Greedfall

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti pairing delivers a robust Greedfall experience, with the data showing a rank of 474 out of 1705 tested combos. This places the system in the top 28% of configurations, indicating a strong foundation for the 2019 Action RPG. The benchmark results reveal a system that handles the game's world comfortably at 1440p and maintains playability at 4K, though the performance scaling between settings highlights a significant shift in the workload's bottleneck as resolution increases.

FAQ

Q: How well does this combo rank compared to all tested systems in Greedfall?

A: The combo ranks 474th out of 1705 tested combos, placing it in the 72nd percentile of all configurations. This indicates it outperforms the majority of systems tested with this specific game.

Q: What is the performance difference between the CPU and its closest rival?

A: The Ryzen 5 7600 has an average benchmark score of 26617, which is 0.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D's score of 26574. It also leads the Intel Core i9-12900HK by 0.2%, as the rival's score is 26672.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the RTX 3090 in raw benchmarks?

A: The RTX 3080 Ti has an average benchmark score of 41224, which is 0.5% lower than the RTX 3090's score of 41441. The data shows a very close performance delta between the two cards.

Q: What are the core and clock specifications of the CPU?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 features 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. It is based on the Zen 4 architecture and uses the AMD Socket AM5.

Q: What is the memory configuration of the GPU?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti comes equipped with 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 912.4 GB/s. Its memory clock runs at 1188 MHz, translating to 19 Gbps effective.

Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded in the measured data?

A: The highest average frame rate is 250 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. This is a significant jump from the 179.3 FPS recorded at the same resolution with High settings.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600's configuration is central to the game's performance at lower resolutions. With 6 cores and 12 threads based on the Zen 4 architecture, the CPU provides a solid foundation for Greedfall's logic and physics. Its boost clock of 5.10 GHz is a key asset, as the data suggests the game can leverage high single-thread performance; the CPU's single-thread benchmark score of 3910 in Passmark reinforces this capability.

The L3 cache is 32 MB shared, which helps maintain data locality for the game engine. In the measured results, the influence of the CPU is most apparent at 1080p, where the frame rates are exceptionally high. The jump from 179.3 FPS at High settings to 250 FPS at Low settings indicates that at this resolution, the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU far more frames than the graphics card can render at higher settings.

The CPU's performance relative to its nearest rivals is notable. It scores 0.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D in average benchmark scores, which is a specialized gaming chip. This suggests that for a game like Greedfall, the 7600's architecture provides competitive gaming performance. The data implies that this processor is not a limiting factor in most scenarios, especially at 1440p and 4K, where the GPU becomes the primary constraint.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is the dominant component in this pairing, particularly as resolution and settings increase. Built on the Ampere architecture with 10240 shading units, the GPU is a high-end part designed for demanding workloads. Its 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus provides a substantial 912.4 GB/s of bandwidth, which is critical for rendering high-resolution textures and effects in Greedfall.

The GPU's role is clearly defined by the scaling of frame rates across settings. At 4K Ultra, the average FPS drops to 45.9, a figure that is heavily dependent on the GPU's raw processing power. The card's boost clock of 1665 MHz and its FP32 performance of 34.10 TFLOPS are the primary drivers here. The benchmark data shows the GPU is very close to the RTX 3090, with a delta of only -0.5%, making it a formidable performer for this title.

The VRAM capacity is also a factor. At 4K with Ultra settings, the game's demand for memory and bandwidth increases, and the 12 GB frame buffer appears sufficient to maintain the measured performance without hitting a hard wall. The data suggests that the RTX 3080 Ti is the component that dictates the ceiling for performance at higher settings, as the CPU is capable of providing more frames than the GPU can process.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo's rank of 474 out of 1705 tested combinations places it in the upper echelon of systems benchmarked for Greedfall. This is a strong result, indicating that the Ryzen 5 7600 and RTX 3080 Ti work well together for this specific game. The data shows that this pairing is not necessarily at the very top, but it is significantly ahead of the median system.

This ranking is supported by the individual component performance. The CPU sits in the 83rd percentile against all CPUs, and the GPU also sits in the 83rd percentile against all GPUs. The alignment of these two high-percentile components results in a balanced system that avoids severe bottlenecks. The rank suggests that a large number of other tested combos (1231) perform worse, while a smaller number (473) perform better.

The position of this combo implies that it is well-suited for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1440p and for a smooth 4K experience at medium to high settings. The data does not show any major imbalance between the CPU and GPU, as the FPS scaling follows a logical pattern. This ranking reflects the synergy of a modern 6-core processor with a high-end graphics card from the previous generation.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a clear shift in the system's bottleneck as resolution changes. At 1920x1080, the system is heavily CPU-bound. The difference between Low and Ultra settings is substantial, with a 138.4 FPS gap (250 vs 111.6). This suggests that the CPU is capable of producing a high number of frames, but the GPU's workload at higher settings begins to limit the output.

Moving to 2560x1440, the scaling becomes more moderate. The gap between Low (170.2 FPS) and Ultra (78.2 FPS) is 92 FPS. The system is becoming more balanced, but the GPU is starting to take on a greater share of the responsibility. The 1080p to 1440p drop for High settings is 57.8 FPS (179.3 to 121.5), showing a significant impact from the increased pixel count.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is the clear limiting factor. The frame rates compress significantly, with the difference between Low (104.4 FPS) and Ultra (45.9 FPS) being 58.5 FPS. The drop from 1440p to 4K for High settings is 48.7 FPS (121.5 to 72.8). This data indicates that while the CPU is strong, the RTX 3080 Ti is the component that determines the experience at 4K, especially when pushing the visual quality settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the average FPS ranges from 250 at Low settings to 111.6 at Ultra. Medium settings yield 195.2 FPS, and High settings produce 179.3 FPS. The performance is consistently high, with even Ultra settings providing a playable frame rate for high-refresh monitors.

At 2560x1440, the results show a similar trend. Low settings average 170.2 FPS, Medium 135 FPS, and High 121.5 FPS. Ultra settings drop to 78.2 FPS, which is still smooth for most displays. The scaling here is more pronounced than at 1080p, indicating the GPU is working harder.

At 3840x2160, the performance is more demanding. Low settings average 104.4 FPS, Medium 81.2 FPS, and High 72.8 FPS. Ultra settings fall to 45.9 FPS, which is at the edge of smoothness for 4K gaming. The data shows a clear progression of performance degradation as both resolution and settings increase, with the most significant drop occurring between High and Ultra at 4K.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured data, the optimal experience depends on the user's display resolution and refresh rate. For 1920x1080, even Ultra settings provide an average of 111.6 FPS, making it a viable option for high-refresh-rate monitors. The High preset offers a balance with 179.3 FPS, providing a significant margin above 144Hz.

For 2560x1440, the High settings preset is the best choice for a fast and responsive experience, delivering 121.5 FPS. This is ideal for 144Hz monitors. The Ultra preset at 78.2 FPS is still very playable for 60Hz displays but sacrifices some smoothness for visual fidelity. Medium settings at 135 FPS is a good middle ground if maximum visual quality is not essential.

At 3840x2160, the High settings preset provides a good balance between visual quality and performance, with an average of 72.8 FPS. This is suitable for 60Hz displays. The Ultra preset at 45.9 FPS is not ideal for smooth gameplay and should be avoided for a fluid experience. The Medium preset at 81.2 FPS offers a slight performance boost over High, which can be beneficial for maintaining a stable frame rate. The data suggests that for 4K, prioritizing High settings over Ultra is the recommended path to ensure a smooth experience.