Inside

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER combo runs _Inside_ (a puzzle platformer released in 2016) with a measured set of FPS points across three resolutions and four quality settings. The data set is complete for average FPS, with min/max values only for Medium settings. This analysis walks through how the pair scales from 1080p to 4K, where it stands among other tested combos, what settings to prefer, and what each component contributes to the observed results.

Resolution Scaling

Across all quality settings, raising the resolution from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160 reduces average FPS substantially. For High settings, the average goes from 155 at 1080p to 111 at 1440p, then to 70 at 4K. The 1080p figure is more than double the 4K figure, but the steps are not equal: the drop from 1440p to 4K (41 FPS) is larger than the drop from 1080p to 1440p (44 FPS). This pattern indicates that the RTX 2070 SUPER is heavily constrained by pixel count; its 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 256-bit bus (448.0 GB/s bandwidth) must feed more and more geometry and shading as resolution increases.

Low settings tell a similar story. 1080p Low averages 310 FPS, 1440p Low 223 FPS, and 4K Low 140 FPS. High-to-Low scaling within each resolution shows how much headroom exists: at 1080p, High (155) is half the Low (310); at 4K, High (70) is exactly half of Low (140). The game is clearly rendering-limited, not CPU-limited, even at Low where the CPU (Ryzen 5 7600) would have more influence if it were the bottleneck.

Medium, the only setting with min/max data, exhibits a similar trend. 1080p Medium averages 248 with a spread of 210–285. At 1440p, it averages 178 (151–205). At 4K, it averages 112 (95–129). The minimum to maximum range tightens at higher resolutions—from 75 FPS at 1080p to 54 at 1440p and 34 at 4K—a sign that lower resolutions are more sensitive to variable scene complexity while 4K is more uniformly limited by GPU throughput.

Ultra, the most demanding preset, produces 147 FPS at 1080p, 106 at 1440p, and 67 at 4K. The relative drop from 1440p to 4K (39 FPS) is slightly less steep than the High preset’s (41 FPS), but the ranking is consistent: every quality tier loses roughly half its FPS going from 1080p to 4K. In summary, the RTX 2070 SUPER is the primary limiting component at all tested resolutions, with the CPU rarely interfering.

How This Combo Ranks

The dataset places this combo at rank 2087 out of 3716 tested configurations for _Inside_. That places it slightly below the midpoint, but the ranking aggregates all test results, not just peak FPS. Considering that the RTX 2070 SUPER is a 2019 card and the Ryzen 5 7600 a 2023 part, the combo performs much better than its generation gap might suggest. For a puzzle platformer, the game’s moderate visual demands mean even the 2070 SUPER can hit 70+ FPS at 4K High and 140+ at 4K Low.

The CPU’s nearest rivals (by average benchmark score) are the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS, Intel Core i9-11900KF, and AMD Ryzen 5 8540U. All are within ±0.5% of the Ryzen 5 7600’s 26324 average, so CPU performance is not an outlier in this league. The GPU’s nearest rivals are the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M, GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, Intel Arc B570, and Intel Arc A750, all within -1.5% of the RTX 2070 SUPER’s 20282 average. This means the combo’s mid-pack rank stems from balanced but not high-end components, and in a game like _Inside_ that balance is more than enough for fluid play on most settings.

Settings Recommendations

According to measured FPS, the sweet spot between visual quality and frame rate is the Medium preset for most displays. At 1080p Medium, the average is 248 FPS, with a minimum of 210 and a maximum of 285. That comfortably exceeds any 144 Hz or 165 Hz monitor and stays above 200 FPS at all times. At 1440p, Medium averages 178 FPS with a 151 FPS minimum—still excellent for high-refresh displays. At 4K, Medium delivers 112 FPS average and never drops below 95, so a 144 Hz 4K panel would see some frames near its limit but the game is still fully playable.

