Lockdown Protocol
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 116 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 52 | 67 | 74 | 107 |
| 1440p QHD | 75 | 103 | 116 | 167 |
| 1080p Full HD | 103 | 142 | 164 | 226 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Lockdown Protocol with AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, with a base clock of 4.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. This desktop CPU, released on 2024-11-06, is built on TSMC's 4 nm process and supports DDR5 memory through a dual-channel interface, with a shared 96 MB L3 cache. In Lockdown Protocol, an FPS title, the CPU's role is primarily about maintaining a high frame rate ceiling rather than being the limiting factor, as its benchmark scores are exceptionally high; for instance, it achieves a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 34004 and a single-core score of 4800.
CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results
The Ryzen 7 9800X3D's 8 cores and 16 threads provide ample parallel processing for the game's simulation and AI logic, but the 3D V-Cache—while not explicitly listed—is a key differentiator for gaming workloads. The CPU's benchmark data shows a 3dmark single-thread score of 1212 and a passmark single-thread score of 4430, indicating strong per-core performance that helps avoid bottlenecks in frame generation. The average benchmark score of 37780 places it at the 90th percentile among all CPUs, with nearest rivals like the Intel Core i5-13600KF (avgScore 38028) trailing by -0.7%, and the Intel Core i9-13900HK (avgScore 38020) behind by -0.6%. These deltas are negligible, meaning the 9800X3D is statistically tied with those parts in general compute, but its gaming-oriented design shows in the measured FPS.
At 1080p with Low settings, the combo hits 226.2 FPS, which is a strong indicator that the CPU is not the primary constraint at lower resolutions. The CPU's 3dmark 16-thread score of 10081 and max-thread score of 10067 confirm it can feed the GPU with high frame rates without stuttering. The 120 TDP and 4 nm process suggest efficient power delivery, though the data does not include in-game CPU utilization. The passmark physics score of 4083 and data encryption score of 22158 further illustrate its capability to handle background tasks without interfering with game performance. The CPU's launch MSRP is $479, but the data shows that in this title, the processor's headroom is such that the GPU becomes the primary variable across different settings.
GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, based on the Ampere architecture, features 8 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus with a bandwidth of 608.3 GB/s. Its base clock is 1575 MHz, boosting to 1770 MHz, and it offers 6144 shading units with 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores. The GPU's 74th percentile ranking among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 30849, shows it is a solid mid-to-high-tier performer, but its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 6700 (avgScore 31112, deltaPct -0.8%) and the AMD Radeon RX 590 GME (avgScore 30755, deltaPct 0.3%), indicating it sits in a competitive but not dominant position.
In Lockdown Protocol, the 8 GB VRAM is the most likely constraint at higher settings and resolutions. The measured FPS drops from 103.1 at 1440p High to 66.8 at 4K High, a 35% reduction, which aligns with the GPU's memory bandwidth being taxed. The passmark G3D score of 23356 and 3dmark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3478 illustrate its raw compute power, but the 8 GB capacity means Ultra settings at 4K (51.5 FPS) force the GPU to manage textures aggressively. The GPU's 290 W TDP and PCIe 4.0 x16 interface are consistent with its performance class, but the data does not include VRAM usage in-game, so we infer from the FPS scaling that memory capacity is a limiting factor at 4K Ultra, where the frame rate falls below 60 FPS.
Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component
The measured FPS across resolutions reveals a clear pattern of GPU-bound scaling. At 1080p Low, the combo reaches 226.2 FPS, dropping to 166.7 at 1440p Low (a 26% decrease), and further to 106.9 at 4K Low (a 36% decrease from 1440p). This scaling is steeper than what would be expected if the CPU were the bottleneck, as the 9800X3D's high single-thread performance (passmark single-thread score of 4430) can easily push beyond 200 FPS in light workloads. The 1080p High setting produces 141.9 FPS, while 1440p High yields 103.1 FPS (27% lower), and 4K High produces 66.8 FPS (35% lower from 1440p). This consistent drop of roughly 25-35% per resolution step indicates the GPU's fill rate and memory bandwidth are the primary constraints.
The gap between Low and Ultra settings widens as resolution increases. At 1080p, the difference between Low (226.2 FPS) and Ultra (103.1 FPS) is 123.1 FPS, or 54%. At 4K, the same comparison shows Low at 106.9 FPS and Ultra at 51.5 FPS, a 55.4 FPS difference, also about 48%. This suggests that the GPU's 8 GB VRAM is not only bandwidth-limited but also capacity-limited at 4K Ultra, where the frame rate dips to 51.5 FPS, below the 60 FPS threshold. The data shows that at 1080p, the CPU still has headroom, as evidenced by the 226.2 FPS Low result, but at 4K, the GPU becomes the sole limiting component, with the CPU's 90th percentile performance being largely irrelevant.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution for maintaining 60+ FPS with this CPU/GPU combo?
A: The data shows that 4K High produces 66.8 FPS, which is above 60 FPS, while 4K Ultra drops to 51.5 FPS. At 1440p, all settings except Ultra (74.8 FPS) are above 100 FPS, so 1440p High or Medium (116.4 FPS) is the safest bet for high refresh rates.
