Lockdown Protocol

Lockdown Protocol

AVERAGE FPS
32
playable

This combination offers playable performance with an average of 32 FPS, though you may want to lower settings for smoother gameplay.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 14 18 21 29
1440p QHD 21 28 32 45
1080p Full HD 29 38 44 61

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 29
3840x2160 Medium 21
3840x2160 High 18
3840x2160 Ultra 14
2560x1440 Low 45
2560x1440 Medium 32
2560x1440 High 28
2560x1440 Ultra 21
1920x1080 Low 61
1920x1080 Medium 44
1920x1080 High 38
1920x1080 Ultra 29

Lockdown Protocol with Intel Core i9-14900K + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti, In-Depth Analysis

# Lockdown Protocol with Intel Core i9-14900K + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

The pairing of Intel's flagship Core i9-14900K with NVIDIA's entry-level GTX 1050 Ti creates one of the most lopsided system configurations in the test database, and the measured FPS data reflects this imbalance with stark clarity. Across all resolutions and settings, the GTX 1050 Ti emerges as the definitive performance bottleneck, with the i9-14900K's substantial compute headroom going largely unused in this FPS title. The benchmark results show a system that can achieve playable frame rates only at the lowest settings and resolution, while struggling severely at higher presets.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is dramatic and reveals a GPU-bound scenario at every resolution tested. At Low settings, the average frame rate falls from 61 FPS at 1920x1080 to 45 FPS at 2560x1440, representing a 26% reduction, and then plummets to 29 FPS at 3840x2160, which is a further 36% drop from 1440p. This progressive decline with each resolution step is the classic signature of a graphics card operating at its absolute limit, where pixel throughput becomes the sole determining factor.

The scaling pattern becomes even more telling when examining Medium settings, which include min/max FPS data. At 1080p Medium, the average is 44 FPS with a range of 37 to 50 FPS. Moving to 1440p Medium drops the average to 32 FPS (a 27% reduction) with min/max of 27 to 37 FPS. At 4K Medium, the average collapses to 21 FPS with a tight min/max range of 18 to 24 FPS. The narrowing variance at 4K indicates the GPU is consistently saturated, leaving little room for frame time variation.

High settings tell a similar story: 38 FPS at 1080p, 28 FPS at 1440p, and 18 FPS at 4K. Ultra settings, which represent the most demanding configuration, yield 29 FPS at 1080p, 21 FPS at 1440p, and a barely interactive 14 FPS at 4K. The consistent pattern across all four quality presets — roughly a 25-35% performance hit when moving from 1080p to 1440p, and another 35-40% hit from 1440p to 4K — confirms that resolution scaling is entirely governed by the GTX 1050 Ti's rendering capabilities.

The data strongly indicates that the limiting component is the GPU, not the CPU. If the i9-14900K were the constraint, we would expect to see diminishing FPS penalties at higher resolutions as the CPU load becomes proportionally smaller. Instead, the FPS scales inversely with pixel count in a near-linear fashion, which is the expected behavior when a 4 GB GDDR5 memory buffer and 112.1 GB/s of bandwidth are being overwhelmed by increasing resolution demands.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i9-14900K brings overwhelming compute resources to this pairing, featuring 24 cores and 32 threads with a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 6.00 GHz. The processor's benchmark scores are exceptional, including a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 39399.5 and a single-core score of 2262.5, along with a Geekbench multi-core score of 21697 and single-core score of 2655. These numbers place the i9-14900K in the 95th percentile of all CPUs tested, with an average benchmark score of 79097.

However, in the context of Lockdown Protocol at the settings tested, this CPU power is almost entirely irrelevant. The FPS data shows no scenario where the CPU could plausibly be the bottleneck, given that even the fastest frame rates (61 FPS at 1080p Low) are well within the capabilities of a processor of this caliber. The i9-14900K's nearest rivals — the Intel Core i9-14900KF with a deltaPct of -0.3%, the Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus at -0.6%, and the AMD EPYC 7413 at -1.2% — all have nearly identical average scores, indicating that any of these CPUs would produce the same FPS results when paired with the GTX 1050 Ti.

