Minimum

Minimum

AVERAGE FPS
144
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 144 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 51 67 80 104
1440p QHD 95 124 148 193
1080p Full HD 147 193 230 299

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 104
3840x2160 Medium 80
3840x2160 High 67
3840x2160 Ultra 51
2560x1440 Low 193
2560x1440 Medium 148
2560x1440 High 124
2560x1440 Ultra 95
1920x1080 Low 299
1920x1080 Medium 230
1920x1080 High 193
1920x1080 Ultra 147

Minimum with AMD Ryzen 5 5600F + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT pairing delivers a remarkably consistent experience in Minimum, a 2014 Third-Person Shooter. The data shows this combination is capable of high refresh rates at standard resolutions and remains playable even at 4K, though the settings menu requires careful selection to balance visual fidelity against frame rate demands.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS rows provide a clear hierarchy of performance across the four available presets. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset produces an average of 147 FPS, which is more than sufficient for a smooth experience on any standard 144Hz monitor. However, dropping to High increases the average to 193 FPS, a substantial 31% uplift that can be crucial for competitive play or for users with higher refresh rate displays. The Low preset reaches 299 FPS, effectively removing any CPU or GPU bottleneck at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset averages 95 FPS, which is playable but leaves little headroom for demanding scenes. The High preset, averaging 124 FPS, is the sweet spot for 1440p, offering a 30% improvement over Ultra while maintaining a strong level of visual quality. The Medium preset, with an average of 148 FPS and a minimum of 126 FPS, is the safest choice for maintaining a locked frame rate above 120 FPS, as the minimum FPS data shows it does not dip below that threshold.

At 3840x2160, the situation changes dramatically. The Ultra preset averages only 51 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target most users expect. The High preset improves this to 67 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for fast-paced action. The Medium preset, with an average of 80 FPS and a minimum of 68 FPS, is the recommended starting point for 4K. It provides a significant performance boost over High while remaining visually acceptable. The Low preset reaches 104 FPS at 4K, proving the hardware has headroom to spare when visual effects are minimized.

The best overall experience depends on the user's display. For 1080p, the High preset offers the best balance, as the jump to Ultra costs 46 FPS for marginal visual improvements. For 1440p, the Medium preset is the most consistent choice, with its minimum FPS data (126 FPS) ensuring no stutter. For 4K, the Medium preset is the only viable option for a consistently smooth experience, as the High preset's 67 FPS average leaves no safety margin.

How This Combo Ranks

This specific combination of the Ryzen 5 5600F and RX 7900 XT ranks 537 out of 2939 tested combos in Minimum. This places it in the top 18% of all configurations tested, which is a strong result for a system built around a mid-range CPU paired with a high-end GPU. The ranking reflects that while the CPU is not the fastest available, the GPU's raw power is able to push frame rates to high levels in this title.

The combo rank indicates that this pairing is well-balanced for this game, avoiding significant bottlenecks. The 5600F's six cores and 12 threads, combined with the RX 7900 XT's massive 20 GB VRAM and high compute throughput, work together efficiently. The data shows that the system is not severely limited by either component, as the frame rates scale predictably with resolution and settings changes.

A rank of 537 out of 2939 also suggests that a large number of competing builds, likely featuring newer or more expensive CPUs, do not perform significantly better. This is indicative of a game that is more dependent on GPU performance than CPU performance, allowing the 5600F to hold its own against more modern processors. The percentile ranking of the individual components supports this: the CPU is in the 85th percentile, while the GPU is in the 55th percentile, but the combined result is still strong.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is the primary driver of performance in Minimum. Its specifications, including a boost clock of 2394 MHz and a game clock of 2025 MHz, provide substantial compute power. The GPU's 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 320-bit bus delivers 800.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is more than sufficient for a game released in 2014, ensuring no texture streaming or memory capacity issues at any settings level.

The GPU's architecture, RDNA 3.0, and its 84 RT cores are not heavily utilized by this older title, but the raw shading power of 5376 shading units is what drives the high frame rates. The FP32 performance of 51.48 TFLOPS is excessive for this game, meaning the GPU is rarely the limiting factor at lower resolutions. The data confirms this: at 1080p Low, the system reaches 299 FPS, likely hitting a CPU or engine-level frame cap rather than a GPU limit.

