Minecraft

Minecraft, as a sandbox title, often behaves differently from typical first-person shooters or AAA action games. The measured data for the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER combination reveals a system with immense headroom, where the frame rates are exceptionally high across the board. The benchmark results indicate that this pairing is rarely stressed by the game’s default rendering paths, making the analysis more about understanding the scaling of performance than about finding playable settings.

Resolution Scaling

The most striking aspect of the data is how frame rates scale with resolution. At 1920x1080, the average frame rates are astronomical, reaching 619 FPS on Low settings. Moving to 2560x1440, these figures drop substantially, and at 3840x2160, they are cut by more than half in most cases. For instance, at High settings, the average FPS falls from 445 at 1080p to 281 at 1440p, and then to 147 at 4K. This pattern suggests that the game becomes increasingly dependent on the GPU as the pixel count rises.

However, the scaling is not perfectly linear, which points to the limiting component shifting. At 1080p, the CPU’s ability to feed the GPU becomes a significant factor. The difference between Low and High settings at 1080p is only 174 FPS (619 vs 445), a 28% drop. At 4K, the same settings gap results in a 87 FPS difference (234 vs 147), a 37% drop. This indicates that at 4K, the GPU is doing more work relative to the CPU, making the performance gap between settings more pronounced. The data suggests that at 1080p, the game is often CPU-bound or at least heavily influenced by CPU performance, while at 4K, the RTX 4070 SUPER becomes the primary bottleneck, though even then, it is not a demanding bottleneck given the high frame rates.

The Ultra preset shows this dynamic most clearly. At 4K Ultra, the average FPS is 92, which is a 61% reduction from the 147 FPS seen at 4K High. At 1080p, the Ultra preset yields 278 FPS, a 38% reduction from the 445 FPS at High. The larger percentage drop at 4K when moving to Ultra indicates that the Ultra settings add a significant GPU workload, further confirming that the GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The frame rate data shows that this system is capable of delivering high refresh rate experiences at 1440p, but the Ultra preset at 4K is the only scenario where the GPU is pushed to a level that might require consideration for a 60 FPS target.

FAQ

Q: What is the maximum average frame rate achieved by this combo?

A: The highest average frame rate recorded is 619 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with the Low settings preset.

Q: How does the 4K Ultra performance compare to the 1080p Low performance?

A: The 4K Ultra preset averages 92 FPS, which is a dramatic reduction from the 619 FPS at 1080p Low. This represents an 85% decrease in average frame rate, highlighting the substantial GPU workload of the Ultra preset at high resolution.

Q: Is there a large difference between High and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: Yes, the data shows a significant gap. At 2560x1440, the High preset averages 281 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 176 FPS. This is a 105 FPS difference, indicating that the Ultra preset imposes a considerable performance penalty.

Q: What is the lowest average frame rate recorded for this hardware combination?

A: The lowest average frame rate is 92 FPS, which occurs only at 3840x2160 resolution with the Ultra settings preset. All other tested configurations exceed 147 FPS on average.

Q: Does the CPU or GPU appear to be the limiting factor at 1080p?

A: The data suggests the CPU becomes more influential at 1080p. The relatively small frame rate difference between Low and High settings at 1080p (174 FPS) compared to the larger difference at 4K (87 FPS) indicates that the GPU is not the sole bottleneck at lower resolutions, and the CPU’s performance is a more significant variable.

Q: Are the minimum FPS values provided for all settings?

A: No, minimum FPS data is only available for the Medium settings preset. At 1920x1080 Medium, the minimum FPS is 477, at 2560x1440 Medium it is 301, and at 3840x2160 Medium it is 157.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is the primary driver of the high frame rates at higher resolutions. Its specifications, including a 12 GB GDDR6X memory buffer and a 192-bit memory bus, provide a 504.2 GB/s bandwidth. This memory bandwidth is a key factor in handling the texture data and world geometry that Minecraft can generate, especially when render distance is increased. The GPU’s boost clock of 2475 MHz and its 7168 shading units allow it to process the game’s relatively simple geometry at extremely high speeds.

The benchmark results show that the GPU’s role becomes more critical as resolution increases. At 4K, the difference between Low and Ultra settings is a 142 FPS swing (from 234 to 92 FPS). This is a direct result of the increased pixel fill rate demand and the more complex shading operations required by the Ultra preset. The RTX 4070 SUPER’s 198.0 GPixel/s pixel rate is sufficient to handle these demands, but the frame rate drop indicates the workload is scaling with the settings.

The GPU’s 56 RT cores are present, but Minecraft’s standard rendering does not typically utilize ray tracing unless specific mods are used, which are not part of this benchmark. The data shows that even at 4K High, the GPU is able to maintain an average of 147 FPS, suggesting that the card has significant headroom. The performance at 1080p, where the GPU is less stressed, shows that the CPU is often the limiting factor, as the GPU is capable of producing over 600 FPS but is held back by other components in the system. The 12 GB of VRAM is more than adequate for this game, as even at 4K Ultra, the frame rates do not suggest a memory capacity bottleneck.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of performance across all tested configurations. At 1920x1080, the average frame rates range from 278 FPS on Ultra to 619 FPS on Low. The Medium preset averages 561 FPS, with a minimum of 477 FPS and a maximum of 645 FPS. The High preset averages 445 FPS. These numbers indicate that at 1080p, the system is overwhelmingly powerful for this game, and even the most demanding preset will provide a buttery-smooth experience on any high refresh rate monitor.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains exceptionally high. The Low preset averages 447 FPS, while High averages 281 FPS. The Medium preset delivers an average of 354 FPS, with a minimum of 301 FPS and a maximum of 407 FPS. The Ultra preset averages 176 FPS. This resolution is the sweet spot for this combo, as it balances the GPU workload with the CPU’s capabilities, resulting in high frame rates that exceed the refresh rate of most gaming monitors.