The CPU's 36 MB of shared L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache, combined with its dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 memory support, provide ample headroom for game logic and physics calculations. Yet the measured results show that Lockdown Protocol's frame rate is determined almost exclusively by the GPU's pixel and texture processing throughput. The i9-14900K's 125 W TDP and Intel Socket 1700 platform deliver the bandwidth necessary to feed the GTX 1050 Ti, but the graphics card simply cannot translate that CPU capability into higher frame rates.

FAQ

Q: Is the Intel Core i9-14900K bottlenecking the GTX 1050 Ti in Lockdown Protocol?

A: No, the benchmark data shows the opposite. The i9-14900K's 24 cores and 32 threads with a 6.00 GHz boost clock far exceed the demands of this game. The FPS scales predictably with resolution and settings, which is the signature of a GPU bottleneck.

Q: What is the best frame rate achievable with this combination?

A: The highest average FPS recorded is 61 at 1920x1080 with Low settings. At Medium settings, the best average is 44 FPS at 1080p, while High settings yield 38 FPS at the same resolution.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Lockdown Protocol?

A: The data indicates 4K is not viable for smooth gameplay. At 3840x2160, the best average is 29 FPS on Low settings, dropping to 18 FPS on High and 14 FPS on Ultra. The Medium preset averages 21 FPS with a minimum of 18 FPS.

Q: How does the GTX 1050 Ti compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The GTX 1050 Ti has an average benchmark score of 4193, placing it in the 25th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon R5 M330 with a deltaPct of 0.6%, the NVIDIA Quadro K2100M at 1%, and the AMD Radeon Vega 3 at -1.8%, all performing within roughly 2% of each other.

Q: Does increasing settings from Low to Ultra have a linear impact on FPS?

A: No, the impact is substantial but not perfectly linear. At 1080p, going from Low (61 FPS) to Medium (44 FPS) costs 17 FPS, Medium to High (38 FPS) costs 6 FPS, and High to Ultra (29 FPS) costs another 9 FPS. The largest single drop occurs between Low and Medium.

Q: What is the system's overall ranking among tested combinations?

A: This combo ranks 3661 out of 3714 tested combinations in Lockdown Protocol, placing it in the bottom 1.4% of all tested system configurations.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core i9-14900K and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti ranks 3661 out of 3714 tested combos in Lockdown Protocol, placing it in the bottom 1.4% of all system configurations evaluated. This ranking is remarkably poor given the CPU's 95th percentile standing among all processors, and it highlights how severely the GPU drags down the overall system performance.

The i9-14900K's average benchmark score of 79097 places it in elite company, with its nearest rivals being the i9-14900KF (79371, -0.3%), Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (79574, -0.6%), and EPYC 7413 (80041, -1.2%). In contrast, the GTX 1050 Ti's average benchmark score of 4193 places it in the 25th percentile of all GPUs, with its nearest rivals being the Radeon R5 M330 (4170, 0.6%), Quadro K2100M (4151, 1%), and Radeon Vega 3 (4268, -1.8%).

This massive disparity between CPU and GPU capability is the defining characteristic of this combo's ranking. The data shows that the combo's position at 3661 is almost entirely attributable to the GPU's limitations. In a game like Lockdown Protocol, which is clearly GPU-bound based on the resolution scaling analysis, the i9-14900K's strengths are wasted. The ranking would likely be similar with a much weaker CPU, as long as the GTX 1050 Ti remained the graphics solution.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the measured results show a clear hierarchy across settings. Low settings deliver the only truly playable experience with an average of 61 FPS. Medium settings produce an average of 44 FPS with a measured range of 37 to 50 FPS, which is borderline for fast-paced FPS gameplay. High settings drop to 38 FPS average, while Ultra settings yield only 29 FPS average. The 1080p resolution represents the best-case scenario for this combo, with the Low preset being the only configuration that reliably exceeds 60 FPS.

Moving to 2560x1440, performance degrades noticeably across all settings. Low settings average 45 FPS, which is a 26% reduction from 1080p. Medium settings average 32 FPS with a range of 27 to 37 FPS, High settings average 28 FPS, and Ultra settings average 21 FPS. None of these results are ideal for a competitive FPS, though Low settings might be marginally acceptable for casual play.

At 3840x2160, the system struggles to maintain interactive frame rates. Low settings average 29 FPS, Medium settings average 21 FPS with a range of 18 to 24 FPS, High settings average 18 FPS, and Ultra settings average just 14 FPS. These numbers confirm that 4K is not a viable option for this combination in Lockdown Protocol, regardless of quality preset.

