Lockdown Protocol
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 116 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 49 | 67 | 79 | 105 |
| 1440p QHD | 78 | 104 | 119 | 165 |
| 1080p Full HD | 103 | 140 | 159 | 226 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Lockdown Protocol with AMD Ryzen 7 9700X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti combination in Lockdown Protocol delivers a balanced performance profile, with the data showing the CPU providing a strong foundation while the GPU becomes the primary scaling factor at higher resolutions. The measured frame rates across twelve settings and resolution permutations reveal a system that is highly capable at 1080p and 1440p, but which shows its limits at 4K Ultra. This analysis walks through the CPU and GPU roles, resolution scaling behavior, overall ranking, and provides practical settings guidance based solely on the measured data.
CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results
The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. It draws from a 32 MB shared L3 cache and supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, which yields a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. In synthetic benchmarks, the CPU posts a strong showing: a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 31588 and a single-core score of 4459, along with a Geekbench multicore score of 17002 and a single-core score of 3353. The 3DMark 16-thread score is 9824, while the max-thread score reaches 9771, indicating that the processor scales well with additional threads.
For Lockdown Protocol, an FPS title, the single-thread performance is particularly relevant, and the data supports this. The CPU’s 3DMark single-thread score of 1280 and Passmark single-thread score of 4654 are strong, suggesting that the processor can feed the GPU efficiently even at high frame rates. The CPU’s percentile ranking versus all CPUs is 89, placing it well above the median. When compared to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen 7 9700X shows a delta of 0.2% against the Intel Core i5-14500HX, a -0.4% delta against the Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, and a 0.6% delta versus the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845. In practical terms, the CPU is not the bottleneck in this configuration at lower resolutions; at 1080p Low, the system achieves 226.2 FPS, which is a frame rate that requires consistent CPU throughput. The data indicates that the CPU’s capability is sufficient to drive the RTX 3070 Ti to its limits in most scenarios, with the GPU becoming the limiting factor as resolution and settings increase.
GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is built on the Ampere architecture with 8 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 608.3 GB/s. Its base clock is 1575 MHz with a boost clock of 1770 MHz, and the memory operates at 1188 MHz (19 Gbps effective). The GPU has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, along with 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores. Its FP32 performance is rated at 21.75 TFLOPS. In benchmark tests, the RTX 3070 Ti achieves a Passmark G3D score of 23356, a Geekbench OpenCL score of 137518, and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3478. Its percentile ranking versus all GPUs is 74.
In Lockdown Protocol, the GPU’s role becomes clear when examining the frame rate data. At 1080p Low, the system hits 226.2 FPS, but this drops to 103.4 FPS at 1080p Ultra, a reduction of over half. This scaling is characteristic of a GPU that is being pushed by higher settings. The RTX 3070 Ti’s nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 6700, which has an average score delta of -0.8%, and the NVIDIA Quadro M5000 with a delta of -0.9%. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM is adequate for the settings tested, but the data suggests that the GPU’s raw compute is the primary driver of performance differences between presets. For instance, moving from 1440p High (104.4 FPS) to 1440p Ultra (78.4 FPS) shows a 26 FPS drop, directly attributable to the GPU’s workload increase. The GPU consistently delivers playable frame rates at High and Medium settings across all resolutions, but Ultra settings at 4K push it below the 60 FPS threshold.
Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component
The measured FPS data shows a clear pattern of frame rate decline as resolution increases, which is typical for a system where the GPU is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions. At High settings, the transition from 1080p to 1440p results in a drop from 140.3 FPS to 104.4 FPS, a 25.6% reduction. Moving from 1440p to 4K High further reduces the frame rate to 66.7 FPS, another 36.1% drop. This scaling behavior indicates that the GPU is under increasing load, while the CPU’s performance headroom is not the limiting factor.
The Low settings row provides a clearer picture of resolution scaling independent of graphical complexity. At 1080p Low, the system produces 226.2 FPS, which drops to 165.1 FPS at 1440p and 104.6 FPS at 4K. The percentage drops are 27.0% and 36.6%, respectively, which are consistent with the High settings drops. This consistency suggests that the GPU’s pixel throughput is the limiting factor, as the CPU’s performance is not affected by resolution changes. At Ultra settings, the drop from 1080p to 1440p is from 103.4 FPS to 78.4 FPS (24.2% reduction), and from 1440p to 4K it falls to 49.3 FPS (37.1% reduction). The 4K Ultra result of 49.3 FPS is the only measured point below 60 FPS across all settings, underscoring that the GPU is the constraining component at that extreme. The data suggests that users aiming for 4K should stick to High settings or lower, while 1440p and 1080p offer ample headroom for higher presets.
