Minimum
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 116 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 41 | 54 | 64 | 84 |
| 1440p QHD | 76 | 100 | 119 | 155 |
| 1080p Full HD | 118 | 155 | 184 | 240 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Minimum with AMD Ryzen 5 8400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti combination delivers a performance profile in Minimum that is heavily dictated by resolution, with the GPU acting as the primary scaling factor from 1440p upward. At 1080p, the system demonstrates exceptional headroom, but the transition to 4K reveals the limits of the graphics card’s memory bandwidth and compute resources. This analysis breaks down the measured data to show exactly where this combo excels and where it falls short.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data shows a clear and predictable drop as resolution increases, but the rate of that drop is not uniform across settings. At High settings, the average frame rate falls from 155 FPS at 1920x1080 to 100 FPS at 2560x1440, a reduction of 55 FPS (or roughly 35%). Moving further to 3840x2160, the average drops to 54 FPS, which is a 46% decline from the 1440p result and a 65% decline from the 1080p baseline. This steep curve indicates that the RTX 3070 Ti’s rendering pipeline becomes the limiting factor as pixel count increases.
Low settings present a similar pattern but with higher absolute numbers. At 1080p Low, the combo reaches 240 FPS, which drops to 155 FPS at 1440p and then to 84 FPS at 4K. The relative drop from 1080p to 4K is 65%, identical to the High setting’s proportional loss. This consistency suggests that the scaling penalty is tied to resolution itself rather than the specific graphical workload. Medium settings follow the same trend: 184 FPS at 1080p, 119 FPS at 1440p, and 64 FPS at 4K. The percentage loss from 1080p to 4K is slightly lower at 65.2%, but the pattern remains.
Ultra settings show the most dramatic degradation. The combo averages 118 FPS at 1080p, which falls to 76 FPS at 1440p (a 35.6% drop) and then to 41 FPS at 4K (a 46.1% drop from 1440p). The total loss from 1080p to 4K is 65.3%, matching the other settings. This uniform scaling behavior indicates that the bottleneck is purely resolution-driven, with the GPU’s fill rate and memory bandwidth being the constraining factors rather than any CPU-side limitation. The data suggests that the Ryzen 5 8400F has ample headroom to feed the GPU at all tested resolutions, as the FPS drops are proportional to pixel count increases.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is the dominant component in this pairing, and its specifications directly explain the observed performance. The GPU features 8 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding 608.3 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, as evidenced by the high average FPS figures, but it becomes a limiting factor at 4K. The 4K results, ranging from 41 FPS on Ultra to 84 FPS on Low, suggest that the 8 GB capacity is being stressed, particularly at higher settings where texture data and frame buffers demand more memory.
The GPU’s clock speeds also play a role. With a base clock of 1575 MHz and a boost clock of 1770 MHz, the RTX 3070 Ti maintains consistent performance across resolutions, but the 4K results indicate that the shader units (6144 total) are being fully utilized. The pixel rate of 169.9 GPixel/s and texture rate of 339.8 GTexel/s are adequate for 1080p and 1440p, but at 4K, the sheer number of pixels being processed causes the average FPS to drop below the 60 FPS threshold on High and Ultra settings. The 4K Medium result of 64 FPS with a minimum of 54 FPS confirms that the GPU is nearing its practical limit at this resolution.
The RTX 3070 Ti’s 21.75 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is a strong figure, but the 4K Ultra result of 41 FPS shows that raw compute is not enough to overcome the memory bandwidth wall at higher resolutions. The GPU’s percentile ranking of 75th among all GPUs places it in the upper tier, and its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6800, scores 0.5% higher on average. This competitive positioning is reflected in the measured results, where the combo performs admirably at lower resolutions but struggles to maintain playable frame rates at 4K Ultra.
How This Combo Ranks
Out of 3,712 tested combos, this pairing ranks 1,328th in Minimum. This places it in the 64th percentile of all combinations, meaning it outperforms roughly two-thirds of tested systems. The rank is influenced by both the CPU and GPU, but given the resolution scaling data, the GPU’s contribution is more significant. The Ryzen 5 8400F, with an average benchmark score of 25,005, sits at the 77th percentile among all CPUs, which is a strong showing. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F, scores 24,964, a delta of just 0.2%, indicating that the 8400F is essentially on par with that chip.
The combination’s rank of 1,328 suggests that while the individual components are solid, there are many faster combos in the database. The RTX 3070 Ti’s average benchmark score of 29,945 places it at the 75th percentile among GPUs, and its nearest rival, the RTX 5070 Mobile, scores 29,928, a 0.1% delta. This close competition means that the combo’s rank is largely determined by how well these two mid-to-high-tier parts work together. In Minimum, the data shows they work well at 1080p and 1440p, but the 4K results drag down the overall ranking compared to combos with more powerful GPUs.
The rank also reflects the age of the components. The RTX 3070 Ti is end-of-life, and its successor, the GeForce 40 series, offers higher performance. However, within the context of this database, the combo holds its own, particularly at lower resolutions. The 1,328 rank out of 3,712 is respectable, and it would be higher if the 4K performance were stronger.
FAQ
*Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Minimum?*
A: The data shows that 1920x1080 is the optimal resolution, with average FPS ranging from 118 on Ultra to 240 on Low. At 2560x1440, the average FPS drops to between 76 and 155, which is still playable, but 3840x2160 is only viable on Low settings, where it averages 84 FPS.
Q: How does the RTX 3070 Ti compare to its closest rival in benchmark scores?
