Lockdown Protocol

Lockdown Protocol

AVERAGE FPS
58
playable

This combination offers playable performance with an average of 58 FPS, though you may want to lower settings for smoother gameplay.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 23 34 36 53
1440p QHD 38 51 60 85
1080p Full HD 54 70 82 113

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 53
3840x2160 Medium 36
3840x2160 High 34
3840x2160 Ultra 23
2560x1440 Low 85
2560x1440 Medium 60
2560x1440 High 51
2560x1440 Ultra 38
1920x1080 Low 113
1920x1080 Medium 82
1920x1080 High 70
1920x1080 Ultra 54

Lockdown Protocol with Intel Core i5-14400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB, In-Depth Analysis

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data for Lockdown Protocol with the Intel Core i5-14400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB reveals a clear and consistent pattern of performance degradation as resolution increases. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combination produces an average of 113.1 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440 at the same settings drops that figure to 84.7 FPS, a reduction of roughly 25%. The final step to 3840x2160 yields 52.6 FPS, which is about 38% below the 1440p result and less than half of the 1080p figure.

This scaling behavior points directly at the GPU as the primary limiting component. If the CPU were the bottleneck, the FPS penalty from raising resolution would be far smaller, since the processor workload remains largely unchanged. Instead, the data shows that each increase in pixel count exacts a substantial toll on frame rates, which is characteristic of a graphics card struggling to fill more pixels. The RTX 3050 4 GB, with its 128-bit memory bus and 192.0 GB/s bandwidth, is simply overwhelmed at higher resolutions.

The pattern holds across all settings presets. At Medium settings, the 1080p score is 81.8 FPS, falling to 60.1 FPS at 1440p and then 35.8 FPS at 4K. The High preset follows suit: 70.3 FPS at 1080p, 50.8 FPS at 1440p, and 33.6 FPS at 4K. Even the Ultra preset, which starts at a modest 53.5 FPS at 1080p, drops to 37.7 FPS at 1440p and further to 23.1 FPS at 4K. The consistent proportional drops across all settings reinforce the conclusion that resolution scaling is governed by GPU throughput rather than any other system component.

Notably, the gap between Low and Ultra settings widens as resolution increases. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 59.6 FPS. At 1440p, that gap narrows to 47.0 FPS, and at 4K it shrinks further to 29.5 FPS. This narrowing suggests that at higher resolutions, the GPU is so saturated that settings adjustments yield diminishing returns—the card simply has fewer spare cycles to allocate toward visual fidelity.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS achievable with this combination?

A: The best measured result is 113.1 FPS at 1920x1080 with Low settings. This is the only configuration in the data set that exceeds 100 FPS.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Lockdown Protocol?

A: At 3840x2160, the highest average FPS recorded is 52.6 FPS on Low settings. The High preset drops to 33.6 FPS, and Ultra falls to 23.1 FPS. None of the 4K configurations reach the 60 FPS threshold.

Q: How does the RTX 3050 4 GB's memory configuration affect performance?

A: The card features 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 192.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The data shows significant FPS drops at higher resolutions, which is consistent with a GPU that runs out of memory bandwidth when pixel counts increase.

Q: What is the difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, Low settings produce 84.7 FPS, while Ultra produces 37.7 FPS. This represents a 47.0 FPS difference, indicating that the Ultra preset costs nearly 55% of the Low preset's frame rate.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in this game?

A: The resolution scaling data strongly indicates the GPU is the bottleneck. The FPS drops by roughly 25% from 1080p to 1440p and another 38% from 1440p to 4K at Low settings, a pattern that would not occur if the processor were the constraint.

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-14400F provide adequate processing power for this game?

A: The CPU benchmarks are strong, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21914 and a single-core score of 3093. The 10-core, 16-thread design with a boost clock of 4.70 GHz is more than sufficient for Lockdown Protocol, as the FPS scaling is dominated by GPU limitations.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB plays the decisive role in shaping Lockdown Protocol's performance profile. This GPU, built on the Ampere architecture with the GA107 chip, operates at a base clock of 1545 MHz and a boost clock of 1740 MHz. The memory runs at 1500 MHz, which translates to 12 Gbps effective, across a 128-bit bus. These specifications combine to deliver 192.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth, a figure that proves insufficient for high-resolution gaming in this title.

The 4 GB memory capacity is particularly consequential. Lockdown Protocol, as a modern FPS released in March 2024, likely requires substantial video memory for textures and scene data at higher settings. The measured FPS data shows that at 4K Ultra, the system manages only 23.1 FPS, while 4K Low achieves 52.6 FPS. This 29.5 FPS swing at the same resolution suggests that texture and memory pressure, not just raw compute, is limiting performance at the highest settings.

The GPU's compute capabilities, rated at 7.127 TFLOPS for FP32 operations, are modest by modern standards. The 2048 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 render output units provide a baseline that works well at 1080p but struggles as pixel count rises. The pixel rate of 55.68 GPixel/s and texture rate of 111.4 GTexel/s are adequate for 1080p gaming but become bottlenecks at 1440p and beyond.

