Downfall

Downfall

AVERAGE FPS
163
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 163 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 60 92 114 136
1440p QHD 94 149 184 224
1080p Full HD 129 212 258 310

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 136
3840x2160 Medium 114
3840x2160 High 92
3840x2160 Ultra 60
2560x1440 Low 224
2560x1440 Medium 184
2560x1440 High 149
2560x1440 Ultra 94
1920x1080 Low 310
1920x1080 Medium 258
1920x1080 High 212
1920x1080 Ultra 129

Downfall with AMD Ryzen 5 9600X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, In-Depth Analysis

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Zen 5 (Granite Ridge) architecture, with a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. It carries a 65W TDP and supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus. The CPU's 32 MB of shared L3 cache and 4 nm process node from TSMC position it as a current-generation desktop part, released in August 2024.

Benchmark results show this is a strong single-threaded performer. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3603 and Geekbench single-core score of 3363 both indicate excellent per-thread throughput. In a horror title like Downfall, which relies heavily on frame-time consistency and responsive input, single-thread performance often dictates the floor for minimum FPS. The 3DMark single-thread score of 1253 reinforces that the 9600X can feed a high-end GPU without becoming the bottleneck at lower resolutions.

Multi-threaded throughput is equally respectable. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25525 and Geekbench multi-core score of 15182 show that the 6-core/12-thread configuration scales well. The PassMark multithread score of 30027, paired with a PassMark physics score of 2012, suggests the CPU can handle background tasks while gaming, though Downfall's engine may not be heavily threaded. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 7585 is nearly identical to the max-thread score of 7590, confirming that the CPU's scaling plateaus quickly — additional threads beyond 12 provide negligible gains.

The 9600X sits in the 85th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 28246. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-13490F, scores 28173 (a 0.3% delta), while the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS scores 28369 (-0.4% delta). This places the 9600X in a tightly contested mid-range tier where no single competitor holds a decisive edge.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

In Downfall, the combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti ranks 427th out of 1741 tested combos. This places the pairing in the top 24.5% of all configurations evaluated for this title. The rank reflects a balanced pairing: the CPU's 85th percentile standing and the GPU's 83rd percentile standing combine to produce a system that outperforms roughly three-quarters of tested setups.

The rank is notable because neither component is at the absolute top of its respective percentile. The GPU, for instance, trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 by 0.5% in average benchmark score (41441 vs 41441 for the RTX 3080 Ti's 41224), yet the combo still achieves a strong in-game position. This suggests that Downfall responds well to the specific balance of CPU single-thread speed and GPU rasterization throughput that this pairing provides.

The 427th rank out of 1741 combos also implies that many higher-ranked configurations use newer or more expensive hardware, but the measured FPS data shows this combo delivers smooth, high-refresh gameplay across most settings. The rank should be interpreted as a strong mid-to-upper-tier result, not a top-10 outlier. The data indicates diminishing returns beyond this tier for Downfall's specific engine demands.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

Resolution scaling reveals a clear shift in bottleneck behavior. At 1080p Low, the combo produces 310.2 FPS; at 1440p Low, it drops to 223.9 FPS (a 27.8% reduction); at 4K Low, it falls to 135.5 FPS (a 39.5% reduction from 1440p). These steep drops at lower settings indicate the GPU becomes the primary limiter as pixel count rises, even on Low presets where CPU overhead is minimal.

At High settings, the scaling is more moderate. From 1080p High (212 FPS) to 1440p High (149.2 FPS), the drop is 29.6%; from 1440p High to 4K High (92.3 FPS), the drop is 38.1%. The consistency of these percentage drops across Low and High suggests the GPU is the dominant constraint at all resolutions, with the CPU providing sufficient headroom to avoid becoming the bottleneck.

Ultra settings tell a different story. At 1080p Ultra, the combo hits 129.2 FPS; at 1440p Ultra, it drops to 93.7 FPS (27.5% reduction); at 4K Ultra, it falls to 60 FPS (36.0% reduction from 1440p). The 4K Ultra result of exactly 60 FPS suggests the engine may be hitting a frame-rate cap or the GPU is saturated at that workload. The fact that the percentage drops remain consistent across all settings presets indicates the GPU is the limiting component throughout, with no resolution or setting combination exposing a CPU ceiling.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

1920x1080: Low delivers 310.2 FPS, Medium 258 FPS, High 212 FPS, and Ultra 129.2 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium is 52.2 FPS (20.2% reduction), Medium to High is 46 FPS (21.7% reduction), and High to Ultra is 82.8 FPS (63.9% reduction). The Ultra preset imposes a heavy penalty, nearly halving the High result.

2560x1440: Low produces 223.9 FPS, Medium 183.8 FPS, High 149.2 FPS, and Ultra 93.7 FPS. The Low-to-Medium drop is 40.1 FPS (21.8%), Medium-to-High is 34.6 FPS (23.2%), and High-to-Ultra is 55.5 FPS (59.6%). The pattern mirrors 1080p, with Ultra again creating a disproportionate performance hit.

3840x2160: Low reaches 135.5 FPS, Medium 113.9 FPS, High 92.3 FPS, and Ultra 60 FPS. The Low-to-Medium drop is 21.6 FPS (18.9%), Medium-to-High is 21.6 FPS (23.4%), and High-to-Ultra is 32.3 FPS (53.5%). At 4K, even Low settings remain above 135 FPS, while Ultra lands exactly at 60 FPS — a hard floor that suggests either a cap or GPU saturation.

