Inside

Inside is a 2016 puzzle platformer that places minimal demands on modern hardware, and the benchmark data for the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 reflects that reality with exceptionally high frame rates across all tested configurations. The combination ranks 311th out of 3,716 tested combos for this title, placing it in the top 8.4% of all systems evaluated, which is a strong position but not the absolute top, suggesting that other factors beyond raw compute power influence performance in this specific game.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo’s rank of 311 out of 3,716 tested combinations for Inside places it comfortably in the upper echelon of systems, yet the percentile standing of the individual components tells a more nuanced story. The CPU holds a 77th percentile ranking against all CPUs, while the GPU sits at an 86th percentile against all GPUs, indicating that the graphics card is the stronger relative component in this pairing. The data shows a system that is well above average but not chart-topping, which makes sense for a game with such modest requirements where even mid-range hardware can achieve triple-digit frame rates.

Examining the nearest rivals provides context for where this combo sits in the broader performance landscape. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 24,964 is nearly identical to the Intel Core i7-11850H (24,935, a 0.1% difference) and the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F (25,005, a -0.2% difference), meaning the processor is effectively performance-equivalent to those alternatives in general compute tasks. The GPU’s average score of 54,247 places it just 0.1% ahead of the RTX 4080 SUPER (54,209), while the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X is 1.1% faster and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is 2.6% faster, which is a surprising result given the architectural differences between these cards.

The ranking suggests that for Inside specifically, this combination is overprovisioned for the task at hand. The game’s puzzle platformer nature means it likely relies more on consistent frame pacing than on peak throughput, and the data shows the combo delivers frame rates well beyond what any display can realistically show, with even the most demanding settings at 4K exceeding 120 FPS. This positions the combo as a high-performance pairing that leaves substantial headroom for other, more demanding titles in a user’s library.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 brings substantial memory resources to the table, with 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus providing 716.8 GB/s of bandwidth. For a game like Inside, which is visually stylized but not texture-heavy by modern standards, this memory capacity is far beyond what the title requires, and the benchmark results confirm that memory bandwidth is not a limiting factor at any resolution tested. The GPU’s 76 ray tracing cores and 304 tensor cores are similarly underutilized, as Inside does not employ ray-traced effects or AI-driven upscaling in its rendering pipeline.

The clock speeds of the RTX 4080 show a base of 2205 MHz and a boost of 2505 MHz, with memory running at an effective 22.4 Gbps. These clocks translate to a pixel rate of 280.6 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 761.5 GTexel/s, which are immense figures for a side-scrolling puzzle game. The data indicates that the GPU operates well within its comfort zone across all settings, as evidenced by the minimal performance scaling between Low and Ultra presets at each resolution, suggesting that the card’s raw throughput is not being taxed by this title.

The GPU’s 86th percentile ranking versus all GPUs and its average benchmark score of 54,247 show that it is a high-end part, yet its performance in Inside is so far beyond the game’s needs that the card is likely idling or running at reduced clocks during gameplay. The measured FPS data supports this interpretation: at 1080p Ultra, the combo achieves 265 FPS average, which is only 24.5% lower than the 351 FPS at Low settings, a relatively narrow spread that indicates the GPU is not the bottleneck even at the highest quality preset.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals distinct scaling patterns as resolution increases from 1080p to 4K, with the most significant drops occurring at the High and Ultra settings. At Low settings, the average FPS falls from 351 at 1080p to 314 at 1440p (a 10.5% drop) and then to 265 at 4K (a 15.6% drop from 1440p), showing that even at the lowest quality, the GPU’s workload scales with pixel count. The Medium preset shows a similar trend: 324 FPS at 1080p, 290 at 1440p (a 10.5% drop), and 212 at 4K (a 26.9% drop from 1440p), with the 4K step being noticeably steeper.

The High and Ultra presets exhibit the most pronounced resolution scaling, which is expected given their heavier shading and post-processing demands. At High settings, the average FPS drops from 270 at 1080p to 211 at 1440p (a 21.9% drop) and then to 133 at 4K (a 37.0% drop from 1440p), indicating that the GPU becomes progressively more stressed as pixel count rises. Ultra settings follow a similar path: 265 FPS at 1080p, 201 at 1440p (a 24.2% drop), and 126 at 4K (a 37.3% drop from 1440p), with the 4K results being the only configuration where the frame rate dips below 130 FPS.

These scaling patterns suggest that the CPU is not the primary limiting factor at any resolution, as the frame rate does not plateau at 1080p but instead continues to rise as resolution decreases. The fact that Low settings at 4K (265 FPS) still exceed High settings at 1080p (270 FPS) by a narrow margin indicates that the GPU has ample headroom and that the game’s engine is well-optimized for high refresh rates. The data implies that for users with 144Hz or 165Hz displays, even 4K Ultra is viable, while 1080p Low can push frame rates toward the 360Hz range.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers exceptional performance across all settings, with the average FPS ranging from 265 at Ultra to 351 at Low. The Medium preset records an average of 324 FPS with a minimum of 275 and a maximum of 372, providing the only min/max data at this resolution. High settings produce 270 FPS average, which is only 5 FPS below Ultra, suggesting that the visual quality difference between these two presets is minimal in terms of performance cost.