The RTX 3050 4 GB also includes 16 ray tracing cores and 64 tensor cores, though these features likely have minimal impact on Lockdown Protocol's performance given the overall frame rates observed. The card's 90 W TDP and dual-slot design indicate a modest power envelope, and the 250 W suggested PSU reflects its efficiency-oriented positioning. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface provides sufficient bandwidth for the card's memory subsystem, though the 128-bit bus remains the key constraint.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core i5-14400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB ranks 1489 out of 1637 tested combos in Lockdown Protocol. This places the system in the bottom 9% of all configurations tested, a position that reflects the GPU's limitations rather than any deficiency in the processor.

The CPU itself performs well in isolation. The i5-14400F achieves an average benchmark score of 32508, placing it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-12800H with an average score of 32513 (a 0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7645 at 32446 (0.2% delta), and the AMD Ryzen 7 250 at 32584 (-0.2% delta). These near-identical scores indicate that the i5-14400F is firmly in the upper tier of desktop processors.

The disconnect between the CPU's strong benchmark performance and the combo's low ranking underscores the GPU bottleneck. A top-tier processor paired with an entry-level graphics card produces a system that is only as strong as its weakest link. In this case, the RTX 3050 4 GB, which sits at the 50th percentile of all GPUs, holds the entire system back in Lockdown Protocol.

The ranking data confirms that most other tested combinations deliver better performance in this specific game. With 148 other combos ranked below this one, there is a small but meaningful set of systems that perform worse, likely featuring even older or weaker GPUs. However, the vast majority of configurations tested—1489 of them—outperform this pairing, highlighting that the RTX 3050 4 GB is simply not competitive for this title at higher resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a complete picture across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the system delivers 113.1 FPS on Low, 81.8 FPS on Medium, 70.3 FPS on High, and 53.5 FPS on Ultra. The 1080p results show a clear hierarchy where each settings tier costs a meaningful portion of performance, with Ultra delivering less than half the frame rate of Low.

At 2560x1440, the scores drop to 84.7 FPS on Low, 60.1 FPS on Medium, 50.8 FPS on High, and 37.7 FPS on Ultra. The 1440p data reveals that even Low settings cannot maintain the 90 FPS mark, and Ultra falls below 40 FPS. This resolution represents a significant compromise for the system, with only the Low preset approaching playable frame rates.

At 3840x2160, the results are 52.6 FPS on Low, 35.8 FPS on Medium, 33.6 FPS on High, and 23.1 FPS on Ultra. The 4K data shows that no settings preset achieves 60 FPS, and the Ultra preset drops below 24 FPS, which is below standard cinematic frame rates. The gap between Low and Medium at 4K is substantial at 16.8 FPS, while the difference between Medium and High is only 2.2 FPS, suggesting diminishing returns at higher settings.

The progression across resolutions for each preset is equally telling. Low settings: 113.1 FPS at 1080p, 84.7 FPS at 1440p, 52.6 FPS at 4K. Medium: 81.8, 60.1, 35.8. High: 70.3, 50.8, 33.6. Ultra: 53.5, 37.7, 23.1. Each step from 1080p to 1440p costs roughly 25-30% of performance, and each step from 1440p to 4K costs an additional 35-40%.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data provides clear guidance for optimizing the Lockdown Protocol experience with this hardware. For 1080p gaming, the Medium preset at 81.8 FPS offers the best balance of visual quality and performance. It delivers a smooth frame rate well above the 60 FPS threshold while providing better visuals than Low. The High preset at 70.3 FPS is also viable for players who prioritize visual fidelity, though the 11.5 FPS drop from Medium may not justify the graphical improvements.

For 1440p, the Low preset at 84.7 FPS is the only configuration that maintains a high refresh rate experience. The Medium preset at 60.1 FPS is playable but leaves little headroom for demanding scenes. The High preset at 50.8 FPS may cause noticeable stuttering in fast-paced FPS combat, and Ultra at 37.7 FPS is not recommended for competitive play.

For 4K, none of the presets achieve 60 FPS. The Low preset at 52.6 FPS is the most playable option, though it will require compromising on visual quality. The Medium preset at 35.8 FPS is borderline, and both High (33.6 FPS) and Ultra (23.1 FPS) produce frame rates that are too low for a responsive FPS experience.

The data suggests that the optimal configuration for most players is 1080p with Medium settings, which delivers 81.8 FPS and balances image quality with responsiveness. Players with 1440p monitors should accept Low settings to maintain playability, while 4K gaming is only marginally viable at Low settings and is not recommended for competitive play. The system's 4 GB VRAM and 192.0 GB/s bandwidth make higher resolutions particularly challenging, so prioritizing resolution over settings yields the best overall experience.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core i5-14400F

Cores / Threads 10 / 16
Base Clock 2500 MHz
Boost Clock 4700 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket Intel Socket 1700
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB

VRAM 4 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 1740 MHz MHz
TDP 90 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core i5-14400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB in Lockdown Protocol

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 52.6
3840x2160 Medium 35.8
3840x2160 High 33.6
3840x2160 Ultra 23.1
2560x1440 Low 84.7
2560x1440 Medium 60.1
2560x1440 High 50.8
2560x1440 Ultra 37.7
1920x1080 Low 113.1
1920x1080 Medium 81.8
1920x1080 High 70.3
1920x1080 Ultra 53.5

Lockdown Protocol with RTX 3050 4 GB + Other CPUs

See how Lockdown Protocol performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with ii5-14400F + RTX 3050 4 GB

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.