Lockdown Protocol
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 161 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 69 | 92 | 105 | 148 |
| 1440p QHD | 107 | 142 | 163 | 230 |
| 1080p Full HD | 146 | 194 | 223 | 307 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Lockdown Protocol with AMD Ryzen 5 7600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti combination ranks at 360th out of 3,714 tested combos in Lockdown Protocol, placing it in the top 10% of all systems evaluated. This is a strong result for a FPS title, indicating the pairing is well-balanced for this game’s engine. The rank becomes more meaningful when considering the individual components: the GPU sits at the 86th percentile among all GPUs, while the CPU rests at the 78th percentile among all CPUs. The GPU does the heavy lifting here, which is typical for a competitive shooter where frame rates scale heavily with rasterization throughput.
How This Combo Ranks
The comboRankInGame of 360 out of 3,714 tested combinations places this pairing firmly in the upper echelon of systems tested for Lockdown Protocol. This is not a top-100 build, but it outperforms the vast majority of configurations, which is impressive given that the list includes extreme hardware. The ranking suggests that the RTX 5070 Ti’s raw performance is complemented well by the Ryzen 5 7600’s capable multi-threading, avoiding a major bottleneck that would drag the combo down.
Looking at the GPU’s nearest rivals, the data shows the RTX 5070 Ti is a tight race. It scores an avgBenchmarkScore of 49,957, which is 0.1% behind the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (score 50,001), 0.4% ahead of the Intel Arc A550M (score 49,737), 2% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (score 50,951), and 3.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (score 48,477). These deltas are small, meaning the GPU’s performance class is comparable to those cards, but the 50-series architecture delivers that performance with modern features. For the CPU, the Ryzen 5 7600’s avgBenchmarkScore of 26,324 is nearly identical to its closest rivals: it is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (score 26,274), 0.3% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS (score 26,402), 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core i9-11900KF (score 26,212), and 0.5% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 8540U (score 26,187). This shows the 7600 is exactly in the middle of a performance cluster, but its desktop platform gives it an edge in sustained workloads like gaming.
The ranking also reflects that Lockdown Protocol is not heavily CPU-limited at higher resolutions. The combo’s position is driven by the GPU’s ability to maintain high frame rates, as the CPU’s single-thread and multi-thread scores are sufficient to feed the graphics card without creating a significant bottleneck. The data indicates that this is a "sweet spot" pairing for 1440p and 1080p competitive play, where the combination of a strong GPU and a solid mid-range CPU yields a top-10% result.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti is the primary driver of performance in this combo, featuring 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration is crucial for Lockdown Protocol, as the game’s textures and geometry at higher settings can consume significant VRAM. The 16 GB capacity ensures that even at 3840x2160 Ultra settings, the GPU does not run out of memory, allowing for consistent frame pacing. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective speed, which is a high-speed implementation that helps maintain bandwidth in demanding scenes.
The GPU’s clock speeds are a key factor in its performance. The base clock is 2295 MHz and the boost clock reaches 2452 MHz. These clocks are relatively high for a large chip, and they allow the GPU’s 8,960 shading units to process pixels rapidly. The boost clock is particularly important in a fast-paced FPS, as it ensures sustained performance during intense firefights and explosions. The GPU also has 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores, but for a game like Lockdown Protocol, which is primarily rasterization-focused, the raw shader throughput is what matters most. The 43.94 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is the headline number here, driving the high frame rates seen in the measured results.
The GPU’s passmark_g3d score of 32,974 and passmark_gpu_compute score of 20,203 reflect its strong compute capabilities. In the context of Lockdown Protocol, these scores translate to the ability to push high average frame rates. The data shows that at 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves 307 FPS average, which is a massive number that only a top-tier GPU can deliver. The GPU’s 86th percentile ranking among all GPUs confirms it is a high-end part, and its architecture (Blackwell 2.0) is built for efficiency and high clock speeds, making it an ideal match for a competitive shooter where every frame counts.
