Microsoft Flight Simulator

Microsoft Flight Simulator

AVERAGE FPS
91
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 91 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 52 55 68 92
1440p QHD 70 74 96 127
1080p Full HD 88 91 123 153

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 92
3840x2160 Medium 68
3840x2160 High 55
3840x2160 Ultra 52
2560x1440 Low 127
2560x1440 Medium 96
2560x1440 High 74
2560x1440 Ultra 70
1920x1080 Low 153
1920x1080 Medium 123
1920x1080 High 91
1920x1080 Ultra 88

Microsoft Flight Simulator with AMD Ryzen 9 5900X + AMD Radeon RX 9070, In-Depth Analysis

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 9 5900X paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9070 lands at rank 558 out of 1795 tested combos in Microsoft Flight Simulator. That places this configuration in the upper third of all combinations tested, which is a solid position for a flight sim that stresses both CPU and GPU heavily. The rank reflects the balance between a 12-core Zen 3 processor and a current-generation RDNA 4 graphics card, and the data shows this pairing delivers playable performance across most settings and resolutions.

What makes this rank notable is that it sits well above the median combo, but it is not at the extreme top tier. The 1795-combo pool includes many high-end pairings, so being in the 31st percentile of all combos is respectable. The measured FPS numbers confirm that the bottleneck shifts depending on settings and resolution, which is typical for Microsoft Flight Simulator. At lower settings, the CPU becomes more relevant; at higher settings and 4K, the GPU takes over. This combo handles both ends competently, though the rank suggests there is headroom for even stronger pairings if you demand maximum frame rates at Ultra settings in 4K.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 carries 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 644.6 GB/s of bandwidth. That memory capacity is crucial for Microsoft Flight Simulator, which loads large textures for terrain and aircraft. The 16 GB buffer means the card will not run out of VRAM at any settings preset in this game, even at 3840x2160 with Ultra details. The GPU clock structure shows a base of 1330 MHz, a game clock of 2070 MHz, and a boost up to 2520 MHz, which gives the card headroom to sustain high frame rates when the CPU can feed it enough data.

The RX 9070 uses the Navi 48 chip on a 4 nm process, with 3584 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 128 raster operation units. It also has 56 ray tracing cores, though Microsoft Flight Simulator's primary workload is traditional rasterization. The pixel rate of 322.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 564.5 GTexel/s indicate strong fill rate capabilities, which matter for the dense geometry and detailed scenery in this sim. In the measured data, the GPU shows a clear scaling pattern: at 1920x1080 Low, the average FPS is 152.6, but at 3840x2160 Ultra, it drops to 51.8. This 66% reduction in performance from the lightest to the heaviest workload shows how the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions and settings.

Settings Recommendations

For the best experience per the measured rows, the Medium preset offers the most balanced performance across all three resolutions. At 1920x1080, Medium delivers 123.2 FPS average, which is smooth and leaves headroom for dips during complex scenery. At 2560x1440, Medium hits 95.6 FPS, still well above the 60 FPS threshold for a comfortable flight sim experience. At 3840x2160, Medium drops to 68 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for very demanding users.

If you have a 1080p or 1440p monitor and want maximum visual fidelity, High settings are a strong choice. At 1080p High, the combo averages 91 FPS; at 1440p High, it averages 74 FPS. Both are smooth for this genre. Ultra settings are only recommended for 1080p users who prioritize image quality over frame rate, as 88 FPS at 1080p Ultra is still acceptable. At 1440p Ultra, the average falls to 69.6 FPS, which is borderline but workable. At 4K Ultra, the 51.8 FPS average is below the ideal threshold, so you should stick to Medium or High at that resolution. Low settings are only necessary if you need the absolute highest frame rates, with 152.6 FPS at 1080p and 127.2 FPS at 1440p, but the visual compromise is significant for a game that relies on scenery detail.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the scaling is clear. Low settings produce an average of 152.6 FPS, Medium drops to 123.2 FPS, High falls to 91 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 88 FPS. The gap between High and Ultra is minimal at just 3 FPS, which suggests that Ultra adds little performance cost over High at this resolution, likely due to CPU limitations at lower graphical loads.

