High On Life
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 62 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 25 | 33 | 40 | 51 |
| 1440p QHD | 41 | 54 | 66 | 84 |
| 1080p Full HD | 58 | 77 | 93 | 119 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
High On Life with AMD Ryzen 7 7700X + Intel Arc B570, In-Depth Analysis
# How This Combo Ranks
The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X paired with the Intel Arc B570 lands at rank 2356 out of 2958 tested combinations for High On Life. This places the combo in the lower half of all tested systems, with roughly 80% of configurations outperforming it. The ranking reflects a pairing where the GPU is the clear limiting factor for this title, as the CPU's strong synthetic benchmarks (85th percentile among all CPUs) are far above the GPU's 65th percentile standing.
The nearest rival comparison for the CPU shows the Ryzen 7 7700X is essentially matched with the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 (0.3% higher average score), Intel Core 7 250H (0.5% higher), AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 (0.5% higher), and Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (0.7% higher). These tiny deltas indicate the processor is not the differentiator in this combo's rank. On the GPU side, the Arc B570 sits within 0.1% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile and Intel Arc A750, and within 0.5% of the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M and AMD Radeon R9 M390X. The GPU's position among these rivals explains the overall ranking: it is a mid-tier graphics solution being asked to handle a demanding title at higher resolutions.
The combination of a top-tier CPU with a mid-range GPU creates an imbalance. The data shows the combo's rank is driven by the GPU's 14195 Passmark G3D score and 65th percentile, which is modest for modern gaming. The CPU's 35686 Passmark multithread score and 19088 Cinebench R23 multicore result are far above what High On Life requires, so the system's in-game performance is constrained by graphics throughput rather than processing power.
Settings Recommendations
The measured FPS rows reveal a clear hierarchy across settings presets at each resolution. At 1080p, the Low preset achieves 119 FPS average, which is the only setting that crosses the 100 FPS threshold. Medium drops to 93 FPS, High falls to 77 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 58 FPS. For smooth gameplay on standard monitors, the Low preset provides the best experience at 1080p, offering a 28% improvement over Medium and 54% over High.
At 1440p, the Low preset delivers 84 FPS average, which remains playable, while Medium drops to 66 FPS (with a minimum of 56 FPS), High falls to 54 FPS, and Ultra sinks to 41 FPS. The Medium preset at 1440p represents the best balance for visual quality and frame rate, as its 66 FPS average stays above the 60 FPS threshold with a minimum of 56 FPS that remains acceptable. The gap between Low and Medium at 1440p is 18 FPS, while the jump from Medium to High costs 12 FPS, making Medium the sweet spot.
At 4K, the situation becomes more constrained. Low delivers 51 FPS average, Medium drops to 40 FPS (with a minimum of 34 FPS), High falls to 33 FPS, and Ultra plummets to 25 FPS. The Low preset is the only viable option for 4K gaming, as it remains above 50 FPS on average. Medium at 4K dips below 40 FPS, which will introduce noticeable stutter in fast-paced FPS action. The data suggests that for the best experience, users should select Low at 4K, Medium at 1440p, and Low at 1080p, with the understanding that these presets prioritize frame rate over visual fidelity.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is steep and consistent across all settings. At Low settings, the average FPS falls from 119 at 1080p to 84 at 1440p, a 29% reduction, and further to 51 at 4K, a 57% total drop from 1080p. For Medium, the progression is 93 to 66 to 40, representing a 29% and 57% reduction respectively. High settings follow a similar pattern: 77 to 54 to 33, dropping 30% then 39%. Ultra settings show the most dramatic decline: 58 to 41 to 25, a 29% then 39% reduction.
These scaling patterns indicate that the GPU is the limiting component. The consistent percentage drops across settings suggest that the Arc B570's 10 GB of GDDR6 memory and 380.0 GB/s bandwidth are being saturated at higher resolutions. The 160-bit memory bus and 2500 MHz clock are modest for 4K workloads, and the data reflects this. The 4K Ultra result of 25 FPS average is particularly telling, as it represents a 57% reduction from the 1080p Ultra score, showing that the GPU cannot maintain performance as pixel count increases.
The 1080p to 1440p transition shows the GPU is still capable, with all settings remaining above 40 FPS. However, the 1440p to 4K jump is where the GPU struggles. The 4K Medium minimum of 34 FPS and 4K High average of 33 FPS show that the card can only deliver playable frame rates at 4K when settings are reduced to Low. This scaling behavior is characteristic of a GPU with limited memory bandwidth and compute resources, as the Arc B570's 11.52 TFLOPS FP32 performance is insufficient for 4K Ultra in a demanding title like High On Life.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1080p, the full settings spectrum is available. Low delivers 119 FPS average, Medium 93 FPS (with 79 FPS minimum and 107 FPS maximum), High 77 FPS, and Ultra 58 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra is 61 FPS, showing that the GPU has headroom at this resolution when settings are reduced. The Medium preset's 28 FPS range between minimum and maximum indicates fairly consistent frame pacing.
At 1440p, performance drops noticeably. Low averages 84 FPS, Medium 66 FPS (56 minimum, 75 maximum), High 54 FPS, and Ultra 41 FPS. The delta between Low and Ultra is 43 FPS, reflecting the increased pixel load. The Medium preset's 19 FPS range is tighter than at 1080p, suggesting the GPU is working harder to maintain frame rates.