The GPU’s power delivery and cooling are also relevant. With a TDP of 300 W and a dual-slot design, it requires a robust power supply (700 W suggested) and adequate case airflow. The 304 mm length is standard for a high-end card, and the 1x 16-pin power connector is a modern standard. While these are physical constraints, they do not impact the measured FPS, but they are worth noting for system builders. The GPU’s DirectX 12 Ultimate support ensures it is fully compatible with the game’s rendering pipeline, and its PCIe 5.0 x16 interface provides ample bandwidth for data transfer.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture (codenamed Raphael), built on a 5 nm process by TSMC. Its base clock is 3.80 GHz and it boosts up to 5.10 GHz, which is a high boost clock for a mid-range desktop CPU. For Lockdown Protocol, the CPU’s role is to feed the GPU with draw calls and physics data. The 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient for this task, as the game is not heavily multi-threaded. The high boost clock is more important than core count, as it ensures low latency in single-threaded game logic.
The CPU’s cache hierarchy is well-suited for gaming. It has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. The 32 MB L3 cache is a significant amount that helps keep frequently accessed game data close to the cores, reducing memory latency. The CPU supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, providing 83.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth. This is adequate for feeding the GPU, although it is not as high as some HEDT platforms. The ECC support is a bonus for stability but not directly relevant to gaming performance.
Benchmark data for the CPU shows a strong single-thread performance, which is critical for this game. The 3dmark_single_thread score is 999, and the cinebench_r23_singlecore score is 1,852. These scores indicate that the CPU can handle the main game thread without becoming a bottleneck. The multi-thread scores are also respectable: cinebench_r23_multicore is 12,735, and geekbench_multicore is 13,413. These numbers show that the CPU can handle background tasks and game server processes without impacting frame rates. The passmark_single_thread score of 3,910 is particularly strong, placing it in a high tier for single-threaded workloads.
In the context of Lockdown Protocol, the CPU’s 78th percentile ranking means it is better than the majority of CPUs tested, but it is not a top-tier part like the Ryzen 9 or Intel Core i9. However, the measured FPS data shows that this is not a problem. At 3840x2160 Ultra, the combo still manages 69 FPS average, which suggests the CPU is keeping up with the GPU’s output. The CPU’s 65 W TDP is low for a desktop part, meaning it generates less heat and is easier to cool, allowing the boost clock to be sustained for longer periods. The Radeon Graphics integrated GPU is present but not used in this configuration, as the discrete RTX 5070 Ti handles all rendering.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive look at how this combo performs across three resolutions and four settings presets. The data is measured (not estimated), making it reliable for analysis.
At 1920x1080, the combo delivers exceptional frame rates. With Low settings, it hits 307 FPS average, which is far beyond any standard 144Hz monitor’s refresh rate, making it ideal for esports. Medium settings yield 223 FPS average, with a minimum of 189 and a maximum of 256 FPS, showing a tight frame time distribution. High settings drop to 194 FPS average, still well above 144Hz. Ultra settings produce 146 FPS average, which is still high but shows the performance cost of maxing out visuals. These numbers indicate that the CPU is not a bottleneck at this resolution, as the GPU is fully utilized.
At 2560x1440, the performance remains excellent. Low settings produce 230 FPS average, which is a significant drop from 1080p but still very high. Medium settings yield 163 FPS average, with a minimum of 139 and a maximum of 188 FPS. High settings produce 142 FPS average, which is right at the edge of 144Hz monitors. Ultra settings drop to 107 FPS average, which is still playable but not as smooth as lower presets. This resolution is the sweet spot for this combo, as it balances visual fidelity with high refresh rates.
At 3840x2160, the GPU is pushed harder. Low settings produce 148 FPS average, which is impressive for 4K. Medium settings yield 105 FPS average, with a minimum of 90 and a maximum of 121 FPS. High settings drop to 92 FPS average, which is still smooth for a 4K display. Ultra settings produce 69 FPS average, which is the lowest measured but still playable on a 60Hz display. The data shows a clear scaling pattern: as resolution increases, the frame rate drops, but the combo remains playable even at 4K Ultra.
The gap between Medium and High settings is notable. At 1080p, the difference is 29 FPS (223 vs 194), while at 1440p it is 21 FPS (163 vs 142), and at 4K it is 13 FPS (105 vs 92). This suggests that High settings add a significant amount of visual detail that impacts the GPU, but the scaling is consistent across resolutions.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution for this combo?
