Inside

# Inside: AMD Ryzen 7 5700X + AMD Radeon RX 9060

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9060 ranks 1615 out of 2887 tested combos in Inside, placing it in the 44th percentile of all measured system configurations. This is a mid-pack result for a puzzle platformer that is not especially demanding by modern standards, and the measured frame rates show that this pairing delivers comfortable playability across all tested resolutions and settings, though the headroom varies significantly depending on the configuration chosen.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo's rank of 1615 out of 2887 tested combinations places it slightly below the median of all tested systems for Inside. This ranking reflects the balanced nature of the pairing: neither the CPU nor the GPU is a top-tier part in its respective benchmark hierarchy, but both are competent mid-range performers that avoid creating a severe bottleneck in either direction.

The CPU, an AMD Ryzen 7 5700X, sits in the 79th percentile of all CPUs tested on the database, with an average benchmark score of 27578. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Intel Core i5-12600K matches it exactly with a 0% delta, the AMD Ryzen 7 5800 trails by just 0.2%, the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X leads by 0.2%, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H leads by 0.3%. This tight grouping means the 5700X is effectively performance-equivalent to several contemporary mid-range options, and its contribution to the combo's rank is consistent with what one would expect from a solid 8-core Zen 3 processor.

The GPU, an AMD Radeon RX 9060, is less centrally positioned in its own hierarchy, sitting in the 59th percentile of all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 16014. Its nearest rivals show a wider spread: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 0.7%, while the AMD Radeon R9 370X trails by 1%, the AMD Radeon RX 7700 trails by 1%, and the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 trails by 2.1%. The GPU's percentile rank is notably lower than the CPU's, suggesting that the graphics card is the more limiting component in this pairing for Inside.

Given that Inside is a puzzle platformer with relatively modest graphical demands, the combo's mid-pack rank is not a cause for concern. The measured frame rates demonstrate that this system can handle the game far above playable thresholds in most configurations, and the rank primarily reflects that the hardware is not pushing the upper limits of what the database has seen for this title.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 9060 is built on the RDNA 4.0 architecture with the Navi 44 chip, manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It carries 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1700 MHz, a game clock of 2400 MHz, and a boost clock of 2990 MHz, with memory running at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

In Inside, the GPU's role is substantial but not overwhelming. At 1080p, the GPU is the primary driver of performance differences between settings, with frame rates ranging from 147 FPS at Ultra to 309 FPS at Low. The scaling from Low to Ultra at 1080p shows a reduction to roughly 48% of the Low setting's performance, which indicates that the graphics card's shading and memory subsystems are being progressively taxed as visual complexity increases.

The GPU's 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units provide a theoretical pixel rate of 191.4 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 334.9 GTexel/s. For a game like Inside, which uses a distinctive monochromatic art style with heavy use of lighting and shadow effects, these capabilities are more than sufficient. The FP32 throughput of 21.43 TFLOPS is ample for the game's rendering requirements, and the 28 ray tracing cores, while not specifically leveraged by this title, add future-proofing for other workloads.

At 4K, the GPU becomes the clear limiting factor when pushing higher settings. The drop from 140 FPS at Low to 70 FPS at High and 66 FPS at Ultra at 3840x2160 shows that the GPU's memory bandwidth and compute resources are stretched at this resolution, particularly as settings increase. The 8 GB VRAM capacity is adequate for Inside at all tested settings, as the game's art style does not demand large texture pools, but the bandwidth constraints become apparent in the scaling pattern.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data shows a consistent pattern of performance degradation as resolution increases from 1080p to 4K, with the severity of the drop varying by settings preset. At Low settings, the frame rate falls from 309 FPS at 1920x1080 to 222 FPS at 2560x1440 and 140 FPS at 3840x2160. This represents a 28% reduction from 1080p to 1440p and a 55% reduction from 1080p to 4K, indicating that even at the lowest settings, the GPU is being substantially loaded by the higher pixel counts.