A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti has an average benchmark score of 29,945, while its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6800, scores 30,095. This represents a delta of -0.5%, meaning the RX 6800 is slightly faster on average. The RTX 2080 Ti is 0.5% slower, with a score of 29,783.
Q: Is the Ryzen 5 8400F a bottleneck for the RTX 3070 Ti?
A: The benchmark data suggests not. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 25,005 places it at the 77th percentile, and its nearest rival, the Ryzen 5 7500F, is only 0.2% faster. The FPS scaling across resolutions is proportional to pixel count, indicating that the GPU is the limiting factor, not the CPU.
Q: What is the minimum FPS recorded for this combo?
A: The only settings with reported minimum FPS values are Medium at each resolution. At 4K Medium, the minimum is 54 FPS; at 1440p Medium, it is 101 FPS; and at 1080p Medium, it is 156 FPS. These figures suggest that Medium settings provide a stable experience, particularly at lower resolutions.
Q: How does this combo rank among all tested combinations?
A: The combo ranks 1,328th out of 3,712 tested combinations in Minimum. This places it in the upper third of all combos, indicating that it is a capable pairing for this game, though not a top-tier performer.
Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration and how does it affect performance?
A: The RTX 3070 Ti has 8 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 608.3 GB/s of bandwidth. This configuration is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p, but the 4K results indicate that the memory capacity and bandwidth are stretched, particularly on Ultra settings where the average FPS drops to 41.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured FPS data, the best experience for this combo depends on resolution. At 1920x1080, Ultra settings are viable, with an average of 118 FPS. This provides the highest visual quality without sacrificing smoothness. At 2560x1440, High settings are the recommended choice, averaging 100 FPS, which is a good balance between visual fidelity and performance. Ultra at 1440p drops to 76 FPS, which is still playable but may feel less responsive.
At 3840x2160, the data clearly shows that Ultra is not a viable option, with an average of 41 FPS. High settings at 4K average 54 FPS, which is borderline, but Medium settings offer a more stable experience with an average of 64 FPS and a minimum of 54 FPS. Low settings at 4K provide the highest frame rate at 84 FPS, but this comes at a significant visual cost. For the best balance at 4K, Medium settings are recommended, as they stay above the 60 FPS threshold on average and maintain a minimum above 50 FPS.
The Medium settings also have the benefit of recorded minimum and maximum FPS values, which provide confidence in stability. At 1080p Medium, the combo averages 184 FPS with a minimum of 156 FPS and a maximum of 212 FPS. At 1440p Medium, the average is 119 FPS with a minimum of 101 FPS. This consistency makes Medium a safe choice across all resolutions.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F plays a supporting role in this combo, and the data shows it is more than adequate for Minimum. The CPU features 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. Its Zen 4 architecture on the Phoenix codename provides strong single-thread performance, as evidenced by its 3DMark single-thread score of 951 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,943. These scores indicate that the CPU can handle the game’s physics and AI calculations without becoming a bottleneck.
The CPU’s multi-threaded performance is also solid, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20,851 and a 3DMark max-threads score of 6,165. This ensures that background tasks and game threads are processed efficiently. The 16 MB of shared L3 cache provides fast access to frequently used data, which is beneficial for gaming workloads. The CPU’s percentile ranking of 77th among all CPUs reinforces its capability.
In the context of Minimum, the CPU’s role is to feed the GPU with draw calls and process game logic. The FPS scaling data shows that the CPU is not limiting performance at any resolution, as the frame rates drop proportionally with pixel count. The nearest CPU rival, the Ryzen 5 7500F, has an average score of 24,964, which is 0.2% lower than the 8400F’s 25,005. This close margin means that swapping to the rival CPU would have a negligible impact on in-game performance. The 8400F’s 65W TDP also indicates efficient operation, though this is not directly reflected in the FPS data.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of performance across all settings and resolutions. At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its best results. Low settings average 240 FPS, which is the highest recorded figure. Medium settings average 184 FPS, with a minimum of 156 FPS and a maximum of 212 FPS. High settings average 155 FPS, and Ultra settings average 118 FPS. These numbers indicate that the combo is capable of high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p, even on the most demanding preset.
At 2560x1440, the performance drops but remains strong. Low settings average 155 FPS, Medium settings average 119 FPS with a minimum of 101 FPS and a maximum of 137 FPS, High settings average 100 FPS, and Ultra settings average 76 FPS. This resolution is well-suited for the combo, as even Ultra stays above 60 FPS. The Medium preset shows good stability, with the minimum and maximum values indicating consistent frame delivery.
At 3840x2160, the combo’s limitations become apparent. Low settings average 84 FPS, which is playable. Medium settings average 64 FPS, with a minimum of 54 FPS and a maximum of 74 FPS, providing a playable experience but with occasional dips. High settings average 54 FPS, which is borderline, and Ultra settings average 41 FPS, which is not smooth. The 4K data shows that the RTX 3070 Ti’s 8 GB memory and bandwidth are insufficient for the highest settings at this resolution. The minimum FPS values for Medium settings at each resolution—54 at 4K, 101 at 1440p, and 156 at 1080p—provide a reference for stability, with the 1080p Medium result being particularly robust.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 8400F
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 8400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti in Minimum
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 84.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 64.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 54.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 41.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 155.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 119.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 100.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 76.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 240.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 184.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 155.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 118.0 |
Minimum with Ryzen 5 8400F + Other GPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Minimum with RTX 3070 Ti + Other CPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 8400F + RTX 3070 Ti
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.