The dataset includes min/max FPS values only for Medium settings across all three resolutions. At 1080p Medium, frames range from 37 to 50 FPS; at 1440p Medium, from 27 to 37 FPS; and at 4K Medium, from 18 to 24 FPS. The narrowing range at higher resolutions further confirms the GPU's saturation point is being reached.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal configuration for this combo is 1920x1080 with Low settings, which delivers an average of 61 FPS. This is the only tested setting/resolution combination that achieves a frame rate at or above the 60 FPS threshold generally considered smooth for FPS gameplay. The 1080p Medium preset, averaging 44 FPS, may be acceptable for players who prioritize visual quality over frame rate, but the 17 FPS penalty compared to Low is substantial.

At 2560x1440, the best option is Low settings at 45 FPS average, though this represents a significant compromise in both resolution and visual fidelity. The 1440p Medium preset at 32 FPS average would likely feel sluggish in a fast-paced FPS, and the High and Ultra presets at 28 and 21 FPS respectively are not recommended for competitive play.

For players who insist on higher visual quality, the 1080p High preset at 38 FPS average is the best balance, but it still falls short of the 60 FPS target. The Ultra preset at 1080p (29 FPS) and any 4K configuration are not recommended, as the frame rates drop below 30 FPS, which is generally considered the minimum for playable performance. The data clearly indicates that this system should be configured at 1080p Low for optimal gameplay, with Medium as a secondary option if visual fidelity is prioritized over frame rate consistency.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is the primary determinant of performance in this combo, and its specifications explain the measured results comprehensively. The GPU features 4 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 128-bit bus with 112.1 GB/s of bandwidth, which proves insufficient for Lockdown Protocol at higher resolutions and settings. The GP107 chip, built on a 14 nm process at Samsung with 3,300 million transistors and a die size of 132 mm², operates at a base clock of 1291 MHz and a boost clock of 1392 MHz.

The GPU's 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 32 ROPs deliver a FP32 performance of 2.138 TFLOPS, which is modest by modern standards. The pixel rate of 44.54 GPixel/s and texture rate of 66.82 GTexel/s directly constrain the frame rates observed in the benchmark data. The GPU's benchmark scores corroborate this analysis: a Passmark G3D score of 6340, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 18129, and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 305.

The 75 W TDP and lack of power connectors indicate this is a low-power card, and the PCIe 3.0 x16 interface provides adequate bandwidth for its capabilities. The GPU's 25th percentile ranking among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 4193, places it in the entry-level category. The nearest rival comparisons — Radeon R5 M330 (0.6% delta), Quadro K2100M (1%), and Radeon Vega 3 (-1.8%) — demonstrate that the GTX 1050 Ti is clustered with other low-performance solutions.

In the context of Lockdown Protocol, the GPU's 4 GB VRAM capacity and 128-bit memory interface are the critical limiting factors. The 14 nm Pascal architecture, despite supporting DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, cannot keep pace with the rendering demands at 4K or high-quality settings. The measured FPS data shows that the GPU saturates quickly as resolution increases, confirming that any upgrade path must prioritize the graphics card to unlock the i9-14900K's potential in this title.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core i9-14900K

Cores / Threads 24 / 32
Base Clock 3200 MHz
Boost Clock 6000 MHz
TDP 125W
Socket Intel Socket 1700
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

VRAM 4 GB GDDR5
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 1392 MHz MHz
TDP 75 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core i9-14900K + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in Lockdown Protocol

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 29.0
3840x2160 Medium 21.0
3840x2160 High 18.0
3840x2160 Ultra 14.0
2560x1440 Low 45.0
2560x1440 Medium 32.0
2560x1440 High 28.0
2560x1440 Ultra 21.0
1920x1080 Low 61.0
1920x1080 Medium 44.0
1920x1080 High 38.0
1920x1080 Ultra 29.0

Lockdown Protocol with ii9-14900K + Other GPUs

See how Lockdown Protocol performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Lockdown Protocol with GTX 1050 Ti + Other CPUs

See how Lockdown Protocol performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with ii9-14900K + GTX 1050 Ti

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.