Minimum
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 117 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 43 | 57 | 65 | 85 |
| 1440p QHD | 79 | 103 | 120 | 157 |
| 1080p Full HD | 116 | 154 | 187 | 240 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Minimum with AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, In-Depth Analysis
How This Combo Ranks
The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti lands at rank 678 out of 1,733 tested combos for Minimum. That places this configuration in the top 39% of all tested pairings, a solidly above-median position for a game released in 2014. The ranking reflects a pairing where the GPU is clearly the dominant performance driver, but the CPU is sufficient to avoid becoming a bottleneck at most settings.
The CPU itself sits at the 78th percentile among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 20,740. Its nearest rivals are extremely close: the Intel Core i7-10700 scores 20,746 (a 0% delta), the Intel Core i5-12490F scores 20,794 (-0.3%), and the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X scores 20,680 (+0.3%). These deltas are within noise, meaning the 5600GT is effectively tied with several well-known mid-range processors from both Intel and AMD. The single-thread performance, as measured by 3DMark's single-thread test at 913 and Cinebench R23 single-core at 2,438, suggests this CPU handles older game engines like Minimum's without issue.
The GPU ranks at the 74th percentile among all graphics cards, with an average benchmark score of 30,849. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 590 GME at 30,755 (+0.3%), the AMD Radeon RX 6700 at 31,112 (-0.8%), and the NVIDIA Quadro M5000 at 31,142 (-0.9%). The RTX 3070 Ti is thus bracketed by a mix of older and newer cards, with the RX 6700 being the closest modern competitor. The combination's overall rank of 678 suggests that while the GPU is strong, the CPU's mid-range standing prevents this from being a top-tier combo for Minimum.
GPU Role
The RTX 3070 Ti brings 8 GB of GDDR6X memory across a 256-bit bus, yielding 608.3 GB/s of bandwidth. For a 2014 third-person shooter like Minimum, this memory configuration is more than adequate. The card's base clock of 1,575 MHz and boost clock of 1,770 MHz, combined with 6,144 shading units and 192 texture mapping units, provide substantial raw compute. The 21.75 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is the headline number here, giving this GPU enough headroom for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1080p and even 1440p.
The memory clock runs at 1,188 MHz, translating to 19 Gbps effective. This bandwidth matters more at higher resolutions where texture streaming and memory access patterns become more demanding. In Minimum, the data shows that the GPU is the limiting factor at 4K, where frame rates drop noticeably regardless of settings. The 48 ray tracing cores and 192 tensor cores are present but largely irrelevant for this older title, which predates widespread RT adoption. The card's 96 ROPs and 339.8 GTexel/s texture rate ensure that even at Ultra settings, the primary constraint will be pixel throughput rather than texture fill.
At 1080p, the GPU is not fully utilized, as frame rates reach as high as 240.1 FPS on Low settings. This suggests that at lower resolutions, the CPU becomes more relevant, though the 5600GT's 6 cores and 12 threads with a 4.60 GHz boost clock appear capable of keeping pace. The GPU's 290 W TDP and suggested 600 W PSU are not performance factors but contextualize the hardware requirements.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data reveals a clear pattern of GPU-bound scaling as resolution increases. At 1080p High, the combo delivers 153.7 FPS, which drops to 103.1 FPS at 1440p High (-32.9%), and further to 56.8 FPS at 4K High (-63.1% from 1080p). This steep decline indicates the RTX 3070 Ti is the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions, as the CPU's workload does not scale proportionally with pixel count.
The Low settings tell a similar story but with higher absolute numbers. At 1080p Low, the combo hits 240.1 FPS, dropping to 156.5 FPS at 1440p (-34.8%) and 85 FPS at 4K (-64.6%). The consistency of these percentage drops across settings suggests that resolution scaling is uniform and GPU-bound. At 1080p Ultra, the frame rate is 116 FPS, which drops to 79.1 FPS at 1440p (-31.8%) and 42.6 FPS at 4K (-63.3%). The Ultra settings at 4K produce the lowest measured result, 42.6 FPS, which is just below the 60 FPS threshold many players consider optimal.
