Minimum
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 90 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 32 | 42 | 50 | 65 |
| 1440p QHD | 59 | 78 | 92 | 121 |
| 1080p Full HD | 92 | 120 | 143 | 187 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Minimum with AMD Ryzen 5 2600 + AMD Radeon RX 9060, In-Depth Analysis
# Minimum — AMD Ryzen 5 2600 + AMD Radeon RX 9060
The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9060 delivers a solid 1080p experience in Minimum, a 2014 third-person shooter that remains popular for its fast-paced action. The measured data shows this combo achieving triple-digit frame rates at 1080p across most settings, with performance scaling predictably as resolution increases. The GPU's RDNA 4.0 architecture and the CPU's 6-core/12-thread Zen design combine to produce a balanced system, though the data reveals where each component becomes the limiting factor.
Resolution Scaling
The frame rate drop from 1080p to 4K is steep and consistent across all settings, indicating that the GPU becomes the dominant constraint at higher resolutions. At Low settings, the average FPS falls from 187 at 1920x1080 to 121 at 2560x1440 — a 35% reduction — and further to 65 at 3840x2160, representing a 65% drop from the 1080p baseline. This scaling pattern is typical of a GPU-bound scenario where pixel count outpaces the rendering capabilities of the Radeon RX 9060.
At High settings, the trend continues: 120 FPS at 1080p drops to 78 FPS at 1440p (a 35% reduction) and then to 42 FPS at 4K (a 65% drop from 1080p). The consistency of these percentage reductions across Low and High presets suggests that the GPU's shading units and memory bandwidth are the primary factors limiting performance, rather than any CPU-side bottleneck. The RX 9060's 128-bit memory bus and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth appear sufficient for 1080p and 1440p workloads but become strained at 4K, where the 8 GB GDDR6 frame buffer also nears its capacity.
The Medium preset shows a similar pattern, with 143 FPS at 1080p, 92 FPS at 1440p, and 50 FPS at 4K. The Ultra preset, which demands the most from the GPU, drops from 92 FPS at 1080p to 59 FPS at 1440p and finally to 32 FPS at 4K — a 65% reduction from 1080p to 4K, matching the other presets. This uniform scaling behavior indicates that resolution, not settings complexity, is the primary driver of frame rate degradation.
The data suggests that 4K gaming is only viable at Low settings, where the 65 FPS average is playable but far from the fluid experience available at lower resolutions. At 1440p, all presets except Ultra remain above 78 FPS, making this resolution the sweet spot for balancing visual quality and performance. The 1080p results, with averages ranging from 92 FPS at Ultra to 187 FPS at Low, confirm that this combo is well-suited for high-refresh-rate monitors at the native resolution of most gamers.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 9060, built on the Navi 44 chip with RDNA 4.0 architecture, provides the graphical horsepower for this combo. Its boost clock of 2990 MHz and game clock of 2400 MHz are the key enablers for the high frame rates observed at 1080p. The GPU's 1792 shading units and 112 texture mapping units deliver a texture rate of 334.9 GTexel/s, which is sufficient to handle Minimum's third-person shooter environments without introducing texture-related stutters.
The 8 GB GDDR6 memory operates at 2250 MHz with an 18 Gbps effective data rate, providing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth across a 128-bit bus. For a game released in 2014, this memory configuration is more than adequate at 1080p and 1440p, where the measured FPS remains high. However, at 4K, the combination of higher pixel count and larger texture working sets begins to tax the memory subsystem, likely contributing to the significant FPS drops observed at 3840x2160.
The GPU's average benchmark score of 16014 places it in the 59th percentile of all GPUs, with nearest rivals including the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (avg score 16129, 0.7% higher) and the AMD Radeon RX 7700 (avg score 15852, 1% lower). This positioning suggests the RX 9060 is a mid-to-upper-tier performer, consistent with the measured FPS results in Minimum. The GPU's FP32 performance of 21.43 TFLOPS and pixel rate of 191.4 GPixel/s provide ample compute for a game of this era, even at elevated settings.
