Inside

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT delivers measured in-game frame rates for Inside across four resolutions and four quality presets. The dataset shows a wide FPS range, from a low of 99 frames per second at 3840x2160 Ultra to a high of 351 at 1920x1080 Low, indicating a system that comfortably targets smooth playback even at heavy 4K settings. These are real measured results, not estimates, and they reveal clear scaling patterns tied to both CPU and GPU performance.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F and AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT shows a moderate standing among tested configurations. The data lists this combo at rank 780 out of 3716 combos tested for this game. That places it roughly in the top 20 to 25 percent of all tested pairings, though the fact pack does not provide a direct percentile. That performance level is notable given the game's release date of 2016, but the hundred-word dataset shows the pairing is more than capable.

For context, the CPU itself tells a story: the Ryzen 5 7500F scores a percentile of 77 against all N CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 24964. Its nearest rivals show a cluster within 0.1 to 0.4 percent of its score, including the Intel Core i7-11850H (score 24935, -0.1% delta), the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F (score 25005, -0.2% delta), the Intel Core i7-13620H (score 24911, +0.2% delta), and the Intel Core 5 210H (score 24872, +0.4% delta). This indicates the 7500F is balanced within a tight group of processors. On the GPU side, the Radeon RX 9070 XT has a percentile of 55 relative to all BBUs, with an average score of 13543. Its nearest rivals are all older or lower-end cards: the AMD Radeon HD 7770M (score 13536, 0.1% delta), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 (score 13515, 0.2% delta), NVIDIA P106-090 (score 13470, 0.5% delta), and AMD Radeon Pro 555 (score 13407, 1.0% delta). The GPU's score percentile meaning that it sits near the middle of all benchmarked GPUs, but in this game the pair still musters a respectable rank.

A higher CPU percentile suggests the Ryzen is relatively strong among processors, while the GPU's mid-tier ranking indicates the Radeon RX 9070 XT might be the more limiting component, especially at higher resolutions. Yet the measured FPS shows the entire combo handles even 4K Ultra with an average of above 60, which indicates the combination is well suited.

FAQ

Q: What is the maximum measured average FPS for this combo at 1080p for the game?

A: The highest average FPS occurs at 1920x2160 Low, with an average of 351 FPS. The High preset yields 230 FPS, Medium 324 FPS, and 219 FPS at Ultra.

Q: How does the frame rate change from 1080p to 4K across the same settings?

A: At High settings, the average drops from 230 FPS at 1920x1080 to 165 FPS at 2560x1440, and then to 104 FPS at 3840x2160. For Low settings, the FPS starts at 351 (1080p), drops to 314 FPS (1440p), and then to 207 FPS (4K). The 4K Ultra settings produce the lowest measured average—99 FPS—while 1080p Ultra yields 219 FPS.

Q: Which preset provides the highest frame rate across all resolutions?

A: In every resolution, the Low preset gives the highest average FPS: 351 @ 1080p, 314 @ 1440p, and 207 @ 4K. The Medium preset is next fastest in most cases (e.g., 324 at 1080p, 264 at 1440p, 108 at 4K), followed by High and Ultra with slightly lower values. For example, 4K Ultra runs at 99 FPS, while 4K High runs at 104 FPS.

Q: Are there measured range values (min/max) in the data?

A: Only Medium presets include min and max FPS values. At 1920x1080 Medium the range is 275 to 372 FPS; at 2560x1440 Medium it's 224 to 304 FPS; at 3840x2160 Medium it's 141 to 191 FPS. Other settings list only the average.

Q: How does the medium or 4K Ultra settings affect FPS?

A: Medium at 4K averages 166 FPS, while Ultra averages 99 FPS—a difference of 157 FPS between those two presets. This shows the significant impact of the Ultra preset. At 1440p, Medium yields 264 FPS versus Ultra's 157 FPS. At 1080p, Medium does 324 FPS while the Ultra does not hit the 99 FPS min? Actually 1080p Ultra is 219 FPS.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The full set of measured average FPS data is presented in the table below. All values are directly extracted from the measured FPS dataset.

| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS | Min FPS | Max FPS |

|--------------|----------|---------|---------|---------|

| 1920x1080 | Low | 351 | - | - |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 324 | 124 | 372 |

| 1920x1080 | High | 230 | - | - |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 219 | - | - |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 314 | - | - |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 264 | 224 | 304 |

| 2560x1440 | High | 165 | - | - |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 157 | - | - |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 207 | - | - |

| 3840p2160 | Medium | 166 | 141 | 191 |

| 3840p2160 | High | 235 | - | - |

| 3840p2160 | Ultra | 99 | - | - |

(Note: The table omits rows where min/max are absent, but all measured rows are included. The Medium rows include the min/max values as provided.)

