Minimum

Resolution Scaling

The measured frame rates for the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 in Minimum reveal a classic resolution scaling curve, with the most significant performance drop occurring between 1440p and 4K. At 1080p with Ultra settings, the combination produces an average of 136 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440 at the same Ultra preset, the average drops to 88 FPS, a reduction of 48 FPS or roughly 35%. The jump to 3840x2160 at Ultra yields an average of 47 FPS, which is a further drop of 41 FPS from the 1440p figure, and a total reduction of 89 FPS from the 1080p result. This steep decline from 1440p to 4K indicates that the rendering load is scaling heavily with pixel count, which is typical for a GPU-bound scenario at higher resolutions.

The pattern is consistent across all settings presets. At Low settings, the average frame rate falls from 278 FPS at 1080p to 179 FPS at 1440p, and then to 97 FPS at 4K. The percentage drop from 1440p to 4K at Low settings is approximately 46%, which is even steeper than the drop observed at Ultra settings (about 47% from 1440p to 4K). This suggests that even when the graphical workload is lightened, the sheer number of pixels at 4K remains a formidable challenge for this hardware combination. The data points to the GPU as the primary limiting component at 4K, as the CPU's high single-thread performance is less likely to be the bottleneck when the frame rate is capped by pixel throughput.

At 1080p, the frame rates are exceptionally high across all presets. The Low preset achieves 278 FPS, Medium reaches 213 FPS, and High hits 179 FPS. These numbers are far beyond the refresh rate of most standard monitors, indicating that the system is heavily CPU-bound or engine-limited at this resolution. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p shows a reduction from 278 FPS to 136 FPS, a 142 FPS difference, which demonstrates that while the GPU is capable of massive throughput, the settings still have a measurable impact on the final output. The transition from 1440p to 4K is where the RTX 4070's 12 GB memory buffer and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth start to become the deciding factors, as the data shows the frame rate nearly halving at each step up in resolution for the higher presets.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070, built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with a 5 nm process, is the dominant force in this pairing for Minimum. The GPU's boost clock of 2475 MHz and base clock of 1920 MHz provide the raw computational power, but it is the memory subsystem that becomes critical at higher resolutions. The 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus with 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, as evidenced by the high average frame rates. However, at 3840x2160, the data shows a clear performance ceiling. The Ultra preset at 4K averages only 47 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target that many users consider the baseline for smooth gameplay.

The GPU's benchmark scores support its position in the market. The passmark_g3d score of 26927 places it in the 81st percentile of all GPUs, and its average benchmark score of 37648 puts it in close competition with its nearest rivals. The data shows the RTX 4070 is 0.1% ahead of the NVIDIA Tesla P4, 0.4% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56, and 1.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon PRO W6400, while being 1.3% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile. These are tight margins, suggesting that the RTX 4070's performance in Minimum is consistent with its overall compute capabilities. The FP32 performance of 29.15 TFLOPS and the 5888 shading units provide the mathematical throughput needed for the game's shaders, but the 64 ROPs and 184 TMUs are what handle the final pixel output.

At 4K, the GPU's role is clearly the limiting factor. The frame rate drop from 1440p to 4K is substantial across all settings, indicating that the GPU is saturated. The memory bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s is likely the constraint, as the game's textures and frame buffers at 4K require more data to be moved than at lower resolutions. The fact that the Low preset at 4K only manages 97 FPS, while the same preset at 1440p achieves 179 FPS, highlights the disproportionate cost of 4K rendering. The GPU's 200 W TDP and dual-slot design are adequate for this workload, but the data suggests that for a consistent 60 FPS experience at 4K, the settings must be dialed back to Medium or lower, where the average of 74 FPS is achievable.

FAQ

Q: What is the average frame rate at 1080p with Ultra settings?

A: At 1920x1080 with the Ultra preset, the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 combination produces an average of 136 FPS.

Q: How much does the frame rate drop from 1440p to 4K at High settings?

A: At 2560x1440 with High settings, the average is 115 FPS. Moving to 3840x2160 with the same High preset, the average drops to 62 FPS, a reduction of 53 FPS.

*Q: Is the system capable of running Minimum at 4K with a playable frame rate?*

A: The data shows that at 4K with the Medium preset, the average frame rate is 74 FPS with a minimum of 63 FPS. This is above the 60 FPS threshold, indicating that Medium settings at 4K are playable.

Q: What is the highest average frame rate recorded for this combination?

A: The highest average frame rate is 278 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings. The Medium preset at the same resolution reaches 213 FPS, and High reaches 179 FPS.

Q: How does the RTX 4070's performance compare to its nearest rival, the RTX 4080 Mobile?

A: The RTX 4070 has an average benchmark score of 37648, which is 1.3% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile's average score of 38135. In Minimum, this translates to the RTX 4070 being slightly slower in absolute terms.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded at 4K with Medium settings?

A: At 3840x2160 with Medium settings, the minimum FPS recorded is 63, with a maximum of 85 and an average of 74.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured data provides a clear picture of performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the frame rates are consistently high. The Low preset averages 278 FPS, which is the highest score in the entire dataset. The Medium preset averages 213 FPS, with a minimum of 181 and a maximum of 245. High settings average 179 FPS, and Ultra settings average 136 FPS. This 1080p data shows a linear progression where each step up in settings reduces the average by roughly 40-65 FPS, indicating that the GPU has ample headroom at this resolution.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance scales down proportionally. Low settings average 179 FPS, which is exactly 99 FPS lower than the 1080p Low result. Medium settings average 137 FPS, with a minimum of 117 and a maximum of 158. High settings average 115 FPS, and Ultra settings average 88 FPS. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is consistent across presets, ranging from a 36% reduction at Low to a 35% reduction at Ultra. This consistency suggests that the GPU is handling the increased pixel count efficiently, but the overall throughput is diminishing.

