Microsoft Flight Simulator
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 71 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 40 | 41 | 57 | 72 |
| 1440p QHD | 52 | 56 | 77 | 97 |
| 1080p Full HD | 70 | 73 | 92 | 124 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Microsoft Flight Simulator with Intel Core i5-14600K + AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT, In-Depth Analysis
Microsoft Flight Simulator is a demanding title that stresses both the processor and the graphics card, and the pairing of the Intel Core i5-14600K with the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT demonstrates a balanced yet resolution-dependent relationship. The measured frame rates across the three primary resolutions and four quality presets reveal a system that can deliver smooth gameplay at 1080p and 1440p, but which begins to show its limits at 4K, particularly on higher settings. The data indicates that this combination ranks 965th out of 1795 tested combos in this specific simulator, placing it just above the median in the database, a position that reflects its competent but not top-tier performance ceiling.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i5-14600K is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz. In a flight simulator, where the CPU often handles the heavy lifting of physics calculations, AI traffic, and complex scenery loading, this processor's high boost clock is crucial for maintaining high frame rates, especially at lower resolutions. The benchmark results show the i5-14600K performing admirably in synthetic tests, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32881 and a single-core score of 4642. The processor also holds a 93rd percentile ranking against all CPUs, indicating it is a powerful part of the system.
However, when looking at the measured frame rates in Microsoft Flight Simulator, the CPU's influence is most apparent at 1080p. At this resolution, the GPU is less burdened, allowing the i5-14600K's strong single-threaded performance to drive the frame rate higher. The gap between the Low and Ultra presets at 1080p is 54 FPS, from 123.5 to 69.5 FPS, which shows that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU enough data to produce very high frame rates when the graphical load is low. In comparison, the i5-14600KF, a close rival without integrated graphics, has an average benchmark score that is only 0.4% higher, making the performance between these two parts effectively identical for this title. The data suggests that the CPU is not the primary bottleneck in this system, as the frame rate scales significantly with resolution and settings, which is more characteristic of a GPU-limited scenario.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT is built on the RDNA 2 architecture and features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 384.0 GB/s. With a base clock of 2321 MHz and a boost clock of 2581 MHz, this GPU is positioned as a solid mid-to-high-end performer, holding a 77th percentile ranking among all GPUs. In the context of Microsoft Flight Simulator, which is known for its heavy reliance on GPU memory for texture streaming of terrain and aircraft, the 12 GB VRAM capacity is a significant asset. It helps to prevent performance dips when flying over detailed urban areas or dense landscapes.
The GPU's performance is clearly the limiting factor as the resolution increases. At 4K with the Ultra preset, the average frame rate drops to exactly 40 FPS, which is the lowest measured in the dataset. This contrasts sharply with the 1080p Ultra result of 69.5 FPS, showing a 42.4% performance loss when scaling up to 4K. The GPU's benchmark scores, such as a Passmark G3D score of 19786, place it in a competitive position. Its closest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6800, has a higher average score by 0.7%, but the RX 6700 XT still manages to edge out the older AMD Radeon HD 7950 by 1% in average benchmark score, showcasing its generational advantage. The data confirms that the GPU's capabilities are what determine the ceiling for frame rates at higher resolutions and quality settings.
Resolution Scaling
The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals a classic GPU-bound scenario. At the High preset, the average FPS drops from 73.2 at 1920x1080 to 55.6 at 2560x1440, and finally to 41.1 at 3840x2160. This represents a 44% reduction in performance from 1080p to 4K. A similar trend is visible across all presets, with the Low preset showing the largest absolute drop from 123.5 FPS at 1080p to 71.5 FPS at 4K, a 42% decrease. This consistent scaling pattern across multiple settings is a strong indicator that the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT is the component that is being pushed to its limits as pixel count increases.
The impact of resolution scaling is most dramatic when considering the Ultra preset. At 4K, the system can only muster 40 FPS, which is below the threshold for a smooth experience in a flight simulator. In contrast, the 1440p Ultra setting averages 51.7 FPS, which is more playable, and 1080p Ultra at 69.5 FPS provides a comfortable margin. The data shows that the i5-14600K has enough headroom to handle the increased data at lower resolutions, but the RX 6700 XT's fill rate and shader power become the bottleneck as the number of pixels rendered quadruples from 1080p to 4K. The scaling from 1440p to 4K is also noteworthy, with a 26% reduction in frame rate on the High preset, indicating that even a step down from 4K provides substantial relief for the GPU.
Settings Recommendations
The measured frames suggest that the Ultra preset, while visually impressive, is not the most pragmatic choice for this combination. At 4K, the Ultra preset yields an average of 40 FPS, which is on the edge of playability and may result in stutter during intense scenes. The High preset at 4K offers only a marginal improvement to 41.1 FPS, which is still not ideal. The data shows that the most significant gains come from stepping down to the Medium preset. At 4K, the Medium preset achieves 56.6 FPS, which is a 41.5% improvement over Ultra, and provides a much smoother experience. This suggests that the Medium preset is the sweet spot for 4K gaming on this hardware.
For 1440p users, the High preset at 55.6 FPS is a good balance, but the Medium preset at 77.2 FPS is the better recommendation for a consistently high frame rate, providing a 38.8% performance increase over High. At 1080p, the user has more freedom. The High preset at 73.2 FPS is excellent, but the Ultra preset at 69.5 FPS is also playable and offers the best visual quality. The data indicates that the Ultra preset is only viable at 1080p, while lower resolutions require a settings compromise. The Low preset at 1080p produces 123.5 FPS, which is overkill for a flight simulator, so the Medium preset at 91.6 FPS represents the best value in terms of visual fidelity versus performance at 1080p.
How This Combo Ranks
Within the database of tested combinations for Microsoft Flight Simulator, this specific pairing of the Intel Core i5-14600K and the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT secures the 965th position out of 1795 total combos. This places it in the 54th percentile of all tested systems, indicating that it performs better than a slight majority of the configurations in the database, but it is far from the top tier. The ranking reflects a system that is well-suited for high-refresh-rate 1080p gaming and solid 1440p performance, but it does not have the raw power to compete with high-end setups in this specific simulator, which is known to be exceptionally demanding.
The ranking is a holistic measure that takes into account all the measured frame rates, and the result is consistent with the component analysis. The CPU is a high performer, ranking in the 93rd percentile, but the GPU, while respectable, is a mid-range part at the 77th percentile. The combination's overall rank of 965 suggests that its performance is limited by the GPU, which holds the system back from a higher position in the rankings. When compared to the top combos in the database, which would likely feature more powerful GPUs, this system lacks the 4K performance and high-resolution headroom needed to climb the ranks. However, the data shows that for its target market—users with 1080p or 1440p monitors—this combination offers a very competitive and capable experience in Microsoft Flight Simulator, making the 965th rank a fair representation of its balanced performance profile.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i5-14600K
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i5-14600K + AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT in Microsoft Flight Simulator
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 71.5 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 56.6 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 41.1 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 40.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 97.2 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 77.2 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 55.6 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 51.7 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 123.5 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 91.6 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 73.2 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 69.5 |
Microsoft Flight Simulator with ii5-14600K + Other GPUs
See how Microsoft Flight Simulator performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Microsoft Flight Simulator with RX 6700 XT + Other CPUs
See how Microsoft Flight Simulator performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii5-14600K + RX 6700 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.