Inside

The Intel Core i7-14700K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti produces a benchmark result that ranks 1652nd out of 1671 tested combinations for Inside. This places the combo in the bottom 1.1% of all tested hardware pairings, a position driven almost entirely by the graphics card. The CPU is a top-tier component—the data shows it sits in the 96th percentile against all processors—while the GPU sits in the 30th percentile against all graphics cards. The measured frame rates confirm this imbalance: the system can push past 100 FPS at 1080p on Low settings, but it struggles to maintain playable frame rates at 4K on higher presets. The bottleneck is unambiguous, and the data indicates that the GTX 1050 Ti is the limiting factor across nearly every resolution and settings combination tested.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo's rank of 1652 out of 1671 tested combinations places it in the bottom 1.1% of all tested pairings for Inside. This is a stark result for a processor that achieves an average benchmark score of 70074, placing it in the 96th percentile against all CPUs. The i7-14700K's nearest rivals in CPU performance—the Intel Core i7-14700KF with a deltaPct of 0, the AMD EPYC 9115 with a deltaPct of 0.3, and the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X with a deltaPct of -0.5—all demonstrate that the processor's raw compute capability is not the constraint. Instead, the GPU's average benchmark score of 5316 places it in the 30th percentile, with its nearest rivals being the NVIDIA GeForce 930A (deltaPct 0), the NVIDIA GeForce 940M (deltaPct 0.4), and the AMD Radeon R7 240 (deltaPct 0.7). The deltaPct values here are minuscule, indicating the GTX 1050 Ti is clustered with entry-level mobile and low-end desktop parts. In the context of Inside, the measured FPS data shows that even the best-case scenario—1080p Low at 105.7 FPS—is only achievable because the game's low preset reduces the GPU workload dramatically, allowing the CPU to push frames. At higher presets or resolutions, the GPU's limits become immediately apparent, dragging the overall rank down.

FAQ

Q: What is the best frame rate this combo can achieve in Inside?

A: The highest measured average FPS is 105.7, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings. This is the only settings/resolution combination that breaks the 100 FPS mark.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700K's average benchmark score of 70074 is nearly identical to the Intel Core i7-14700KF at 70104 (deltaPct 0), and it is 0.3% ahead of the AMD EPYC 9115 at 69887. It trails the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X by 0.5%.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its closest rivals?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti's average benchmark score of 5316 is effectively tied with the NVIDIA GeForce 930A at 5317 (deltaPct 0). It is 0.4% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce 940M and 0.7% ahead of the AMD Radeon R7 240, but 0.8% behind the AMD Radeon R7 M445.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in this combo?

A: The data clearly indicates the GPU is the limiting factor. The CPU ranks in the 96th percentile of all processors, while the GPU ranks in the 30th percentile. The frame rate scaling with resolution and settings changes follows GPU-bound behavior, not CPU-bound behavior.

Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in Inside?

A: At 3840x2160, the measured average FPS ranges from 23.1 on High to 49.6 on Low. The Ultra preset delivers 25.8 FPS, which is below the threshold for smooth gameplay. Only the Low preset at 4K approaches acceptable playability.

Q: What is the difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the average FPS drops from 105.7 on Low to 49.3 on Ultra. This represents a 53.4% reduction in frame rate when moving from the lowest to the highest preset.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a predictable but steep resolution scaling curve, driven by the GTX 1050 Ti's limited memory bandwidth and pixel throughput. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 105.7 at 1920x1080 to 78.3 at 2560x1440, a 25.9% reduction, and then to 49.6 at 3840x2160, a further 36.7% reduction from 1440p. This scaling pattern is characteristic of a GPU that is heavily constrained by its 112.1 GB/s memory bandwidth and 32 ROPs, as the pixel count increases disproportionately with resolution. At Medium settings, the frame rate falls from 86.1 at 1080p to 63 at 1440p, then to 37.7 at 4K. The High preset shows a similar trend: 56.2 at 1080p, 39.2 at 1440p, and 23.1 at 4K. The Ultra preset delivers 49.3 at 1080p, 35.2 at 1440p, and 25.8 at 4K.

