Minimum

Minimum, the 2014 third-person shooter, shows a fascinating performance profile when paired with the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080. The benchmark data reveals a system that is overwhelmingly GPU-bound at higher resolutions, yet transitions to a more balanced workload as resolution drops, with the CPU's capabilities becoming the ultimate ceiling at 1080p. This combination ranks 246th out of 3,712 tested configurations in this title, placing it in the top 7% of all systems, which indicates a high-performance pairing that still has distinct behavioral characteristics depending on the graphical load.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data shows a clear and predictable pattern of performance degradation as resolution increases, but the rate of that degradation tells a significant story about where the bottleneck lies. At 1080p with Low settings, the system produces an average of 356 FPS. Moving to 1440p at the same Low settings drops that figure to 230 FPS, a reduction of 35.4%. Pushing further to 4K at Low settings yields 124 FPS, which is a 46.1% drop from the 1440p result and a 65.2% drop from the original 1080p figure. This steep decline at lower settings is classic evidence of a GPU that is being fed more pixels than it can process, even at a modest quality preset.

When examining the High preset, the scaling pattern shifts. The system delivers 229 FPS at 1080p, which falls to 148 FPS at 1440p (a 35.4% decrease) and then to 79 FPS at 4K (a 46.6% decrease from 1440p). The consistency of these percentage drops across Low and High settings suggests that the RTX 4080 is the primary limiting factor in both cases, as the relative cost of rendering each frame scales uniformly with pixel count. However, the Ultra preset tells a different story: 174 FPS at 1080p, 112 FPS at 1440p, and 61 FPS at 4K. Here, the drop from 1080p to 1440p is 35.6%, nearly identical to the other presets, but the drop from 1440p to 4K is 45.5%, slightly less severe, hinting that at Ultra settings with 16 GB of VRAM, the GPU is still the dominant constraint, though the margin tightens.

The data indicates that the RTX 4080's rendering pipeline is the limiting component across all resolutions and settings. The FPS drops are substantial and consistent, showing no signs of a CPU-induced plateau even at 1080p Low where the system exceeds 350 FPS. This is notable because many high-refresh-rate scenarios would typically expose a CPU limit at such frame rates, but the Ryzen 5 8400F's 6 cores and 12 threads appear sufficient to keep feeding the GPU even at these extreme output levels. The game's age and its engine's threading model likely contribute to this, as the data shows no point where the CPU prevents the GPU from reaching its full potential.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 8000 series, built on the Zen 4 architecture with a 4 nm process node. Its base clock of 4.20 GHz and boost clock of 4.70 GHz provide the foundational compute power for this pairing. In synthetic benchmarks, this CPU achieves a single-thread score of 951 in 3dmark and a multi-thread score of 6,165 in the max threads test, alongside a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20,851. These figures place it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 25,005.

In the context of Minimum, the CPU's role is to maintain frame pacing and feed the GPU with draw calls and game logic. The benchmark results show that at 1080p Low, the system reaches 356 FPS, which is an exceptionally high frame rate for any title. This performance level demonstrates that the Ryzen 5 8400F is not a bottleneck in this scenario. The processor's nearest rivals, such as the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F with an average score of 24,964 (0.2% lower), and the Intel Core i7-11850H at 24,935 (0.3% lower), are all within a fraction of a percent of its performance, confirming that this is a mid-range CPU that punches above its weight in gaming workloads.

However, the data also reveals that the CPU's performance is not the differentiator in this game. The FPS differences between settings at the same resolution are entirely attributable to GPU workload, not CPU capability. For instance, at 1440p, the system averages 230 FPS on Low, 176 FPS on Medium, 148 FPS on High, and 112 FPS on Ultra. This 2.05x spread from Low to Ultra is a function of the RTX 4080's rendering load, not the CPU's processing power. The Ryzen 5 8400F's 16 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 memory support with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient to avoid stuttering or frame drops, as evidenced by the consistent min FPS figures at Medium settings (232 FPS at 1080p, 149 FPS at 1440p, 80 FPS at 4K).

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 is the undisputed performance driver in this configuration, and its specifications directly explain the measured FPS results. With 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 716.8 GB/s of bandwidth, the GPU has ample resources for Minimum's graphical demands, even at 4K Ultra. The GPU's 9,728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, and 112 ROPs, combined with a boost clock of 2,505 MHz, provide the raw compute necessary to achieve the high frame rates observed.

The GPU's percentile ranking of 86th among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 54,247, places it in the upper echelon of graphics cards. Its nearest rival, the RTX 4080 SUPER, scores 54,209 (0.1% lower), showing that this card is essentially at parity with its successor. In Minimum, the RTX 4080's performance scales predictably with settings: at 4K, it produces 124 FPS on Low, 95 FPS on Medium, 79 FPS on High, and 61 FPS on Ultra. This progression shows that the GPU is the primary constraint, as each increase in quality level demands more shader work and memory bandwidth.

The VRAM capacity of 16 GB is more than sufficient for this game, which was released in 2014 and does not have the massive texture requirements of modern titles. The data shows no signs of memory-related performance drops, as the min FPS at 4K Medium is 80 FPS, which is only 15.8% below the average of 95 FPS, indicating stable frame delivery without paging or texture thrashing. The GPU's 76 ray tracing cores and 304 tensor cores are present on the die, but these features are unlikely to be fully utilized by a 2014 title, making the card's traditional rasterization performance the key metric here.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS achievable with this combo?

