Microsoft Flight Simulator

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT demonstrates a mid-pack standing in Microsoft Flight Simulator, securing the 1,929th position out of 3,714 tested combinations. This places the configuration in the 48th percentile of all tested combos, indicating that while it is not at the bleeding edge of performance, it delivers a balanced experience that sits squarely within the upper-middle tier of the database. The ranking reflects a pairing where neither component is severely bottlenecking the other, but where the overall capability is limited by the generational constraints of both the CPU and GPU.

The data reveals that this combo performs respectably but does not dominate any specific metric. When compared to other tested configurations, the Ryzen 7 5700G's average benchmark score of 27,051 places it nearly neck-and-neck with the Intel Core i9-9900K, which scores 27,097, showing a negligible delta of -0.2%. This suggests that in CPU-bound scenarios, the 5700G holds its own against a former flagship, though it falls slightly behind the newer Intel Core i5-14400T and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 445. The GPU side shows a similar pattern, with the RX 6700 XT's average score of 27,425 being essentially tied with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, which scores 27,565, a delta of -0.5%. This indicates that the 6700 XT provides performance within striking distance of a high-end previous-generation card, making the overall combo a competent, if not class-leading, choice.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo's rank of 1,929 out of 3,714 places it in the 52nd percentile of tested pairings, meaning slightly more than half of all tested configurations outperform it. This is a critical context for interpreting the measured frames per second, as it suggests that while the system can handle the game, users should temper expectations regarding maximum visual fidelity at higher resolutions. Benchmark results indicate that the pairing is well-balanced for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the gap between this combo and higher-ranking configurations becomes more pronounced as resolution increases to 4K.

Analyzing the CPU's percentile rank of 79 against all CPUs, the Ryzen 7 5700G is positioned favorably, outperforming 79% of all processors in the database. This strong CPU standing is complemented by a GPU that ranks in the 72nd percentile against all GPUs, showing that the graphics card is also above average. However, the combo's overall rank of 1,929 out of 3,714 suggests that the synergy between the two components does not boost the system to the top tiers, likely due to the game's heavy reliance on both single-threaded CPU performance and raw GPU throughput. The data shows that this configuration is a solid mid-range option, capable of delivering playable frame rates, but it will not challenge the top 10% of tested systems in Microsoft Flight Simulator.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT is a critical component in this pairing, and its 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus provides a 384.0 GB/s memory bandwidth. This memory configuration is sufficient for the high-resolution textures and complex scenery that Microsoft Flight Simulator loads, but the data suggests it is not without limits. The GPU's base clock of 2321 MHz and boost clock of 2581 MHz, with a game clock of 2424 MHz, indicate that the card is designed to sustain high frequencies under load, which is beneficial for maintaining consistent frame rates in a simulation where the camera frequently pans across dense urban environments and detailed terrain.

The RX 6700 XT's 40 ray tracing cores and 2560 shading units contribute to its 13.21 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, which is adequate for the game's DirectX 12 rendering path. However, the measured FPS data shows that the GPU becomes the primary limiting factor at higher settings and resolutions. For instance, at 4K Ultra settings, the average frame rate drops to 40 FPS, while at 4K Low settings, it rises to 72 FPS. This 32 FPS swing underscores how heavily the GPU's workload scales with visual fidelity. The GPU's role is further highlighted by the fact that at 1080p Low settings, the system achieves 121 FPS, but at 1080p Ultra, it falls to 67 FPS. This indicates that while the card can handle the game's demands at lower presets, the Ultra preset at any resolution pushes the GPU to its limits, making it the bottleneck in this configuration.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution to play Microsoft Flight Simulator with this combo?

A: Based on the measured FPS data, 2560x1440 with Medium settings provides a balanced experience, achieving an average of 76 FPS with a minimum of 64 FPS. This resolution offers a good compromise between visual clarity and performance, as 4K Ultra drops to 40 FPS, which may be too low for smooth gameplay.

Q: How does the combo perform at 1080p with High settings?

A: At 1920x1080 with High settings, the system achieves an average of 71 FPS. This indicates that the combination is well-suited for 1080p gaming at High presets, providing a smooth experience that is above the 60 FPS threshold for most users.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in this system?

A: The data suggests that the GPU is the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions and settings. For example, at 4K, the frame rate drops from 72 FPS at Low to 40 FPS at Ultra, a reduction of 32 FPS. This large swing is indicative of GPU-bound performance, as the CPU's strong single-threaded scores (3,283 in PassMark single-thread) are less likely to bottleneck at these settings.

Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming?

A: Yes, but with compromises. At 4K with Medium settings, the system averages 56 FPS with a minimum of 47 FPS, which is playable. However, at 4K Ultra, the average drops to 40 FPS, which may not be ideal for a smooth experience. For 4K, Medium or High settings are recommended based on the data.

Q: How does the RX 6700 XT compare to its nearest rivals in this game?

