Minimum
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 134 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 48 | 60 | 75 | 95 |
| 1440p QHD | 90 | 118 | 135 | 178 |
| 1080p Full HD | 134 | 180 | 216 | 276 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Minimum with AMD Ryzen 5 9600X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti delivers a performance profile in Minimum that is heavily dictated by resolution, with the GPU acting as the primary bottleneck at higher pixel counts. At 1920x1080, the combination produces exceptionally high frame rates, while at 3840x2160, the frame rates become more demanding, revealing the limits of the graphics card. This analysis breaks down the measured performance data for this specific hardware configuration.
Resolution Scaling
The data shows a clear and expected trend: average frame rates decline as resolution increases, but the rate of decline is not linear across all settings. At Low settings, the drop from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 is substantial, moving from 276.3 FPS down to 178 FPS, a reduction of roughly 36%. Continuing to 3840x2160, the frame rate falls further to 94.5 FPS, which is about 34% lower than the 1440p result. This steep decline indicates that even at Low settings, the GPU is being pushed harder as pixel count increases, though the CPU still has enough headroom to keep feeding frames.
With High settings, the scaling is similar but the starting point is lower. The 1080p result is 179.8 FPS, dropping to 117.5 FPS at 1440p and then to 60.3 FPS at 4K. The percentage drop from 1080p to 4K is more severe here, as the higher settings increase the per-pixel workload, making the GPU the limiting component at 4K. The gap between Low and High at 4K is 34.2 FPS, suggesting that the settings overhead becomes more significant when the GPU is already under load.
The most demanding scenario, Ultra settings, shows the largest absolute impact from resolution scaling. The frame rate starts at 133.9 FPS at 1080p, drops to 90.2 FPS at 1440p, and then plummets to 48.1 FPS at 4K. This 4K result is below the 60 FPS threshold often considered the minimum for smooth gameplay. The data suggests that at 4K, the RTX 3080 Ti is the primary constraint, as the performance difference between 1440p and 4K is significant regardless of the settings preset.
How This Combo Ranks
Within the database of tested hardware combinations for Minimum, this specific pairing of the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti holds a rank of 457 out of 1733 tested combos. This places it in the top percentile of all tested systems, indicating that it is a high-performing configuration for this game. The CPU itself sits in the 85th percentile when compared to all other CPUs in the database, and the GPU is in the 83rd percentile for all GPUs, which aligns with the overall combo ranking.
Looking at the immediate rivals from the benchmark data, the scores are very close. The Ryzen 5 9600X has an average benchmark score of 28246, which is a mere 0.3% higher than the Intel Core i5-13490F and the AMD Ryzen 5 230. It is also only 0.4% lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS and 0.5% lower than the Intel Core i5-14500T. This shows that the CPU's performance is essentially on par with its closest competitors, meaning the combo's rank is not driven by a significant CPU advantage over other similar builds.
On the GPU side, the RTX 3080 Tiβs average score of 41224 is very close to its nearest rivals. It is 0.5% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 and 0.9% behind the AMD Radeon Pro 5300. It also trails the newer NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 by 1.1% and the NVIDIA Tesla M40 by 1.6%. These small deltas suggest that the RTX 3080 Ti is positioned in a highly competitive performance tier, and the measured frame rates in Minimum are consistent with this mid-to-high-tier standing.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured average FPS data, the optimal settings preset depends on the target resolution and desired frame rate. For 1920x1080, all presets deliver playable performance, but the High preset at 179.8 FPS provides a strong balance of visual fidelity and speed. The Low preset at 276.3 FPS is excessively high for most displays and would not offer a tangible gameplay benefit over High, while Ultra at 133.9 FPS is still very smooth but may not justify the potential visual differences for a 46 FPS reduction.
At 2560x1440, the High preset is the clear recommendation, achieving 117.5 FPS. This provides a fluid experience that is well above the 60 FPS standard. The Medium preset at 134.7 FPS is also viable if higher frame rates are preferred, but the High preset offers a better visual experience with only a 17.2 FPS penalty. Ultra at 90.2 FPS remains playable, but the drop from High is noticeable, and the performance gain from High to Ultra may not be worth it on a 1440p panel.
For 3840x2160, the choices are more constrained. The High preset at 60.3 FPS is the only option that hits the 60 FPS target, making it the recommended choice for a 4K display. The Medium preset at 74.5 FPS is also acceptable, but the Low preset at 94.5 FPS sacrifices significant visual quality. The Ultra preset at 48.1 FPS falls below the 60 FPS threshold and is not recommended for a smooth experience. Therefore, for 4K gaming, the data clearly points to High or Medium as the best options.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured average frame rates for this combo are as follows. At 1920x1080, the Low preset achieves 276.3 FPS, which is the highest score recorded. The Medium preset yields 216.1 FPS, and the High preset delivers 179.8 FPS. The Ultra preset is the most demanding, producing 133.9 FPS.
At 2560x1440, the performance scales down as expected. The Low preset still leads with 178 FPS, followed by Medium at 134.7 FPS. The High preset achieves 117.5 FPS, and the Ultra preset produces 90.2 FPS. The trend shows that the gap between presets narrows slightly at this resolution compared to 1080p.
At 3840x2160, the frame rates are significantly lower across all presets. The Low setting provides 94.5 FPS, which is the only preset to remain above the 90 FPS mark. The Medium setting drops to 74.5 FPS, and the High setting falls to 60.3 FPS. The Ultra setting is the most demanding, yielding just 48.1 FPS. This data confirms that 4K resolution pushes the RTX 3080 Ti to its limits, especially with higher graphical settings.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is the clear performance limiter in this configuration, particularly at higher resolutions and settings. Its 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus provides a memory bandwidth of 912.4 GB/s, which is sufficient for the majority of titles, but the data suggests that the GPU's compute capabilities are what determine the frame rates in Minimum. The core clocks of 1365 MHz base and 1665 MHz boost, combined with 10240 shading units, allow for high throughput, but the scaling from 1440p to 4K shows a significant workload increase.
The GPU's benchmark scores reinforce its position. It achieves a Passmark G3D score of 26896, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs. Its performance is tightly clustered with its nearest rivals, as the delta to the RTX 3090 is only -0.5%, indicating that the 3080 Ti offers nearly identical performance to its higher-tier sibling in this game. The 34.10 TFLOPS FP32 performance is substantial, yet the 4K Ultra result of 48.1 FPS suggests that the card is not over-provisioned for the most demanding scenarios in this title.
The GPU's role is most apparent when examining the frame rate differences between settings. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 142.4 FPS, showing that the CPU has enough headroom to allow the GPU to work harder. However, at 4K, this difference shrinks to 46.4 FPS, indicating that the GPU is already saturated and has less capacity to render additional visual effects. The launch MSRP of the RTX 3080 Ti is 1,199 USD, but its performance is now comparable to newer models, as shown by the -1.1% delta to the RTX 5070, making it a capable but not top-tier part for modern gaming.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 9600X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti in Minimum
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 94.5 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 74.5 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 60.3 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 48.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 178.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 134.7 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 117.5 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 90.2 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 276.3 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 216.1 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 179.8 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 133.9 |
Minimum with Ryzen 5 9600X + Other GPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Minimum with RTX 3080 Ti + Other CPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 9600X + RTX 3080 Ti
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.