Greedfall

# CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 8400F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Zen 4 (Phoenix) architecture using TSMC's 4 nm process. With a base clock of 4.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, this CPU delivers strong single-thread performance that matters for Greedfall's gameplay. The 16 MB shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 memory support (83.2 GB/s bandwidth) provide adequate memory bandwidth for this Action RPG.

Benchmark data shows the Ryzen 5 8400F achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20851 and a single-core score of 2943. The 3DMark 8-thread score of 5275 and max-thread score of 6165 indicate that the CPU scales well with moderate thread counts, which is typical for games like Greedfall that don't heavily utilize more than 8 threads. The processor ranks in the 82nd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 25064.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen 5 8400F sits essentially level with the AMD Ryzen 7 2700X (deltaPct 0), the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 (deltaPct -0.1), and the AMD EPYC 9474F (deltaPct -0.2). It is 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F. This clustering suggests that in CPU-bound scenarios, the 8400F performs on par with these alternatives, meaning Greedfall's frame rates at lower resolutions will be competitive with systems using those CPUs.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture (Navi 33 chip) using a 6 nm process. It features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU has a base clock of 1980 MHz, a game clock of 2470 MHz, and a boost clock of 2755 MHz. With 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, the card offers 22.57 TFLOPS of FP32 compute performance.

The GPU's 16 GB VRAM capacity is particularly relevant for Greedfall at high resolutions and settings, as the game's open-world environments and texture detail can consume significant memory. The memory clock runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective), and the 128-bit bus width means bandwidth is moderate but sufficient for this title.

In benchmark tests, the RX 7600 XT achieves a Passmark G3D score of 17132 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2348. It ranks in the 63rd percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 20146. Against its nearest rivals, the RX 7600 XT is 0.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 460 (deltaPct 0.3) and 1.9% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER (deltaPct 1.9). It trails the AMD Radeon RX 7600 by 0.6% and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile by 1.9%. This positioning suggests the GPU is a capable mid-range performer that should handle Greedfall comfortably at most settings.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a clear pattern of GPU-bound performance scaling across resolutions. At 1080p with High settings, the combo achieves 114.1 FPS, which drops to 79.5 FPS at 1440p (−30.3%) and 44.3 FPS at 4K (−61.2%). This substantial drop from 1080p to 4K indicates the RX 7600 XT becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions.

Low settings demonstrate the most dramatic scaling: 160 FPS at 1080p, 112.1 FPS at 1440p (−29.9%), and 67.7 FPS at 4K (−57.7%). The percentage drops are consistent across settings, reinforcing that resolution scaling is primarily GPU-driven. At 1080p Low, the CPU is likely the bottleneck, as the frame rate of 160 FPS suggests the Ryzen 5 8400F can push well beyond what the GPU delivers at higher resolutions.

Ultra settings show the steepest absolute decline: 71 FPS at 1080p, 53.2 FPS at 1440p (−25.1%), and 30.2 FPS at 4K (−57.5%). The 4K Ultra result of 30.2 FPS falls below playable thresholds, while 1440p Ultra at 53.2 FPS remains usable. The data suggests that at 1080p, the CPU has headroom, but at 4K, the GPU's compute and memory bandwidth constraints dominate.

How This Combo Ranks

In Greedfall, this combination of AMD Ryzen 5 8400F and AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT ranks 1064 out of 1705 tested combos. This places it in the lower-middle portion of the ranking, which is consistent with the GPU's 63rd percentile standing among all GPUs. The ranking reflects that while the CPU is strong (82nd percentile), the GPU holds the combo back in a game that is visually demanding.

The combo's position suggests that many other CPU-GPU pairings outperform it, particularly those with higher-tier GPUs. However, the rank is not an indication of poor performance — rather, it reflects the mid-range nature of this pairing. The measured FPS data shows the combo delivers playable frame rates at 1080p and 1440p across most settings, which is the practical takeaway for this configuration.