A: The data shows 2560x1440 is the sweet spot. At High settings, it delivers 142 FPS average, which is high enough for a 144Hz monitor. At 1920x1080, the frame rates are higher (194 FPS at High), but the visual detail is lower. At 3840x2160, the frame rates drop to 92 FPS at High, which is still playable but not ideal for competitive play.
Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming?
A: Yes, the data shows it can. At 3840x2160 with Medium settings, it achieves 105 FPS average, and at High settings it achieves 92 FPS average. Even at Ultra settings, it maintains 69 FPS average, which is above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay on a standard 4K TV.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its rivals?
A: The Ryzen 5 7600 has an avgBenchmarkScore of 26,324, which is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (score 26,274), 0.3% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS (score 26,402), 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core i9-11900KF (score 26,212), and 0.5% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 8540U (score 26,187). This puts it in a tight performance cluster, but its desktop platform offers better sustained performance.
Q: Is the RTX 5070 Ti faster than the RX 6900 XT?
A: No, the data shows the RTX 5070 Ti has an avgBenchmarkScore of 49,957, which is 2% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT (score 50,951). However, it is 3.1% ahead of the RX 6800 XT (score 48,477) and 0.4% ahead of the Intel Arc A550M (score 49,737).
Q: What FPS can I expect at 1080p with High settings?
A: The measured data shows an average of 194 FPS at 1920x1080 with High settings. This is more than enough for any high-refresh-rate monitor and provides a smooth, responsive experience in fast-paced gameplay.
Q: Does the CPU bottleneck the GPU at 1080p?
A: The data suggests no. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves 307 FPS average, indicating the CPU can feed the GPU fast enough. The high single-thread score (3,910 in passmark_single_thread) supports this, as the main game thread is not a limiting factor.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings preset depends on the player’s display and performance goals. For players with a 144Hz monitor at 2560x1440, the High preset is recommended. It delivers 142 FPS average, which nearly saturates a 144Hz display while providing excellent visual fidelity. The Medium preset at 1440p yields 163 FPS average, which is a safer choice for maintaining a rock-solid frame rate above 144Hz, but the visual difference between Medium and High is noticeable in the data (a 21 FPS drop).
For players with a 240Hz monitor at 1920x1080, the Low preset is the best choice. It achieves 307 FPS average, which is well above 240Hz, ensuring the monitor is fully utilized. The Medium preset at 1080p yields 223 FPS average, which is also above 240Hz but with a smaller margin. The High preset at 1080p (194 FPS) and Ultra preset (146 FPS) will not saturate a 240Hz panel, so they are less ideal for competitive play.
For players using a 4K display, the Medium preset is recommended. It delivers 105 FPS average, which is smooth on a 120Hz 4K TV, and it provides a good balance of visual quality and performance. The High preset at 4K (92 FPS) is also viable for a 60Hz display, but the Medium preset offers a higher frame rate with a minimal visual trade-off. The Ultra preset at 4K (69 FPS) is only recommended for players who prioritize visual fidelity over frame rate and are using a 60Hz display.
The data indicates that the Medium preset is the most versatile choice across all resolutions. It provides a significant FPS boost over High (e.g., 223 vs 194 at 1080p) while maintaining a high level of visual detail. For players who want the highest frame rates possible, the Low preset is the go-to, but it sacrifices visual quality. The Ultra preset is not recommended for competitive play, as the frame rate drops below 70 FPS at 4K and below 150 FPS at 1080p, which is suboptimal for fast-paced FPS action. The sweet spot for this combo is 2560x1440 with High or Medium settings, offering a perfect balance of visuals and performance for most gaming scenarios.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 7600
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 7600 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti in Lockdown Protocol
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 148.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 105.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 92.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 69.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 230.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 163.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 142.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 107.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 307.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 223.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 194.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 146.0 |
Lockdown Protocol with Ryzen 5 7600 + Other GPUs
See how Lockdown Protocol performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Lockdown Protocol with RTX 5070 Ti + Other CPUs
See how Lockdown Protocol performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 7600 + RTX 5070 Ti
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.