Lockdown Protocol
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 63 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 27 | 36 | 41 | 58 |
| 1440p QHD | 42 | 56 | 64 | 90 |
| 1080p Full HD | 57 | 76 | 87 | 122 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Lockdown Protocol with Intel Core i5-14600K + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti, In-Depth Analysis
Lockdown Protocol presents an interesting stress test for the Intel Core i5-14600K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti. The benchmark data reveals a configuration that is heavily balanced toward CPU performance, with the GPU acting as the primary bottleneck in most scenarios. This analysis explores how the combination scales across resolutions, where it stands among tested systems, and what the measured frames indicate about the underlying hardware limits.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data shows a clear and consistent pattern: performance degrades significantly as resolution increases from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves 122 FPS, but this drops to 90 FPS at 1440p and further to 58 FPS at 4K. This represents a 52.5% reduction in frame rate from 1080p Low to 4K Low, which is a substantial hit that points directly at the GPU as the limiting factor.
The scaling becomes even more pronounced at higher settings. With High settings, the average FPS falls from 76 at 1080p to 56 at 1440p, then to 36 at 4K. The drop from 1440p to 4K is particularly steep—a 35.7% decrease—which suggests the GTX 1660 Ti's 6 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are struggling to feed the pixel pipeline at 4K. The Ultra preset tells a similar story: 57 FPS at 1080p, 42 FPS at 1440p, and 27 FPS at 4K.
What does this scaling imply about the limiting component? The fact that 1080p Low delivers 122 FPS—well above playable thresholds—indicates the CPU is not holding the system back at lower resolutions. However, the rapid falloff at 4K, where even Low settings only produce 58 FPS, shows the GPU is saturated. The data suggests that if the GPU were more capable, the CPU could push much higher frame rates, as evidenced by the strong 1080p results. The gap between 1080p and 4K at Low settings (64 FPS difference) versus the gap at Ultra (30 FPS difference) also hints that the GPU's compute resources, not just memory, are the bottleneck at higher resolutions.
How This Combo Ranks
In Lockdown Protocol, this specific combination of the Intel Core i5-14600K and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti ranks 3199 out of 3714 tested combos. This places it in the lower 13.8% of all configurations, which is a surprisingly low position given the CPU's strength. The discrepancy between the CPU's high benchmark scores and this poor in-game ranking underscores the GPU's role as the weak link in this pairing.
The combo rank of 3199 means that 515 other tested combinations performed better in this game. This is a significant margin, suggesting that Lockdown Protocol is particularly sensitive to GPU performance. The data implies that many systems with weaker CPUs but stronger GPUs are achieving better results in this title. For context, the CPU itself ranks in the 90th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits in the 41st percentile, so the pairing of a top-tier CPU with a mid-range GPU creates a mismatch that the game's engine exploits.
Looking at the GPU's nearest rivals, the GTX 1660 Ti's average benchmark score of 7723 is only 0.7% higher than the AMD Radeon 540's 7673, and 1.9% higher than the Radeon Pro WX 3100's 7580. These are extremely close margins, meaning the GPU is competitively positioned among its direct peers, yet the combo rank suggests that even small GPU differences translate into large FPS swings in Lockdown Protocol. The rank data indicates that users with this CPU should pair it with a significantly stronger GPU to move up the leaderboard.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is built on the Turing architecture using a 12 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 284 mm² and 6,600 million transistors. Its 6 GB of GDDR6 memory operates at 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) across a 192-bit bus, yielding 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU's base clock is 1500 MHz with a boost clock of 1770 MHz, and it has 1536 shading units, 96 TMUs, and 48 ROPs.
These specifications directly relate to the measured FPS in Lockdown Protocol. The 6 GB VRAM capacity is likely a limiting factor at 4K Ultra, where the game appears to require more memory than available, resulting in the lowest average of 27 FPS. The memory bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s, while respectable for the era, is insufficient for the high-resolution textures that Lockdown Protocol demands. The pixel rate of 84.96 GPixel/s and texture rate of 169.9 GTexel/s are also modest, which explains why the FPS drops sharply when settings are increased.
The GPU's FP32 performance of 5.437 TFLOPS and FP16 of 10.87 TFLOPS (2:1) provide a baseline for compute capability, but the game's results show that raw throughput isn't enough. The benchmark scores reflect this: the Passmark G3D score is 12871, and the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 1061, both indicating mid-range performance. The GPU's percentile rank of 41 among all GPUs means it outperforms only 41% of the field, which aligns with the observed FPS limitations. The data suggests that the GTX 1660 Ti is adequate for 1080p gaming but becomes increasingly inadequate as resolution and settings climb.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers an average of 122 FPS, which is the highest recorded value for this combo. Medium settings produce 87 FPS with a minimum of 74 and maximum of 100 FPS, while High settings yield 76 FPS. Ultra drops to 57 FPS, showing that even at 1080p, the Ultra preset pushes the GPU hard.
Moving to 2560x1440, the Low preset achieves 90 FPS, which is still quite playable. Medium settings average 64 FPS with a range of 54 to 73 FPS, while High settings produce 56 FPS. Ultra falls to 42 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold that many players consider smooth. The transition from 1080p to 1440p costs roughly 26-27% performance across the board, which is consistent with the increased pixel count.
