Inside
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 68 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 32 | 28 | 47 | 62 |
| 1440p QHD | 44 | 52 | 79 | 96 |
| 1080p Full HD | 67 | 71 | 110 | 136 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Inside with Intel Core Ultra 7 265K + AMD Radeon RX 570, In-Depth Analysis
The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K paired with the AMD Radeon RX 570 ranks 1,573 out of 1,671 tested combos for Inside. This places the configuration in the bottom 6% of all systems tested, indicating that while the CPU is exceptionally capable, the graphics card severely limits the overall experience for this title. The benchmark data confirms a system that is heavily GPU-bound, where the processor's high-end capabilities are largely left untapped.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo's rank of 1,573 out of 1,671 is a clear verdict on its standing. This is a low placement, driven almost entirely by the GPU's age and performance class. The data shows a stark contrast: the CPU sits at the 97th percentile compared to all CPUs, while the GPU is at the 74th percentile compared to all GPUs. This disparity means the system's potential is capped by the RX 570, which is a legacy Polaris architecture part. In a game like Inside, which is a 2D puzzle platformer, the visual load is modest, yet the GPU still struggles to maintain high frame rates at higher settings. The ranking reflects that this is not a balanced pairing for modern gaming, even for a less demanding title. The CPU is effectively waiting on the GPU at every resolution and settings combination tested, making the 1573rd position a predictable outcome for a processor of this class paired with an entry-level graphics card from 2017.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 570 is the decisive component in this system’s performance. Its specifications—4 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 256-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth—are the primary constraints observed in the measured results. The GPU’s base clock of 1168 MHz and boost clock of 1244 MHz, combined with 2048 shading units, provide the raw throughput for rendering. However, the data indicates that this older architecture, built on a 14 nm process, is insufficient for high-refresh-rate gaming at higher presets. The GPU’s 74th percentile ranking versus all GPUs is respectable for its age, but it is the lowest-performing component in this specific combo. Its 4 GB VRAM buffer is a limiting factor, especially at 4K where the demands on memory bandwidth and capacity increase. The benchmark results show that the GPU is the bottleneck in every scenario, as evidenced by the significant frame rate drops when moving from Low to Ultra settings at any resolution. The card's performance is consistent with its end-of-life production status, and its 150 W TDP and dual-slot design are the only physical characteristics that hint at its modest capabilities.
Resolution Scaling
The frame rate data reveals a clear and expected trend: performance degrades as resolution increases, confirming the GPU as the limiting component. At 1080p, the system delivers playable frame rates across all settings, ranging from 135.6 FPS on Low to 66.6 FPS on Ultra. Moving to 1440p, we see a significant drop, with the average FPS falling to 95.6 on Low and 43.6 on Ultra. This represents a performance reduction of approximately 29% at Low settings and 34% at Ultra settings when moving from 1080p to 1440p. The scaling to 4K is even more punishing. At 3840x2160, the average frame rates plummet to 61.7 FPS on Low and 28.3 FPS on High. The drop from 1440p to 4K is a 35% reduction at Low settings, but the gap widens to 46% at High settings. This pattern is a classic sign of a GPU-bound system, where the increased pixel count at higher resolutions directly stresses the RX 570's fill rate and memory bandwidth. The CPU's performance is not the variable here; the GPU's inability to keep up with the pixel throughput is the sole reason for the observed scaling.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured data provides a comprehensive view of the combo's performance across twelve distinct scenarios. At 1920x1080, the system shows its best results. The Low preset achieves an average of 135.6 FPS, while Medium and High deliver 109.9 FPS and 70.9 FPS, respectively. The Ultra preset is still playable at 66.6 FPS. At 2560x1440, the performance drops noticeably. The Low preset averages 95.6 FPS, Medium 78.6 FPS, and High 52 FPS. The Ultra preset falls to 43.6 FPS, which is beginning to feel less smooth for a game that benefits from fluid motion. At 3840x2160, the system struggles. The Low preset is the only one that maintains a reasonable average at 61.7 FPS. The Medium preset drops to 47.3 FPS, while High and Ultra yield 28.3 FPS and 31.8 FPS, respectively. These numbers show that the GPU is the definitive bottleneck, as the CPU's high core count and clock speeds are irrelevant once the resolution increases. The gap between Low and Ultra at 4K is substantial, a 54% reduction in frame rate, highlighting the GPU's performance ceiling.