A: The highest recorded average FPS is 356 at 1080p with Low settings. This represents the absolute maximum output of the system in the measured data.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested systems?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and RTX 4080 combination ranks 246th out of 3,712 tested combos in Minimum, placing it in the top 6.6% of all configurations.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the primary bottleneck in this game?

A: Benchmark results indicate the GPU is the limiting component at all resolutions. The FPS drops consistently with increasing resolution and settings, with no evidence of a CPU-induced plateau even at 1080p Low where the system exceeds 350 FPS.

Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded for this system?

A: The lowest recorded average FPS is 61 at 4K Ultra settings. The only min FPS figures provided are for Medium settings: 232 FPS at 1080p, 149 FPS at 1440p, and 80 FPS at 4K.

Q: How does the RTX 4080 compare to its closest rival in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The RTX 4080 scores 54,247 on average, while the RTX 4080 SUPER scores 54,209, a difference of only 0.1%. This makes the two cards virtually identical in raw compute performance.

Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming smoothly?

A: Yes, but with caveats. At 4K High, the system averages 79 FPS, which is playable, while 4K Ultra drops to 61 FPS. For a smoother experience, 4K Medium at 95 FPS or 4K Low at 124 FPS are preferable.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 achieves a rank of 246 out of 3,712 tested combos in Minimum. This percentile placement indicates that the system outperforms 93.4% of all configurations tested in this database. The rank is a holistic measure of the pairing's ability to deliver high frame rates across all settings and resolutions, weighted by the raw performance of both components.

The CPU's contribution to this rank is solid but not exceptional. With an average benchmark score of 25,005, the Ryzen 5 8400F sits in the 77th percentile of all CPUs, meaning it is a competent but not top-tier processor. Its nearest rivals, the Ryzen 5 7500F and Intel Core i7-11850H, are within 0.3% of its score, showing that this CPU is at the performance level of other mid-range options. In contrast, the GPU's rank is significantly higher at the 86th percentile, with an average score of 54,247. This disparity suggests that the RTX 4080 is the primary driver of the combo's high overall rank, while the CPU provides sufficient support without becoming a limiting factor.

The rank of 246th out of 3,712 is influenced by the game's age and optimization. Minimum's 2014 engine does not heavily utilize multi-threading, so the CPU's 12 threads are not fully leveraged. However, the data shows that the single-thread performance of the Ryzen 5 8400F, as evidenced by its 3dmark single-thread score of 951 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,943, is more than adequate for this workload. The combo's rank reflects a balanced system where the GPU is the star, and the CPU is a capable supporting player.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend on the user's target resolution and frame rate preference. For 1080p gaming, the High preset at 229 FPS is the recommended choice, as it delivers a smooth experience well above the 144 FPS threshold for high-refresh-rate monitors. The Ultra preset at 174 FPS is also viable for those prioritizing visual fidelity, but the 24% FPS drop from High may not justify the graphical gains in a game of this age.

At 1440p, the Medium preset at 176 FPS offers the best balance of performance and quality, providing a substantial frame rate cushion for G-Sync or FreeSync displays. The High preset at 148 FPS is also excellent and is recommended for users with 144 Hz monitors who want maximum visual detail. The Ultra preset at 112 FPS is playable but may not fully saturate a 144 Hz panel, so it is only advisable for those who prioritize image quality over smoothness.

For 4K, the Medium preset at 95 FPS is the sweet spot, delivering a high frame rate that is well-suited for 60 Hz displays with headroom for future monitoring. The High preset at 79 FPS is also acceptable for 60 Hz gaming, but it sacrifices 16.8% of the frame rate compared to Medium. The Low preset at 124 FPS is overkill for most 4K displays and unnecessarily reduces visual quality. The Ultra preset at 61 FPS is borderline, hovering near the 60 FPS minimum for smooth gameplay, and is not recommended unless the user accepts occasional frame drops.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The complete measured FPS data for the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 in Minimum is as follows:

At 1920x1080, the system achieves 356 FPS on Low, 273 FPS on Medium, 229 FPS on High, and 174 FPS on Ultra. The Medium preset provides min FPS of 232 and max FPS of 313, indicating a 35.4% variance from average, which is typical for a GPU-bound scenario. The Low preset demonstrates the system's absolute ceiling, while the Ultra preset shows a 51.1% reduction from Low, highlighting the cost of maximum quality settings.

At 2560x1440, the FPS figures are 230 on Low, 176 on Medium, 148 on High, and 112 on Ultra. The Medium preset has a min of 149 and max of 202, with a variance of 30.1% from the average. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a 51.3% decrease, nearly identical to the 1080p scaling, confirming that the GPU's workload scales consistently with settings regardless of resolution.

At 3840x2160, the system produces 124 FPS on Low, 95 FPS on Medium, 79 FPS on High, and 61 FPS on Ultra. The Medium preset's min FPS is 80 and max is 109, with a variance of 30.5% from the average. The drop from Low to Ultra is 50.8%, and the 4K results show that even the most demanding setting remains playable, though the Ultra preset is right at the edge of the 60 FPS threshold. These numbers provide a complete picture of the combo's capabilities across all graphical configurations.