Microsoft Flight Simulator

Microsoft Flight Simulator

AVERAGE FPS
59
playable

This combination offers playable performance with an average of 59 FPS, though you may want to lower settings for smoother gameplay.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 32 35 47 57
1440p QHD 47 47 63 80
1080p Full HD 56 62 79 99

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 57
3840x2160 Medium 47
3840x2160 High 35
3840x2160 Ultra 32
2560x1440 Low 80
2560x1440 Medium 63
2560x1440 Ultra 47
2560x1440 High 47
1920x1080 Low 99
1920x1080 Medium 79
1920x1080 High 62
1920x1080 Ultra 56

Microsoft Flight Simulator with AMD Ryzen 7 9700X + AMD Radeon RX 7600, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X and AMD Radeon RX 7600 combination in Microsoft Flight Simulator presents a classic study in system balance. The data shows a configuration where the graphics card is the primary constraint at higher resolutions, while the processor’s strong single-thread performance keeps frame rates respectable at lower settings. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS across resolutions, examines the roles of the CPU and GPU, and places the combo within the broader benchmark database.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a consistent and predictable drop as resolution increases, confirming that the AMD Radeon RX 7600 is the limiting factor in this pairing. At 1080p with Low settings, the system achieves an average of 99.4 FPS. Moving to 1440p Low drops this to 80.4 FPS, a reduction of approximately 19%. At 4K Low, the average falls further to 57.1 FPS, representing a 28% decrease from the 1440p figure. This scaling pattern indicates that the GPU’s pixel throughput is becoming the bottleneck as resolution climbs, even at the lowest graphical preset.

The trend is more pronounced at higher settings. At High settings, the frame rate drops from 62.1 FPS at 1080p to 46.6 FPS at 1440p, a 25% decline, and then to 35.1 FPS at 4K, a further 25% reduction. The Ultra preset shows a similar trajectory: 56.1 FPS at 1080p, 47.4 FPS at 1440p, and 32.2 FPS at 4K. The gap between 1080p and 4K at Ultra is a 43% loss, highlighting how the RX 7600’s 8 GB memory buffer and 128-bit bus struggle with the higher pixel counts and texture loads of Microsoft Flight Simulator.

Interestingly, the difference between Low and Ultra settings at 4K is only 25 FPS (57.1 vs. 32.2), while at 1080p the difference is 43.3 FPS (99.4 vs. 56.1). This suggests that at 4K, the GPU is so saturated that reducing settings yields diminishing returns. In contrast, at 1080p, the CPU has enough headroom to feed the GPU more frames when the load is light, allowing settings to have a larger impact. The data clearly indicates that for smooth 4K gameplay, this combo would require significant settings reductions, while 1080p and 1440p offer more flexibility.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X is built on the Zen 5 architecture (Granite Ridge) and features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. Its single-thread performance is a standout, evidenced by a 3dmark single-thread score of 1280 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4459. This is crucial for Microsoft Flight Simulator, which relies heavily on single-threaded simulation logic. The CPU’s 32 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 memory support (89.6 GB/s bandwidth) further aid in feeding data to the GPU.

Benchmark results show the 9700X is a strong performer relative to its peers. Its average benchmark score of 36029 places it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-14500HX (avgScore 35940, deltaPct +0.2%), Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (avgScore 36165, deltaPct -0.4%), AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 (avgScore 35802, deltaPct +0.6%), and Intel Core Ultra 5 225H (avgScore 36328, deltaPct -0.8%). These deltas are minimal, all within 1%, indicating that the 9700X is competitively positioned against these mobile and desktop parts. The 3dmark 16-thread score of 9824 and max-thread score of 9771 show that multi-threaded scaling is modest, which aligns with the game’s preference for fewer, faster cores.