A: The GPU's average benchmark score of 27,425 is nearly identical to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, which scores 27,565, showing a delta of -0.5%. This indicates that in synthetic benchmarks, the 6700 XT performs comparably to the RTX 3090, though real-world game performance may vary based on drivers and optimization.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the system achieves 97 FPS at Low settings and 54 FPS at Ultra settings. This represents a 43 FPS reduction when moving from Low to Ultra, highlighting the significant performance cost of higher visual fidelity.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of the combo's performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the system delivers its highest frame rates, with an average of 121 FPS at Low settings, 94 FPS at Medium settings (with a minimum of 80 and maximum of 108), 71 FPS at High settings, and 67 FPS at Ultra settings. These numbers indicate that the combo is more than capable of handling 1080p gaming at all presets, with even the most demanding Ultra preset maintaining an average above 60 FPS.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates scale down predictably. The Low preset yields an average of 97 FPS, while the Medium preset produces 76 FPS (minimum 64, maximum 87). The High preset averages 57 FPS, and the Ultra preset drops to 54 FPS. The transition from 1080p to 1440p shows a consistent reduction in performance, but the system remains playable at Medium and above, with only the Ultra preset dipping slightly below the 60 FPS threshold.

At 3840x2160, the GPU's workload increases significantly. The Low preset averages 72 FPS, which is surprisingly high for 4K, but this comes at the cost of visual quality. The Medium preset averages 56 FPS (minimum 47, maximum 64), which is still playable but shows signs of strain. The High preset averages 42 FPS, and the Ultra preset falls to 40 FPS. These 4K results clearly show that the combo is not designed for maximum fidelity at this resolution, but it can provide a passable experience at lower presets.

Resolution Scaling

The scaling of frame rates from 1080p to 4K reveals important insights about the limiting component in this system. At Low settings, the frame rate drops from 121 FPS at 1080p to 97 FPS at 1440p, a 24 FPS reduction, and then to 72 FPS at 4K, a further 25 FPS reduction. This pattern shows that even at Low settings, the GPU is being tasked with more work as resolution increases, but the CPU is still able to keep up, as the frame rates remain relatively high.

At Ultra settings, the scaling is more dramatic. The frame rate drops from 67 FPS at 1080p to 54 FPS at 1440p, a 13 FPS reduction, and then to 40 FPS at 4K, a further 14 FPS reduction. The percentage drop from 1080p to 4K at Ultra is approximately 40%, which is significant. This steep decline indicates that the GPU is the primary bottleneck at Ultra settings, as the increased pixel count and shading complexity overwhelm the RX 6700 XT's 13.21 TFLOPS of processing power. Conversely, the CPU's role is more pronounced at lower resolutions, where the frame rates are higher and the GPU has more headroom, but the data shows that the Ryzen 7 5700G's 8 cores and 16 threads are sufficient to avoid being a major limiting factor.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal preset for this combo depends on the user's priority for visual quality versus frame rate. For a smooth and responsive experience, the Medium preset at 1920x1080 is highly recommended, as it achieves an average of 94 FPS with a minimum of 80 FPS, ensuring no major stutters during flight. This preset offers a good balance of visual detail and performance, making it the safest choice for most users.

At 2560x1440, the Medium preset is also the best option, providing an average of 76 FPS with a minimum of 64 FPS. This yields a playable experience that remains above the 60 FPS threshold, though users who are sensitive to frame rate drops may prefer to adjust some settings down to maintain a more stable floor. The High preset at 1440p averages 57 FPS, which is playable but may result in occasional dips during complex scenes, making Medium the more reliable choice.

For users with 4K displays, the Low preset is the only option that consistently delivers above 60 FPS, averaging 72 FPS. The Medium preset at 4K averages 56 FPS with a minimum of 47 FPS, which may be acceptable for a slower-paced simulation like Microsoft Flight Simulator, but it requires a tolerance for occasional frame rate dips. Given the data, the Medium preset at 1440p provides the best overall experience, balancing visual fidelity with a stable frame rate that enhances the immersive nature of the game.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700G plays a crucial role in this combo, and its performance characteristics are well-documented in the benchmark data. With 8 cores and 16 threads, the CPU is capable of handling the game's multi-threaded workloads, but Microsoft Flight Simulator is known to be sensitive to single-threaded performance. The CPU's single-thread score of 3,283 in PassMark is respectable, placing it in the upper echelon of processors, and its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,494 confirms strong single-core capability. This is essential for the game's simulation logic, which relies heavily on a single primary thread for flight dynamics and AI calculations.

The CPU's multi-threaded performance is also solid, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12,830.5 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 9,950. These scores indicate that the CPU can handle background tasks and the game's auxiliary threads without bottlenecking the GPU. The 65 W TDP and 7 nm Zen 3 architecture contribute to efficient operation, ensuring that the CPU does not generate excessive heat that could throttle performance during extended play sessions.

The CPU's role becomes more apparent at lower resolutions and settings, where the GPU has more headroom. For example, at 1080p Low settings, the system achieves 121 FPS, which suggests that the CPU is able to feed the GPU with enough data to maintain high frame rates. However, at 4K Ultra, the frame rate drops to 40 FPS, indicating that the GPU is the limiting factor. The data shows that the Ryzen 7 5700G is not the bottleneck in this configuration, as its performance is sufficient to support the RX 6700 XT across all tested settings. The CPU's 16 MB of L3 cache and 51.2 GB/s memory bandwidth provide adequate data throughput for the game's asset streaming, ensuring that the system remains responsive even when flying over detailed terrain.