Minecraft: Java Edition
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 138 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 36 | 65 | 78 | 101 |
| 1440p QHD | 73 | 119 | 149 | 189 |
| 1080p Full HD | 118 | 186 | 235 | 301 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Minecraft: Java Edition with Intel Core i5-13400F + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER, In-Depth Analysis
The Intel Core i5-13400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER delivers a highly playable Minecraft: Java Edition experience across most settings, but the data clearly indicates that the Medium preset at 1080p offers the optimal balance of fluidity and visual fidelity. The combo achieves a 235.4 FPS average at 1920x1080 on Medium, which represents a substantial performance buffer above the 117.5 FPS recorded on Ultra, while still maintaining a significant visual upgrade over the Low preset. The Ultra preset at 4K drops to a 36.4 FPS average, which is the only configuration in the dataset that falls below the 60 FPS threshold, making it the sole setting that can be considered compromised.
Settings Recommendations
The benchmark results reveal a clear hierarchy where the Medium preset emerges as the recommended choice for this hardware combination. At 1920x1080, Medium produces a 235.4 FPS average, which is 117.9 FPS higher than Ultra and 65.9 FPS lower than Low. This positions Medium as the sweet spot, delivering nearly double the frame rate of Ultra while retaining enough graphical detail to justify the performance trade-off. The Low preset at 1080p reaches 301.3 FPS, but this comes at the cost of visual quality that most players would find unnecessary given the headroom available.
For 2560x1440 users, the Medium preset again provides the best experience, with a 149.4 FPS average that comfortably exceeds the 118.6 FPS of High and the 73.2 FPS of Ultra. The scaling pattern holds consistently: Medium maintains a frame rate approximately 2.04 times higher than Ultra at both 1080p and 1440p, while Low offers roughly 1.28 times the performance of Medium at every resolution. At 3840x2160, the Medium preset's 77.6 FPS average remains playable, though the High preset at 64.9 FPS and the Low preset at 100.8 FPS provide alternatives depending on whether visual fidelity or raw frame rate takes priority.
GPU Role
The GTX 1660 SUPER's 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus provides 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which proves sufficient for Minecraft's texture streaming demands across all tested configurations. The GPU's 1408 shading units and 48 ROPs deliver a 5.027 TFLOPS FP32 throughput that scales predictably with resolution increases. The benchmark data shows that the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions: the transition from 1080p to 1440p reduces the Medium preset's frame rate by 36.5%, and the further jump to 4K reduces it by another 48.0% relative to 1440p.
The GPU's clock behavior, with a 1530 MHz base and 1785 MHz boost, contributes to its percentile ranking of 55 among all GPUs. This places it in the middle of the performance distribution, and its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT, trails by 0.7% in average benchmark score. The performance gap between Low and Ultra presets at 4K is particularly telling: the 100.8 FPS at Low versus 36.4 FPS at Ultra represents a 64.1% reduction, which is the largest preset-based drop in the entire dataset, indicating that the GPU's memory bandwidth and shading resources are fully taxed by the Ultra preset's additional rendering work at this resolution.
CPU Role
The Core i5-13400F's 10 cores and 16 threads, operating with a 2.50 GHz base and 4.60 GHz boost clock, provide ample computational headroom for Minecraft's single-threaded game logic. The CPU's 20 MB of shared L3 cache and 1.25 MB per-core L2 cache help maintain consistent frame pacing even when the GPU is not the limiting factor. The single-threaded benchmark results, including a 3004 score in Cinebench R23 single-core and a 3634 score in PassMark single-thread, indicate strong per-core performance that prevents CPU-induced frame drops in this title.
Evidence of CPU headroom appears in the 1080p Low preset result of 301.3 FPS, which is the highest frame rate in the dataset and suggests the CPU can push well beyond typical display refresh rates. The CPU's 82nd percentile ranking among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 25236, places it slightly ahead of the Intel Core i7-13620H by 0.1% and marginally behind the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D by 0.5%. This positioning confirms that the i5-13400F is not the performance ceiling in this combination, as the frame rate differences between presets at 1080p (301.3 FPS at Low versus 185.7 FPS at High) are driven primarily by GPU workload rather than CPU limitations.
How This Combo Ranks
The combined system ranks 1534 out of 1727 tested configurations in Minecraft: Java Edition, placing it in the bottom 11.2% of all combos in the database. This ranking reflects the GPU's modest 55th percentile position more heavily than the CPU's stronger 82nd percentile standing. The disparity between component percentiles suggests that the GTX 1660 SUPER constrains the overall system performance more than the i5-13400F would if paired with a more powerful graphics card.