In this game, the CPU’s role is to maintain a stable frame delivery, particularly at lower resolutions where the GPU is less stressed. At 1080p Low (99.4 FPS) and 1440p Low (80.4 FPS), the 9700X’s high boost clock ensures the RX 7600 is not starved of draw calls. However, the data suggests that at Ultra settings, the CPU is not the bottleneck; the GPU’s rendering load dominates. The processor’s 65W TDP and 4 nm process node also indicate efficiency, though this is not directly reflected in the FPS numbers.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 is based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture (Navi 33 chip) and operates with a base clock of 1720 MHz, a game clock of 2250 MHz, and a boost clock of 2655 MHz. It has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU’s 2048 shading units and 64 ROPs give it a pixel rate of 169.9 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 339.8 GTexel/s. Its FP32 performance of 21.75 TFLOPS is respectable for its class, but the memory configuration is a limiting factor for high-resolution textures.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 20258, placing it in the 63rd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT (avgScore 20146, deltaPct +0.6%), AMD Radeon RX 460 (avgScore 20088, deltaPct +0.8%), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (avgScore 20534, deltaPct -1.3%), and Intel Arc B570 (avgScore 20556, deltaPct -1.5%). The RX 7600 is virtually tied with these cards, with deltas under 2%, showing that it sits at a specific performance tier. In Microsoft Flight Simulator, the GPU’s role is to render the complex scenery, terrain, and weather effects. The data shows that at 4K Ultra (32.2 FPS), the GPU is overwhelmed, producing an unplayable average. At 1080p High (62.1 FPS), it provides a playable experience, but the 8 GB VRAM may cause texture swapping in dense areas.

The measured FPS at 1440p High (46.6 FPS) and 4K Medium (47 FPS) are nearly identical, suggesting that the GPU’s memory bandwidth is the limiting factor rather than raw compute. The RX 7600’s 128-bit bus is a known constraint, and the results confirm that it cannot maintain high frame rates at higher resolutions. The GPU’s 165W TDP and PCIe 4.0 x8 interface are adequate for this workload, but the data clearly shows that the card is best suited for 1080p gaming in this title.

How This Combo Ranks

Within the benchmark database, this combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X and AMD Radeon RX 7600 ranks 1243 out of 1795 tested combos for Microsoft Flight Simulator. This places it in the 31st percentile of all combinations, meaning it outperforms roughly a third of tested systems. The rank is likely dragged down by the GPU’s limitations at higher resolutions, as the CPU is a top-tier performer in its own right. The CPU’s 89th percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 63rd percentile illustrates a mismatch in capability.

The combo’s rank of 1243 suggests that while the CPU provides excellent single-threaded performance, the GPU cannot fully leverage it in this game at higher settings. Systems with weaker CPUs but stronger GPUs would likely rank higher, as Microsoft Flight Simulator scales more with GPU at high resolutions. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 99.4 FPS, which is a strong result, but this is a best-case scenario. At 4K Ultra, the 32.2 FPS result is below the threshold for smooth gameplay, underscoring why the combo sits in the lower-middle of the rankings. The data indicates that this pairing is viable for 1080p and light 1440p gaming, but it is not optimized for higher resolutions.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS this combo can achieve in Microsoft Flight Simulator?

A: The highest measured average FPS is 99.4, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival in terms of average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X has an average score of 36029, which is 0.2% higher than the Intel Core i5-14500HX (score 35940) and 0.4% lower than the Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (score 36165).

Q: At which resolution and settings does the system fail to maintain 60 FPS?

A: The system drops below 60 FPS at 1440p High (46.6 FPS), 1440p Ultra (47.4 FPS), 4K High (35.1 FPS), 4K Medium (47 FPS), and 4K Ultra (32.2 FPS). It also falls to 56.1 FPS at 1080p Ultra.

Q: Is the GPU or CPU more likely to bottleneck at 4K resolution?

A: The GPU is the bottleneck at 4K. The average FPS drops to 32.2 at Ultra and 35.1 at High, while the CPU’s strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4459) is not the limiting factor.

Q: How does the GPU’s benchmark score compare to the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600 has an average score of 20258, which is 0.6% lower than the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT’s score of 20146.

Q: What is the combo’s rank among all tested combinations for this game?

A: The combo ranks 1243 out of 1795 tested combinations, placing it in the lower-middle tier of performance.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 7 9700X

Cores / Threads 8 / 16
Base Clock 3800 MHz
Boost Clock 5500 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket AMD Socket AM5
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 7600

VRAM 8 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2655 MHz MHz
TDP 165 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 9700X + AMD Radeon RX 7600 in Microsoft Flight Simulator

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 57.1
3840x2160 Medium 47.0
3840x2160 High 35.1
3840x2160 Ultra 32.2
2560x1440 Low 80.4
2560x1440 Medium 62.9
2560x1440 Ultra 47.4
2560x1440 High 46.6
1920x1080 Low 99.4
1920x1080 Medium 78.8
1920x1080 High 62.1
1920x1080 Ultra 56.1

Microsoft Flight Simulator with Ryzen 7 9700X + Other GPUs

See how Microsoft Flight Simulator performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Microsoft Flight Simulator with RX 7600 + Other CPUs

See how Microsoft Flight Simulator performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 7 9700X + RX 7600

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.