Inside

The AMD Ryzen 9 5900X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti ranks 1662 out of 1671 tested combos in Inside, placing it in the bottom 1% of all configurations. This is an extreme pairing where a top-tier 12-core CPU is harnessed to a GPU that sits at the 30th percentile of all graphics cards. The benchmark data indicates that this system is almost entirely constrained by its graphics card, making it a poor match for this title at higher settings, though it remains fully playable at lower presets.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo’s rank of 1662 out of 1671 is a clear signal that this pairing is far from optimal for Inside. In a database of over 1,600 tested configurations, this system lands near the very bottom. The data shows that the GTX 1050 Ti’s performance ceiling is the limiting factor; its average benchmark score of 5316 places it just 0.4% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce 940M and only 0.7% ahead of the AMD Radeon R7 240 in synthetic tests. Meanwhile, the Ryzen 9 5900X is a flagship processor, scoring in the 90th percentile of all CPUs and outperforming the Intel Core i7-13700 by 1% in average benchmark scores. This massive imbalance means the CPU’s potential is essentially wasted in this game, as the GPU cannot translate that processing power into higher frame rates. The result is a system that performs admirably at low settings but struggles to maintain smooth gameplay at higher graphical presets.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is the definitive bottleneck in this configuration. Its 4 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 128-bit bus provides 112.1 GB/s of bandwidth, which is insufficient for high-resolution textures and effects in Inside. The GPU’s base clock of 1291 MHz and boost clock of 1392 MHz are modest, and its 768 shading units deliver a raw FP32 performance of 2.138 TFLOPS. These specifications explain the measured frame rates: at 3840x2160 with High settings, the average FPS drops to 21.6, which is unplayable. Even at 2560x1440 with High settings, the average of 36.6 FPS falls short of a smooth 60 FPS target. The GPU’s 30th percentile ranking among all graphics cards, with a PassMark G3D score of 6340, corroborates its position as a low-end part. In synthetic DirectX 12 tests, it scores just 26, which is a strong indicator of its limited ability to handle modern rendering workloads, even in a lightly demanding title like Inside.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo run Inside at 1080p smoothly?

A: Yes, but only at lower settings. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the average frame rate is 107 FPS, which is excellent. At Medium settings, it drops to 84.8 FPS, still very smooth. However, at High settings the average falls to 56.3 FPS, and at Ultra it is 51.1 FPS.

Q: Is the Ryzen 9 5900X holding back the GTX 1050 Ti?

A: No. The CPU is far more powerful than the GPU. The Ryzen 9 5900X scores 33150 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and ranks in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. The GTX 1050 Ti’s average benchmark score of 5316 is the limiting factor, creating a significant imbalance.

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Inside?

A: 1920x1080 is the most sensible choice. At this resolution, the system can achieve over 100 FPS at Low settings and nearly 85 FPS at Medium. At 2560x1440, only the Low preset (75.4 FPS) provides a consistently smooth experience.

Q: How does the GTX 1050 Ti compare to its closest rivals?

A: The GTX 1050 Ti’s average benchmark score of 5316 is essentially identical to the NVIDIA GeForce 930A (5317), 0.4% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce 940M (5297), and 0.7% ahead of the AMD Radeon R7 240 (5280). It is 0.8% behind the AMD Radeon R7 M445 (5361).

Q: Is the 4 GB VRAM sufficient for 4K gaming?

A: No. At 3840x2160, the High preset yields an average of 21.6 FPS, and the Ultra preset only manages 23.8 FPS. Even the Medium preset at 38.1 FPS is below playable thresholds. The Low preset at 52.2 FPS is the only 4K option that approaches playability.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the GPU?

A: The launch MSRP of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is 139 USD.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the data shows a clear scaling pattern. With Low settings, the average FPS is 107, which is a highly responsive experience. Moving to Medium reduces the average to 84.8 FPS, still excellent for a puzzle platformer. High settings produce an average of 56.3 FPS, which is playable but less fluid. The Ultra preset delivers an average of 51.1 FPS, indicating that the GPU is nearing its limits.

At 2560x1440, the performance drop is significant. The Low preset averages 75.4 FPS, which is good. Medium settings yield 62.4 FPS, which is acceptable for a slower-paced game. High settings drop to 36.6 FPS, which is choppy, and Ultra settings are worse at 37.1 FPS. These numbers highlight that 1440p is only viable on lower presets.

At 3840x2160, the GTX 1050 Ti is clearly overmatched. The Low preset is the only playable option, averaging 52.2 FPS. Medium settings drop to 38.1 FPS, High to 21.6 FPS, and Ultra to 23.8 FPS. None of these higher presets provide a smooth experience, making 4K gaming impractical with this GPU.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 9 5900X is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, running on the AM4 socket. With a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, it is a formidable CPU. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33150 and single-core score of 4680 demonstrate its immense processing power. In the context of Inside, however, this power is largely unused. The game is a side-scrolling puzzle platformer with modest CPU demands, and the GPU becomes the limiting factor long before the CPU is taxed. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 39453 places it 0.2% ahead of the AMD EPYC 4245P and 0.9% ahead of the Intel Core i7-13700F. This data confirms that the Ryzen 9 5900X is not the source of any performance issues; rather, it is a high-end component paired with a low-end GPU, resulting in a system that is CPU-bound in synthetic tests but GPU-bound in actual gameplay.

Settings Recommendations

For the best experience with this combo, prioritize a smooth frame rate over visual fidelity. At 1920x1080, the Medium preset is the sweet spot, offering an average of 84.8 FPS, which is both fluid and visually acceptable. The Low preset at 107 FPS is ideal for players who prefer maximum responsiveness. Avoid the High and Ultra presets at this resolution, as they dip below 60 FPS on average.

At 2560x1440, the Low preset is the only sensible choice, delivering 75.4 FPS. The Medium preset at 62.4 FPS is playable but may show occasional dips. For a consistent 60 FPS experience at 1440p, stick to Low. At 3840x2160, the Low preset at 52.2 FPS is technically playable but borderline, and it is not recommended for a smooth experience. The data suggests that 1080p Medium is the best overall balance of performance and visual quality for this hardware combination.