Lockdown Protocol

Lockdown Protocol

AVERAGE FPS
133
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 133 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 57 76 87 122
1440p QHD 88 118 135 190
1080p Full HD 120 161 184 259

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 122
3840x2160 Medium 87
3840x2160 High 76
3840x2160 Ultra 57
2560x1440 Low 190
2560x1440 Medium 135
2560x1440 High 118
2560x1440 Ultra 88
1920x1080 Low 259
1920x1080 Medium 184
1920x1080 High 161
1920x1080 Ultra 120

Lockdown Protocol with Intel Core i5-12400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, In-Depth Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti combination presents a fascinating study in bottleneck dynamics within Lockdown Protocol. The CPU, a 6-core, 12-thread Alder Lake-S part with a 2.50 GHz base and 4.40 GHz boost clock, posts a 73rd-percentile standing among all tested CPUs. Its synthetic benchmarks, such as a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12380 and a single-core score of 1680, place it in a competitive tier, with its average benchmark score of 19039 sitting within 0.3% of rivals like the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS and Intel Core i5-1335U. This processor is not a slouch, but the data suggests its 18 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel memory support are configured for mainstream throughput, not extreme high-refresh-rate gaming. The GPU, conversely, is a heavyweight, with a 83rd-percentile rank, 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus delivering 912.4 GB/s of bandwidth, and a boost clock of 1665 MHz. The measured FPS data reveals how these two components interact across resolutions, with the CPU's influence waning as the GPU becomes the primary constraint at higher pixel counts.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The i5-12400F's role is defined by its 6 Physical Core / 12 Thread configuration and a 65 W TDP, which suggests a focus on efficiency while maintaining respectable multi-threaded performance. In CPU-bound scenarios, its 4.40 GHz boost clock is the key asset. The benchmark data shows a clear pattern: at 1080p, the CPU must feed frames as fast as possible, and the average FPS scores of 259 on Low and 161 on High demonstrate that this processor has the headroom to drive high frame rates, though it begins to show strain at Ultra settings with 120 FPS. The 3DMark scores are telling here—the processor’s 16-thread score of 5895 and single-thread score of 909 indicate a balanced design, but the delta between its multi-threaded and single-threaded performance is modest. This implies that while the CPU can handle multiple background tasks, its per-core strength is sufficient but not exceptional.

Comparing the i5-12400F to its nearest rivals, the data shows a statistical near-tie. The AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS has an average score of 19047, a 0% delta from the i5-12400F’s 19039. The Intel Core i5-1335U is 0.3% faster, and the AMD EPYC 7773X is also 0.3% faster. This tells us that in raw synthetic throughput, the i5-12400F is not leaving competitors in the dust; its advantage lies in its specific combination of latency and clock speed. In Lockdown Protocol, a fast-paced FPS, the single-thread performance is critical. The Geekbench single-core score of 1964 and Cinebench R20 single-core score of 985 are the metrics that likely correlate with the game’s frame pacing. The data implies that at 1080p, the CPU is the primary driver of the average FPS, but it is not a limiting factor in a negative sense—it provides a stable platform that allows the RTX 3080 Ti to operate at high utilization.

The cache hierarchy also plays a role. With 80 KB of L1 per core and 1.25 MB of L2 per core, the i5-12400F has fast access to frequently used data. The 18 MB shared L3 cache is a substantial pool, but it is not the massive 3D V-Cache found in some AMD parts. For a game like Lockdown Protocol, which may rely on predictable memory access patterns, this cache size is likely adequate. The absence of integrated graphics on the "F" suffix ensures all processing power is dedicated to the primary task. The synthetic data suggests this CPU is a strong mid-range performer, and the game results confirm it can sustain high refresh rates, but the 73rd percentile ranking indicates that more powerful CPUs exist for those seeking absolute maximum FPS at 1080p.

FAQ

Q: What is the average FPS at 1080p with Medium settings?

A: The measured average FPS is 184, with a minimum of 156 and a maximum of 211. This indicates a smooth experience with some variance, suggesting the CPU and GPU are well-matched at this preset.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS?

A: The i5-12400F has an average benchmark score of 19039, which is a 0% delta compared to the Ryzen 5 7535HS’s 19047. They are effectively tied in synthetic performance, though real-world gaming can differ due to architecture and cache behavior.

Q: Is the RTX 3080 Ti a significant upgrade over the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070?

A: The RTX 3080 Ti has an average benchmark score of 41187, which is 2% higher than the RTX 5070’s 40377. The data shows a slight performance advantage for the 3080 Ti in aggregate benchmarks, despite the generational difference.

Q: What is the maximum average FPS achieved by this combo?

A: The highest average FPS recorded is 259, which occurs at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. This highlights the CPU’s ability to push very high frame rates when the GPU is not heavily burdened.

Q: Does the GPU support the latest DirectX version?

A: Yes, the RTX 3080 Ti supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), along with OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern game APIs that Lockdown Protocol may utilize.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth, and why might it matter?

