Inside

Inside is a puzzle platformer with modest visual demands, and the measured results for the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti combination confirm that this pairing is far more capable than the game requires. The data shows a system that easily clears playable frame rates at every resolution and setting, making the limiting factor less about raw horsepower and more about how the game’s engine scales with the hardware. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS across resolutions and settings, interprets the CPU and GPU roles, and offers practical advice based solely on the provided benchmark data.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is significant, but the absolute numbers remain high enough that the experience stays smooth throughout. At High settings, the average frame rate falls from 258 FPS at 1920x1080 to 196.9 FPS at 2560x1440, a reduction of roughly 61 FPS. Moving to 3840x2160, the average drops further to 124.9 FPS, which is about 48% lower than the 1080p result. This pattern indicates that the GPU is becoming the primary constraint as pixel count increases, though the RTX 4070 Ti still delivers a very playable 4K experience.

The scaling is more dramatic when comparing Low settings across resolutions. At 1080p Low, the system hits 340.8 FPS, which drops to 300.5 FPS at 1440p and then to 242.8 FPS at 4K. The relative drop from 1080p to 4K is about 29%, which is steeper than the High preset’s 52% reduction. This suggests that at lower settings, the CPU has more headroom to push frames, but the GPU’s workload at 4K still becomes the bottleneck. The Ultra preset tells a similar story: 258.4 FPS at 1080p, 184.2 FPS at 1440p, and 113.4 FPS at 4K, with the 4K result being 56% lower than 1080p.

What the data implies is that Inside is not a graphically intense title for this hardware. The RTX 4070 Ti’s performance at 4K High (124.9 FPS) is nearly double what most gamers consider sufficient, so the resolution scaling is more of a theoretical exercise than a practical concern. The limiting component at 4K is clearly the GPU, as evidenced by the consistent FPS drops across all settings when moving from 1440p to 2160p. At 1080p, the CPU’s role becomes more apparent, but the Ryzen 5 8400F’s strong single-thread performance keeps frame rates well above 250 FPS even at Ultra.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with a 5 nm process, featuring 7680 shading units and 80 ROPs. Its 12 GB of GDDR6X memory operates on a 192-bit bus, delivering 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The base clock is 2310 MHz with a boost clock of 2610 MHz, and the memory runs at an effective 21 Gbps. These specifications translate into a pixel rate of 208.8 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 626.4 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance at 40.09 TFLOPS. The GPU’s benchmark scores place it in the 85th percentile of all GPUs, with an average score of 44900.

In Inside, the GPU’s influence is most visible at 4K and at higher settings. The gap between Low and Ultra at 4K is substantial: 242.8 FPS versus 113.4 FPS, a difference of 129.4 FPS. This indicates that the game’s visual effects, which likely include lighting and shadow quality, scale heavily with GPU workload. At 1440p, the same settings gap is 116.3 FPS (300.5 vs 184.2), and at 1080p it narrows to 82.4 FPS (340.8 vs 258.4). The shrinking delta at lower resolutions confirms that the GPU is less stressed when pixel count drops, allowing the CPU to take over more of the frame pacing.

The RTX 4070 Ti’s nearest rivals in the benchmark database include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile (avgScore 45152, deltaPct -0.6) and the Intel Arc A730M (avgScore 45592, deltaPct -1.5), showing that this desktop card is competitive with high-end mobile parts. Its 12 GB VRAM is more than enough for Inside, which is a 2016 title with modest texture requirements. The data suggests that the GPU is never the limiting factor at 1080p, but at 4K Ultra, the 113.4 FPS average shows the card working harder, though still delivering a fluid experience.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Phoenix, and manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC. It has a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The cache layout includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. Memory support is DDR5 with dual-channel bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The CPU’s benchmark results show a strong single-thread score of 951 in 3DMark and 2943 in Cinebench R23 single-core, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs with an average score of 25064.

Inside is a game that benefits from high single-thread performance, and the Ryzen 5 8400F delivers. At 1080p Low, the system reaches 340.8 FPS, which is likely near the game’s engine limit given the CPU’s capabilities. The difference between 1080p Medium (309.7 FPS) and 1080p Ultra (258.4 FPS) is 51.3 FPS, indicating that the CPU can maintain high frame rates even as GPU load increases. However, at 4K, the CPU’s role diminishes, as the GPU becomes the bottleneck—the gap between 4K Low (242.8 FPS) and 4K Ultra (113.4 FPS) is 129.4 FPS, showing the GPU’s dominance at that resolution.

