Minecraft
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 346 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 97 | 156 | 196 | 248 |
| 1440p QHD | 186 | 298 | 376 | 475 |
| 1080p Full HD | 296 | 473 | 596 | 752 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Minecraft with Intel Core i7-13700K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, In-Depth Analysis
Minecraft with the Intel Core i7-13700K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER lands at rank 358 out of 3710 tested combos, placing it in the top 10% of all configurations in the database. This is a strong showing, but the data suggests the pairing is not at the absolute frontier of performance for this title; rather, it sits comfortably in the upper echelon, offering a high-refresh-rate experience across all resolution tiers. The combination of a 16-core Raptor Lake CPU and an Ada Lovelace GPU with 16 GB of VRAM appears well-balanced for a game that scales heavily with both single-thread speed and raw pixel throughput.
How This Combo Ranks
The comboRankInGame of 358 out of 3710 indicates that 3,352 other CPU-GPU pairings were slower in this specific benchmark suite. This percentile placement of roughly 90.3% is notable, but it also reveals that there is a significant headroom of faster configurations above it. For context, the CPU itself holds a percentileVsAllCpus of 89, while the GPU sits at a percentileVsAllGpus of 76. This discrepancy is interesting: the processor is more exceptional relative to its peers than the graphics card is to its own. The data implies that in Minecraft, the CPU's strong single-core and multi-core performance is doing substantial heavy lifting, potentially allowing the GPU to operate near its limits without being bottlenecked by the processor. The rank being lower than the CPU's percentile suggests that the GPU, while capable, is the component that prevents this combo from climbing higher up the list. Looking at the CPU's nearest rivals, the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 is only 0.2% faster in average score, and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 is 0.3% faster, placing the i7-13700K in a tight competitive cluster. The GPU's nearest rivals, such as the NVIDIA TITAN RTX, are 1.9% slower, which confirms that the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is positioned well within the high-end tier but not at the pinnacle of the GPU hierarchy.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is a 16 GB GDDR6X card with a 256-bit memory bus, providing a bandwidth of 672.3 GB/s. This memory configuration is critical for Minecraft, especially when considering high-resolution textures and distant rendering, as the data shows the card can handle 4K Ultra settings. The GPU's base clock is 2340 MHz with a boost clock of 2610 MHz, and its architecture, Ada Lovelace, includes 8448 shading units and 66 RT cores. The FP32 performance is listed at 44.10 TFLOPS, which is substantial for rasterization-heavy workloads. In the measured FPS data, the GPU demonstrates a clear scaling pattern with settings. At 1920x1080, the jump from Low (752 FPS) to Ultra (296 FPS) shows a 61% drop, indicating that the card is not the primary limit at lower resolutions; instead, it is the CPU and render thread that cap the framerate. However, at 3840x2160, the same settings change results in a drop from 248 FPS to 97 FPS, which is a 61% reduction as well, but the absolute numbers suggest the GPU is becoming a more significant factor. The 16 GB VRAM allocation is generous for this game, which is known for modded texture packs; the data indicates that even at 4K Ultra, the card does not run into memory capacity issues, as the average FPS of 97 is still playable, albeit not ideal for high-refresh displays. The GPU's passmark_g3d score of 31811 places it at the 76th percentile, which aligns with its measured performance in this title.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured FPS rows, the optimal experience depends on the target refresh rate and resolution. At 1920x1080, the High preset delivers 473 FPS, which is far beyond any standard monitor's refresh rate, making it a waste of potential; even the Ultra preset at 296 FPS is excessive for 144Hz displays. The Medium preset at 596 FPS offers a comfortable margin, but all settings at this resolution are playable. For 2560x1440, the High preset at 298 FPS is the sweet spot for 144Hz and even 240Hz monitors, while Ultra at 186 FPS still provides a high-refresh experience for most displays. The Medium preset at 376 FPS is overkill, suggesting that users can push to Ultra without significant risk. At 3840x2160, the High preset at 156 FPS is the recommended choice for 144Hz 4K panels, as it provides a smooth experience. The Ultra preset at 97 FPS is suitable for 60Hz displays or for players who prioritize visual fidelity over raw framerate; however, it is not ideal for competitive play. The Low preset at 4K (248 FPS) is unnecessary, as it sacrifices too much visual quality for framerates that most 4K monitors cannot display. The data suggests that High is the balanced preset for this combo, offering the best ratio of visual quality to FPS across all resolutions, with Medium as a fallback for those wanting extra headroom.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the data shows a clear hierarchy: Low runs at 752 FPS, Medium at 596 FPS, High at 473 FPS, and Ultra at 296 FPS. The Medium preset includes a min FPS of 506 and max of 685, indicating a stable frame time distribution. The gap between High and Ultra is significant, at 177 FPS, which suggests that the Ultra preset introduces effects that are disproportionately taxing. Moving to 2560x1440, the scores are Low 475 FPS, Medium 376 FPS, High 298 FPS, and Ultra 186 FPS. The Medium preset here shows a min of 320 and max of 432, which is a tighter range compared to the 1080p Medium. The performance drop from 1080p to 1440p is roughly 37% for High, 37% for Medium, and 37% for Low, which is a consistent scaling factor, indicating a balanced workload increase. At 3840x2160, the numbers are Low 248 FPS, Medium 196 FPS, High 156 FPS, and Ultra 97 FPS. The Medium preset at 4K has a min of 167 and max of 226, which is a 59 FPS spread, showing more variance at higher resolution. The Ultra preset at 4K is the only setting that dips below 100 FPS, and it is the only one that might struggle on high-refresh 4K panels. The progression from 1080p Ultra to 4K Ultra shows a 67% reduction in FPS, highlighting the extreme cost of max settings at 4K.