Inside

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti combination delivers exceptionally high frame rates in Inside, a 2016 puzzle platformer, across all tested resolutions and settings. The data shows this pairing ranks 503rd out of 1671 tested combos for this game, placing it in the top 30% of configurations. The measured results reveal a system that is massively overqualified for the game’s demands, with even the most demanding preset at 4K producing an average of 117.9 FPS.

FAQ

Q: What is the average frame rate at 1080p with Ultra settings?

A: At 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, the combo achieves an average of 205.1 FPS. This is only slightly lower than the High preset’s 206.6 FPS, indicating a performance plateau at this resolution.

Q: How does the CPU's 3D V-Cache benefit this game?

A: The CPU features 96 MB of shared L3 cache, a hallmark of the X3D series. The benchmark results suggest this large cache helps maintain high minimum frame rates, although specific minimum FPS values are not provided in the data.

Q: Is the RTX 4070 Ti's 12 GB VRAM sufficient for 4K in this title?

A: Yes. The measured results show an average of 121.1 FPS at 3840x2160 with High settings, proving the 12 GB of GDDR6X memory is not a bottleneck for this game’s visual assets.

Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: The difference is substantial. At 2560x1440, Low settings produce an average of 245.6 FPS, while Ultra settings yield 182.1 FPS. This represents a 63.5 FPS drop for maximum visual fidelity.

Q: Does the combo rank higher with this CPU or GPU?

A: The CPU has a percentile rank of 82 against all CPUs, while the GPU has a percentile rank of 85 against all GPUs. In this game, the combo rank is 503 out of 1671, suggesting the pairing is well-balanced.

Q: What is the lowest average frame rate recorded in the entire dataset?

A: The lowest average frame rate is 117.9 FPS, recorded at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings. This is still well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D is a desktop processor from the 5000 series, built on the Zen 3 architecture (codename Vermeer) using a 7 nm process. It has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.10 GHz. The processor’s defining feature is its cache configuration: 64 KB of L1 and 512 KB of L2 per core, but critically, a shared 96 MB L3 cache. This large L3 pool is designed to reduce memory latency, which can be beneficial for game logic and physics calculations.

In Inside, a game that is not heavily threaded, the CPU’s performance is more about raw single-thread speed and cache efficiency than core count. The benchmark data shows a single-thread score of 804 in 3DMark and 3157 in Cinebench R23. These scores are competitive, but the real advantage comes from the 96 MB L3 cache, which likely ensures that frequently accessed game data stays close to the cores. The processor’s memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s over dual-channel DDR4 is adequate for this title, as the measured FPS does not indicate any CPU-related bottlenecks at any resolution.

The CPU’s nearest rivals in average benchmark score include the Intel Core i7-1360P (0.2% faster), AMD Ryzen 5 7600X3D (0.3% faster), and Intel Core i5-11600 (0.5% faster). These small deltas indicate that the 5700X3D is in a very tight performance cluster, but in this game, its cache advantage may push it ahead. The data shows a passmark_multithread score of 26318, which is strong, but for a puzzle platformer, the single-threaded and cache-sensitive performance is more relevant.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti holds a combo rank of 503 out of 1671 tested configurations for Inside. This places it in the 70th percentile of all combos, meaning it outperforms 70% of the systems tested. Given the game’s release in 2016, this is an extremely high ranking, as many modern and older systems will struggle to reach the frame rates this pairing achieves.

