Inside

The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 combination delivers exceptionally high frame rates in Inside, a 2016 puzzle platformer, with the data showing that even at 4K Ultra settings, the game remains highly playable. This pairing of a 16-core flagship CPU with a Blackwell-generation GPU produces results that are firmly in the top tier of all tested configurations.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average frame rate recorded for this combo?

A: The highest average frame rate in the measured data is 434 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

Q: How does the combo perform at 4K resolution with Ultra settings?

A: At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the combination produces an average frame rate of 106 FPS. This is the lowest average FPS recorded across all tested resolutions and settings.

Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the average FPS drops from 353 FPS on Low settings to 168 FPS on Ultra settings. This represents a significant performance scaling overhead for the higher visual fidelity preset.

Q: Does the RTX 5070 have enough VRAM for this game?

A: Yes, the RTX 5070 includes 12 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, which is more than sufficient for Inside's rendering requirements across all tested settings and resolutions, as evidenced by the consistently high frame rates.

Q: How many cores does the CPU have, and what is its boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D has 16 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 4.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.70 GHz.

Q: What is the combo's rank among all tested configurations?

A: The combo ranks 362nd out of 3716 tested combinations, placing it in the top 10% of all recorded system pairings for this game.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Granite Ridge. It operates on the AMD Socket AM5 platform, with a base clock of 4.30 GHz and a boost clock of 5.70 GHz. The processor features a substantial 128 MB of L3 cache, which is critical for gaming performance, as it allows for more data to be stored closer to the cores, reducing latency and improving frame pacing.

In the context of Inside, a puzzle platformer that is not traditionally considered CPU-intensive, this processor is massively over-provisioned. The benchmark results confirm this, as the CPU's strong single-thread performance, evidenced by a 3DMark single-thread score of 1292 and a Geekbench single-core score of 3064, ensures that the game's primary logic thread is never a bottleneck. The high multi-thread capabilities, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42018, also provide ample headroom for any background tasks or physics calculations the game might offload.

The CPU's performance relative to its direct competitors is tight. It is 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755 and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9755X3D in average benchmark scores. It also holds a 0.3% lead over the AMD EPYC 8224P and a 0.4% lead over the Intel Core Ultra 9 285. While these deltas are small, they demonstrate that the 9950X3D sits at the top of the performance stack for desktop processors, ensuring that the CPU does not limit frame rates in Inside at any resolution. The data suggests that the CPU's role here is to provide a stable, high-frequency platform that allows the GPU to operate at its full potential without being starved of data.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 is the primary driver of frame rates in Inside, and its performance scales predictably with resolution and settings. Built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, the GPU features 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 80 render output units. It operates at a base clock of 2325 MHz and a boost clock of 2512 MHz. The 12 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus provides a memory bandwidth of 672.0 GB/s, which is more than adequate for the game's art assets.

The GPU's raw compute power is significant, with an FP32 performance of 30.87 TFLOPS and a pixel rate of 201.0 GPixel/s. These specifications translate directly into the high frame rates observed. For instance, at 1080p, the GPU is able to push an average of 434 FPS on Low settings, indicating that even at lower resolutions, the GPU is not the limiting factor until the CPU's frame generation limit is approached. The data shows that the GPU's performance in Inside is well above the needs of the game, as even the most demanding test scenario, 4K Ultra, yields an average of 106 FPS.

Compared to its rivals in the benchmark database, the RTX 5070's average score is 0.1% higher than the AMD Radeon Pro 580 and 0.8% higher than the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100. It also outperforms the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile by 2.0%. However, it is 1.2% behind the AMD Radeon Pro 5300. These comparisons highlight that while the RTX 5070 is a high-end consumer card, its performance in synthetic benchmarks is contextually similar to some professional workstation cards. In the context of Inside, the GPU's role is purely about maintaining high rasterization rates, and the data confirms it excels at this task across all tested configurations.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 achieves a rank of 362 out of 3716 tested combos in Inside. This places the system in the 90th percentile of all recorded configurations, indicating that it delivers performance that is superior to the vast majority of other systems.

