Inside

Inside is a 2016 puzzle platformer that remains remarkably light on hardware demands, and the measured data for the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 paired with the AMD Radeon RX 570 reflects that. This combination produces a playable experience across most settings, but the data reveals a clear performance ceiling that separates it from higher-tier combos. The following analysis breaks down the CPU and GPU roles, the combo's overall ranking, and the precise frame rates achieved at each resolution and settings preset.

FAQ

Q: What is the average frame rate at 1920x1080 with High settings?

A: The measured average FPS at 1920x1080 with High settings is 68 frames per second. This is above the 60 FPS threshold, indicating smooth gameplay for this title.

Q: Does the combo achieve 60 FPS at 4K?

A: Yes, but only at Low settings. The measured average at 3840x2160 with Low settings is 61 FPS. At Medium settings, the average drops to 49 FPS, and at High and Ultra, it falls below 31 FPS, which is not ideal for a smooth experience.

Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the difference is substantial. The Low preset yields an average of 97 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages only 46 FPS. This represents a performance drop of more than half when moving from the lowest to the highest quality preset.

Q: Which component is more likely the bottleneck in this pairing?

A: The data suggests the GPU is the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions and settings. For instance, at 4K High, the average FPS is 31, while at 1080p High, it is 68. The CPU’s strong single-thread score of 999 in 3dmark_single_thread indicates it can handle the game’s logic, but the RX 570’s 4 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth struggle with the higher resolution demands.

Q: Is this combo ranked high among all tested configurations for Inside?

A: No, it ranks 3523 out of 3716 tested combos. This places it in the lower percentile of all configurations, meaning most other pairings deliver higher frame rates in this game.

Q: What is the best settings preset for a 60 FPS target at 1920x1080?

A: The Medium preset is the best choice for a 60 FPS target, as it delivers an average of 108 FPS. The High preset also achieves 68 FPS, but the Medium preset provides a higher margin of safety above the target.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. In the context of Inside, a puzzle platformer with modest computational demands, the CPU’s role is less about raw multi-threaded throughput and more about maintaining consistent frame pacing. The benchmark data shows a single-thread score of 999 in 3dmark_single_thread and a multi-thread score of 6503 in 3dmark_max_threads, which are strong numbers for a desktop processor.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen 5 7600 sits within a tight performance band. Its average benchmark score of 26324 is 0.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX and 0.4% higher than the Intel Core i9-11900KF, while being 0.3% lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 7435HS. These deltas are negligible, meaning the CPU is unlikely to be the differentiator in frame rates for this game. The processor’s 32 MB of shared L3 cache and DDR5 memory support contribute to its overall responsiveness, but for a 2016 title like Inside, the game’s engine does not appear to stress the CPU heavily.

The measured FPS data supports this interpretation. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 135 FPS, which is a high frame rate that suggests the CPU can push frames well beyond common display refresh rates. Even at 4K Low, the average is 61 FPS, indicating that the CPU is not the limiting factor at lower graphics settings. The bottleneck emerges when graphics settings are increased, particularly at higher resolutions, which points directly to the GPU as the performance constraint.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 570 is a Polaris 20 chip built on a 14 nm process, featuring 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. It has a base clock of 1168 MHz and a boost clock of 1244 MHz, with 4 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. This GPU was designed for 1080p gaming in its era, and its performance in Inside reflects that historical positioning.

The GPU’s benchmark scores show it is competitive with its nearest rivals, with an average benchmark score of 28766. It is 0.4% slower than the AMD Radeon RX 6800M, 0.7% faster than the AMD Radeon R9 M295X, and 0.8% slower than the AMD Radeon RX 470. These small deltas indicate that the RX 570 performs as expected for its class, but it does not have the headroom to handle demanding resolutions or high-quality presets in modern titles.

In Inside, the GPU’s limitations are evident in the scaling of frame rates. At 1080p, the Ultra preset averages 64 FPS, which is acceptable, but at 1440p Ultra, the average drops to 46 FPS, and at 4K Ultra, it falls to 29 FPS. The 4 GB VRAM is a likely constraint at higher resolutions, as the game’s textures and effects consume more memory, leading to reduced frame rates. The data shows a clear pattern: the GPU is the primary bottleneck when settings are increased, as the CPU’s performance remains consistent across all tested configurations.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and AMD Radeon RX 570 ranks 3523 out of 3716 tested combos for Inside. This places it in the bottom 5% of all configurations, which is a significant finding given that the CPU itself is a high-performing part. The ranking highlights the disproportionate impact of the GPU on this game’s performance, as the RX 570 drags down what would otherwise be a top-tier processor pairing.