A: The RTX 3080 Ti has a memory bandwidth of 912.4 GB/s, stemming from its 384-bit bus and 19 Gbps effective memory clock. This high bandwidth is crucial for feeding the 10240 shading units at high resolutions, particularly in texture-heavy scenes.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The resolution scaling data reveals a textbook shift in bottleneck from CPU to GPU as pixel count increases. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves 259 FPS. Moving to 1440p, this drops to 190 FPS, and at 4K it falls to 122 FPS. This represents a 27% drop from 1080p to 1440p, and a 53% drop from 1080p to 4K. The pattern indicates that at 1080p, the CPU is likely the limiting factor, as the GPU has ample headroom to render frames quickly, but the processor cannot issue draw calls fast enough to exceed the 259 FPS mark. The fact that the FPS does not scale linearly with the pixel count (4K has 4x the pixels of 1080p) confirms that the GPU is becoming the primary constraint at higher resolutions.

Examining the High settings row provides further clarity. At 1080p High, the average is 161 FPS; at 1440p High, it is 118 FPS; and at 4K High, it is 76 FPS. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is 43 FPS, while the drop from 1440p to 4K is 42 FPS. This near-linear decline in FPS as resolution increases suggests that the GPU is now the dominant bottleneck. The CPU can still provide the necessary data, but the RTX 3080 Ti’s rendering workload is scaling with the pixel count. The Ultra settings tell a similar story: 120 FPS at 1080p, 88 FPS at 1440p, and 57 FPS at 4K. The percentage drops are consistent, reinforcing that the GPU’s compute and memory bandwidth are the limiting factors in these higher-load scenarios.

The implications are clear: for gamers targeting 1080p with this combo, the i5-12400F may prevent the RTX 3080 Ti from reaching its full potential, especially on Low settings where the FPS ceiling is CPU-bound. However, at 1440p and 4K, the system becomes balanced, with the GPU’s 12 GB of VRAM and 912.4 GB/s bandwidth being the primary drivers of performance. The data suggests that the sweet spot for this pairing, where neither component is severely underutilized, lies between 1440p and 4K, where the FPS drops are proportional to the rendering load.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

At 1920x1080, the data shows a wide spread across presets. Low settings yield an average of 259 FPS, which is the highest recorded for this combo. Medium settings produce an average of 184 FPS, with a variance between 156 and 211 FPS, indicating some frame pacing inconsistency. High settings average 161 FPS, and Ultra settings drop to 120 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a 54% reduction in average FPS (from 259 to 120), which is a significant cost for the visual fidelity gains. The Medium preset’s minimum of 156 FPS is notably higher than the Ultra average, suggesting that Medium offers a smoother experience relative to its FPS ceiling.

Moving to 2560x1440, the averages scale down predictably. Low settings average 190 FPS, Medium averages 135 FPS with a 115-155 FPS range, High averages 118 FPS, and Ultra averages 88 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra here is 102 FPS, which is a proportional drop similar to 1080p. The Medium preset’s minimum of 115 FPS is still well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay, indicating that this resolution is well-handled by the combo. The Ultra preset’s 88 FPS average is respectable, but the data suggests that players seeking consistent high refresh rates might prefer High settings.

At 3840x2160, the GPU’s workload becomes substantial. Low settings average 122 FPS, which is impressive for 4K. Medium averages 87 FPS, with a minimum of 74 FPS and a maximum of 100 FPS, showing tighter frame times than at lower resolutions. High settings average 76 FPS, and Ultra drops to 57 FPS. The transition from Medium to High at 4K is only an 11 FPS drop, while High to Ultra is a 19 FPS drop, suggesting that the Ultra preset introduces particularly demanding effects. The 4K Low average of 122 FPS is a standout figure, proving that the RTX 3080 Ti has substantial raw power, but the CPU is not holding it back at this resolution, as evidenced by the higher FPS compared to 1080p High settings.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is the dominant component in this pairing, and its specifications align with the measured performance. With 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, the GPU has a bandwidth of 912.4 GB/s, which is essential for high-resolution textures and complex shaders in Lockdown Protocol. The 10240 shading units, 320 TMUs, and 112 ROPs provide a massive compute throughput, reflected in the FP32 performance of 34.10 TFLOPS. The boost clock of 1665 MHz, while not exceptionally high, is supplemented by the sheer number of cores. The GPU’s 83rd-percentile rank among all GPUs indicates it is a top-tier performer, and the benchmark results confirm this.

The GPU’s role becomes more apparent when analyzing the 4K results. At 4K Ultra, the average FPS of 57 suggests the GPU is heavily loaded, with the 350 W TDP and dual-slot cooler design indicating the thermal and power demands of such workloads. The memory clock of 1188 MHz (19 Gbps effective) and the 912.4 GB/s bandwidth are likely the keys to maintaining playable frame rates at 4K, as texture streaming and memory access are critical. The data shows that the GPU is not a bottleneck at 1080p, where the CPU limits performance, but at 4K, the GPU’s architecture is the deciding factor.