How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos
The combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti ranks 657 out of 1637 tested combos in Lockdown Protocol. This places the pairing in the upper-middle tier of all tested configurations. The rank is a direct reflection of the measured FPS data, which shows the combo achieving high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p but falling behind more powerful GPU pairings at 4K Ultra. The CPU’s strong synthetic scores (89th percentile) and the GPU’s solid but not top-tier scores (74th percentile) combine to produce a system that excels in most scenarios but is not at the absolute forefront.
The rank of 657 out of 1637 means that approximately 60% of tested combos perform better, which is expected given the RTX 3070 Ti’s position in the GPU hierarchy. However, the data also shows that this combo outperforms a significant number of alternatives, particularly those with weaker CPUs. The CPU’s high single-thread performance ensures that the GPU is not starved for data, which is evident in the 1080p Low result of 226.2 FPS. The combo’s ranking confirms the balance between the 9700X’s processing power and the 3070 Ti’s rendering capability, though it is clear that a more powerful GPU would improve the 4K Ultra experience.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution for this combo if I want to stay above 100 FPS?
A: At 1080p, the combo stays above 100 FPS on all settings except Ultra, where it still manages 103.4 FPS. At 1440p, High and Low settings exceed 100 FPS (104.4 and 165.1 FPS, respectively), but Medium drops to 118.9 FPS. For consistent 100+ FPS, 1440p High is the maximum.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The Ryzen 7 9700X has an average benchmark score of 36029, which is 0.2% higher than the Intel Core i5-14500HX (35940) and 0.6% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 (35802). It trails the Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (36165) by 0.4%.
Q: Is the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM sufficient for this game at 4K?
A: The measured data shows that at 4K High settings, the combo achieves 66.7 FPS, indicating that the 8 GB VRAM does not prevent playable performance. At 4K Ultra, the frame rate drops to 49.3 FPS, but this is more likely due to GPU compute limits than VRAM capacity, as the settings increase.
Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?
A: At 1440p, Low settings produce 165.1 FPS, while Ultra settings produce 78.4 FPS. This is a difference of 86.7 FPS, or a 52.5% reduction, showing the significant impact of graphical presets on this combo.
Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations?
A: The combo ranks 657 out of 1637 tested combos, placing it in the 60th percentile of all configurations tested in this game.
Q: What is the GPU’s average benchmark score relative to its nearest rival?
A: The RTX 3070 Ti has an average benchmark score of 30849, which is 0.3% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 590 GME (30755) and 0.8% lower than the AMD Radeon RX 6700 (31112).
Settings Recommendations
The measured data provides a clear hierarchy of settings for this combo, balancing frame rate and visual quality. For the best overall experience, the High preset at 1440p is the recommended starting point, as it delivers 104.4 FPS, which is comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold and offers a significant visual improvement over Low settings. At 1080p, High settings yield 140.3 FPS, and even Ultra settings remain playable at 103.4 FPS, making 1080p Ultra a viable option for users prioritizing visual fidelity over sheer frame rate.
At 4K, the data suggests that High settings (66.7 FPS) are the optimal choice, as they provide a smooth experience without the substantial frame rate penalty of Ultra (49.3 FPS). Medium settings at 4K (78.5 FPS) are a slightly safer option for those who want more headroom, while Low settings (104.6 FPS) are best suited for competitive play where frame rate is paramount. For users with high refresh rate monitors at 1440p, the High preset is the sweet spot, as it exceeds 100 FPS while maintaining visual quality. Choosing Ultra at 1440p drops the frame rate to 78.4 FPS, which is still playable but sacrifices 26 FPS for marginal visual gains. The data strongly supports avoiding 4K Ultra with this combo, as the 49.3 FPS result is below the standard for smooth gameplay.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 9700X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 9700X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti in Lockdown Protocol
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 104.6 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 78.5 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 66.7 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 49.3 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 165.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 118.9 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 104.4 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 78.4 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 226.2 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 158.6 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 140.3 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 103.4 |
Lockdown Protocol with Ryzen 7 9700X + Other GPUs
See how Lockdown Protocol performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Lockdown Protocol with RTX 3070 Ti + Other CPUs
See how Lockdown Protocol performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 9700X + RTX 3070 Ti
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.