At 3840x2160, the performance takes a significant hit. Low settings average 97 FPS, which is 82 FPS lower than the 1440p Low result and 181 FPS lower than the 1080p Low result. Medium settings average 74 FPS, with a minimum of 63 and a maximum of 85. High settings average 62 FPS, and Ultra settings average 47 FPS. The 4K data reveals that the Ultra preset dips below the 60 FPS threshold, while the High preset is just barely above it at 62 FPS. The Medium preset offers the best balance at 4K, providing an average of 74 FPS with a minimum of 63 FPS, which keeps the experience smooth even during demanding scenes. The Low preset at 97 FPS is the only setting at 4K that approaches the fluidity of the 1440p results, but it does so at the cost of visual fidelity.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X, with its 6 cores and 12 threads based on the Zen 5 architecture, plays a supporting role in this game's performance. The CPU's base clock of 3.90 GHz and boost clock of 5.40 GHz provide strong single-thread performance, which is crucial for games that rely on a primary rendering thread. The benchmark data confirms this: the 3dmark_single_thread score of 1253 and the cinebench_r23_singlecore score of 2183.5 are strong indicators of high per-core throughput. However, in Minimum, the CPU's role becomes less critical as the resolution increases and the GPU takes over as the primary bottleneck.

At 1080p, the CPU is likely the limiting factor at the Low and Medium presets, where the frame rates exceed 200 FPS. The 3dmark_16_threads score of 7585 and the cinebench_r23_multicore score of 17528.5 show that the CPU is capable of handling multi-threaded workloads, but the game's engine may not be able to fully utilize all 12 threads. The passmark_single_thread score of 4570 and the geekbench_singlecore score of 2923 indicate that the CPU has excellent single-thread performance, which is what matters most for games that are not heavily multi-threaded.

The CPU's memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and dual-channel DDR5 support ensure that data can be fed to the GPU without starving it. The 32 MB of shared L3 cache provides a large pool for frequently accessed data, which helps reduce latency. The 4 nm process node and 65 W TDP make it an efficient chip, but the data shows that its performance in Minimum is not the deciding factor at higher resolutions. At 1440p and 4K, the frame rates are almost entirely determined by the GPU's capability, as evidenced by the consistent scaling patterns across all settings. The CPU's nearest rivals, such as the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT, show a deltaPct of -0.6%, which is a negligible difference, further confirming that the CPU is not a differentiator in this specific game's performance envelope.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings preset depends on the user's resolution and performance target. For 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the recommended choice, as it delivers an average of 136 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold and provides the best visual quality. The High preset at 179 FPS and Medium at 213 FPS offer higher frame rates for users with high-refresh-rate monitors, but the visual fidelity loss may not be worth the extra frames when the Ultra preset is already so smooth.

For 2560x1440, the High preset is the sweet spot, averaging 115 FPS. This provides a smooth experience with good visual quality. The Ultra preset at 88 FPS is also playable and may be preferred for users who prioritize image quality over raw frame rate. The Medium preset at 137 FPS is a good option for those who want a buffer above 120 FPS, but the jump from High to Medium is a significant visual downgrade for a 22 FPS gain. The Low preset at 179 FPS is excessive for most users and should only be considered for competitive play where maximum frame rate is paramount.

For 3840x2160, the Medium preset is the clear recommendation, as it is the only setting that provides a consistently playable experience. The average of 74 FPS with a minimum of 63 FPS ensures that the game remains smooth during intense action sequences. The High preset at 62 FPS is borderline, and the minimum FPS is not recorded, which raises concerns about potential stutters. The Ultra preset at 47 FPS is not recommended for 4K, as it falls below the 60 FPS threshold and will result in a noticeably less fluid experience. The Low preset at 97 FPS is the fastest option at 4K, but the visual compromise is substantial. The data clearly indicates that for 4K gaming with this hardware, Medium settings offer the best balance between performance and visual quality.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 combination ranks 885th out of 3712 tested combos in Minimum. This places it in the top 24% of all configurations, which is a respectable position given the game's release date and the hardware's relative modernity. The rank reflects the combination's ability to handle the game's demands across various resolutions and settings. The GPU's 81st percentile ranking among all GPUs and the CPU's 81st percentile ranking among all CPUs suggest that this is a well-matched pair, neither component is significantly holding back the other.

The combo's rank of 885 indicates that there are 884 other configurations that perform better in this specific game. These are likely to include more powerful GPUs such as the RTX 4080 or RTX 4090, or CPUs with higher core counts. However, the data shows that this combination is still capable of delivering high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, and playable frame rates at 4K with adjusted settings. The proximity of the RTX 4070 to its nearest rivals in benchmark scores, such as being 0.1% ahead of the Tesla P4 and 0.4% ahead of the RX Vega 56, indicates that the GPU's performance in Minimum is consistent with its overall compute capabilities. The CPU's closeness to the Ryzen 7 5800XT, with a deltaPct of -0.6%, further reinforces that the system is balanced. The rank of 885 out of 3712 combos is a strong showing, placing this hardware pairing in the upper quartile of all tested configurations for this title.