At 3840x2160, the situation becomes more challenging. Low settings manage 58 FPS, but Medium drops to 41 FPS (with a minimum of 35 and maximum of 47), High falls to 36 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 27 FPS. The spread between Low and Ultra at 4K is 31 FPS, which is a narrower gap than at 1080p (65 FPS) or 1440p (48 FPS). This narrowing suggests that at 4K, the GPU is so heavily constrained that settings changes have diminishing returns—the bottleneck is absolute.
The data shows that the only setting where this combo consistently exceeds 60 FPS is at 1080p Low. At 1440p Low, it reaches 90 FPS, but any higher settings at 1440p or any settings at 4K result in sub-60 FPS averages. The Medium preset at 1080p, with its 87 FPS average and 74 FPS minimum, offers the best balance of quality and performance for those seeking a smooth experience.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured FPS rows, the optimal settings for this combo depend on the target resolution and desired frame rate. At 1920x1080, the Medium preset is the clear recommendation, delivering an 87 FPS average with a minimum of 74 FPS. This provides a comfortable margin above 60 FPS while offering better visual quality than Low. The High preset at 76 FPS is also viable, but Medium provides a safer minimum frame rate for competitive play.
For 2560x1440, the Low preset is the only option that maintains a high frame rate, achieving 90 FPS. Medium drops to 64 FPS, which is borderline, and the minimum of 54 FPS could cause noticeable stutters in fast-paced FPS action. If the user prioritizes visual fidelity over frame rate, Medium at 1440p is acceptable, but Low is recommended for consistent performance. High and Ultra at this resolution are not advisable, as they fall to 56 and 42 FPS respectively.
At 3840x2160, none of the settings achieve 60 FPS, so the recommendation depends on tolerance for lower frame rates. Low at 58 FPS is the closest to playable, while Medium at 41 FPS and High at 36 FPS are marginal. Ultra at 27 FPS is only suitable for slower-paced gameplay or screenshot purposes. For a competitive FPS like Lockdown Protocol, the data suggests that 1080p Medium or 1440p Low are the best choices, as they balance frame rate and visual quality without sacrificing responsiveness.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i5-14600K is a 14-core, 20-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, manufactured on Intel's 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.30 GHz, with a 125 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB L1 per core, 2 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This CPU supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration and uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes.
The CPU's benchmark scores are impressive, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24491 and single-core score of 2064. The Geekbench multicore score is 16673, and single-core is 2491. The Passmark multithread score is 38682, with a single-thread score of 4270. These numbers place the CPU in the 90th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 48618. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H (48698, -0.2% delta), AMD EPYC 4345P (48470, +0.3%), and Intel Core Ultra 5 245HX (48287, +0.7%).
In Lockdown Protocol, the CPU's role is to maintain high frame rates at lower resolutions where the GPU isn't saturated. The 1080p Low result of 122 FPS indicates the CPU can drive the game well above typical refresh rates. The 20 threads and high boost clock of 5.30 GHz are particularly beneficial for FPS games that often rely on single-thread performance for game logic and physics. The 24 MB L3 cache also helps reduce memory latency, which is crucial for maintaining consistent frame times.
However, the measured data shows that the CPU's potential is largely unrealized in this combo because the GPU becomes the bottleneck at higher resolutions. The 4K results, which hover around 27-58 FPS, are clearly GPU-limited, as the CPU has ample headroom to push more frames. The rank of 3199 out of 3714 combos reflects this imbalance—the CPU is overqualified for the GPU, and the game's performance suffers as a result. Users with this CPU should consider upgrading the GPU to fully unlock its capabilities in Lockdown Protocol.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution and settings combo for this system?
A: Based on the measured data, 1920x1080 with Medium settings provides the best experience, with an average of 87 FPS and a minimum of 74 FPS. This is the highest settings preset that maintains a comfortable margin above 60 FPS.
Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Lockdown Protocol?
A: The data shows 4K performance is limited, with the highest average being 58 FPS at Low settings. Medium, High, and Ultra all fall below 41 FPS, making 4K gaming impractical for smooth play.
Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested systems?
A: This combo ranks 3199 out of 3714 tested combinations, placing it in the bottom 13.8% of systems. This low rank is primarily due to the GPU's limitations despite the CPU's strong performance.
Q: What is the CPU's benchmark performance relative to its rivals?
A: The Intel Core i5-14600K has an average benchmark score of 48618, which is 0.2% lower than the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H (48698) and 0.3% higher than the AMD EPYC 4345P (48470). It ranks in the 90th percentile among all CPUs.
Q: What are the GPU's clock speeds and memory specifications?
A: The GTX 1660 Ti has a base clock of 1500 MHz and a boost clock of 1770 MHz. It features 6 GB of GDDR6 memory at 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) with a 192-bit bus and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth.
Q: Is the GPU or CPU the primary bottleneck in this game?
A: The data indicates the GPU is the primary bottleneck, especially at higher resolutions. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 122 FPS, but this drops to 58 FPS at 4K Low, showing that the GPU cannot maintain performance as pixel count increases despite the CPU's high capabilities.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i5-14600K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i5-14600K + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in Lockdown Protocol
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 58.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 41.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 36.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 27.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 90.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 64.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 56.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 42.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 122.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 87.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 76.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 57.0 |
Lockdown Protocol with ii5-14600K + Other GPUs
See how Lockdown Protocol performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Lockdown Protocol with GTX 1660 Ti + Other CPUs
See how Lockdown Protocol performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii5-14600K + GTX 1660 Ti
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.