At Medium settings, the pattern is similar but with slightly different proportions: 247 FPS at 1080p, 178 FPS at 1440p, and 112 FPS at 4K. The 1440p result is 72% of the 1080p figure, while the 4K result is 45% of the 1080p figure. The Medium preset also provides the only min/max FPS data in the measured set, showing a 210-284 FPS range at 1080p, a 151-204 FPS range at 1440p, and a 95-128 FPS range at 4K. These ranges suggest that frame pacing remains consistent across resolutions, with no severe stuttering or drops below playable thresholds.

High settings show a more pronounced scaling penalty: 155 FPS at 1080p, 111 FPS at 1440p, and 70 FPS at 4K. The 1440p result is 72% of 1080p, matching the Medium preset's proportional drop, but the 4K result is only 45% of the 1080p figure, identical to Medium's proportional scaling. Ultra settings follow a similar trajectory: 147 FPS at 1080p, 106 FPS at 1440p, and 66 FPS at 4K, with the 1440p and 4K results representing 72% and 45% of the 1080p figure, respectively.

The consistent proportional scaling across Medium, High, and Ultra settings indicates that the GPU is the primary limiting component at higher resolutions, with the CPU maintaining sufficient headroom to avoid becoming a bottleneck. The Low preset's slightly different scaling pattern (55% at 4K versus 45% for other presets) suggests that at the lowest settings, the CPU's role becomes relatively more significant, as the GPU is less burdened by visual effects and the frame rate climbs high enough for CPU limitations to emerge.

FAQ

Q: Is this combo capable of running Inside at 4K?

A: Yes, the measured data shows playable frame rates at 3840x2160 across all settings, with 66 FPS at Ultra, 70 FPS at High, 112 FPS at Medium, and 140 FPS at Low. Even the most demanding configuration, Ultra at 4K, maintains an average above 60 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X has an average benchmark score of 27578, which is exactly matched by the Intel Core i5-12600K (0% delta), while the AMD Ryzen 7 5800 trails by 0.2%, and both the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X and Intel Core Ultra 5 125H lead by 0.2% and 0.3%, respectively.

Q: What is the GPU's standing relative to other graphics cards?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 9060 sits in the 59th percentile of all GPUs with an average score of 16014. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 0.7%, while the AMD Radeon R9 370X and AMD Radeon RX 7700 both trail by 1%, and the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 trails by 2.1%.

Q: Does the frame rate drop significantly from 1080p to 1440p?

A: The reduction is consistent across Medium, High, and Ultra settings, with 1440p frame rates averaging 72% of the 1080p figures. For example, High settings drop from 155 FPS at 1080p to 111 FPS at 1440p, while Medium drops from 247 FPS to 178 FPS.

Q: Which settings preset provides the best balance of visual quality and performance at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the Medium preset delivers 178 FPS average with a 151-204 FPS range, which is well above the 106 FPS at Ultra and 111 FPS at High. The High and Ultra presets both remain above 100 FPS, so any of these three would be playable, but Medium offers the most headroom.

Q: What are the CPU's key specifications for gaming workloads?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. It features 32 MB of shared L3 cache and supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700X is an 8-core, 16-thread processor from the 5000 series, based on the Zen 3 architecture (codenamed Vermeer) built on a 7 nm process at TSMC. It operates with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The CPU features a cache hierarchy of 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing 51.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth, and connects via PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes.

In synthetic benchmarks, the 5700X demonstrates strong multi-threaded performance with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 13184 and a Geekbench multicore score of 10779. Single-threaded performance is also respectable, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1499 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2016. The 3DMark results show scaling from 921 in single-thread to 6858 in 16-thread tests, indicating good core utilization. The PassMark multithread score of 26612 and single-thread score of 3385 further confirm its balanced capabilities.