At 2560x1440, the pattern shifts slightly. Low averages 127.2 FPS, Medium delivers 95.6 FPS, High reaches 74 FPS, and Ultra averages 69.6 FPS. The drop from Medium to High is 21.6 FPS, which is the largest step in this resolution. This indicates the GPU starts to become more relevant at 1440p, and the extra detail from High settings has a measurable impact.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly the dominant factor. Low averages 92.3 FPS, Medium drops to 68 FPS, High falls to 54.7 FPS, and Ultra averages 51.8 FPS. The difference between High and Ultra is only 2.9 FPS, showing that Ultra at 4K is not worth the visual gain for most users. The step from Low to Medium at 4K is 24.3 FPS, which is the largest single drop in the entire dataset. This confirms that 4K is where the RX 9070's 16 GB memory and bandwidth are fully utilized, and the frame rate penalty for higher settings is steep.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo maintain 60 FPS at 1440p with High settings?

A: Yes. The measured average at 2560x1440 High is 74 FPS, which provides a 14 FPS margin above the 60 FPS threshold. This leaves room for frame drops during heavy scenery without falling below playable levels.

Q: Is 4K gaming viable with this pairing?

A: It depends on your settings tolerance. At 4K Medium, the average is 68 FPS, which is playable. At 4K High, the average drops to 54.7 FPS, and at 4K Ultra it falls to 51.8 FPS. If you want 60 FPS or higher, stick to Medium at 3840x2160.

Q: How much performance difference is there between Low and Ultra at 1080p?

A: The gap is 64.6 FPS, from 152.6 FPS at Low to 88 FPS at Ultra. This is a 42% reduction in average frame rate when moving from the lowest to the highest settings preset.

Q: Does the 16 GB VRAM make a difference in this game?

A: The data shows consistent performance across all settings without any indication of VRAM-related stuttering or texture pop-in. The 16 GB buffer on the RX 9070 is sufficient for Microsoft Flight Simulator's largest texture loads at any resolution tested.

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo?

A: Based on the measured averages, 2560x1440 with High settings offers the best balance, delivering 74 FPS. This resolution shows a clear improvement over 4K while still providing more detail than 1080p, and the frame rate remains well above the playable threshold.

Q: How does the combo perform at Ultra settings across all resolutions?

A: At 1080p Ultra, it averages 88 FPS; at 1440p Ultra, 69.6 FPS; at 4K Ultra, 51.8 FPS. Each resolution step reduces performance by roughly 20 FPS, which is a consistent degradation pattern that shows the GPU scaling under increasing pixel load.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 9 5900X brings 12 cores and 24 threads based on the Zen 3 architecture, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. It uses 64 MB of L3 cache, which is a meaningful asset for Microsoft Flight Simulator because the game frequently accesses terrain and aircraft data. The CPU's 3DMark scores show strong multi-threaded performance: 9075 in the 16-thread test and 10075 at max threads. Single-thread performance is 941 in the 3DMark single-thread test, which is sufficient for the game's primary simulation loop.

The CPU's role in this pairing becomes evident when comparing settings at lower resolutions. At 1080p Low, the combo hits 152.6 FPS, but at 1080p Ultra, it only drops to 88 FPS. This relatively small 64.6 FPS difference suggests the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU at high frame rates, but the GPU becomes the limiter when settings increase. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 33150 confirms the CPU's strength in heavily threaded workloads, while the single-core score of 4680 shows it can handle the game's main thread demands. The CPU ranks in the 90th percentile against all CPUs, and its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS with a delta of -0.7% and the Intel Core i7-13700 with a delta of -1%. This indicates the 5900X is competitive with newer mid-range and high-end options, providing a solid foundation for the RX 9070 in this flight sim.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 9 5900X

Cores / Threads 12 / 24
Base Clock 3700 MHz
Boost Clock 4800 MHz
TDP 105W
Socket AMD Socket AM4
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 9070

VRAM 16 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2520 MHz MHz
TDP 220 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 9 5900X + AMD Radeon RX 9070 in Microsoft Flight Simulator

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 92.3
3840x2160 Medium 68.0
3840x2160 High 54.7
3840x2160 Ultra 51.8
2560x1440 Low 127.2
2560x1440 Medium 95.6
2560x1440 High 74.0
2560x1440 Ultra 69.6
1920x1080 Low 152.6
1920x1080 Medium 123.2
1920x1080 High 91.0
1920x1080 Ultra 88.0

Microsoft Flight Simulator with Ryzen 9 5900X + Other GPUs

See how Microsoft Flight Simulator performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Microsoft Flight Simulator with RX 9070 + Other CPUs

See how Microsoft Flight Simulator performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 9 5900X + RX 9070

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.