For those who prioritize the highest quality without sacrificing smoothness, High at 1440p (111 FPS) is also valid, but Medium at 4K offers a better balance of resolution and FPS. Ultra gives 147 FPS at 1080p, but that differs little from Medium 1080p while imposing more GPU load; the visual gain is unlikely to justify the 41-FPS difference. Low is only suitable for competitive play or ridiculously high FPS needs, but it still yields 310 FPS at 1080p and 223 at 1440p. The measured data suggests that Medium is the intuitive default, with High as a viable upgrade for 1080p/1440p users who have a 144Hz or 60Hz monitor and value visual fidelity over extra headroom.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The full dataset is reproduced below.

| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS | Min FPS | Max FPS |

|------------|----------|---------|---------|---------|

| 1920x1080 | High | 155 | - | - |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 310 | - | - |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 248 | 210 | 285 |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 147 | - | - |

| 2560x1440 | High | 111 | - | - |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 223 | - | - |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 178 | 151 | 205 |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 106 | - | - |

| 3840x2160 | High | 70 | - | - |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 140 | - | - |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 112 | 95 | 129 |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 67 | - | - |

(Min/Max values are not provided for High, Low, and Ultra; only Medium includes they.)

At 1080p, Low doubles High’s FPS (310 vs 155). Medium splits the difference at 248, and Ultra is slightly below High (147). At 1440p the same ordering holds: Low 223, Medium 178, High 111, Ultra 106. At 4K, the gap between Low (140) and High (70) is exactly 2x, and Medium (112) sits between them, with Ultra (67) the lowest of all. The min FPS for Medium 4K is 95, still a smooth 45% above the average of High (70), so Medium provides a substantial margin over the 60 Hz barrier.

FAQ

Q: What is the average FPS at 1920x1080 with Medium settings?

A: The measured average FPS is 248, with a minimum of 210 and a maximum of 285.

Q: How does the 4K High result compare to 4K Ultra?

A: At 3840x2160, High averages 70 FPS, while Ultra averages 67 FPS—a difference of only 3 FPS, suggesting Ultra brings only minor visual improvements for similar performance.

Q: Which settings gives the highest FPS at all resolutions?

A: Lower gives the highest average FPS at all three resolutions: 310 at 1080p, 223 at 1440p, and 140 at 4K.

Q: Is the CPU or the GPU the bottleneck at 4K?

A: The measured scaling from 1080p (155 High) to 4K (70 High) shows a drop of over 2x, which indicates GPU limitation rather than CPU. The Ryzen 5 7600 has plenty of headroom; its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12735 and single-core of 1852 would not be stressed by this puzzle platformer.

Q: What is the FPS coverage at 1440p Medium?

A: At 2560x1440 Medium, the average is 178 FPS with a minimum of 151 and maximum of 205, so even the 151 FPS minimum remains well above typical 60 or 120 Hz refresh rates.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested combos for the game?

A: It is ranked 2087 out of 3716 combos, placing it in the middle of the pack but with more than enough performance to produce smooth gameplay at 1080p and 1440p on high and medium settings.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 features six cores and twelve threads, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 6.10 GHz. It is based on the Zen 4 (Raphael) architecture, built on a 5 nm TSMC process, and supports DDR5 dual-channel memory (83.2 GB/s bandwidth). It also includes integrated Radeon Graphics, though the discrete RTX 2070 SUPER is used here. Its benchmark scores are solid: Cinebench R23 multi-core 12735, single-core 1852, Geekbench 6 single-core 2521, multi-core 13413, and PassMark multi-thread 27058. In _Inside_, which is a light 2D puzzle platformer from 2016, the CPU is hardly stressed. The fact that FPS scales almost entirely with resolution (310→223→140 at Low) shows that the game’s frame rate is not capped by CPU micro-threading or per-core performance. The 6-core/12-thread configuration allows the game to easily place its main thread, and even at 310 FPS the CPU is unlikely to be at its limit.

GPU Role

NVIDIA’s RTX 2070 SUPER is a Turing-based card with 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit interface, achieving a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. Its base clock is 1605 MHz, boosting to 1770 MHz, and it has 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. Real-time ray tracing cores (40) and tensor cores (320) are present but not relevant for this game. The measured FPS shows that the GPU is fully utilized at 4K: High averages 70 FPS, which is close to the Ultra's 67, indicating that the card is near its limits. At 1440p, High hits 111 FPS, which is comfortable. The 8 GB VRAM is more than enough for a puzzle platformer of this visual simplicity. The card's G3D benchmark score of 18169 and Geekbench rendering scores of 83358 (OpenCL) and 90637 (Vulkan) place it in the mid-range. The data indicates that for _Inside_, the RTX 2070 SUPER delivers playable FPS at every setting, with the only compromise being that 4K Ultra requires the Hz drops to 67 FPS. For higher refresh rate use, sticking to 1440p Medium or High is the best use of the GPU’s capabilities.