Lockdown Protocol
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 83 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 36 | 50 | 56 | 75 |
| 1440p QHD | 54 | 70 | 86 | 120 |
| 1080p Full HD | 74 | 100 | 116 | 158 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Lockdown Protocol with AMD Ryzen 5 7600 + AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT delivers a solid 1080p gaming experience in Lockdown Protocol, but the data reveals a clear performance ceiling that becomes more pronounced as resolution increases. This combination ranks in the 31st percentile of all tested combos for this title, placing it in the lower-middle tier of the 1,637 configurations evaluated. The benchmark results indicate a system that is well-balanced at lower resolutions but struggles to maintain high frame rates when the graphical load intensifies.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS data across the three tested resolutions shows a predictable but steep decline, with the most dramatic drop occurring between 1440p and 4K. At 1080p with High settings, the combo achieves 100.2 FPS, which drops to 69.6 FPS at 1440p (a 30.5% reduction) and further to 49.7 FPS at 4K (a 28.6% reduction from 1440p). This scaling pattern indicates that the GPU becomes the primary limiting factor as pixel count rises, with the CPU’s six Zen 4 cores providing sufficient headroom at lower resolutions.
The gap between Low and Ultra settings widens significantly at higher resolutions. At 1080p, the spread between Low (158.1 FPS) and Ultra (74.4 FPS) is 83.7 FPS, but at 4K, that spread narrows to 39.1 FPS (75.3 FPS Low vs. 36.2 FPS Ultra). This compression suggests that at 4K, the RX 6600 XT is saturated even at Low settings, leaving less room for settings-based performance differentiation. The 4K Ultra result of 36.2 FPS falls below the 60 FPS threshold commonly targeted for smooth gameplay, while 4K High manages 49.7 FPS—playable but not ideal for competitive FPS action.
At 1440p, the data shows a similar pattern: Low settings hit 120 FPS, Medium drops to 85.8 FPS, High to 69.6 FPS, and Ultra to 54.4 FPS. The 1440p Ultra result is notably close to the 4K High result (54.4 vs. 49.7 FPS), indicating that the GPU’s 8 GB frame buffer and 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are being taxed heavily at these settings. For players targeting 144Hz displays, 1080p Low (158.1 FPS) is the only configuration that fully saturates such a refresh rate, while 1080p Medium (115.5 FPS) and High (100.2 FPS) remain respectable.
FAQ
*Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Lockdown Protocol?*
A: The data shows 1080p as the optimal resolution. At High settings, the combo produces 100.2 FPS, and at Low settings it reaches 158.1 FPS, both comfortably above 60 FPS. The 1440p results are playable but require Medium or Low settings to stay above 85 FPS.
Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in this title?
A: Barely. The 4K High result is 49.7 FPS, while 4K Ultra drops to 36.2 FPS. Only 4K Low (75.3 FPS) exceeds the 60 FPS threshold, so 4K gaming is possible but requires significant settings compromises.
Q: How does the CPU perform relative to its closest rivals?
A: The Ryzen 5 7600 averages a benchmark score of 26,617, which is 0.2% above the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D (26,574) and 0.2% above the AMD EPYC 8024P (26,555). It trails the Intel Core i9-12900HK by 0.2% (26,672) and beats the Intel Core i9-11900K by 0.3% (26,546).
Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest competitors?
A: The RX 6600 XT scores an average of 27,985, which is 0.1% above the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti (27,956) and 0.4% above the AMD Radeon R9 M395X (27,883). It sits 0.9% below the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 (28,238) and 1.5% below the AMD FirePro S7150 (28,409).
Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?
A: At 1440p, Low settings deliver 120 FPS while Ultra falls to 54.4 FPS, a difference of 65.6 FPS. Medium (85.8 FPS) and High (69.6 FPS) sit between these extremes, showing a significant performance cost for higher visual fidelity.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU more likely to bottleneck this system?
A: The benchmark data suggests the GPU is the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The 4K Low result (75.3 FPS) is only 47.7 FPS lower than the 1080p Low result (158.1 FPS), indicating that the GPU’s rendering capacity, not the CPU’s 12 threads, constrains performance as resolution increases.
How This Combo Ranks
The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 + AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT combination ranks 1,126th out of 1,637 tested combos in Lockdown Protocol. This places it in the 31st percentile, meaning roughly 69% of all tested configurations deliver higher average frame rates in this game. The ranking reflects a mid-tier pairing that is outperformed by systems with higher-end GPUs or more cache-rich CPUs.
