Greedfall

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture (Phoenix codename) using a 4 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The CPU’s 16 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 memory support with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth provide a solid foundation for feeding a discrete graphics card in an Action RPG like Greedfall.

The CPU’s synthetic benchmark profile shows strong multi-threaded capability: a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20,851 and a single-core score of 2,943. In 3DMark tests, the processor scales from 951 points in single-thread to 6,165 in max-thread workloads. This scaling pattern indicates that the 8400F can handle both lightly-threaded game logic and more heavily-threaded background tasks without becoming a bottleneck in most scenarios.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the 8400F sits in a tight cluster. Its average benchmark score of 25,064 is essentially identical to the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X (25,057, 0% delta) and the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 (25,099, -0.1% delta). It edges out the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F (24,993, 0.3% delta) by a hair. The 8400F ranks in the 82nd percentile among all CPUs, confirming it is a capable mid-range part that should not limit frame rates in Greedfall at the settings tested.

For Greedfall specifically, the CPU’s 12 threads and 4.70 GHz boost clock are relevant because the game’s world simulation and AI routines benefit from both high single-thread performance and adequate multi-thread headroom. The measured FPS data shows that even at 1080p with Low settings (152.2 avg FPS), the combo achieves very high frame rates, suggesting the CPU is not a limiting factor at lower resolutions. The 8400F’s performance percentile (82nd) aligns with a processor that can keep up with a mid-range GPU in a 2019-era Action RPG.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 8400F compare to its closest CPU rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The 8400F scores 25,064 on average. This is virtually tied with the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X (25,057, 0% delta) and the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 (25,099, -0.1% delta). It is 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F (24,993). All four processors are within a fraction of a percent of each other.

Q: What is the combo’s overall rank among all tested CPU-GPU combinations in Greedfall?

A: The Ryzen 5 8400F + Radeon RX 7600 combination ranks 1,167 out of 1,705 tested combos in Greedfall. This places it in the lower-middle portion of the database, meaning many other combinations deliver higher average frame rates in this title.

Q: What frame rate does this combo achieve at 1080p with High settings?

A: At 1920x1080 with High settings, the combo produces an average of 109.8 FPS. This is a smooth experience for most displays, well above the 60 FPS threshold commonly targeted for action games.

Q: How does the GPU’s benchmark score compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Radeon RX 7600 has an average benchmark score of 20,258. It is 0.6% behind the Radeon RX 7600 XT (20,146), 0.8% behind the Radeon RX 460 (20,088), and 1.3% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (20,534). The Intel Arc B570 (20,556) is 1.5% ahead. The GPU ranks in the 63rd percentile among all GPUs.

Q: What is the largest FPS drop when moving from 1080p to 4K at High settings?

A: At High settings, the average FPS drops from 109.8 at 1920x1080 to 48 at 3840x2160. This represents a 56.3% reduction in frame rate, indicating that the GPU becomes significantly more stressed at higher resolutions.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more likely to be the limiting factor in this combo?

A: The data suggests the GPU is the primary limiter at higher resolutions. At 1080p Low, the combo hits 152.2 FPS, but at 4K Ultra it falls to 30 FPS. The CPU’s strong single-thread score (2,943 in Cinebench R23) and 82nd percentile ranking indicate it can drive high frame rates, while the GPU’s 63rd percentile ranking and the steep resolution scaling point to the graphics card as the bottleneck at 4K.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 achieves a combo rank of 1,167 out of 1,705 tested combinations in Greedfall. This places the pairing in the 68.4th percentile of all tested combos, meaning roughly 68% of combinations perform better in this specific game. This is a notable outcome given that the individual components rank higher in their respective categories: the CPU sits in the 82nd percentile among all CPUs, and the GPU sits in the 63rd percentile among all GPUs.

The gap between the component-level percentiles and the combo-level rank suggests that Greedfall is particularly demanding on the graphics subsystem. The RX 7600’s 8 GB GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth may be a limiting factor at higher resolutions and settings. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 16,634 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,310 are modest figures that align with its mid-range positioning.

