Greedfall

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT pairing in Greedfall presents a clear study in component hierarchy. The 8-core, 16-thread CPU, running at a base clock of 3.70 GHz and boosting to 4.60 GHz, exhibits the characteristics of a well-balanced mid-range processor. Its 16 MB of L3 cache and Zen 3 architecture deliver solid synthetic results that place it in the 84th percentile of all CPUs. In the context of this 2019 Action RPG, the processor’s role appears to be one of providing stable, high-frequency throughput that prevents bottlenecking at lower resolutions, though the data suggests its influence wanes as resolution increases and the GPU becomes the primary workload driver.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Ryzen 7 5700’s specifications point to a chip designed for consistent, multi-threaded performance. With 8 cores and 16 threads, it offers substantial parallel processing capability, which is reflected in its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20655. The single-core performance, measured at 2916 in Cinebench R23, is the more critical metric for a game like Greedfall, which relies heavily on single-threaded game logic and draw calls. The 3.70 GHz base and 4.60 GHz boost clocks provide the necessary headroom for such tasks. The benchmark results show a CPU that sits in a competitive tier, with its average benchmark score of 27220 being a mere 0.7% ahead of the Intel Core i9-9900K and 0.8% ahead of the Intel Core i7-12700H. This proximity in performance means that in Greedfall, the CPU is likely not the limiting factor, but rather a capable and stable foundation. The data indicates that while the CPU can handle the game's threading demands, its influence on the final FPS is indirect, primarily ensuring that frames are fed to the GPU without interruption. The difference between 8 and 16 threads becomes less critical when the rendering workload is high, but at lower resolutions, the CPU’s ability to process the game’s simulation is put to the test.

FAQ — 4-6 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: At what resolution does the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 pairing with the RX 9070 XT deliver the highest average frame rate?

A: The highest average frame rate is observed at 1920x1080 with Low settings, where the combo achieves 244.4 FPS. This indicates that at lower resolutions, the GPU is not fully saturated, allowing the CPU to push frames to their maximum potential.

Q: How does the combo's performance at 2560x1440 with High settings compare to 3840x2160 with High settings?

A: The average FPS at 2560x1440 with High settings is 122.5, while at 3840x2160 with the same settings, it drops to 72.9. This represents a significant 40.5% performance reduction when moving to 4K, highlighting the increased pixel throughput demand on the GPU.

Q: What is the single greatest performance penalty observed when enabling the highest settings preset?

A: The largest single-setting penalty is seen at 3840x2160, where moving from Medium (81.3 FPS) to Ultra (47.7 FPS) results in a 41.3% reduction in average frame rate. This suggests that the Ultra preset at 4K imposes an exceptionally heavy rendering load.

Q: In the overall benchmark database, where does this specific CPU and GPU combination rank for Greedfall?

A: This combo is ranked 446th out of 1705 tested combinations, placing it in the top 26.2% of all systems tested for this game. This indicates a strong, though not top-tier, performance showing.

Q: Based on the measured data, is the CPU or GPU more likely to be the bottleneck at 1080p with Low settings?

A: The data strongly implies the CPU is the limiting factor at 1920x1080 with Low settings. The average frame rate of 244.4 FPS is exceptionally high, but the frame rate scaling from 1440p Low (171 FPS) to 1080p Low (244.4 FPS) is not linear, suggesting the CPU's processing capability is approaching its ceiling before the GPU's rendering capacity is fully exhausted.