Measured FPS Breakdown

1080p (1920x1080):

• Low: 160 FPS average
• Medium: 123.5 FPS average
• High: 114.1 FPS average
• Ultra: 71 FPS average

1440p (2560x1440):

• Low: 112.1 FPS average
• Medium: 88.2 FPS average
• High: 79.5 FPS average
• Ultra: 53.2 FPS average

4K (3840x2160):

• Low: 67.7 FPS average
• Medium: 53.7 FPS average
• High: 44.3 FPS average
• Ultra: 30.2 FPS average

The data shows a consistent hierarchy: Low settings always deliver the highest frame rates, followed by Medium, then High, with Ultra being the most demanding. At 1080p, the jump from Low to Medium costs 36.5 FPS (22.8% drop), while Medium to High costs only 9.4 FPS (7.6% drop). The High to Ultra transition is the steepest, losing 43.1 FPS (37.8% drop). This pattern repeats at 1440p and 4K, indicating that Ultra settings impose a disproportionate performance penalty.

At 1440p, all settings except Ultra exceed 79 FPS, making this resolution highly playable. At 4K, only Low settings (67.7 FPS) approach a smooth experience; Medium drops to 53.7 FPS, and High falls to 44.3 FPS. The Ultra preset at 4K is the only configuration that dips below 30 FPS.

Settings Recommendations

For the best experience per the measured rows, 1440p High emerges as the sweet spot. It delivers 79.5 FPS average, which is smooth for an Action RPG, while maintaining visual quality that takes advantage of the RX 7600 XT's 16 GB VRAM. This setting also leaves headroom for demanding scenes without dropping below playable thresholds.

At 1080p, High settings at 114.1 FPS is the recommended choice. It provides excellent frame rates with only a 9.4 FPS penalty over Medium, making it a clear value pick. The jump to Ultra costs 43.1 FPS for marginal visual gains, which is not justified by the performance loss. Alternatively, 1080p Medium at 123.5 FPS offers a slight performance boost if frame rate consistency is a priority.

For users with 4K displays, Low settings at 67.7 FPS is the only viable option for smooth gameplay. Medium at 53.7 FPS is borderline playable, but the 14 FPS gap between Low and Medium suggests the GPU is struggling with the higher preset. The data indicates 4K is not this combo's strength; users should either lower resolution or accept reduced settings.

Avoid Ultra at all resolutions unless frame rates of 30-71 FPS are acceptable. At 1440p Ultra (53.2 FPS) and 1080p Ultra (71 FPS), the visual improvements do not compensate for the significant FPS loss compared to High settings.

FAQ

Q: Is this combo capable of running Greedfall at 60 FPS?

A: Yes, at 1080p High (114.1 FPS), 1080p Medium (123.5 FPS), 1080p Low (160 FPS), 1440p Low (112.1 FPS), 1440p Medium (88.2 FPS), and 1440p High (79.5 FPS). At 4K, only Low settings (67.7 FPS) exceed 60 FPS.

Q: What is the best resolution for this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: 1440p with High settings delivers 79.5 FPS, which is the strongest balance of visual quality and performance. At 1080p, High settings offer 114.1 FPS, but 1440p High provides a better visual experience without sacrificing smoothness.

Q: How does the RX 7600 XT compare to its closest GPU rivals?

A: The RX 7600 XT is 0.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 460 and 1.9% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER. It trails the AMD Radeon RX 7600 by 0.6% and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile by 1.9%.

Q: Why does Ultra settings cause such a large FPS drop?

A: The Ultra preset at 1080p drops from High's 114.1 FPS to 71 FPS—a 37.8% reduction. At 1440p, Ultra falls to 53.2 FPS from High's 79.5 FPS (−33.1%), and at 4K, Ultra drops to 30.2 FPS from High's 44.3 FPS (−31.8%). The GPU's compute resources are strained by the additional rendering demands.

Q: Is the Ryzen 5 8400F a bottleneck at any resolution?

A: At 1080p Low, the 160 FPS result suggests the CPU is capable of high frame rates, but the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions and settings. The CPU's 82nd percentile ranking indicates it is not the primary constraint in most scenarios.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations?

A: This combo ranks 1064 out of 1705 tested combos in Greedfall. The rank reflects the GPU's mid-range positioning (63rd percentile) relative to the CPU's stronger standing (82nd percentile).