The RDNA 4.0 architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process, includes 28 ray tracing cores, though Minimum does not appear to leverage this feature based on the measured data. The GPU's DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2) ensures compatibility with modern APIs, but the game's 2014 release date likely uses older rendering paths, allowing the RX 9060 to operate well within its capabilities.
FAQ
*Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Minimum?*
A: The data shows 2560x1440 as the optimal resolution, with all presets except Ultra maintaining at least 78 FPS. At 1080p, the combo delivers 92-187 FPS depending on settings, while 4K drops to 32-65 FPS across the same preset range.
Q: How does the RX 9060 compare to its nearest GPU rivals?
A: The RX 9060's average benchmark score of 16014 is 0.7% below the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (16129) and 1% above the AMD Radeon RX 7700 (15852). It also sits 2.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 (15679).
*Q: Is the 8 GB VRAM sufficient for Minimum?*
A: Based on the measured FPS data, 8 GB of GDDR6 memory is sufficient at all tested resolutions and settings. The game, released in 2014, does not appear to exceed this capacity, as performance scales consistently with resolution rather than showing sudden frame drops indicative of VRAM exhaustion.
Q: What frame rate can I expect at 1080p with High settings?
A: The measured average is 120 FPS at 1920x1080 with High settings. This drops to 78 FPS at 1440p and 42 FPS at 4K, showing the GPU's performance envelope as resolution increases.
Q: How does the Ryzen 5 2600's CPU performance affect gaming?
A: The CPU's multi-threaded score of 13160 in PassMark and 1248 in Cinebench R15 multicore indicate it can keep up with the GPU at 1080p and 1440p, where the measured FPS remains high. The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient for this 2014 title, which likely does not utilize more than a few threads.
Q: Is 4K gaming viable with this combo?
A: At 4K, the combo achieves 65 FPS on Low settings, 50 FPS on Medium, 42 FPS on High, and 32 FPS on Ultra. Only the Low preset provides a consistently playable experience above 60 FPS, suggesting 4K is not the intended use case for this hardware.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its strongest results. Low settings produce an average of 187 FPS, while Medium achieves 143 FPS with a minimum of 122 and maximum of 165. High settings yield 120 FPS, and Ultra drops to 92 FPS. These numbers indicate that the RX 9060 operates comfortably at 1080p, with even the most demanding preset maintaining near-100 FPS averages.
Moving to 2560x1440, performance scales down proportionally. Low settings average 121 FPS, Medium averages 92 FPS with a range of 79 to 106 FPS, High averages 78 FPS, and Ultra drops to 59 FPS. The 1440p results show that Medium and High presets remain highly playable, while Ultra approaches the edge of the 60 FPS threshold.
At 3840x2160, the GPU's limitations become apparent. Low settings average 65 FPS, Medium averages 50 FPS with a minimum of 42 and maximum of 57, High averages 42 FPS, and Ultra averages 32 FPS. The 4K results demonstrate that this combo is not designed for ultra-high-resolution gaming, with only Low settings providing a smooth experience.
The Medium preset is the only setting with recorded minimum and maximum FPS values, showing a 15 FPS spread at 1080p (122-165), a 27 FPS spread at 1440p (79-106), and a 15 FPS spread at 4K (42-57). This variance suggests that the GPU maintains consistent frame pacing across resolutions, with no signs of severe stuttering or frame-time spikes.
How This Combo Ranks
The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 + AMD Radeon RX 9060 combination ranks 1677 out of 2939 tested combos in Minimum, placing it in the upper-middle tier of all configurations. This ranking reflects the hardware's balance: the CPU's 75th percentile standing among all processors (average benchmark score of 21484) pairs with the GPU's 59th percentile position to produce solid, though not exceptional, gaming performance.