When examining the nearest rival GPUs, the RX 7600 is within 1.5% of four other graphics cards in average benchmark score. This tight clustering means that small differences in game-specific optimization can shift the ranking. In Greedfall, the combo’s 1,167th place out of 1,705 indicates that this pairing delivers playable but not exceptional performance, particularly at 4K where the Ultra preset drops to 30 FPS.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its strongest results. With Low settings, the average FPS reaches 152.2. Medium settings yield 118.5 FPS, High settings produce 109.8 FPS, and Ultra settings drop to 69.1 FPS. All four presets at 1080p are playable, with even the most demanding Ultra preset maintaining a comfortable frame rate above 60 FPS.

Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain respectable but show the GPU working harder. Low settings average 107 FPS, Medium drops to 85.8 FPS, High achieves 74.3 FPS, and Ultra falls to 46.4 FPS. The Ultra preset at 1440p crosses below the 60 FPS threshold, indicating that this setting is only suitable for users who prioritize visual fidelity over smoothness.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly the limiting factor. Low settings average 63.3 FPS, which is still playable. Medium settings drop to 50.1 FPS, High settings fall to 48 FPS, and Ultra settings bottom out at 30 FPS. The 4K Ultra result is borderline unplayable for most action games, while 4K Low remains acceptable for slower-paced exploration.

The data shows a consistent pattern: each step up in settings costs a meaningful amount of performance. At 1080p, the gap between Low and Ultra is 83.1 FPS (152.2 to 69.1). At 1440p, the gap is 60.6 FPS (107 to 46.4). At 4K, the gap narrows to 33.3 FPS (63.3 to 30), as the GPU becomes saturated even at Low settings.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals where the bottleneck lies. At High settings, the combo delivers 109.8 FPS at 1080p, 74.3 FPS at 1440p, and 48 FPS at 4K. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is 35.5 FPS (a 32.3% reduction), while the drop from 1440p to 4K is 26.3 FPS (a 35.4% reduction). This relatively even scaling suggests the GPU is the primary constraint, as a CPU-bound scenario would show a much smaller drop at higher resolutions.

At Low settings, the scaling is steeper in absolute terms but similar in percentage. The combo produces 152.2 FPS at 1080p, 107 FPS at 1440p, and 63.3 FPS at 4K. The 1080p to 1440p drop is 45.2 FPS (29.7%), and the 1440p to 4K drop is 43.7 FPS (40.8%). The larger percentage drop at 4K Low indicates that even at minimal settings, the RX 7600’s 8 GB memory and 128-bit bus are strained by the pixel count.

The resolution scaling analysis points clearly to the GPU as the limiting component. The CPU’s performance remains constant across resolutions, yet frame rates drop substantially as resolution increases. This is expected behavior for a mid-range GPU like the RX 7600, which has a PassMark G3D score of 16,634 and ranks in the 63rd percentile. For users targeting 4K, this combo requires Low settings for playable frame rates; for 1440p, High settings are viable; for 1080p, even Ultra settings work well.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend on the target resolution and the user’s preference for smoothness versus visual quality.

At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset delivers 69.1 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold for most players. This makes 1080p Ultra the best choice for users with 60 Hz displays who want maximum visual quality. For users with 144 Hz or higher refresh rate monitors, the High preset at 109.8 FPS provides a much smoother experience while sacrificing some visual fidelity. The Medium preset at 118.5 FPS is a middle ground, but High offers a better balance of quality and performance.

At 2560x1440, the High preset at 74.3 FPS is the recommended choice. It stays above 60 FPS while providing good visual quality. The Medium preset at 85.8 FPS is also viable for users who prioritize frame rate. The Ultra preset at 46.4 FPS falls below 60 FPS and should be avoided unless the user is willing to accept reduced smoothness. The Low preset at 107 FPS is the best option for competitive play or high refresh rate displays, though it sacrifices most visual enhancements.

At 3840x2160, the options are limited. The Low preset at 63.3 FPS is the only setting that maintains playable performance above 60 FPS. The Medium preset at 50.1 FPS and High preset at 48 FPS are borderline and may be acceptable for slower-paced exploration but will feel less responsive in combat. The Ultra preset at 30 FPS is not recommended for active gameplay. For 4K users, Low settings provide the best experience, with Medium as a fallback for those who prioritize visuals over frame rate.

Across all resolutions, the data indicates that the combo performs best at 1080p, where all presets are playable. At 1440p, High is the sweet spot. At 4K, Low is the only reliable choice. Users should adjust settings based on their display’s refresh rate and their tolerance for frame rate dips during intense scenes.