For Inside, the CPU's role is to maintain adequate frame pacing and avoid bottlenecking the GPU, particularly at lower resolutions and settings where frame rates climb above 200 FPS. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 309 FPS, and at 1080p Medium it reaches 247 FPS. These high frame rates suggest that the 5700X's single-thread performance, as indicated by its 3DMark single-thread score of 921 and PassMark single-thread score of 3385, is sufficient to feed the GPU effectively at these levels.

The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads provide ample parallel processing capability for a game like Inside, which is not heavily multi-threaded. The measured data shows that as resolution increases and frame rates drop, the CPU's importance diminishes relative to the GPU, consistent with the pattern seen in the resolution scaling analysis. The 5700X's 79th percentile ranking among all CPUs, alongside its tight clustering with rivals like the Intel Core i5-12600K and AMD Ryzen 5 7600X, confirms that it is a competent mid-range processor that does not hold back this GPU in Inside.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data provides clear guidance for optimal settings at each resolution. At 1920x1080, all presets deliver exceptionally high frame rates, from 147 FPS at Ultra to 309 FPS at Low. The Medium preset offers a 247 FPS average with a 210-284 FPS range, which is more than sufficient for any display. The High preset at 155 FPS and Ultra at 147 FPS are both viable, and given the minimal difference between High and Ultra (8 FPS), players with high refresh rate monitors may prefer High for the slight performance edge, while those prioritizing visual fidelity can select Ultra without concern.

At 2560x1440, the Medium preset delivers 178 FPS average with a 151-204 FPS range, making it the strongest recommendation for most users. The High preset at 111 FPS and Ultra at 106 FPS both remain above 100 FPS, so they are also playable options, but the Medium preset provides the best combination of smoothness and visual quality. The Low preset at 222 FPS is available for competitive play or very high refresh rate displays, but the visual compromise may not be worth the frame rate increase given that Medium already exceeds 144 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the Medium preset delivers 112 FPS average with a 95-128 FPS range, making it the recommended choice for 4K gaming. The High preset at 70 FPS and Ultra at 66 FPS both stay above 60 FPS, which is acceptable for most players, but the Medium preset offers significantly more headroom and a more consistent frame rate, as indicated by the min/max data. The Low preset at 140 FPS is available for those who prioritize maximum smoothness, but Medium provides a substantial visual upgrade while maintaining well over 100 FPS.

Overall, the Medium preset appears to be the sweet spot for this combo across all resolutions, delivering frame rates that are at least double the 60 FPS threshold at 1080p and 1440p, and nearly double at 4K. The High and Ultra presets are viable alternatives at lower resolutions, but at 4K they approach the minimum playable threshold more closely, making Medium the safest recommendation.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the measured average frame rates are 309 FPS at Low, 247 FPS at Medium, 155 FPS at High, and 147 FPS at Ultra. The Medium preset provides the only min/max data at this resolution, with a range of 210 to 284 FPS, indicating consistent frame pacing. The Low setting offers the highest performance by a significant margin, while the difference between High and Ultra is minimal at just 8 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the average frame rates are 222 FPS at Low, 178 FPS at Medium, 111 FPS at High, and 106 FPS at Ultra. The Medium preset shows a min/max range of 151 to 204 FPS, maintaining a spread of 53 FPS between the lowest and highest measured frames. The proportional drop from 1080p is consistent across Medium, High, and Ultra at approximately 28%, while Low sees a slightly larger reduction of 28% as well.

At 3840x2160, the average frame rates are 140 FPS at Low, 112 FPS at Medium, 70 FPS at High, and 66 FPS at Ultra. The Medium preset records a min/max range of 95 to 128 FPS, with a spread of 33 FPS. The 4K results show the most significant scaling penalty, with Medium, High, and Ultra all dropping to approximately 45% of their 1080p performance, while Low retains 45% of its 1080p figure as well. The minimum recorded frame rate across all configurations is 95 FPS at 4K Medium, which remains well above playable thresholds.