The ranking suggests that while the combo is not in the top tier (which would likely consist of newer, more expensive hardware), it is more than sufficient for this title. The GPU’s high percentile (85) and the CPU’s strong cache performance combine to push this combo well above the median. The data indicates that this pairing is overkill for Inside, as even the most demanding settings produce frame rates in excess of 117 FPS. The rank of 503 is more a reflection of the sheer number of high-end combos tested than any weakness in this specific configuration. In practical terms, this combo is positioned to deliver a flawless experience in this game, with no measurable performance compromise.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of performance scaling across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the combo delivers extraordinary results. Low settings achieve an average of 272.7 FPS, Medium 249.7 FPS, High 206.6 FPS, and Ultra 205.1 FPS. The difference between High and Ultra is negligible (1.5 FPS), suggesting that the Ultra preset’s additional effects are not taxing the hardware. The gap between Low and Ultra is 67.6 FPS, indicating that the GPU has ample headroom even at the highest settings.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains exceptionally high but shows more scaling. Low settings average 245.6 FPS, Medium 223.8 FPS, High 186.3 FPS, and Ultra 182.1 FPS. The drop from Low to Ultra is 63.5 FPS, a similar margin to 1080p. This suggests that the GPU is still the primary driver, and the CPU’s 96 MB L3 cache is sufficient to feed the RTX 4070 Ti at this resolution. The High and Ultra presets are again nearly identical, with only a 4.2 FPS difference.

At 3840x2160, the performance is still impressive but shows the expected resolution scaling. Low settings average 208.8 FPS, Medium 194 FPS, High 121.1 FPS, and Ultra 117.9 FPS. The significant drop between Medium and High (72.9 FPS) is notable, indicating that the High preset introduces graphical features that are more demanding at 4K. The lowest recorded average is 117.9 FPS at 4K Ultra, which is still far above the 60 FPS standard for console-like smoothness. Across all resolutions, the data shows a consistent pattern: Low and Medium presets are GPU-bound, while High and Ultra presets are more demanding on the GPU’s memory bandwidth and compute units.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is a high-end graphics card from the GeForce 40-series, based on the Ada Lovelace architecture and fabricated on a 5 nm process. It features 7680 shading units, 240 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output units. The card has a base clock of 2310 MHz and a boost clock of 2610 MHz, with a 12 GB GDDR6X memory pool on a 192-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s.

In Inside, the GPU is the dominant performance factor. The game’s side-scrolling perspective and stylized visuals are not overly demanding on the CPU, but the GPU’s raw throughput determines the frame rates at higher resolutions and presets. The data shows that the RTX 4070 Ti has immense headroom, as even at 4K Ultra it produces 117.9 FPS. The card’s memory bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s is more than sufficient for the game’s textures, which are relatively modest by modern standards. The GPU’s nearest rivals in benchmark scores include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile (0.6% faster), Intel Arc A730M (1.5% faster), and AMD Radeon Pro 580 (1.6% slower). These close deltas underscore the RTX 4070 Ti’s position as a high-tier performer.

The GPU’s 12 GB VRAM is a non-issue for this game, as the measured FPS does not show any signs of memory capacity throttling. The card’s FP32 performance of 40.09 TFLOPS is overkill for a puzzle platformer, but it ensures that the combo never dips below 117 FPS in any tested scenario. The role of the GPU here is to provide a framerate buffer that is effectively limitless, making the CPU’s cache management the only potential source of frame pacing differences.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend on the target resolution and refresh rate. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset is the clear choice, as it delivers 205.1 FPS, which is only 1.5 FPS lower than High. This allows players to enjoy the maximum visual fidelity without any meaningful performance cost. The Medium preset at 249.7 FPS is unnecessary unless the user has a 240 Hz monitor, but the Ultra preset still easily exceeds 200 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the Ultra preset is again recommended, with 182.1 FPS. This is well above the 144 Hz refresh rate common for 1440p monitors. The High preset at 186.3 FPS is nearly identical, so the choice between High and Ultra is purely aesthetic. For users with a 240 Hz 1440p monitor, the Medium preset at 223.8 FPS is the best option, as it provides a significant jump over Ultra while maintaining high visual quality.

At 3840x2160, the recommendation is more nuanced. The Ultra preset at 117.9 FPS is suitable for a 120 Hz 4K display, but the High preset at 121.1 FPS is almost indistinguishable in performance. The Medium preset at 194 FPS is recommended for users with a 144 Hz 4K monitor, as it offers a substantial FPS increase with only a moderate reduction in visual effects. The Low preset at 208.8 FPS is overkill for any current 4K display and would only be useful for extreme e-sports scenarios, which do not apply to a puzzle platformer. For the best balance of visual quality and performance at 4K, the High preset is the recommended choice, as it maintains an average above 120 FPS while retaining most of the game’s graphical features.