Q: How does the Ryzen 7 9800X3D compare to its closest rival in terms of overall score?
A: The 9800X3D has an average benchmark score of 37780, which is -0.7% behind the Intel Core i5-13600KF (avgScore 38028) and -0.6% behind the Intel Core i9-13900HK (avgScore 38020). This means the CPU is effectively tied with these parts in general benchmarks.
Q: Is the RTX 3070 Ti's 8 GB VRAM sufficient for 4K gaming in Lockdown Protocol?
A: The measured data shows 4K Ultra at 51.5 FPS and 4K High at 66.8 FPS, indicating that the 8 GB capacity is sufficient for High settings but becomes a limiting factor on Ultra, where the frame rate drops below 60 FPS.
Q: What is the CPU's single-thread performance relative to its multicore performance?
A: The CPU scores 4800 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 34004 in multicore, a ratio of about 1:7. The 3dmark single-thread score is 1212 versus 10081 for 16 threads, showing that while the CPU has strong single-core performance, its multicore scaling is robust.
Q: How does the frame rate scale from 1080p to 1440p at Medium settings?
A: At 1080p Medium, the combo produces 164.1 FPS, which drops to 116.4 FPS at 1440p Medium, a 29% reduction. This indicates the GPU is the primary constraint, as the CPU's performance headroom is not fully utilized.
Q: What is the GPU's rank among all GPUs, and what does that mean for this game?
A: The RTX 3070 Ti is at the 74th percentile, with an average benchmark score of 30849. This places it above the AMD Radeon RX 6700 (avgScore 31112, deltaPct -0.8%), but the measured FPS shows it is still capable of 4K High at 66.8 FPS.
Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers
At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its highest frame rates. Low settings produce an average of 226.2 FPS, Medium drops to 164.1 FPS, High yields 141.9 FPS, and Ultra falls to 103.1 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is 123.1 FPS, indicating that the GPU's shading units and memory bandwidth are heavily taxed by higher settings, but the CPU is not a limiting factor at this resolution.
Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates scale down predictably. Low settings average 166.7 FPS, Medium averages 116.4 FPS, High averages 103.1 FPS, and Ultra averages 74.8 FPS. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is most pronounced at Low settings (a 59.5 FPS decrease, or 26%), while the Ultra setting sees a smaller absolute drop of 28.3 FPS, but a larger relative drop of 27%. This suggests that at 1440p, the GPU is approaching its memory bandwidth limit, but still maintains playable frame rates across all settings.
At 3840x2160, the 8 GB VRAM becomes a bottleneck. Low settings average 106.9 FPS, Medium drops to 74.1 FPS, High averages 66.8 FPS, and Ultra falls to 51.5 FPS. The scaling from 1440p to 4K is severe: Low drops by 59.8 FPS (36%), Medium by 42.3 FPS (36%), High by 36.3 FPS (35%), and Ultra by 23.3 FPS (31%). The fact that the relative drop is consistent around 31-36% across settings confirms that the GPU is the sole limiting component, with the CPU's 90th percentile performance providing no relief at this resolution.
Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows
For a 60 FPS target, the data shows that 4K High is the only 4K preset that meets the threshold, averaging 66.8 FPS. However, 4K Medium (74.1 FPS) offers a slight buffer, while 4K Ultra (51.5 FPS) falls short. At 1440p, all four settings exceed 60 FPS, with Ultra at 74.8 FPS being the lowest, so users can safely choose Ultra for maximum visual fidelity without sacrificing frame rate. At 1080p, even Ultra achieves 103.1 FPS, making it the clear choice for high-refresh-rate monitors.
The data suggests that the best experience balances visual quality with frame rate stability. At 4K, High settings provide 66.8 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold but leaves little headroom for demanding scenes. Medium (74.1 FPS) provides a 10% buffer over High and is a safer recommendation for 4K play. At 1440p, Ultra (74.8 FPS) is the best preset because it delivers the highest visual quality while still maintaining a frame rate that is 24% higher than the 4K High result. For competitive play at 1080p, Low (226.2 FPS) offers the highest frame rate, but Medium (164.1 FPS) provides a balance between responsiveness and visual polish, especially since the CPU's strong single-thread performance (3dmark single-thread score of 1212) ensures no CPU-induced stutters.
The measured data highlights that the RTX 3070 Ti's 8 GB VRAM is the deciding factor at 4K Ultra, where the 51.5 FPS result is the only sub-60 FPS reading in the entire dataset. Therefore, the recommendation is to avoid Ultra at 4K and instead use High or Medium, while at 1440p and 1080p, the Ultra preset is fully playable and offers the best visual experience per the measured rows.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti in Lockdown Protocol
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 106.9 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 74.1 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 66.8 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 51.5 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 166.7 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 116.4 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 103.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 74.8 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 226.2 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 164.1 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 141.9 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 103.1 |
Lockdown Protocol with Ryzen 7 9800X3D + Other GPUs
See how Lockdown Protocol performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Lockdown Protocol with RTX 3070 Ti + Other CPUs
See how Lockdown Protocol performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 9800X3D + RTX 3070 Ti
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.