The low ranking is not surprising when considering the measured FPS data. At 4K Ultra, the combo averages only 29 FPS, which is well below the 60 FPS target for smooth gameplay. Even at 1080p Ultra, the average is 64 FPS, which is playable but not exceptional. The GPU’s 74th percentile ranking among all GPUs, combined with its end-of-life production status, indicates that it is an older component that struggles with the demands of higher resolutions.

Comparatively, the CPU’s 78th percentile ranking among all CPUs shows that it is a capable processor, but the combo’s overall rank is determined by the weakest link. The nearest rival GPUs, such as the AMD Radeon RX 470, show similar performance, reinforcing that the RX 570 is the limiting factor in this pairing. For users aiming for high frame rates at 4K or maximum settings, this combo is not recommended based on the data.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of the combo’s performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the Low preset yields an average of 135 FPS, which is excellent for high-refresh-rate displays. The Medium preset averages 108 FPS, with a minimum of 92 FPS and a maximum of 124 FPS, indicating stable performance. The High preset drops to 68 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 64 FPS, which remains playable but shows a significant decrease from Low.

At 2560x1440, the performance scales down as expected. The Low preset averages 97 FPS, which is still above 60 FPS, but the Medium preset drops to 78 FPS, with a minimum of 66 FPS and a maximum of 89 FPS. The High preset averages 49 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 46 FPS, both of which are below the 60 FPS threshold. This suggests that 1440p gaming with this combo is only viable at Low or Medium settings.

At 3840x2160, the combo struggles to maintain playable frame rates. The Low preset averages 61 FPS, which is just above 60 FPS, but the Medium preset drops to 49 FPS, with a minimum of 42 FPS and a maximum of 56 FPS. The High preset averages 31 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 29 FPS, both of which are unsuitable for smooth gameplay. The data clearly shows that 4K is only feasible at Low settings, and even then, the frame rate is marginal.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the best settings preset for this combo depends on the target resolution and desired frame rate. For 1920x1080, the Medium preset is the optimal choice, as it delivers an average of 108 FPS with a minimum of 92 FPS, ensuring smooth gameplay with a comfortable margin above 60 FPS. The High preset also achieves 68 FPS, but the Medium preset offers a better balance between visual quality and performance.

For 2560x1440, the Medium preset is the recommended option, with an average of 78 FPS and a minimum of 66 FPS. This provides a playable experience without dropping below 60 FPS. The Low preset achieves 97 FPS, but the Medium preset offers improved visuals with only a modest performance penalty. The High and Ultra presets are not recommended, as they average below 50 FPS, which can lead to noticeable stuttering.

For 3840x2160, the Low preset is the only viable option, averaging 61 FPS. This is barely above the 60 FPS threshold, and any increase in settings results in a significant drop in performance. The Medium preset averages 49 FPS, which is below the ideal threshold, and High and Ultra are not playable. For users prioritizing 4K, the Low preset is the only choice, but it is recommended to consider lowering the resolution for a better experience.

Resolution Scaling

The resolution scaling data reveals a clear pattern of performance degradation as resolution increases, which is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario. From 1080p to 1440p, the average FPS at Medium settings drops from 108 to 78, a reduction of approximately 27.8%. From 1440p to 4K, the average FPS at Medium settings drops from 78 to 49, a reduction of approximately 37.2%. This acceleration in performance loss at higher resolutions indicates that the GPU’s memory bandwidth and processing power are insufficient for 4K rendering.

At High settings, the scaling is even more pronounced. The average FPS drops from 68 at 1080p to 49 at 1440p (a 27.9% reduction) and then to 31 at 4K (a 36.7% reduction). This pattern confirms that the RX 570 is the limiting component, as the CPU’s performance remains consistent across resolutions. The data suggests that the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM is exhausted at higher resolutions, leading to texture thrashing and reduced frame rates.

The resolution scaling also highlights the diminishing returns of lowering settings. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 71 FPS (135 vs 64), but at 4K, the difference is 32 FPS (61 vs 29). This indicates that at higher resolutions, the GPU is so heavily taxed that even reducing settings cannot fully compensate for the increased pixel count. For users with this combo, the data recommends sticking to 1080p or 1440p for the best experience, as 4K gameplay is only possible at the lowest settings with marginal frame rates.