The CPU’s nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X (avgScore 25057, deltaPct 0) and the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F (avgScore 24993, deltaPct 0.3), indicating that the 8400F is a solid mid-range option. Its 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient for Inside, which is not a heavily threaded title. The data shows that at 1080p, the CPU is the primary driver of frame rates, with the 340.8 FPS Low result being the highest measured in the entire dataset. This suggests that the CPU has headroom to spare, and the game’s performance is more limited by the engine’s frame pacing than by hardware constraints.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution to play Inside with this hardware?

A: The data shows that 2560x1440 at High settings provides a 196.9 FPS average, which is smooth and visually detailed. At 4K High, the average drops to 124.9 FPS, still playable, but the 1440p result offers a better balance of quality and performance.

Q: How much of a performance difference is there between Low and Ultra settings?

A: At 1080p, the difference is 82.4 FPS (340.8 vs 258.4), at 1440p it is 116.3 FPS (300.5 vs 184.2), and at 4K it is 129.4 FPS (242.8 vs 113.4). The gap widens as resolution increases, showing the GPU’s growing workload.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more important for this game?

A: At 1080p, the CPU is more influential, as seen in the high frame rates across all settings. At 4K, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, with a 52% FPS drop from 1080p to 4K at High settings.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Inside?

A: Yes, the 4K Ultra average is 113.4 FPS, and 4K High is 124.9 FPS. Both are well above the 60 FPS threshold, so the RTX 4070 Ti manages 4K comfortably.

Q: How does the RTX 4070 Ti compare to its nearest rivals in benchmarks?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti has an average score of 44900, which is slightly lower than the RTX 5090 Mobile (45152) by 0.6% and the Intel Arc A730M (45592) by 1.5%, but higher than the AMD Radeon Pro 580 (44195) by 1.6%.

Q: What is the highest FPS recorded for this combo?

A: The highest average FPS is 340.8 at 1080p with Low settings. This is the peak measured result, indicating the CPU’s limit in this game.

Settings Recommendations

For the best experience, the data points to 2560x1440 with the High preset as the optimal choice. This setting delivers a 196.9 FPS average, which is smooth and visually rich, and it avoids the diminishing returns of Ultra settings, which only provide a marginal visual improvement over High. At 1440p, the difference between High (196.9 FPS) and Ultra (184.2 FPS) is just 12.7 FPS, so the extra GPU load is not worth the minimal quality gain. The Medium preset at 1440p offers 281.3 FPS, but High provides a better visual experience without sacrificing playability.

If 4K is the target, the High preset is again the recommended choice, with a 124.9 FPS average. The Ultra preset at 4K drops to 113.4 FPS, which is still playable but shows a 9.2% performance penalty. For competitive or high-refresh-rate play, 1080p with Medium settings (309.7 FPS) is a strong option, as it offers a high frame rate with better visuals than Low (340.8 FPS). The Low preset is only advisable for extreme refresh rates, as the visual downgrade is unnecessary given the hardware’s capabilities.

The data suggests avoiding Ultra on this hardware, as the performance cost does not translate into a proportional visual benefit. The sweet spot is High across all resolutions, balancing frame rate and image quality. At 1080p, High delivers 258 FPS, which is more than enough for any display, and at 4K, High remains above 120 FPS, ensuring a fluid experience.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the average frame rates are as follows: Low settings produce 340.8 FPS, Medium produces 309.7 FPS, High produces 258 FPS, and Ultra produces 258.4 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra is 82.4 FPS, with the Low preset being the fastest. The Medium preset offers a 49.7 FPS advantage over High, showing that the High settings introduce a significant GPU load.

At 2560x1440, the averages are 300.5 FPS for Low, 281.3 FPS for Medium, 196.9 FPS for High, and 184.2 FPS for Ultra. The gap between Low and Ultra widens to 116.3 FPS, with Medium providing a substantial 84.4 FPS lead over High. This resolution is the sweet spot for performance, as even Ultra stays above 180 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the averages are 242.8 FPS for Low, 193.8 FPS for Medium, 124.9 FPS for High, and 113.4 FPS for Ultra. The difference between Low and Ultra is 129.4 FPS, the largest across all resolutions. Medium is nearly double the frame rate of Ultra, while High remains above 120 FPS. The data confirms that 4K is the most demanding scenario, but the system still handles it with ease. Overall, the measured FPS shows that this combo is overkill for Inside, with even the lowest performance point (4K Ultra at 113.4 FPS) being well above standard display refresh rates.