Inside

The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER combination delivers exceptionally high frame rates in Inside, a game that is far more demanding on the GPU than the CPU at higher resolutions. The data shows a pairing where the 6-core, 12-thread processor provides ample headroom, allowing the graphics card to become the primary performance driver. This results in a smooth, high-refresh-rate experience across all tested settings and resolutions, from 1080p to 4K.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, codenamed Granite Ridge. It operates on the AMD Socket AM5 platform and has a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. This processor also features a 32 MB shared L3 cache. Its benchmark performance places it in the 85th percentile among all CPUs, indicating it is a high-performing part. In synthetic tests, it scores 25,525 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 3,603 in single-core, with a Geekbench multi-core score of 15,182 and a single-core score of 3,363.

In the context of Inside, the CPU’s role is to feed the GPU with enough data to maintain high frame rates. The benchmark results show that the processor is more than capable of this task. Across all measured configurations, the frame rates are extremely high, suggesting that the game is not bottlenecked by the CPU at any point. For instance, at 1080p with Low settings, the average frame rate reaches 417.8 FPS, a level where CPU overhead can often become a limiting factor. The fact that the system achieves this with the 9600X indicates that its high single-thread performance, as evidenced by its 3,603 Cinebench R23 single-core score, is sufficient to handle the game’s logic and physics without creating a bottleneck.

The processor's performance is closely matched to its nearest rivals, with only marginal differences. It is 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i5-13490F and the AMD Ryzen 5 230, and 0.4% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS and 0.5% behind the Intel Core i5-14500T. These minor deltas suggest that in a game like Inside, any of these CPUs would deliver nearly identical performance, meaning the choice between them is unlikely to affect the frame rates. The data confirms that the 9600X provides a robust foundation for this GPU, ensuring that the graphics card can operate at its full potential.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER is the dominant component in this pairing. It is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture and features 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 736.3 GB/s. The GPU has a base clock of 2295 MHz and a boost clock of 2550 MHz. With 10,240 shading units, it offers substantial compute power, achieving a passmark G3D score of 34,245. This performance places it in the 88th percentile among all GPUs.

As the resolution and settings increase, the GPU's workload scales significantly, and the benchmark data shows the RTX 4080 SUPER handles it with ease. At 4K with Ultra settings, the average frame rate is 127.4 FPS, which is still very high. The GPU's large memory pool and high bandwidth are critical for maintaining performance at these higher resolutions, preventing any potential stuttering or texture loading issues. The data shows a clear progression: at 1080p, the GPU is often underutilized, as frame rates can exceed 400 FPS, but at 4K, it becomes the primary limiting factor, with frame rates dropping to a still-excellent 127.4 FPS at Ultra settings.

The RTX 4080 SUPER is a significant performer relative to its rivals. It is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT and 0.4% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M. It also leads the AMD Radeon RX 7700S by 2.1% and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti by 2.9%. These deltas demonstrate that the 4080 SUPER is a top-tier card, capable of delivering some of the highest frame rates available. In Inside, this translates to a flawless, high-refresh-rate experience even at the most demanding settings.

FAQ — 4-6 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the maximum average frame rate this combo can achieve?

A: The highest average frame rate recorded is 417.8 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

Q: Can this system maintain a high refresh rate at 4K?

A: Yes. At 3840x2160 resolution, the average frame rates range from 127.4 FPS on Ultra settings to 262.7 FPS on Low settings, all well above standard 60Hz and 120Hz refresh rates.

Q: How does the CPU's performance compare to its closest competitors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X is essentially tied with its nearest rivals. It is 0.3% faster than the Intel Core i5-13490F and AMD Ryzen 5 230, and 0.4% slower than the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS.

Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the average frame rate drops from 375.6 FPS on Low settings to 200.6 FPS on Ultra settings, a decrease of 175 FPS.

Q: How does the GPU's average benchmark score compare to the RTX 5070 Ti?

A: The GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 53,610, which is 2.9% higher than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti's score.

Q: Is the frame rate at 1080p High settings high enough for a 240Hz monitor?

A: Yes, the average frame rate at 1920x1080 with High settings is 292 FPS, which exceeds the refresh rate of a 240Hz monitor, ensuring the display is fully utilized.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER ranks 37th out of 1,671 tested combos for Inside. This places it in the top 2.2% of all systems tested, a very strong result that underscores the high-end nature of this pairing. This ranking reflects the GPU's massive compute power and the CPU's ability to keep up without bottlenecking.

The ranking of 37 places this combo in the upper echelon of performance. It is likely that the systems ranked above it feature even more powerful GPUs, such as the RTX 4090, or possibly higher-end CPUs that might provide a marginal edge in specific scenarios. However, the data shows that for this game, the 4080 SUPER is already delivering frame rates that are at or near the limits of what most displays can handle. The difference between rank 37 and, say, rank 10, is likely to be a small percentage of frame rate, which would be imperceptible in practice. The high percentile ranking confirms that this is a top-tier configuration for a smooth and responsive experience in Inside.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The benchmark data provides average FPS figures for three resolutions and four settings presets, offering a comprehensive view of performance scaling.

At 1920x1080, the system delivers extremely high frame rates. The average FPS is 417.8 on Low settings, 386.8 on Medium, 292 on High, and 279 on Ultra. The scaling here is gradual, with a 138.8 FPS difference between Low and Ultra. This indicates that even at the highest settings, the GPU is not fully saturated, as the CPU is still capable of supporting these high frame rates.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain very high but show more scaling with settings. The average FPS is 375.6 on Low, 337.7 on Medium, 210.1 on High, and 200.6 on Ultra. The gap between Low and Ultra widens to 175 FPS, showing the increased load on the GPU. The difference between High and Ultra is only 9.5 FPS, suggesting that the Ultra preset adds minimal visual benefit for a small performance cost at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the clear limiting factor. The average FPS is 262.7 on Low, 211.8 on Medium, 130.2 on High, and 127.4 on Ultra. The scaling is more pronounced here, with a 135.3 FPS difference between Low and Ultra. The difference between High and Ultra is just 2.8 FPS, indicating that the Ultra preset has a negligible performance impact at 4K. All results are well above 60 FPS, ensuring a smooth experience even at the most demanding settings.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

For a game like Inside, the goal is to achieve a stable, high frame rate that matches the refresh rate of the display. The data shows that this combo is so powerful that it can max out nearly any monitor.

If you are using a 1080p display with a high refresh rate (e.g., 240Hz or 360Hz), the High or Ultra settings are recommended. The difference between them is a mere 13 FPS (292 vs 279), and both provide enough performance to keep a 240Hz monitor fully fed. There is no reason to use Low or Medium since they offer no practical benefit at this resolution.

For a 1440p display, the High preset is the sweet spot. It delivers 210.1 FPS, which is more than enough for a 240Hz monitor. The Ultra preset offers only a 9.5 FPS reduction (200.6 FPS), so it is also a viable choice if you prefer the highest visual quality. However, the performance delta is minor, so either setting will provide an excellent experience.

At 4K, the High preset is the recommended choice. It provides 130.2 FPS, ensuring a buttery-smooth experience on a 120Hz or 144Hz display. The Ultra preset offers almost no visual improvement for a 2.8 FPS loss, making High the more efficient option. The Medium and Low presets are not necessary, as the system is already delivering high performance at High settings. In summary, the data suggests that you can confidently use High settings at any resolution for an optimal balance of visual fidelity and frame rate, with Ultra being a viable option at 1080p and 1440p if you want the absolute maximum quality.