The CPU's nearest rivals in benchmark scores include the Intel Core Ultra 5 228V (avg score 21440, 0.2% lower), Intel Core i9-11900H (21367, 0.5% lower), Intel Xeon D-1746TER (21635, 0.7% higher), and AMD EPYC 9454 (21223, 1.2% lower). These rivals span mobile, desktop, and server segments, indicating the Ryzen 5 2600's multi-threaded performance remains competitive despite its 2018 release date.
The combo's rank of 1677 out of 2939 suggests that roughly 57% of tested configurations outperform it in Minimum. This is consistent with the GPU's mid-tier positioning; while the RX 9060 is a capable 1080p card, the 4K performance gap reveals its limits. The rank also reflects the CPU's age — the Zen architecture, while still functional, is outclassed by newer processors in single-threaded workloads, which can matter in CPU-bound scenarios.
Settings Recommendations
For 1080p gaming, the data supports using High settings as the optimal balance. The 120 FPS average at High is well above the 60 FPS threshold and only 23 FPS lower than Medium's 143 FPS, while offering improved visual fidelity. Ultra at 92 FPS remains playable but provides diminishing returns over High for a 28 FPS cost. Low at 187 FPS is unnecessary for most displays, making High the recommended preset for 1080p.
At 1440p, Medium settings provide the best experience. The 92 FPS average with a minimum of 79 FPS ensures smooth gameplay, while High's 78 FPS is still acceptable but closer to the edge. Ultra's 59 FPS falls below the 60 FPS ideal, making Medium the safe choice for consistent performance.
For 4K, Low settings are the only viable option. The 65 FPS average at Low is playable, but Medium's 50 FPS and High's 42 FPS introduce noticeable frame rate drops. Ultra at 32 FPS is not recommended for competitive play. Users prioritizing 4K should accept the visual compromise of Low settings or consider lowering the resolution to 1440p.
Across all resolutions, the Medium preset shows the most stable frame pacing, with the smallest variance between minimum and maximum FPS relative to its average. This consistency makes Medium a reliable choice for users who prioritize smoothness over absolute visual quality.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 5 2600, with 6 cores and 12 threads, provides the computational foundation for this combo. Its base clock of 3.40 GHz and boost clock of 3.90 GHz are modest by modern standards, but the CPU's 16 MB of shared L3 cache helps mitigate latency in gaming workloads. The CPU's 65 W TDP and AM4 socket compatibility make it an efficient, accessible platform.
In Minimum, a game from 2014, the CPU's role is likely secondary to the GPU at higher resolutions. The measured FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K shows consistent percentage drops across settings, indicating GPU-bound performance. However, at 1080p with Low settings (187 FPS), the CPU's single-threaded performance may become a factor, as the PassMark single-thread score of 2239 and Geekbench single-core score of 1154 are modest.
The CPU's multi-threaded capabilities, evidenced by a PassMark multi-thread score of 13160 and Cinebench R15 multicore score of 1248, ensure that background tasks and game threads are handled without introducing bottlenecks. The 12 threads allow for efficient parallel processing, which can benefit games that offload physics or AI to separate threads. The CPU's 75th percentile ranking among all processors confirms it remains a capable mid-range option.
The 46.9 GB/s dual-channel memory bandwidth and DDR4 support provide adequate data throughput for the GPU, especially at 1080p and 1440p where the measured FPS remains high. The PCIe Gen 3 x16 interface, while older than the GPU's PCIe 5.0 capability, does not appear to limit performance in this title, as the data shows no unusual frame drops that would indicate bandwidth constraints.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
AMD Radeon RX 9060
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 2600 + AMD Radeon RX 9060 in Minimum
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 65.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 50.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 42.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 32.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 121.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 92.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 78.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 59.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 187.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 143.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 120.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 92.0 |
Minimum with Ryzen 5 2600 + Other GPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Minimum with RX 9060 + Other CPUs
See how Minimum performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 2600 + RX 9060
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.