Inside

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER delivers an exceptionally strong performance profile for Inside, a 2016 puzzle platformer that is far less demanding than modern AAA titles. The measured data shows this combination is heavily overqualified for the game, producing frame rates that are not only playable but frequently approach or exceed the refresh rate limits of most high-end displays. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS across resolutions and settings, interpreting what the numbers mean for the limiting hardware component and providing practical recommendations based strictly on the provided data.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals a clear shift in workload. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the system produces 311.7 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440 at the same settings drops this to 277 FPS, a reduction of roughly 11%. At 3840x2160, the Low preset yields 239 FPS, another 13.7% decrease from 1440p. This pattern indicates that even at the highest pixel counts, the GPU still has significant headroom.

The scaling becomes more pronounced when looking at the Ultra preset. At 1080p, Ultra delivers 233.2 FPS. At 1440p, this falls to 183.6 FPS (a 21.3% drop), and at 4K, it bottoms out at 118.9 FPS (a further 35.2% drop). The data suggests that while the GPU is the primary bottleneck at 4K, the CPU is still capable of feeding it enough data to maintain over 100 FPS. The difference between the 1080p and 1440p results at lower settings (277 vs 311.7 FPS) is relatively small, suggesting that the Ryzen 7 5700X’s single-thread performance becomes a limiting factor when the GPU load is light. However, the 4K results show the GPU is working harder, as the frame rate gap between High (122.3 FPS) and Ultra (118.9 FPS) is minimal, indicating a GPU-side limit at that resolution.

GPU Role

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the dominant component in this configuration for Inside. Its 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus provides 672.3 GB/s of bandwidth, which is far more than a game of this visual complexity requires. The data confirms this: even at 4K Ultra, the average FPS is 118.9, a figure that suggests the GPU is not struggling to render the scene. The graphics card’s Ada Lovelace architecture, with 8448 shading units and 66 RT cores, is capable of processing the game’s 2D side-scrolling visuals with massive efficiency.

The boost clock of 2610 MHz is a key factor here. The measured results show that the GPU’s performance scales predictably with resolution. At 1080p Low, the card produces 311.7 FPS, and at 4K Low, it produces 239 FPS. This 23% performance drop from 1080p to 4K is less than the pixel count increase (which is 4x), indicating that the game is not purely pixel-bound; the CPU is playing a significant role in limiting the maximum frame rate. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 48704 places it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs, and its nearest rival, the NVIDIA CMP 50HX, is only 0.7% faster, while the RTX A2000 is 1.6% slower. This context shows the 4070 Ti SUPER is a high-tier card, but for Inside, its raw power is not the primary constraint; the game simply does not present enough graphical load to fully utilize it.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X, with 8 cores and 16 threads based on the Zen 3 architecture, plays a crucial role in achieving the high frame rates seen at lower resolutions. While the game is not likely to use all 16 threads, the CPU’s strong single-core performance is essential for maintaining high FPS when the GPU is underutilized. The data supports this: at 1080p Low, the system hits 311.7 FPS, a number that is likely near the CPU’s practical limit for this game’s engine. The 3dmark single-thread score of 921 and the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3193 suggest that the 5700X has the per-core muscle to avoid bottlenecking the GPU at these settings.

However, the CPU’s influence wanes as resolution increases. The difference between 1080p and 1440p at Low settings is only 34.7 FPS (311.7 vs 277), which shows that the GPU is starting to take on more work. By 4K, the CPU is no longer the primary constraint, as the FPS is determined more by the GPU’s rendering capabilities. The CPU’s 32 MB of shared L3 cache and 16 threads provide ample headroom for any background tasks, but for Inside, the benchmark results indicate that the 5700X is more than sufficient, never becoming a noticeable bottleneck even at the lowest settings. Its average benchmark score of 26214 places it in the 83rd percentile, with its closest rival, the Intel Core i9-11900KF, being only 0.1% faster, confirming its balanced performance.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured rows, the most efficient path for a high-refresh-rate experience is the Medium preset. At 2560x1440, Medium delivers 254.7 FPS, which is more than enough for any 144Hz or 240Hz monitor, and it is only 8% slower than the Low preset (277 FPS) while offering better visual quality. At 3840x2160, Medium produces 195.8 FPS, which remains exceptionally smooth and is a 22% improvement over the High preset’s 122.3 FPS. For users with a standard 60Hz display, the High preset at 4K (122.3 FPS) is a solid choice, providing a balance of visual fidelity and performance.

The Ultra preset, while offering the highest quality, yields the lowest frame rates. At 4K, it drops to 118.9 FPS, which is still playable but represents a 39% reduction compared to Medium. Given that the jump from Medium to Ultra is unlikely to be visually transformative in a game with this art style, the data suggests that Medium offers the best experience per the measured rows. For those prioritizing maximum frame rates at 1080p, the Low preset (311.7 FPS) is the top choice, but the Medium preset (284.5 FPS) is a more balanced option that only sacrifices 8.7% performance for improved visuals.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS achievable with this hardware at 1080p?

A: The highest average FPS recorded is 311.7, achieved at 1920x1080 with the Low preset.

Q: Can this system maintain over 100 FPS at 4K with the highest settings?

A: Yes. At 3840x2160 with the Ultra preset, the average FPS is 118.9, which is above the 100 FPS threshold.

Q: How much faster is the Medium preset compared to Ultra at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, Medium delivers 254.7 FPS, while Ultra delivers 183.6 FPS. Medium is approximately 38.7% faster.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor at 4K resolution?

A: The data indicates the GPU is the primary limiting factor at 4K, as the frame rate drops are more significant when moving from 1440p to 4K (e.g., High preset drops from 196.6 to 122.3 FPS) than when moving from 1080p to 1440p.

Q: What is the performance difference between Low and High settings at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, Low produces 311.7 FPS, while High produces 238.7 FPS. Low is roughly 30.6% faster than High.

Q: Does the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s 16 GB VRAM make a difference in this game?

A: The benchmark data does not show any VRAM-related limitations, as the card’s 16 GB capacity and 672.3 GB/s bandwidth are far above the requirements for Inside, allowing it to run at maximum settings without issue.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system provides a full range of high-speed options. The Low preset achieves an average of 311.7 FPS, which is the peak performance measured. Medium follows at 284.5 FPS, offering a balance of speed and quality. High sits at 238.7 FPS, and Ultra is the slowest at 1080p with 233.2 FPS. The gap between High and Ultra is only 5.5 FPS, suggesting that the Ultra preset is not particularly demanding at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the scores remain high but show a clear drop. Low delivers 277 FPS, making it the fastest option. Medium is close behind at 254.7 FPS, representing a 8% decrease. High drops to 196.6 FPS, a significant 22.8% reduction from Medium. Ultra is the lowest at 183.6 FPS, which is 6.6% slower than High. This resolution is ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors, as even Ultra surpasses 180 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the GPU begins to feel the load, but the results are still impressive. Low produces 239 FPS, which is excellent for 4K. Medium reaches 195.8 FPS, a 18% drop from Low. High falls to 122.3 FPS, which is a substantial 37.5% reduction from Medium, indicating that the High preset introduces a more significant graphical workload. Ultra is the most demanding, yielding 118.9 FPS, which is only 3.4 FPS lower than High. This suggests that the High to Ultra transition has a minimal performance cost at 4K. Overall, the data shows that Medium is the sweet spot across all resolutions, providing frame rates that are competitive with Low while offering better visual fidelity.