Moving to 2560x1440, the average FPS drops to between 201 and 314 across the four presets. Low settings achieve 314 FPS, Medium records 290 FPS with a minimum of 246 and maximum of 333, High produces 211 FPS, and Ultra delivers 201 FPS. The spread between Low and Ultra at 1440p is 113 FPS, which is narrower than the 86 FPS spread at 1080p, indicating that the GPU’s workload becomes more balanced as resolution increases. The Medium preset’s min/max data shows a 87 FPS range, which is the largest variance recorded at any resolution.

At 3840x2160, the performance remains highly playable, with average FPS ranging from 126 at Ultra to 265 at Low. Medium settings record 212 FPS average with a minimum of 181 and maximum of 244, providing the only 4K min/max data. High settings achieve 133 FPS, while Ultra drops to 126 FPS, making it the only configuration tested that falls below the 130 FPS mark. The data shows that even at 4K Ultra, the combo maintains frame rates that exceed standard 120Hz display refresh rates, leaving no practical scenario where the game would feel anything less than smooth.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for maximizing frame rate with this combo in Inside?

A: At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 351 FPS average, which is the highest measured frame rate across all resolutions and settings. However, even at 4K Ultra, the average FPS remains at 126, so users with standard 60Hz or 144Hz displays will find any resolution viable.

Q: How does the RTX 4080 compare to its closest rival in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The RTX 4080 has an average benchmark score of 54,247, which is 0.1% higher than the RTX 4080 SUPER (54,209) and 1.1% lower than the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X (54,828). The AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB scores 55,698, which is 2.6% higher.

Q: Does the Ryzen 5 7500F hold back the RTX 4080 in this game?

A: The data shows no evidence of CPU bottlenecking, as frame rates continue to scale with resolution changes. At 1080p Low, the combo hits 351 FPS, which is near the practical limits for most displays, indicating the CPU can feed the GPU adequately.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra settings at 4K?

A: At 4K, Low settings produce 265 FPS average, while Ultra produces 126 FPS, a difference of 139 FPS. This represents a 52.5% reduction in frame rate from Low to Ultra, which is the largest percentage drop observed across all resolutions.

Q: Is this combo overkill for Inside given its puzzle platformer genre?

A: The benchmark results indicate the combo provides far more performance than the game requires, with even the most demanding configuration (4K Ultra) achieving 126 FPS. The game released in 2016, and the hardware is from 2022-2023, so the generous headroom is expected.

Q: How does the combo’s rank in Inside compare to its component percentiles?

A: The combo ranks 311th out of 3,716 tested combinations, which places it in the top 8.4%. The CPU is in the 77th percentile and the GPU in the 86th percentile, so the combo’s game-specific rank is lower than what the individual component percentiles would suggest, likely due to the game’s low system requirements.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. Its 32 MB of shared L3 cache and 83.2 GB/s of dual-channel DDR5 memory bandwidth provide ample throughput for gaming workloads, though Inside’s modest computational demands mean the CPU is rarely stressed. The processor’s 65W TDP and 5 nm process node from TSMC indicate high efficiency, and its benchmark scores confirm strong single-threaded performance with a 3dmark single-thread score of 974.

The CPU’s multi-threaded capabilities are substantial, as shown by its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22,799 and Geekbench multicore score of 12,362. However, for Inside, which is a 2D side-scrolling game with limited physics and AI, the game likely uses only a few threads, making the CPU’s 12 threads largely irrelevant for this title. The 3dmark 2-thread score of 1,902 and 4-thread score of 3,621 suggest that even when limited to a few cores, the processor delivers strong performance that exceeds the game’s needs.

The CPU’s nearest rivals in average benchmark score include the Intel Core i7-11850H (24,935, 0.1% slower) and the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F (25,005, 0.2% faster), with the Intel Core i7-13620H (24,911, 0.2% slower) and Intel Core 5 210H (24,872, 0.4% slower) also closely matched. This tight clustering indicates that the Ryzen 5 7500F is performance-competitive with a range of laptop and desktop processors, though none of these differences would be perceptible in a game like Inside where the CPU is not the bottleneck.

Settings Recommendations

For users seeking the best experience in Inside with this combo, the High preset at 4K delivers 133 FPS average, which is above the 120Hz threshold for high-refresh displays while maintaining substantial visual quality. The data shows that stepping from High to Ultra at 4K costs only 7 FPS (133 to 126), making Ultra a viable choice for those who prioritize image quality over marginal frame rate gains. At 1440p, the High preset produces 211 FPS, which exceeds the refresh rate of most gaming monitors, while Ultra drops to 201 FPS, a negligible difference.

The Medium preset offers the most balanced performance-to-quality ratio, with 290 FPS at 1440p and 212 FPS at 4K, both of which are well above playable thresholds. The Low preset provides the highest frame rates (314 FPS at 1440p, 265 FPS at 4K) but sacrifices visual fidelity for performance that is unlikely to be perceptible on standard displays. Given that the game’s side-scrolling perspective minimizes the impact of texture details, the Medium or High presets at 1440p provide the most sensible combination of visual quality and frame rate stability.

For those with 4K displays, the High preset at 133 FPS is the recommended starting point, as it offers a 5.3% frame rate improvement over Ultra while likely maintaining similar visual clarity in a game with a muted color palette and stylized art direction. The min/max data for Medium settings shows a 63 FPS range at 4K (181 to 244), which is tighter than the 97 FPS range at 1440p (246 to 333), suggesting that frame pacing is more consistent at higher resolutions, making Medium at 4K a strong choice for smooth gameplay. Ultimately, the data supports using the High preset at any resolution for the best balance, with Ultra reserved for users who prefer maximum settings and have displays that refresh at 120Hz or lower.