Lockdown Protocol

Lockdown Protocol is a 2024 FPS that stresses systems in a very specific way: the data shows that this AMD Ryzen 7 7700X + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 pairing ranks 1554th out of 1637 tested combos, placing it in the bottom 5% of configurations. This is a combination where a very strong CPU is paired with an entry-level GPU, and the measured frame rates reflect that bottleneck clearly. The benchmark results indicate that while the processor has the muscle to handle the game’s logic, the graphics card is the definitive limiting factor across all resolutions and settings.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X is the clear performance anchor of this system. It is an 8-core, 16-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, built on a 5 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 4.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, and it is unlocked for overclocking. In synthetic benchmarks, this CPU demonstrates exceptional multi-threaded capability, scoring 30,325 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 35,686 in Passmark multithread. Its single-thread performance is equally strong, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,281 and a Passmark single-thread score of 4,190. This places the CPU in the 89th percentile of all processors.

However, in Lockdown Protocol, the CPU’s role is largely preparatory. At lower resolutions and settings, the game’s frame rate is often dictated by how quickly the CPU can feed draw calls to the GPU. The data shows that at 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves 78.1 FPS average. At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average drops to 14.9 FPS. This is a classic sign of a GPU bottleneck; the CPU has ample headroom (it sits 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core i5-13500 and 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core i7-12800HX in average benchmark scores) but is being starved of work by the graphics card. In short, the Ryzen 7 7700X is not the reason for the low frame rates; it is the GTX 1650 that holds this combo back.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 is a Turing-architecture card built on a 12 nm process, and it is the primary performance limiter in this pairing. It features 4 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 128.1 GB/s of bandwidth. The card’s base clock is 1485 MHz with a boost clock of 1665 MHz, and its memory runs at an effective 8 Gbps. With 896 shading units and a 128-bit memory interface, the GTX 1650 is designed for 1080p gaming, but Lockdown Protocol’s demands at higher settings quickly overwhelm it.

The GPU’s synthetic benchmarks confirm its entry-level status. It scores 7,880 in Passmark G3D and 305 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, placing it in the 43rd percentile of all GPUs. In direct comparison, the GTX 1650 sits 0.4% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile and 0.5% ahead of the NVIDIA Quadro P2200 in average scores, indicating it is in a tight cluster of low-to-mid-range performance. The 4 GB VRAM is likely a critical constraint in Lockdown Protocol, as the frame rate collapses from 39.1 FPS at 3840x2160 Low to 23 FPS at 3840x2160 High, and further to 14.9 FPS at Ultra. This pattern suggests that texture data exceeds the VRAM capacity, causing severe drops. At 1080p, the card manages a playable 78.1 FPS on Low, but this falls to 35 FPS on Ultra.

FAQ

Q: Is this combo capable of running Lockdown Protocol at 1080p?

A: Yes, but only at lower settings. The measured data shows an average of 78.1 FPS at 1920x1080 with Low settings, which drops to 56.7 FPS on Medium and 46.2 FPS on High. At Ultra settings, the average falls to 35 FPS, which may feel less fluid.

Q: What is the biggest bottleneck in this system for this game?

A: The GPU is the definitive bottleneck. The Ryzen 7 7700X scores in the 89th percentile of CPUs, while the GTX 1650 is in the 43rd percentile of GPUs. The frame rate scaling between Low and Ultra settings is almost entirely dependent on GPU workload, and the 4 GB VRAM appears to be a limiting factor at high resolutions.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its direct rivals?

A: The Ryzen 7 7700X has an average benchmark score of 34,313, which is 0.4% higher than the Intel Core i5-13500 and 0.5% higher than the Intel Core i7-12800HX. It trails the Intel Core Ultra 7 165H by 0.8% and the AMD EPYC 4244P by 0.8%.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its direct rivals?

A: The GTX 1650 has an average benchmark score of 8,713, which is 0.4% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Mobile and 0.4% lower than the AMD Radeon 550X. It is 0.5% higher than the NVIDIA Quadro P2200 and 0.5% lower than the AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100.

Q: Is the 4 GB VRAM of the GTX 1650 sufficient for Lockdown Protocol?

A: The data suggests it is not at higher resolutions. At 3840x2160, the average FPS drops from 39.1 on Low to 23 on High and 14.9 on Ultra. Similarly, at 2560x1440, the average falls from 58.9 on Low to 23.8 on Ultra. This steep decline points to VRAM capacity being exceeded as texture quality increases.

Q: What is the best resolution/settings combination for a smoother experience?

A: The highest average FPS is 78.1 at 1920x1080 with Low settings. For a balance of quality and performance, 2560x1440 on Low yields 58.9 FPS, while 1920x1080 on Medium yields 56.7 FPS. The data shows that 4K is not a viable option for this combo, with all settings averaging below 40 FPS.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo’s rank of 1554 out of 1637 tested combinations is a stark indicator of its position. It places this system in the bottom 5% of all configurations tested for Lockdown Protocol. This is a direct consequence of the pairing of a top-tier CPU with a low-tier GPU. The Ryzen 7 7700X is a high-performance chip, but the GTX 1650 is an end-of-life product from 2019. The benchmark results show that this is not a balanced system for this game; the CPU is overqualified, and the GPU is underqualified. The data implies that users with this combo are likely to experience significant frame rate limitations, particularly at higher resolutions, making it a less desirable pairing for Lockdown Protocol specifically.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of the system’s performance envelope across various settings. At 1920x1080, the combo starts at a playable level but degrades quickly as settings increase. Low settings produce an average of 78.1 FPS, Medium produces 56.7 FPS, High produces 46.2 FPS, and Ultra drops to 35 FPS. This 55% reduction from Low to Ultra shows the GPU’s limited headroom at the most common resolution.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance drops across the board. Low settings yield 58.9 FPS, Medium yields 39.8 FPS, High yields 37 FPS, and Ultra falls to 23.8 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is 60%, indicating that the higher pixel count exacerbates the GPU’s workload and VRAM pressure. The 1440p resolution is playable only on Low settings, and even then, it is not a high-refresh experience.

At 3840x2160, the combo struggles to maintain playability. Low settings average 39.1 FPS, Medium averages 29 FPS, High averages 23 FPS, and Ultra averages 14.9 FPS. The data reveals that 4K is not a feasible option for this pairing, as even the lowest settings fail to reach 40 FPS. The substantial drop from Low to Ultra (a 62% decrease) highlights the severe limitation of the 4 GB VRAM and the GPU’s raw compute power. For users aiming for a consistent 60 FPS experience, the data suggests that only 1920x1080 with Low settings is capable of achieving that target.