The delta between Low and Ultra at each resolution shows the GPU's headroom. At 1080p, the gap is 124.1 FPS (240.1 vs 116), at 1440p it is 77.4 FPS (156.5 vs 79.1), and at 4K it is 42.4 FPS (85 vs 42.6). This narrowing gap at higher resolutions confirms that the GPU is the bottleneck at 4K, while at 1080p, the CPU begins to limit the maximum achievable frame rate, particularly on Low settings where the GPU could otherwise push even higher.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its highest frame rates. Low settings produce 240.1 FPS average, Medium drops to 187.3 FPS, High to 153.7 FPS, and Ultra to 116 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra represents a 51.7% reduction in frame rate, which is a typical range for a title of this era. The 116 FPS at Ultra is still well above the 60 FPS standard, making this resolution fully playable at maximum settings.
Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain strong. Low settings yield 156.5 FPS, Medium 119.8 FPS, High 103.1 FPS, and Ultra 79.1 FPS. The Ultra result at 79.1 FPS is the only setting at this resolution that dips below 100 FPS, but it remains comfortably above 60 FPS. The step from Low to Ultra at 1440p is a 49.5% drop, slightly less than at 1080p, indicating the GPU is beginning to feel the pixel load.
At 3840x2160, the frame rates show the GPU's limits. Low settings produce 85 FPS, Medium 64.6 FPS, High 56.8 FPS, and Ultra 42.6 FPS. The Ultra setting at 4K is the only configuration in the entire dataset that falls below 60 FPS, and it does so by a significant margin. The Medium setting at 64.6 FPS is borderline, while Low at 85 FPS is playable. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 4K is a 49.9% reduction, consistent with the other resolutions, but the absolute numbers are much lower.
The data shows a consistent pattern: at 1080p and 1440p, all settings are playable at 60 FPS or above, with most exceeding 100 FPS. At 4K, only Low and Medium settings maintain 60 FPS or better, and even Medium is marginal. Players targeting 4K should use Medium settings for a stable experience, while those at 1440p can comfortably run Ultra.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution and settings combination for this combo in Minimum?
A: At 1920x1080 Ultra, the combo delivers 116 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold. At 2560x1440 Ultra, it drops to 79.1 FPS, still playable. The 3840x2160 Ultra setting produces only 42.6 FPS, so 4K users should drop to Medium (64.6 FPS) or Low (85 FPS) for a smoother experience.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-10700?
A: The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT has an average benchmark score of 20,740, essentially identical to the Intel Core i7-10700 at 20,746, with a 0% delta. The two processors are effectively tied in overall performance, making the choice between them dependent on platform preferences rather than raw capability.
Q: Is the GPU or CPU the limiting factor at 4K in this game?
A: The data indicates the GPU is the limiting factor at 4K. Frame rates drop by roughly 63% from 1080p to 4K across all settings, which is a pixel-throughput-bound pattern. The RTX 3070 Ti's 8 GB of GDDR6X and 608.3 GB/s bandwidth cannot sustain high frame rates at 4K Ultra, whereas the CPU shows no such scaling issue.
Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra at 1440p?
A: At 2560x1440, Low settings produce 156.5 FPS while Ultra produces 79.1 FPS, a difference of 77.4 FPS. This 49.5% reduction demonstrates the significant impact of graphical settings on performance at this resolution.
Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations for Minimum?
A: The combo ranks 678th out of 1,733 tested combinations, placing it in the top 39% of all pairings. This is a respectable position, though not elite, reflecting the mid-range CPU paired with a high-end GPU.
Q: Can this combo maintain 60 FPS at all settings and resolutions tested?
A: No. The 3840x2160 Ultra setting produces only 42.6 FPS, which is below 60 FPS. All other tested configurations — including 4K High at 56.8 FPS — fall short of 60 FPS at 4K, while every 1080p and 1440p setting exceeds 60 FPS.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti in Minimum
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 85.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 64.6 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 56.8 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 42.6 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 156.5 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 119.8 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 103.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 79.1 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 240.1 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 187.3 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 153.7 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 116.0 |
Minimum with Ryzen 5 5600GT + Other GPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Minimum with RTX 3070 Ti + Other CPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 5600GT + RTX 3070 Ti
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.