Q: How does the average benchmark score of the CPU compare to that of the GPU in a general sense?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 27220, while the GPU's average score is 39647. This indicates that, in synthetic workloads, the GPU demonstrates a higher raw performance output, which is typical for a discrete graphics card compared to a processor.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured FPS data across resolutions paints a clear picture of scaling behavior. From 1920x1080 to 2560x1440, the performance drop is noticeable but manageable. For instance, at High settings, the frame rate falls from 179.9 FPS to 122.5 FPS, a 31.9% reduction. However, the most dramatic shift occurs when moving from 2560x1440 to 3840x2160. At High settings, the frame rate sinks from 122.5 FPS to 72.9 FPS, a 40.5% loss. This pattern is consistent across all settings presets. At Low settings, the drop from 1080p to 4K is from 244.4 FPS to 104.6 FPS, a 57.2% decrease. This scaling behavior is the classic signature of a GPU-bound scenario at higher resolutions. The pixel count quadruples from 1080p to 4K, and the GPU's fill rate and memory bandwidth become the primary constraints. The CPU, while capable, cannot compensate for the exponential increase in rendering work. The data suggests that at 1080p, the system is partially CPU-bound, especially at low settings, but by 1440p, the GPU begins to take over as the dominant factor, and at 4K, it is fully GPU-bound.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The combo's rank of 446 out of 1705 tested combinations places it in the upper quartile of all systems tested for Greedfall. This is a strong result, indicating that the pairing of the Ryzen 7 5700 and RX 9070 XT is well-balanced for this title. The percentage of systems it outperforms (roughly 73.8%) suggests that this configuration delivers a high level of performance that will be more than adequate for a smooth gaming experience at most settings. While it does not crack the top 100, its position in the upper echelon implies that the limiting factor is not a fundamental mismatch between the CPU and GPU, but rather the absolute performance ceiling of the components themselves. The data shows that this combo is positioned to deliver high refresh-rate experiences at 1080p and 1440p, and a solid 60+ FPS experience at 4K on lower settings. It outranks a significant majority of other tested systems, which often include older or less powerful hardware, confirming that this is a modern, high-performance pairing.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT is the undisputed powerhouse in this pairing. Its 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides a bandwidth of 644.6 GB/s, which is crucial for feeding the high-resolution textures and geometry that Greedfall demands at 4K. The GPU's architecture, RDNA 4.0, is built on a 4 nm process and features 4096 shading units. The boost clock of 2970 MHz and game clock of 2400 MHz are indicative of a high-frequency design. The GPU's synthetic benchmark scores are robust, with a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 7260 and a Passmark G3D score of 26795. Its average benchmark score of 39647 places it in the 82nd percentile of all GPUs. The GPU's role is clear: it is the primary driver of frame rate at higher resolutions. The data shows a direct correlation between resolution and FPS, which is a direct consequence of the GPU's rendering workload. The 16 GB VRAM buffer is a forward-looking feature that ensures the game's assets can be loaded without stuttering, even at 4K resolution with higher detail settings. The RX 9070 XT is the component that determines the ceiling for visual fidelity and frame rate, while the CPU works to ensure the GPU is fed with data.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured data provides a comprehensive view of the combo's capabilities. At 1920x1080, the system is exceptionally fast. With Low settings, it achieves an average of 244.4 FPS. This drops to 195.7 FPS at Medium, 179.9 FPS at High, and 113.5 FPS at Ultra. At 2560x1440, the performance remains very high. The average FPS is 171 at Low, 136.6 at Medium, 122.5 at High, and 79.2 at Ultra. The transition to 3840x2160 brings a significant performance cost. At this resolution, the average FPS is 104.6 at Low, 81.3 at Medium, 72.9 at High, and 47.7 at Ultra. The data shows a consistent pattern: the gap between Low and Ultra settings widens as resolution increases. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 130.9 FPS. At 4K, this difference is 56.9 FPS. This indicates that the GPU's compute resources are heavily taxed at 4K, and the relative cost of enabling higher detail settings becomes more pronounced. The minimum and maximum FPS values are not provided, so the analysis relies solely on average FPS, which still provides a clear picture of performance scaling.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Based strictly on the measured average FPS, the optimal settings depend heavily on the target resolution and desired frame rate. For a high-refresh-rate monitor at 1920x1080, the High preset offers an excellent balance, delivering 179.9 FPS. This is well above the 144 Hz threshold and provides a significant visual upgrade over the Medium preset (195.7 FPS) without a substantial performance hit. The Ultra preset at 1080p, while achieving 113.5 FPS, is still smooth and would be the choice for maximum visual fidelity on a 60Hz or 120Hz display. At 2560x1440, the High preset is the clear winner, delivering 122.5 FPS. This is perfect for 1440p 120Hz monitors. The Medium preset is also a strong option for those prioritizing higher frame rates, hitting 136.6 FPS. At 3840x2160, the situation changes. The High preset, at 72.9 FPS, is playable on a 60Hz display and offers a good balance of quality and performance. However, the Medium preset, at 81.3 FPS, is arguably the best choice for 4K gaming, as it provides a more comfortable margin above 60 FPS while still looking significantly better than Low (104.6 FPS). The Ultra preset at 4K, with an average of 47.7 FPS, is not recommended for a consistently smooth experience. The data suggests that for this combo, the High preset is the most versatile, offering a strong blend of visual quality and frame rate across all resolutions, while Medium is the safest bet for a locked 60+ FPS experience at 4K.