FAQ
*Q: Is this CPU-GPU combo capable of running Inside at 4K?*
A: Yes, but only at the Low settings preset, which averages 61.7 FPS. Higher presets at 4K (Medium, High, Ultra) fall below 50 FPS, with High and Ultra averaging 28.3 FPS and 31.8 FPS, respectively.
Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to achieve a high frame rate?
A: At 1080p, the combo delivers the highest frame rates, with the Low preset averaging 135.6 FPS and the Medium preset averaging 109.9 FPS. These are the only tested scenarios that exceed 100 FPS.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in overall benchmark scores?
A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K has an average benchmark score of 79102. It is 0.2% slower than the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF and Intel Core i9-14900KF, and 0.9% slower than the Intel Core i9-14900K.
Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals in overall benchmark scores?
A: The AMD Radeon RX 570 has an average benchmark score of 30158. This is 0.2% faster than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 and AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT, and 0.6% faster than the NVIDIA Tesla M60.
Q: What is the limiting factor for performance in this game?
A: The data indicates the GPU is the sole limiting factor. The CPU's performance percentile is 97, while the GPU's is 74, and the frame rates drop significantly with resolution increases, a clear sign of a GPU bottleneck.
Q: What are the GPU's memory specifications?
A: The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s.
CPU Role
The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K is a high-end processor that plays a minimal role in this game's performance. With 20 cores and 20 threads, a base clock of 3.90 GHz, and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, it is a powerhouse for multi-threaded workloads. Its 30 MB of shared L3 cache and support for DDR5 memory further cement its position as a top-tier desktop part. In synthetic benchmarks, it scores 50,009 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 7,060 in single-core, placing it at the 97th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-14900KF, has an average score that is only 0.2% higher, showing that the 265K is competitive at the highest level. However, in Inside, this processing power is largely unused. The game's 2D nature and low geometric complexity do not stress the CPU, meaning the measured frame rates are almost entirely dependent on the GPU. The CPU is not the bottleneck; it is simply waiting for the RX 570 to render each frame. The data shows that its 20 cores and high clocks are irrelevant to the final FPS numbers in this specific title.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured FPS, the optimal settings for this combo depend on the user's target resolution and preference for smoothness. For 1080p, the Medium preset offers the best balance, delivering an average of 109.9 FPS, which is well above the threshold for smooth gameplay. The Low preset at 135.6 FPS provides an even higher margin but sacrifices visual quality. The High preset at 70.9 FPS is also playable, but the jump to Ultra only yields 66.6 FPS, which is a marginal gain in quality for a significant drop in performance. At 1440p, the Low preset is the recommended choice, averaging 95.6 FPS. The Medium preset at 78.6 FPS is acceptable, but High and Ultra drop to 52 FPS and 43.6 FPS, respectively, which may be too low for a game that relies on smooth animation. At 4K, the only viable option is the Low preset, which averages 61.7 FPS. All other presets at this resolution result in averages below 50 FPS, with High and Ultra being unplayable at 28.3 FPS and 31.8 FPS. The data suggests that to maintain a consistent 60+ FPS experience, users should stick to Low settings at 1440p or Medium settings at 1080p. The GPU's limitations make higher presets a poor trade-off for the performance cost.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
AMD Radeon RX 570
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 7 265K + AMD Radeon RX 570 in Inside
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 61.7 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 47.3 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 31.8 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 28.3 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 95.6 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 78.6 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 52.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 43.6 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 135.6 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 109.9 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 70.9 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 66.6 |
Inside with iUltra 7 265K + Other GPUs
See how Inside performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Inside with RX 570 + Other CPUs
See how Inside performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with iUltra 7 265K + RX 570
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.