At 3840x2160, the performance begins to show the strain of the higher pixel count, but it remains highly playable. The Low preset averages 234 FPS. The Medium preset averages 185 FPS, with a minimum of 157 FPS and a maximum of 213 FPS. The High preset averages 147 FPS. The Ultra preset is the only configuration that drops below the 100 FPS mark, averaging 92 FPS. This is still a very playable frame rate, but it shows that the Ultra preset at 4K is the most demanding scenario in the data set.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700, with its 8 cores and 16 threads, provides a solid foundation for the game’s logic and world generation. Its base clock of 3.70 GHz and boost clock of 4.60 GHz are sufficient for Minecraft’s mostly single-threaded nature, though the game can use multiple threads for chunk generation and entity updates. The CPU’s performance in synthetic benchmarks, such as a single-thread score of 901 in 3dmark and a multicore score of 20655 in Cinebench R23, indicates it has strong per-core performance.

The data suggests that the CPU is a limiting factor at 1080p. The fact that the frame rate at 1080p Low (619 FPS) is higher than at 1440p Low (447 FPS) shows that the GPU is not the only bottleneck at lower resolutions. The CPU’s ability to process draw calls and game logic becomes the constraint. The relatively small difference in performance between 1080p Low and High (174 FPS) compared to the 4K Low and High difference (87 FPS) further supports this. At 1080p, the GPU has enough power to render frames quickly, but the CPU cannot keep up with the higher settings that increase the number of objects and draw calls.

The CPU’s 16 MB of L3 cache and 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth are adequate for the game’s data flow. The benchmark results show that this CPU is not a weak link, as it is capable of feeding the GPU to achieve over 400 FPS at 1440p. However, for users targeting the absolute maximum frame rates at 1080p, the CPU is the component that prevents the system from exceeding the 619 FPS mark. The CPU’s percentile rank of 78 indicates it is a capable processor, and its performance is on par with rivals like the Intel Xeon D-2752TER and AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, which have similar average benchmark scores.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured rows, the optimal settings depend on the user’s display and performance goals. For a 1080p display with a 144Hz or 165Hz refresh rate, any preset will provide a flawless experience. The High preset at 445 FPS offers a good balance of visual quality and performance, and it is a significant improvement over the Low preset. The Ultra preset, at 278 FPS, is also a viable choice for 1080p, as it still maintains an extremely high frame rate. There is no reason to use the Low preset at this resolution, as the High preset provides a much better visual experience without any risk of dropping below 400 FPS.

For a 1440p display, which is the most common high-refresh-rate resolution, the High preset is the recommended choice. At 281 FPS, it provides a very smooth experience that will easily saturate a 240Hz monitor. The Medium preset at 354 FPS is also an option, but the visual fidelity of the High preset is worth the 73 FPS cost. The Ultra preset at 176 FPS is still excellent and will satisfy users with a 144Hz monitor who want the best visuals. The data shows that the system is never in danger of dropping to unplayable levels at this resolution.

For a 4K display, the High preset is the best recommendation. At 147 FPS, it delivers a smooth experience on a 120Hz or 144Hz display. The Medium preset at 185 FPS offers even more headroom, but the High preset is a good middle ground. The Ultra preset, at 92 FPS, is only recommended for users with a 60Hz display or those who prioritize visual fidelity above all else, as it is the only configuration that drops below the 100 FPS threshold. The Low preset, at 234 FPS, is not recommended, as the visual quality loss is too significant for the frame rate gain.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER combination holds a rank of 622 out of 3710 tested combos for Minecraft. This places it in the top 17% of all tested configurations. This high rank is expected, given the extremely high frame rates measured. The combination of the CPU’s strong single-thread performance and the GPU’s raw power ensures that the system is never the bottleneck in this game.

The rank is more a reflection of the game’s low system requirements than a limitation of the hardware. Many of the 622 combos ranked higher are likely to feature more powerful CPUs, such as those with higher clock speeds, which can push frame rates even higher at 1080p. The GPU’s performance is less of a differentiator in this game, as even a mid-range GPU can produce high frame rates. The data indicates that the CPU is the more critical component for achieving the absolute highest frame rates in Minecraft, and the Ryzen 7 5700’s 78th percentile ranking among all CPUs is a strong indicator of its capability. The GPU’s 83rd percentile ranking also shows it is a high-performing part, but its influence on the final frame rate is more pronounced at 4K resolutions. Overall, this combo is a top-tier performer for Minecraft, offering a level of performance that will satisfy the most demanding players.