The combo's ranking becomes more understandable when examining the CPU and GPU benchmark averages independently. The CPU's 25236 average benchmark score sits between the AMD EPYC 9474F at 25103 and the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D at 25365, while the GPU's 14286 average score places it between the Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics at 14315 and the AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT at 14389. This combination of a high-performing CPU with a mid-range GPU produces a system that excels at CPU-light tasks but falls behind in GPU-intensive scenarios, which explains its low overall ranking despite the strong individual component performance.
Resolution Scaling
The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals distinct bottleneck patterns across presets. At Low settings, the 301.3 FPS at 1080p drops to 189.4 FPS at 1440p (a 37.1% reduction) and then to 100.8 FPS at 4K (a further 46.8% reduction). This consistent scaling indicates the GPU is the limiting component, as the CPU maintains sufficient headroom to feed the graphics card at all resolutions. The same pattern holds for Medium, with 235.4 FPS at 1080p dropping to 149.4 FPS at 1440p and 77.6 FPS at 4K.
The Ultra preset shows the most dramatic scaling: 117.5 FPS at 1080p falls to 73.2 FPS at 1440p and 36.4 FPS at 4K, representing cumulative reductions of 37.7% and 50.3% respectively. The High preset follows a similar trajectory with 185.7 FPS at 1080p, 118.6 FPS at 1440p, and 64.9 FPS at 4K. The consistent frame rate halving between 1080p and 4K across all presets confirms that resolution scaling is purely GPU-bound, with the i5-13400F's single-thread performance never becoming a constraining factor.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the Low preset achieves a 301.3 FPS average, Medium reaches 235.4 FPS, High delivers 185.7 FPS, and Ultra produces 117.5 FPS. These results show that each preset step from Low to Ultra reduces frame rate by approximately 22-37%, with the largest single drop occurring between High and Ultra at 36.7%.
The 2560x1440 results demonstrate proportional scaling: Low averages 189.4 FPS, Medium 149.4 FPS, High 118.6 FPS, and Ultra 73.2 FPS. The relative differences between presets remain consistent with 1080p, though the absolute gaps narrow as the GPU begins to saturate. At 3840x2160, Low maintains a 100.8 FPS average, Medium drops to 77.6 FPS, High to 64.9 FPS, and Ultra falls to 36.4 FPS. The 4K Ultra result is the only sub-60 FPS configuration in the entire dataset, highlighting the GPU's limitations at extreme resolutions with maximum settings.
FAQ
Q: What is the best preset for 1080p gaming with this combo?
A: The Medium preset provides the optimal balance, achieving a 235.4 FPS average at 1920x1080, which is 117.9 FPS higher than Ultra while offering significantly better visual quality than the Low preset's 301.3 FPS.
Q: Can this system handle 4K resolution?
A: Yes, but only at lower presets. The Low preset achieves a 100.8 FPS average at 3840x2160, while Medium drops to 77.6 FPS. The Ultra preset is not recommended at 4K, as it falls to a 36.4 FPS average.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in Minecraft?
A: The GPU is the primary bottleneck. Evidence shows that frame rates scale consistently with resolution changes, and the CPU's 82nd percentile ranking far exceeds the GPU's 55th percentile, indicating the GTX 1660 SUPER constrains performance.
Q: How does this combo rank against other tested systems?
A: It ranks 1534 out of 1727 combinations in Minecraft: Java Edition, placing it in the bottom 11.2% of tested configurations.
Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra presets at 1440p?
A: The Low preset averages 189.4 FPS compared to 73.2 FPS on Ultra at 2560x1440, representing a 116.2 FPS difference (61.3% reduction from Low to Ultra).
Q: Does the CPU's 10-core configuration provide any advantage in Minecraft?
A: The CPU's single-thread performance (3004 in Cinebench R23 single-core) is more relevant, as Minecraft primarily relies on single-threaded game logic. The multi-core capacity provides overhead but does not directly boost frame rates in this title.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i5-13400F
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i5-13400F + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER in Minecraft: Java Edition
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 100.8 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 77.6 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 64.9 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 36.4 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 189.4 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 149.4 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 118.6 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 73.2 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 301.3 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 235.4 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 185.7 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 117.5 |
Minecraft: Java Edition with ii5-13400F + Other GPUs
See how Minecraft: Java Edition performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Minecraft: Java Edition with GTX 1660 SUPER + Other CPUs
See how Minecraft: Java Edition performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii5-13400F + GTX 1660 SUPER
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.