1440p, the situation becomes more nuanced. Medium settings achieve 166 FPS average (min 141, max 190), while High delivers 139 FPS and Ultra drops to 106 FPS. The 27 FPS advantage of Medium over High at 1440p, combined with the relatively modest visual difference between these presets in a 2014 title, makes Medium the recommended setting for high-refresh-rate displays. However, for players prioritizing visual fidelity over frame rate, High at 139 FPS still provides an excellent experience.
At 1080p, the data shows that even Ultra settings achieve 164 FPS average, which exceeds the refresh rate of most standard monitors. Low settings reach 283 FPS, Medium 257 FPS, and High 215 FPS. The Medium preset's minimum of 218 FPS and maximum of 295 FPS demonstrate excellent frame time consistency. Given that all presets at 1080p deliver well above 144 FPS, the recommendation shifts toward maximizing visual quality — Ultra at 164 FPS remains highly playable, though High at 215 FPS offers a better balance for competitive play where higher frame rates provide a tangible advantage.
How This Combo Ranks
This specific combination of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti ranks 537th out of 3712 tested combos in Minimum, placing it in the top 14.5% of all configurations. This ranking reflects the GPU's strong performance in this title, as the RTX 5070 Ti's 86th percentile standing among all GPUs (based on its average benchmark score of 49957) suggests it handles this game's rendering demands efficiently. The CPU's 84th percentile ranking among all processors provides a complementary foundation without bottlenecking the GPU at most resolutions.
The combo's rank of 537 out of 3712 indicates that while this system performs well, there are 536 configurations that achieve higher frame rates in Minimum. Given the game's age and relatively modest graphical requirements, many of these higher-ranked combos likely feature newer, higher-clocked CPUs that can push frame rates even higher at 1080p, where the Ryzen 7 3700X's single-thread performance becomes a limiting factor. The GPU's rivals — including the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (which scores 50951, 2% higher) and RX 6800 XT (48477, 3.1% lower) — suggest that GPU choice alone doesn't explain the ranking, pointing to CPU performance as the differentiator in this CPU-sensitive title.
The RTX 5070 Ti's nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks include the RX Vega 64 (50001, 0.1% higher) and Intel Arc A550M (49737, 0.4% lower), yet the RTX 5070 Ti's real-world gaming performance in Minimum benefits from its modern architecture features. The GPU's 8960 shading units, 280 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, combined with its 2452 MHz boost clock, provide substantial raw computing power that this game can leverage effectively.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using TSMC's 5 nm process, featuring 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die. Its 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus delivers 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth, while the GPU operates at a base clock of 2295 MHz and boost clock of 2452 MHz. These specifications translate to 43.94 TFLOPS of FP32 compute performance, with a pixel rate of 235.4 GPixel/s and texture rate of 686.6 GTexel/s.
In Minimum, the GPU's role is clearly dominant at higher resolutions. The 4K performance across all settings (57-116 FPS) demonstrates that the GPU's pixel processing capabilities are the primary constraint at this resolution. The RTX 5070 Ti's 96 ROPs and 235.4 GPixel/s pixel rate determine how quickly the GPU can fill the 8.3 million pixels of a 4K frame, and the measured frame rates align with what these specifications would suggest for a 2014-era game with modern GPU overhead.
The GPU's memory subsystem proves more than sufficient for this title. The 16 GB GDDR7 capacity and 896.0 GB/s bandwidth far exceed Minimum's requirements, as evidenced by the consistent frame rates without any indication of memory-related stuttering or texture pop-in. The measured minimum FPS values (76 FPS at 4K Medium, 141 FPS at 1440p Medium, 218 FPS at 1080p Medium) show stable performance without severe frame drops, indicating the GPU isn't struggling with memory capacity or bandwidth limitations.
The RTX 5070 Ti's 300 W TDP and PCIe 5.0 x16 interface provide ample power and bandwidth for this workload. The GPU's DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) ensures compatibility with any modern rendering features, while its Vulkan 1.4 and OpenGL 4.6 support provide flexibility for various game engines. In synthetic benchmarks, the GPU scores 32974 in PassMark G3D and 6604 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, confirming its high-end positioning.
FAQ
*Q: What is the highest average FPS this combo achieves in Minimum?*
A: The highest measured average FPS is 283, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.
Q: Does this system maintain playable frame rates at 4K resolution?
A: Yes, at 4K with Medium settings, the system achieves 89 FPS average with a minimum of 76 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold commonly considered playable.
Q: How does the RTX 5070 Ti compare to its nearest rival GPUs?
A: The RTX 5070 Ti scores 49957 on average benchmarks, placing it 0.1% below the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (50001) and 0.4% above the Intel Arc A550M (49737). It trails the RX 6900 XT by 2% but leads the RX 6800 XT by 3.1%.
Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?
A: At 2560x1440, Low settings achieve 216 FPS average while Ultra settings deliver 106 FPS, representing a 110 FPS difference (approximately 51% lower performance at Ultra).
*Q: Is the Ryzen 7 3700X a bottleneck for this GPU in Minimum?*
A: The data suggests partial CPU limitation at 1080p, where the gap between Low (283 FPS) and Medium (257 FPS) is smaller than expected, indicating the CPU's single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread score of 2656) may limit frame rates above ~280 FPS.
Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations?
A: This combo ranks 537th out of 3712 tested combinations, placing it in the top 14.5% of all systems tested in Minimum.
Measured FPS Breakdown
1920x1080:
- Low: 283 FPS average
- Medium: 257 FPS average, 218 FPS minimum, 295 FPS maximum
- High: 215 FPS average
- Ultra: 164 FPS average
2560x1440:
- Low: 216 FPS average
- Medium: 166 FPS average, 141 FPS minimum, 190 FPS maximum
- High: 139 FPS average
- Ultra: 106 FPS average
3840x2160:
- Low: 116 FPS average
- Medium: 89 FPS average, 76 FPS minimum, 103 FPS maximum
- High: 75 FPS average
- Ultra: 57 FPS average
The data reveals a steady progression of performance degradation as both resolution and settings increase. At 1080p, the system delivers exceptional performance across all presets, with even Ultra settings maintaining 164 FPS. The 1440p results show a balanced distribution, with Medium providing the best combination of visual quality and performance at 166 FPS. At 4K, only Low and Medium settings maintain frame rates above 60 FPS, with Ultra dropping to 57 FPS — the only measured configuration below the 60 FPS threshold. The Medium preset at 4K provides the most consistent experience, as evidenced by its recorded minimum (76 FPS) and maximum (103 FPS) values, indicating stable frame pacing throughout the benchmark.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 3700X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti in Minimum
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 116.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 89.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 75.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 57.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 216.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 166.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 139.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 106.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 283.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 257.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 215.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 164.0 |
Minimum with Ryzen 7 3700X + Other GPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Minimum with RTX 5070 Ti + Other CPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 3700X + RTX 5070 Ti
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.