The CPU itself sits in the 83rd percentile of all processors, with an average benchmark score of 26,617. Its nearest rivals include the Ryzen 7 5800X3D (0.2% higher score) and the Core i9-12900HK (0.2% lower score), showing that the 7600 is competitive with older high-end chips. However, the GPU’s 71st percentile ranking (average score 27,985) is notably lower, and its nearest rivals include the GTX 980 Ti (0.1% lower) and RTX 3070 (0.9% higher), indicating the graphics card drags the overall combo ranking down.
The delta between the CPU’s strong percentile (83rd) and the GPU’s weaker one (71st) suggests a slight imbalance, where the processor has more headroom than the graphics card can exploit in this title. This explains why the combo’s overall rank (31st percentile) lags behind what the CPU alone might suggest, as the GPU becomes the bottleneck at higher settings and resolutions.
Measured FPS Breakdown
1080p: The combo delivers its strongest performance here. Low settings produce 158.1 FPS, Medium drops to 115.5 FPS, High to 100.2 FPS, and Ultra to 74.4 FPS. All four settings exceed the 60 FPS baseline, with even Ultra remaining smooth for competitive play. The jump from Low to Medium costs 42.6 FPS, while the step from High to Ultra costs 25.8 FPS.
1440p: Performance remains playable but requires settings discipline. Low hits 120 FPS, Medium drops to 85.8 FPS, High to 69.6 FPS, and Ultra to 54.4 FPS. Only Low and Medium stay above 60 FPS. The gap between Low and High is 50.4 FPS, showing that High settings demand a substantial performance premium.
4K: This resolution pushes the GPU to its limits. Low manages 75.3 FPS, Medium falls to 56.2 FPS, High to 49.7 FPS, and Ultra to 36.2 FPS. Only the Low setting breaks the 60 FPS barrier. The 4K Ultra result is just 48.8% of the 1080p Ultra result (36.2 vs. 74.4 FPS), illustrating the severe scaling penalty at maximum resolution.
Across all resolutions, the pattern is consistent: Medium settings offer the best balance of visual quality and frame rate, with 115.5 FPS at 1080p and 85.8 FPS at 1440p. The Ultra setting consistently delivers the largest relative drop, costing an average of 20-25% performance over High across the three resolutions.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT plays a decisive role in shaping these results. With 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus delivering 256.0 GB/s bandwidth, the card provides adequate capacity for 1080p and 1440p gaming but shows strain at 4K. The 4K results—particularly the 36.2 FPS Ultra figure—indicate that the frame buffer and memory bandwidth are insufficient for high-fidelity rendering at that resolution.
The GPU’s clock speeds are notable: a base clock of 1968 MHz, a boost clock of 2589 MHz, and a game clock of 2359 MHz. These clocks, combined with 2,048 shading units and 64 ROPs, yield a pixel rate of 165.7 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 331.4 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance of 10.60 TFLOPS places the card in the mid-range tier, which aligns with its 71st percentile ranking among all GPUs.
The 7 nm process node and RDNA 2.0 architecture contribute to the card’s efficiency, but the 160 W TDP and 1x 8-pin power connector indicate it is not a high-power part. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface provides sufficient bandwidth for this title, though the 128-bit memory bus is a limiting factor compared to wider-bus competitors. The GPU’s nearest rival, the RTX 3070, scores 0.9% higher in synthetic benchmarks, which explains why the 6600 XT trails in higher-resolution gameplay where memory bandwidth becomes critical.
The data shows that the GPU’s role shifts from being the primary driver at 1080p to becoming the sole bottleneck at 4K. At 1080p Low, the 158.1 FPS result suggests the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU adequately, but the 4K Low result of 75.3 FPS reveals that the GPU’s compute and memory resources are exhausted. This is consistent with the GPU’s 71st percentile ranking, which is lower than the CPU’s 83rd percentile, confirming that the graphics card limits the system’s overall potential in Lockdown Protocol.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 7600
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 7600 + AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT in Lockdown Protocol
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 75.3 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 56.2 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 49.7 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 36.2 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 120.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 85.8 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 69.6 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 54.4 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 158.1 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 115.5 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 100.2 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 74.4 |
Lockdown Protocol with Ryzen 5 7600 + Other GPUs
See how Lockdown Protocol performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Lockdown Protocol with RX 6600 XT + Other CPUs
See how Lockdown Protocol performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 7600 + RX 6600 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.