Comparing the RTX 3080 Ti to its nearest rivals, the data shows a solid standing. It is 0.8% faster than the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 and 2% faster than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070, but 1.2% slower than the Tesla M40 24 GB. These deltas are small, indicating that the 3080 Ti is in a highly competitive performance band. The PassMark G3D score of 26896 and the Geekbench OpenCL score of 170037 provide context for its compute capabilities. In Lockdown Protocol, the GPU’s role is to render the game’s environments and effects; the high texture rate of 532.8 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 186.5 GPixel/s ensure that the game can maintain high visual fidelity without compromising frame rate, as long as the CPU can keep up with the game logic.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend on the target resolution and refresh rate. At 1080p, the High preset offers an average of 161 FPS, which is an excellent balance between visual quality and performance. The Ultra preset drops to 120 FPS, which is still high, but the 25% performance hit may not be justified by the visual improvements. The Medium preset at 184 FPS is also viable, but its minimum FPS of 156 is lower than High’s average, suggesting less consistency. For players with 144Hz monitors, the High preset at 1080p is the recommended choice, as it provides a stable frame rate above the refresh rate threshold.

At 1440p, the High preset averages 118 FPS, which is suitable for high-refresh-rate displays. The Medium preset averages 135 FPS and offers a better margin above 120 FPS, but the High preset’s visual benefits are substantial. The Ultra preset at 88 FPS is playable but may not be ideal for competitive play where high frame rates are advantageous. This analysis suggests that High is the sweet spot at 1440p, providing a 118 FPS average without the steep performance cost of Ultra. The Medium preset’s minimum of 115 FPS is also respectable, but the High preset’s average is closer to the monitor’s refresh rate capabilities.

At 4K, the decision becomes more nuanced. The High preset averages 76 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS standard for smooth gameplay, but the Ultra preset at 57 FPS may cause noticeable stutters on 60Hz displays. The Medium preset at 87 FPS is the most balanced option, offering a 15% performance uplift over High while maintaining good visual quality. The Low preset at 122 FPS is excellent for fast-paced play, but it sacrifices too much visual fidelity for most users. Therefore, for 4K, the Medium preset is the recommended choice, as it provides a high average FPS with a minimum of 74 FPS, ensuring a smooth experience without compromising too much on graphical details.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The Intel Core i5-12400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti combination ranks 936th out of 3714 tested combos in Lockdown Protocol. This places it in the top 25.2% of all systems tested, indicating that it is a high-performing setup. The rank is a composite metric that considers the measured FPS across all resolutions and settings, and this position suggests that the combo is well above the median performer. The rank of 936 implies that there are 935 other combos that achieve higher overall performance, but also that this system outperforms roughly 2778 other combinations.

The percentile calculation (936/3714) shows that this combo is in the 74.8th percentile of all tested systems. This is a strong result, but it also highlights that the CPU and GPU are not the absolute top-tier components available. The i5-12400F’s 73rd percentile ranking and the RTX 3080 Ti’s 83rd percentile ranking are both high, but the combo’s overall rank is slightly lower than the GPU’s percentile, suggesting that the CPU may be holding the system back in some scenarios. In CPU-bound situations, such as 1080p Low settings, the i5-12400F limits the FPS to 259, whereas a higher-ranked CPU might allow the RTX 3080 Ti to achieve even higher frame rates.

The combo’s rank of 936 is not a negative reflection; it reflects the balance of the system. The data shows that this pairing excels at high resolutions, where the GPU’s power is fully utilized, and at high settings, where the CPU’s limits are less apparent. The rank indicates that for a 6-core CPU and a previous-generation flagship GPU, this is a highly capable gaming machine. The fact that it sits in the top quartile of all combos underscores its viability for demanding games like Lockdown Protocol. However, the rank also implies that users seeking the absolute highest FPS might consider a more powerful CPU, such as those with higher single-thread scores, to fully unlock the RTX 3080 Ti’s potential at lower resolutions.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core i5-12400F

Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Base Clock 2500 MHz
Boost Clock 4400 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket Intel Socket 1700
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti

VRAM 12 GB GDDR6X
Base Clock
Boost Clock 1665 MHz MHz
TDP 350 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core i5-12400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti in Lockdown Protocol

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 122.0
3840x2160 Medium 87.0
3840x2160 High 76.0
3840x2160 Ultra 57.0
2560x1440 Low 190.0
2560x1440 Medium 135.0
2560x1440 High 118.0
2560x1440 Ultra 88.0
1920x1080 Low 259.0
1920x1080 Medium 184.0
1920x1080 High 161.0
1920x1080 Ultra 120.0

Lockdown Protocol with ii5-12400F + Other GPUs

See how Lockdown Protocol performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Lockdown Protocol with RTX 3080 Ti + Other CPUs

See how Lockdown Protocol performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with ii5-12400F + RTX 3080 Ti

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.