The difference between Low and Medium at each resolution is substantial, but the gap narrows as resolution increases. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Medium is 19.6 FPS; at 4K, it is 11.9 FPS. This suggests that at higher resolutions, the GPU is so saturated that the settings preset has diminishing returns on frame rate. The limiting component is unequivocally the GPU. The i7-14700K, with its 20 cores and 28 threads, is more than capable of feeding frames at these rates. The data shows that even at 1080p Low—the least GPU-intensive scenario—the combo achieves 105.7 FPS, which is still far below what the CPU could theoretically support. The GTX 1050 Ti, with its 2.138 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 44.54 GPixel/s pixel rate, is the ceiling for this system.

Settings Recommendations

For this combo, the measured data points to Low settings as the only preset that provides a consistently playable experience across all tested resolutions. At 1920x1080, Low delivers 105.7 FPS, which is smooth and responsive. Medium at 1080p delivers 86.1 FPS, which is also acceptable for most players, but the 19.6 FPS drop from Low to Medium suggests that the GPU's limited fill rate is already being taxed. At 2560x1440, Low delivers 78.3 FPS, which is playable, while Medium drops to 63 FPS—still workable but with less headroom. The High preset at 1440p delivers 39.2 FPS, which is borderline for a game like Inside that benefits from consistent frame pacing.

At 3840x2160, the situation is more constrained. Low delivers 49.6 FPS, which is playable but not ideal. Medium drops to 37.7 FPS, and High falls to 23.1 FPS, which is below acceptable standards for most players. Ultra at any resolution is not recommended: it delivers 49.3 FPS at 1080p, 35.2 FPS at 1440p, and 25.8 FPS at 4K. The data indicates that the best experience for this combo is to prioritize Low settings for high frame rates, or Medium at 1080p for a balance of visual quality and performance. The GPU's 4 GB of GDDR5 memory and 128-bit bus width are insufficient for the higher presets at higher resolutions, causing the frame rate to collapse.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its best performance. Low settings produce an average of 105.7 FPS, which is the only measured result above 100 FPS. Medium settings yield 86.1 FPS, a drop of 19.6 FPS from Low. High settings produce 56.2 FPS, and Ultra drops to 49.3 FPS. The gap between High and Ultra is only 6.9 FPS, suggesting that the Ultra preset's additional effects are not proportionally more demanding than High, but both are well below the 60 FPS threshold.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates scale down significantly. Low settings deliver 78.3 FPS, which is a 27.4 FPS drop from 1080p Low. Medium settings produce 63 FPS, which is 23.1 FPS lower than 1080p Medium. High settings fall to 39.2 FPS, and Ultra drops to 35.2 FPS. The difference between Low and Medium at 1440p is 15.3 FPS, while the difference between High and Ultra is only 4 FPS. This indicates that the GPU is becoming the dominant constraint, with the higher presets causing more severe frame rate degradation.

At 3840x2160, the combo struggles to maintain playable frame rates on most presets. Low settings produce 49.6 FPS, which is the only 4K preset above 40 FPS. Medium settings drop to 37.7 FPS, High falls to 23.1 FPS, and Ultra delivers 25.8 FPS. Notably, the Ultra preset at 4K achieves a slightly higher frame rate than High (25.8 vs 23.1), which is an anomaly in the data, but both are well below playable thresholds. The scaling from 1080p Low to 4K Low shows a 56.1 FPS drop, representing a 53% reduction in performance. This scaling pattern reinforces that the GTX 1050 Ti is the limiting component, as the i7-14700K's compute capabilities are far beyond what the GPU can utilize in this title. The data across all 12 measured combinations shows a consistent pattern: the GPU's memory bandwidth and pixel throughput are insufficient for high-fidelity rendering at higher resolutions, making Low settings the only reliable choice for this pairing.