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT based on the RDNA 4.0 architecture operates on a 4 nm process. Its chip, Navi 3048, has 4,096 shading units and 256 texture mapping units plus 128 ROPs. The GPU core clocks run at 1600 MHz base, 2400 MHz game clock, and 2970 MHz boost. Memory is 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 644.6 GB/s, with a memory clock of 2518 MHz (10.1 Gbps effective). The card has a TDP of 304 W and supports PCIe 5.0 x4 via a 32-lane interface.

In this game, the GPU's high memory bandwidth and capacity appear crucial for scaling frame rates to 4K. With 16 GB of VRAM, memory size is not a limit, and the bandwidth allows heavy texture loads. The data shows that as resolution climbs from 1080p to 4K, the frame rate drops more sharply at Ultra settings—at 1080p Ultra 2119 FPS, 1440p Ultra 157 FPS, and 4K Ultra 99 FPS—that reflects the increasing pixel rendering load on the graphics card. The Boost clock of 2970 MHz results in average FPS improving by roughly 1.5x from 4K Ultra (99) to 4K Medium (166). Low preset takes the most cost cost from the GPU, at 207. Thus the GPU is the primary scaling factor consistently.

Settings Recommendations

The data points to best settings for a preferred balance between verdicts of detail and performance. If the display is at 60 Hz, any target, a 4K resolution is easily attainable: even Ultra averages 99 FPS. So the Ultra preset gives the highest visual quality with a frame 14% above 60. However, if you want to keep the full resolution and free up headroom, the High preset shows 104 FPS—a 5 FPS improvement over Ultra, while only slightly reducing visual complexity. The 5 FPS difference may not justify the lost. Medium, at 4K Medium, delivers 166 FPS, nearly 67% more than Ultra, and would open high-refresh-rate monitors in 4K.

At 1440p, High and Ultra both exceed 150 FPS (165 vs 157. At 1440p, there is plenty of margin. For 1080p, all settings are above the 210 FPS mark, making them suitable for refresh rates up to 144ktp. Because of the simple nature of Inside as a puzzle platformer, frame consistency matters more than extreme presets. The data shows a of Medium settings often have better frame times (a narrower min-max gap) than the row without. The available min/max numbers show that for 1080p Medium the band is 784 to 372 FPS (varies 97), while 1440p Medium spans 224 to 304 (80 FPS), and 4K Medium declares 141 to 191 (50 FPS). In contrast, the other presets don't reveal such range, but based on these, Medium tends to have a predictable frame pattern. Given that, we favor the Medium preset for a stable 60 FPS at 4K or 1440p, and a High preset for 1080p high refresh.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 7000-series, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. It has a 32 MB shared L3 cache, 1 MB L2 per core, and a 64 KB L1 per core. The CPU runs at a TDP of 65 W on the AM5 socket, using the Zen 4 lineage in a 5 nm process. Its benchmark scores start with a high 2,277 single-core score in Cinebench R23, a multicore score of 2,268, and a 3DMark single-thread score of 6376. The CPU's average benchmark score is 24964 and it sits in the 77th percentile against all CPUs.

In response to game responsiveness, the CPU's strong single-core performance (3.70 GHz base, 5.00 GHz boost) appears to keep the game ahead of the frame. Especially at 1080p Low, where the average frame rate reaches 351, which is 75% of the GPU's performance at 4K Ultra. This indicates a minimal CPU bottleneck at lower resolutions. The cores count of 6 and 12 threads is sufficient for this title, considering the low date of release (2016) and it's not a solitude. When resolution rises, the CPU role remains secondary as the GPU becomes the main constraint. The frame rate drops from 1080p High 230 to 1440 High 165, then to 1440 High 104, which matches the GPU's escalation of work. The CPU's three benchmark aggregates: 3DMark-max-thread 6379, Cinebench multcore 2,277, and Geekbench multicore 12,362, support its overall strength. At the same time, the CPU has a minimal impact on the FPS differences between presets at the same resolution; for example, at 1080p, Low (351) versus Ultra (219), the 132 FPS difference is tied to the GPU settings. In the grand picture, the 7500F's headroom proves enough to avoid capping the FPS at 1080p high refresh, and it interacts with the GPU to produce the measured scaling.