Across all resolutions, the Ultra preset consistently costs roughly 50-60% of the High preset's frame rate. This is a larger relative penalty than the step from Medium to High, which hovers around 21-23%. The data indicates that Ultra settings enable effects that disproportionately tax the GPU in Downfall.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti features 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, delivering 912.4 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU runs at a base clock of 1365 MHz with a boost clock of 1665 MHz, and memory operates at 1188 MHz (19 Gbps effective). Built on Samsung's 8 nm process with 28,300 million transistors, the GA102 chip includes 10240 shading units, 320 TMUs, and 112 ROPs.

The 12 GB VRAM capacity is relevant for Downfall at 4K Ultra, where the measured 60 FPS result suggests the GPU is fully utilized. The 912.4 GB/s bandwidth provides ample headroom for texture streaming at high resolutions, which explains why the combo maintains 92.3 FPS at 4K High — the memory subsystem is not a limiting factor. The GPU's 186.5 GPixel/s pixel rate and 532.8 GTexel/s texture rate support the high fill-rate demands of a horror title's lighting and shadow effects.

The RTX 3080 Ti scores 26896 in PassMark G3D and 5077 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. Its average benchmark score of 41224 places it in the 83rd percentile, just 0.5% behind the RTX 3090 (41441) and 1.1% ahead of the RTX 5070 (41687). The GPU's FP32 performance of 34.10 TFLOPS, paired with 80 RT cores and 320 tensor cores, provides robust compute throughput for DirectX 12 Ultimate workloads. The near-identical scores to the RTX 3090 in synthetic benchmarks suggest the 3080 Ti is well-positioned for rasterized titles like Downfall, where the measured FPS data confirms strong performance across all settings.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

The measured data points to High settings as the optimal balance for this combo. At 1080p High, the system delivers 212 FPS — well above any high-refresh display's needs. At 1440p High, 149.2 FPS remains excellent for competitive play. Even at 4K High, 92.3 FPS is smooth and playable on most displays.

Medium settings offer marginal gains over High: 258 FPS at 1080p (a 21.7% increase), 183.8 FPS at 1440p (a 23.2% increase), and 113.9 FPS at 4K (a 23.4% increase). These improvements are not proportional to the visual quality loss typically associated with dropping from High to Medium in modern titles.

Ultra settings are not recommended. The 60 FPS result at 4K Ultra, while technically playable, represents a 53.5% drop from High at the same resolution. At 1080p and 1440p, Ultra still delivers 129.2 FPS and 93.7 FPS respectively, but the consistent 50-60% penalty over High indicates that Ultra enables effects with poor performance scaling.

Low settings are only useful for extreme refresh-rate scenarios. At 1080p Low, the combo produces 310.2 FPS, which could benefit a 360 Hz display. At 1440p Low, 223.9 FPS supports 240 Hz monitors. However, the visual trade-off in a horror game — where atmosphere and lighting are critical — makes Low a poor default choice.

The verdict: High settings at any resolution provide the best measured experience. The combo maintains 92 FPS or higher at 4K, 149 FPS at 1440p, and 212 FPS at 1080p, with no setting preset offering a compelling reason to deviate.

FAQ — 4-6 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 9600X compare to its nearest CPU rival in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The 9600X has an average benchmark score of 28246, placing it 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i5-13490F (28173) and 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 230 (28164). It trails the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (28369) by 0.4% and the Intel Core i5-14500T (28377) by 0.5%.

Q: What is the combo's ranking among all tested configurations in Downfall?

A: The Ryzen 5 9600X + RTX 3080 Ti combination ranks 427th out of 1741 tested combos, placing it in the top 24.5% of all configurations.

Q: What FPS does the combo achieve at 4K with the High preset?

A: At 3840x2160 with High settings, the combo delivers an average of 92.3 FPS. This drops to 60 FPS on Ultra and rises to 113.9 FPS on Medium and 135.5 FPS on Low.

Q: Which component is the primary bottleneck in Downfall?

A: The GPU is the limiting factor. FPS drops from 1080p to 4K at roughly 30-40% per resolution step across all settings, and the RTX 3080 Ti's average benchmark score (41224) sits just below the RTX 3090 (41441) while the CPU ranks in the 85th percentile.

Q: How does the RTX 3080 Ti's memory bandwidth affect 4K performance?

A: The 12 GB GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus provides 912.4 GB/s of bandwidth, which supports the measured 92.3 FPS at 4K High. The memory subsystem does not appear to be a limiting factor, as the bottleneck is the GPU's compute throughput at higher settings.

Q: What is the best settings preset for this combo in Downfall?

A: High settings provide the best experience. At 1080p, it delivers 212 FPS; at 1440p, 149.2 FPS; and at 4K, 92.3 FPS. Ultra settings impose a 50-60% performance penalty across all resolutions, while Medium offers only a ~22% gain over High, which does not justify the visual downgrade.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 5 9600X

Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Base Clock 3900 MHz
Boost Clock 5400 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket AMD Socket AM5
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

VRAM 12 GB GDDR6X
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 1665 MHz MHz
TDP 350 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 9600X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti in Downfall

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 135.5
3840x2160 Medium 113.9
3840x2160 High 92.3
3840x2160 Ultra 60.0
2560x1440 Low 223.9
2560x1440 Medium 183.8
2560x1440 High 149.2
2560x1440 Ultra 93.7
1920x1080 Low 310.2
1920x1080 Medium 258.0
1920x1080 High 212.0
1920x1080 Ultra 129.2

Downfall with Ryzen 5 9600X + Other GPUs

See how Downfall performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Downfall with RTX 3080 Ti + Other CPUs

See how Downfall performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 5 9600X + RTX 3080 Ti

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.