This high ranking is a direct result of the synergy between the top-tier CPU and the powerful GPU. While the CPU's strong single-core performance ensures minimal overhead, the GPU's raw fill rate and shading power allow for high frame rates even at 4K. The data suggests that this combo is not just capable of running the game smoothly, but it does so with a significant performance margin, making it one of the most capable systems tested for this title. The rank implies that users with this hardware can expect a smooth experience, with frame rates that are likely limited by the display's refresh rate rather than the hardware's capabilities. The substantial headroom, evidenced by the 434 FPS result at 1080p Low, positions this combo as one that will remain relevant for a long time.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal balance between visual quality and performance is achieved with the High settings preset. At 1080p, High settings produce an average of 245 FPS, which is over 4x the refresh rate of a standard 60 Hz monitor and well above the threshold for high-refresh-rate displays. Moving to 1440p, High settings still deliver an excellent 176 FPS average. Even at the demanding 4K resolution, the High preset yields an average of 111 FPS, which is perfectly playable on most displays.

While the Ultra preset offers the highest visual fidelity, the performance cost is substantial. At 4K, the Ultra preset drops the average FPS to 106, which is only a 5 FPS difference from High, but at 1440p, the gap widens to 8 FPS (176 vs 168). The Medium preset provides a compromise, achieving 392 FPS at 1080p, 282 FPS at 1440p, and 177 FPS at 4K. However, the visual difference between Medium and High is often less perceptible than the frame rate difference. Therefore, for the best experience that balances high frame rates with a high level of visual detail, the High preset is the recommended choice. For users prioritizing maximum frame rates on high-refresh-rate monitors, the Medium preset offers a significant boost, particularly at 1440p and 4K.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of the combo's performance across different settings and resolutions.

At 1920x1080, the frame rates are exceptionally high. The Low preset achieves an average of 434 FPS. The Medium preset averages 392 FPS, with a minimum of 334 FPS and a maximum of 451 FPS. The High preset averages 245 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 234 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium is 42 FPS, while the gap between High and Ultra is only 11 FPS, indicating diminishing returns at the higher settings.

At 2560x1440, the performance remains very strong. The Low preset averages 353 FPS. The Medium preset averages 282 FPS, with a minimum of 240 FPS and a maximum of 325 FPS. The High preset averages 176 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 168 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p shows a performance drop of approximately 19% for Low settings (434 to 353 FPS) and 28% for High settings (245 to 176 FPS).

At 3840x2160, the combo still delivers high frame rates. The Low preset averages 222 FPS. The Medium preset averages 177 FPS, with a minimum of 151 FPS and a maximum of 204 FPS. The High preset averages 111 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 106 FPS. The performance drop from 1440p to 4K is significant, with High settings seeing a 37% reduction (176 to 111 FPS) and Low settings seeing a 37% reduction (353 to 222 FPS) as well.

Resolution Scaling

The data reveals a clear pattern in how frame rates scale with resolution. Moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 results in a noticeable performance hit across all settings. For instance, on Low settings, the average FPS drops from 434 to 353, a decrease of 81 FPS. On High settings, the drop is 69 FPS (245 to 176). This indicates that the GPU is becoming more heavily utilized as the pixel count increases, though the CPU still has ample headroom.

The scaling from 2560x1440 to 3840x2160 is even more pronounced. The Low setting average falls from 353 to 222 FPS, a drop of 131 FPS. The High setting average falls from 176 to 111 FPS, a drop of 65 FPS. This steeper decline at 4K strongly suggests that the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 is the primary limiting component at this resolution. The GPU's fill rate and memory bandwidth are being taxed more heavily, while the CPU's role diminishes further.

The scaling behavior shows that the system is balanced at 1080p and 1440p, where the CPU and GPU work in concert to produce high frame rates. However, at 4K, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck. The fact that the 4K Ultra preset still manages 106 FPS reflects the GPU's power, but the relative performance drop from 1080p to 4K (a 75% reduction on High settings) indicates that the GPU is the component that limits the system's maximum output in the most demanding scenarios. This analysis is consistent with the game's age and non-demanding nature, where even a mid-range GPU would suffice, and the high-end RTX 5070 provides an enormous performance buffer.