At 4K, the results are as follows: Low 51 FPS, Medium 40 FPS (34 minimum, 46 maximum), High 33 FPS, and Ultra 25 FPS. The spread between Low and Ultra is 26 FPS, the smallest of any resolution, indicating that even at Low settings the GPU is near its limit. The Medium preset's 12 FPS range shows that frame times become less consistent at 4K.
The measured data shows that High On Life's performance scales almost linearly with resolution. The 1080p to 1440p reduction is roughly 29% across Low, Medium, and High settings, while the 1440p to 4K reduction is 39% for High and Ultra, and 39% for Low and Medium. These consistent percentages confirm that the GPU's 10 GB VRAM capacity and 380.0 GB/s bandwidth are the primary constraints, as CPU-bound scenarios would show less dramatic scaling.
FAQ
Q: Is the Ryzen 7 7700X the bottleneck in this configuration?
A: No, the data indicates the GPU is limiting. The CPU's 85th percentile ranking and 19088 Cinebench R23 multicore score are far above what High On Life requires. The consistent FPS drops from 1080p to 4K across all settings point to GPU saturation, not CPU limitation.
Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in High On Life?
A: The 1080p Low preset provides the highest average FPS at 119, making it the smoothest experience. At 1440p, Medium at 66 FPS average offers the best balance of quality and performance. 4K is only viable at Low settings with 51 FPS average.
Q: How does the Arc B570 compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Arc A750?
A: The Arc B570's average benchmark score is 20556, while the Arc A750 scores 20582, a delta of -0.1%. This means the B570 is essentially performance-equivalent to the A750, with a negligible 0.1% difference in synthetic benchmarks.
Q: Can this combo handle 4K Ultra settings?
A: No, the measured 4K Ultra average FPS is 25, which is below playable thresholds. Even 4K High only reaches 33 FPS average. The GPU lacks the raw throughput (11.52 TFLOPS FP32) and memory bandwidth (380.0 GB/s) for 4K Ultra in this title.
Q: Why does the 1080p to 4K FPS drop so steeply at Low settings?
A: The drop from 119 to 51 FPS (57% reduction) at Low settings indicates that even at the lowest graphical workload, the GPU's 10 GB VRAM and 160-bit memory bus are overwhelmed by 4K resolution. The GPU's 2500 MHz clock cannot compensate for the pixel count increase.
Q: What is the CPU's role in this game's performance?
A: The Ryzen 7 7700X's 16 threads and 5.40 GHz boost clock provide ample processing power. Its 3DMark 16-thread score of 8859 and Passmark multithread score of 35686 show it can easily feed frames to the GPU. The CPU's 0.3% to 0.7% delta from its nearest rivals confirms it is not the performance limiter.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 7 7700X brings 8 cores and 16 threads based on the Zen 4 architecture, fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process. Its base clock of 4.50 GHz and boost clock of 5.40 GHz are high for a desktop processor, and the 32 MB shared L3 cache helps with game data locality. The CPU's 105 W TDP and DDR5 memory support with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth provide a solid foundation for gaming workloads.
In High On Life, the CPU's role is to maintain consistent frame delivery, and the data shows it does so effectively. The 3DMark single-thread score of 1090 and Passmark single-thread score of 4190 indicate strong per-core performance, which is critical for game logic and physics. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 19088 demonstrates that the 16 threads can handle any background tasks without impacting game performance.
The CPU's benchmark scores place it at the 85th percentile of all processors, and its nearest rivals are all within 0.7% of its average score. This tight clustering means that swapping in the Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 or Intel Core 7 250H would not meaningfully change in-game FPS. The CPU's 16 threads are more than sufficient for High On Life, which is a single-player FPS that does not heavily multi-thread. The measured FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K is consistent with a GPU-bound scenario, confirming that the 7700X is not the bottleneck.
GPU Role
The Intel Arc B570 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture (Battlemage generation) and fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process. It features 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output units, along with 18 ray tracing cores. The GPU operates at a base and boost clock of 2500 MHz, with 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus delivering 380.0 GB/s bandwidth.
In High On Life, the GPU's 11.52 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 200.0 GPixel/s pixel rate are the determining factors for frame rates. The measured results show that the card handles 1080p well (58-119 FPS depending on settings) but struggles at 4K (25-51 FPS). The 4K Ultra result of 25 FPS average is particularly poor, reflecting the GPU's limited memory bandwidth and compute resources for high-resolution rendering.
The Arc B570's 65th percentile ranking and 14195 Passmark G3D score place it in the mid-range tier. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, is within 0.1% of its average score, showing that the B570 is competitive with mobile RTX 3070-class performance. The 10 GB VRAM capacity is sufficient for High On Life at 1080p and 1440p but becomes a constraint at 4K, where the memory bus width of 160-bit limits data throughput. The GPU's 18 ray tracing cores are not heavily utilized in this title, as the game's visual effects are primarily rasterized.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
Intel Arc B570
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 7700X + Intel Arc B570 in High On Life
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 51.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 40.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 33.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 25.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 84.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 66.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 54.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 41.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 119.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 93.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 77.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 58.0 |
High On Life with Ryzen 7 7700X + Other GPUs
See how High On Life performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
High On Life with Arc B570 + Other CPUs
See how High On Life performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 7700X + Arc B570
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.