The RX 7900 XT's benchmark scores are also informative. Its Passmark G3D score of 29009 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 71068 indicate high DirectX and Vulkan performance. However, the game's age means it likely relies on older APIs, where the GPU's DirectX 11 score of 340 and DirectX 12 score of 110 show it is still capable. The GPU's percentile rank of 55 is lower than its raw performance suggests, but this is due to the benchmark database including all GPUs, including many that are not relevant to gaming. In Minimum, the GPU's performance is clearly sufficient to drive high refresh rates at 1440p and playable frame rates at 4K.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of performance across resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the system delivers an average of 299 FPS on Low, 230 FPS on Medium (with a minimum of 195 FPS and maximum of 264 FPS), 193 FPS on High, and 147 FPS on Ultra. This shows a clear progression where each settings tier reduces performance by roughly 20-25%, except for the jump from High to Ultra, which costs 46 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the averages are 193 FPS on Low, 148 FPS on Medium (minimum 126 FPS, maximum 170 FPS), 124 FPS on High, and 95 FPS on Ultra. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a performance drop of approximately 35% at each settings level, which is expected given the increase in pixel count. The Medium preset at 1440p provides a minimum FPS of 126, which is the only measured minimum data point that holds above 120 FPS at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the averages drop to 104 FPS on Low, 80 FPS on Medium (minimum 68 FPS, maximum 92 FPS), 67 FPS on High, and 51 FPS on Ultra. The jump from 1440p to 4K represents a 46% reduction in frame rate, which is steeper than the 1080p to 1440p drop. This indicates that 4K is where the GPU's memory bandwidth and compute limits begin to show, even with a 20 GB frame buffer. The Medium preset at 4K, with its 68 FPS minimum, is the lowest playable configuration that avoids frequent drops below 60 FPS.

FAQ

Q: What is the best settings preset for 1440p gaming with this combo?

A: The Medium preset is the best choice for 2560x1440, as it averages 148 FPS with a minimum of 126 FPS. This provides a consistent frame rate above 120 FPS, whereas the High preset averages 124 FPS but does not have a reported minimum to guarantee consistency.

*Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Minimum?*

A: Yes, but with caveats. At 3840x2160, the High preset averages 67 FPS, and the Medium preset averages 80 FPS with a minimum of 68 FPS. The Ultra preset averages only 51 FPS, which is not smooth. The Medium preset is the recommended 4K option.

Q: How does the CPU affect performance at 1080p?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600F is likely the limiting factor at 1920x1080 Low, where the system reaches 299 FPS. This high frame rate suggests the CPU is nearing its maximum throughput, as the GPU is more than capable of rendering frames faster than this.

Q: What is the performance difference between High and Ultra settings?

A: The difference is significant. At 1080p, High averages 193 FPS while Ultra averages 147 FPS, a 46 FPS drop. At 1440p, High averages 124 FPS while Ultra averages 95 FPS, a 29 FPS drop. At 4K, High averages 67 FPS while Ultra averages 51 FPS, a 16 FPS drop.

Q: Is the RX 7900 XT's 20 GB VRAM necessary for this game?

A: No, a game from 2014 will not use anywhere near 20 GB of VRAM. However, the large memory pool and 800.0 GB/s bandwidth ensure that there are no texture streaming or memory allocation bottlenecks at any resolution or settings level.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to other systems tested?

A: This combination ranks 537 out of 2939 tested combos in Minimum, placing it in the top 18% of all configurations. This is a strong result, indicating that the pairing is well-suited for this game.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F plays a supporting but essential role in this configuration. Its six cores and 12 threads, based on the Zen 3 architecture, provide sufficient processing power to feed the RX 7900 XT. The CPU's base clock of 3.00 GHz and boost clock of 4.00 GHz are modest by today's standards, yet the Passmark single-thread score of 2872 and multithread score of 19236 show it is still a capable performer.

In Minimum, a game from 2014, the CPU is not heavily taxed. The game's engine is likely optimized for fewer threads, meaning the 5600F's high single-thread performance is more important than its core count. The data supports this: the CPU's Passmark find prime numbers score of 120 and floating point math score of 34548 are respectable, but the game's frame rates are more closely tied to the GPU's output.

The CPU's 32 MB of shared L3 cache is beneficial for gaming, as it reduces memory latency and improves data access patterns. The dual-channel DDR4 memory support with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth is not a bottleneck, as the GPU has its own dedicated memory. The CPU's percentile rank of 85 indicates it outperforms the majority of all CPUs, which is why it does not hold back the RX 7900 XT in this title.

The 5600F's power characteristics, with a 65W TDP, are not directly relevant to gaming performance but do indicate it runs cool and leaves thermal headroom. The CPU's performance relative to its nearest rivals is interesting: it scores nearly identically to the Intel Core Ultra 5 225, with a deltaPct of 0, and is only 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D. This means that in Minimum, swapping to a rival CPU would have virtually no impact on frame rates, as the game is not CPU-bound at most settings. The CPU's role is to ensure a stable frame delivery, which it does effectively, as evidenced by the consistent minimum FPS data at Medium settings.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 5 5600F

Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Base Clock 3000 MHz
Boost Clock 4000 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket AMD Socket AM4
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

VRAM 20 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2394 MHz MHz
TDP 300 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 5600F + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT in Minimum

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 104.0
3840x2160 Medium 80.0
3840x2160 High 67.0
3840x2160 Ultra 51.0
2560x1440 Low 193.0
2560x1440 Medium 148.0
2560x1440 High 124.0
2560x1440 Ultra 95.0
1920x1080 Low 299.0
1920x1080 Medium 230.0
1920x1080 High 193.0
1920x1080 Ultra 147.0

Minimum with Ryzen 5 5600F + Other GPUs

See how Minimum performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Minimum with RX 7900 XT + Other CPUs

See how Minimum performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 5 5600F + RX 7900 XT

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.