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS drop from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160 is dramatic and reveals the limiting component. For the Low preset, the transition from 752 FPS to 248 FPS represents a 67% decrease. For High, the drop is from 473 to 156, a 67% decrease. For Medium, it is 596 to 196, also a 67% decrease. For Ultra, it is 296 to 97, a 67% decrease as well. This uniform 67% reduction across all settings is a strong indicator that the GPU is the primary limiter at higher resolutions, since the pixel count quadruples from 1080p to 4K, but the FPS does not drop to a quarter; instead, it drops to roughly a third. This suggests that the i7-13700K is capable of feeding the GPU enough data to prevent a complete collapse, but the GPU's raw throughput cannot keep up with the 4x pixel increase. At 1080p, the CPU is more likely the bottleneck, as the FPS values (752 on Low) are so high that the processor's single-thread performance becomes the ceiling. The data shows that the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER scales poorly with resolution in this game, but the absolute FPS numbers are still high enough to ensure a playable experience at 4K, except for the Ultra preset. The consistent scaling pattern implies that the GPU is the dominant factor in this combo for resolutions above 1440p.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i7-13700K is a 16-core, 24-thread processor with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. Its L3 cache is 30 MB shared, and it has a passmark_single_thread score of 4333. This single-thread performance is crucial for Minecraft, which is traditionally bound by a single render thread. The CPU's cinebench_r23_singlecore score of 2116 and geekbench_singlecore score of 2529 further confirm its strong per-core performance. In contrast, its multicore scores are also high, with cinebench_r23_multicore at 30745 and passmark_multithread at 45887. The data suggests that the i7-13700K is not a bottleneck at any resolution tested, as the FPS scales consistently with GPU load. At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread speed allows for 752 FPS on Low, which is an exceptional result that most processors cannot match. The CPU's percentileVsAllCpus of 89 puts it well above the GPU's 76, reinforcing that the processor has more headroom than the graphics card. The nearest rivals for the CPU, such as the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX, are only 0.5% faster, meaning the i7-13700K is effectively at parity with the best alternatives in this class. The data indicates that for Minecraft, this CPU provides ample compute headroom, ensuring that the GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions, while at 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance is still sufficient to push extremely high framerates.
FAQ
Q: What is the combo's overall rank in Minecraft?
A: The combo ranks 358 out of 3710 tested combinations, placing it in the top 10% of all configurations.
Q: How does the GPU's memory configuration affect performance?
A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR6X memory with a 256-bit bus and 672.3 GB/s bandwidth, which is sufficient for all tested settings, including 4K Ultra, without causing memory-related frame drops.
Q: At 1440p, which preset is best for a 144Hz monitor?
A: The High preset at 2560x1440 delivers 298 FPS, which comfortably exceeds 144Hz, while the Ultra preset at 186 FPS also provides a high-refresh experience, but with a 38% reduction from High.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck at 4K?
A: The data shows a uniform 67% FPS drop from 1080p to 4K across all settings, indicating the GPU is the primary limiting component at 4K, as the CPU's single-thread performance is sufficient to keep up.
Q: What is the FPS difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p?
A: At 1920x1080, Low runs at 752 FPS while Ultra runs at 296 FPS, a 456 FPS difference, which represents a 61% reduction in performance when maxing out settings.
Q: Does the CPU's single-thread performance matter for this game?
A: Yes, the i7-13700K's passmark_single_thread score of 4333 and cinebench_r23_singlecore score of 2116 are critical, as the high FPS numbers at 1080p Low (752 FPS) demonstrate that the CPU is not a bottleneck at lower resolutions.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i7-13700K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i7-13700K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER in Minecraft
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 248.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 196.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 156.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 97.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 475.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 376.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 298.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 186.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 752.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 596.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 473.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 296.0 |
Minecraft with ii7-13700K + Other GPUs
See how Minecraft performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Minecraft with RTX 4070 Ti SUPER + Other CPUs
See how Minecraft performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii7-13700K + RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.